Hi,
Am 05.11.2015 um 03:45 schrieb Mark Roszko:
>> I have repeatedly asked that devs do incremental changes so I can
>> easily review them.
> It's hard to do refactoring when your one commit has to throw out the
> kitchen sink.
However, it is often possible to submit multiple commits of the
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 3:57 AM, Wayne Stambaugh wrote:
> On 11/4/2015 9:01 PM, Stefano Rossi wrote:
>> Also, it isn't clear the goals. Are CERNs goals kicad goals? I have
>> learned that if you have no clear goals you will waste time in useless
>> features. Feature creep.
Hi Mark, Martin,
"~mrluzeiro/kicad/kicad_new3d-viewer is the ray tracing viewer. This is
not a refactor. Its a different direction to improve rendering."
My branch is actually / technical a refactoring. There is very little from the
old-3d-viewer, there are only some legacy names that I keept
015 22:07
To: kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Subject: Re: [Kicad-developers] About collaboration, simulation,
documentation, organisation, usability and documentation
Hi Mario,
thank you for your reply. The other people felt offended when I said "waist of
time".
Actually I m
> On Nov 4, 2015, at 1:02 PM, x...@sms.cz wrote:
>
> Hello Andy,
>
> what you are saying really interests me.
>
>> Regarding integrating any kind of simulation tool into the mainline PCB
> design
>> package, I suggest the following: DONT BOTHER.
>
> I'm not an EE professional, I'm an EE
My bad, I thought you were doing just rendering but I would throw
handling different render targets as part of rendering.
Either way theres no overlap in refactoring and its completely normal
to have separate branches for divergent work until its time to merge.
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 4:46 PM,
Hi to all,
some other guys, like me, has developed external tools to improve the
MCAD exports of board and component
http://sourceforge.net/projects/kicadstepup/
I started years ago to improve myself the 3d rendering, before the
actual 3D realistic rendering was available in the main branch
gt;
Příjemce: "x...@sms.cz" <x...@sms.cz>, "kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net"
<kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net>
Datum: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 21:20:00 +
Předmět: RE: [Kicad-developers] About collaboration, simulation,
documentation, organisation, usability
KiCad user or a long-time KiCad developer.
Martin.
- Původní zpráva -
Odesílatel: Javier Serrano <javier.serrano.par...@gmail.com>
Příjemce: x...@sms.cz
Datum: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 21:10:47 +0100
Předmět: Re: [Kicad-developers] About collaboration, simulation,
documentatio
Hi Martin,
It is good to bring some discussion where to the mailing list. Some of this
points discussed here (as Wayne pointed?) was already discussed before, we may
need some way of track / record of this discussions, it would help to add /
improve the discussions.
"On the other hand, it's
Hi All,
"Simulations: Provide quality circuit simulation capabilities similar to
commercial products - no progress".
This is my personal view.
Taking this (simulation feature) as an example, I think because the nature of
kicad, adding new big features like this need a lot of ponderation from
pers
<kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net>
Datum: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 22:03:01 +
Předmět: RE: [Kicad-developers] About collaboration, simulation,
documentation, organisation, usability and documentation
> Hi All,
>
> "Simulations: Provide quality circuit simulation capabilities simi
iro <mrluze...@ua.pt>
Příjemce: "x...@sms.cz" <x...@sms.cz>, KiCad Developers
<kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net>
Datum: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 22:03:01 +
Předmět: RE: [Kicad-developers] About collaboration, simulation,
documentation, organisation, usability and documentati
Andy,
I've put my comments in to the text below.
> > I'm not an EE professional, I'm an EE hobbyist. And my ideal tool would
allow
> > me to draw a schema and allow me to copy it to a document or to publish it
to
> > internet. And then by extending it a little bit I could use the same
schema
> >
Actually right now, officially we are doing current code maintenance
only as we are trying to do a "stable" release. Its also why things
have quieted down as people have went to squirrel away on personal
branches as no new features are accepted right now.
be a long-time KiCad user or a long-time KiCad developer.
>
> Martin.
>
>
> - Původní zpráva -
> Odesílatel: Javier Serrano <javier.serrano.par...@gmail.com>
> Příjemce: x...@sms.cz
> Datum: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 21:10:47 +0100
> Předmět: Re: [Kicad-developers]
> On Nov 4, 2015, at 4:11 PM, x...@sms.cz wrote:
>
> Andy,
>
> I've put my comments in to the text below.
>
>>> I'm not an EE professional, I'm an EE hobbyist. And my ideal tool would
> allow
>>> me to draw a schema and allow me to copy it to a document or to publish it
> to
>>> internet. And
Creating separate branches with large change sets is risky. I've stated
many times before that my time is limited and reviewing a 10K+ lines of
code merge request is likely going to sit in the queue for a long time
until I or someone who's coding ability I trust can find time to review
the
>When I hear that UI refinement is not necessary. I cringe
Don't confuse UX with UI. UX is User Experience, it includes UI but it
also includes workflow which is highly opinionated stuff like Wayne
mentioned where its selection toolbars vs. hotkeys.
Yes, the UI isn't the greatest and I don't
On 11/4/2015 9:45 PM, Mark Roszko wrote:
>> I have repeatedly asked that devs do incremental changes so I can
> easily review them.
>
> It's hard to do refactoring when your one commit has to throw out the
> kitchen sink.
> My experimental gerbview refactor for giggles changes the layer system
>
> I have repeatedly asked that devs do incremental changes so I can
easily review them.
It's hard to do refactoring when your one commit has to throw out the
kitchen sink.
My experimental gerbview refactor for giggles changes the layer system
from the fixed bitmask nonsense to a dynamic managed
t; I know this is sad, but the newbie cannot make the high-level design by
> himself. It must be a long-time KiCad user or a long-time KiCad
> developer.
>
> Martin.
>
>
> - Původní zpráva -----
> Odesílatel: Javier Serrano <javier.serrano.par...
2015-11-04 20:33 GMT+01:00 :
>> You are treating developers as a some sort of object. We
>> are people, we have lives, we do not sit here looking for work.
>
> Please, don't feel offended :-). I'm a professional developer, and I'm used to
> be treated as a "human resource". But I
Hello Andy,
what you are saying really interests me.
> Regarding integrating any kind of simulation tool into the mainline PCB
design
> package, I suggest the following: DONT BOTHER.
I'm not an EE professional, I'm an EE hobbyist. And my ideal tool would allow
me to draw a schema and allow me
This starts to be a debate of opinions.
> What are their amibtions?
I've met many developers that wanted to create something cool that many will
be using. And they end up an application of no use that is used only by
themselves. I was like that too when I was younger. My idea was that if they
> On Nov 3, 2015, at 8:12 PM, timofonic timofonic wrote:
>
> Hello
>
> I'm just a lurker and still not started to contribute, but I have some ideas:
>
> - Indian Institute of Technology Bombay: I see technological and educational
> institutions as potential contributors
> You are treating developers as a some sort of object. We
> are people, we have lives, we do not sit here looking for work.
Please, don't feel offended :-). I'm a professional developer, and I'm used to
be treated as a "human resource". But I don't take that personally, I don't
feel my humanity
>I think, that many developers just seek for an opportunity to realize their
ambitions somewhere.
If it were true, then no open source project would have a lack of man power.
We don't control the name of bzr branches, we don't even control the
existence of branches as launchpad shows everyones
kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net"
<kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net>
Datum: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 14:32:13 +0100
Předmět: Re: [Kicad-developers] About collaboration, simulation,
documentation, organisation, usability and documentation
> Hello,
>
> a good topic and good ideas, in my
Hello,
a good topic and good ideas, in my opinion. Though it should be the core
developers who should say that.
A few weeks ago I was performing my own small research in what EDA tools are
available. I was looking for a schema_drawing-simulator-pcb_creator all-in-one
app. And found none (free).
My responses below are pretty well known to most of the devs that have
been here a while. For the folks new to the mailing list, please read
on. I should probably put a lot of this in some type of formal
developer documentation ("A Word from the Project Leader"???) so that I
do not have to keep
I would like to add just a little to this: over the last few years, many
people on this list have spent a lot of time making the developer community
a friendlier place. This is not easy, and required hard decisions by many
people.
Additionally, people have worked hard to make it easier to
>This is exactly the reason why these "competent" developers should be shared
>and cooperated among projects.
You are treating developers as a some sort of object. We
are people, we have lives, we do not sit here looking for work.
We pick what we like to do and work on it if we have time.
You
On 11/4/2015 11:33 AM, Adam Wolf wrote:
> I would like to add just a little to this: over the last few years,
> many people on this list have spent a lot of time making the developer
> community a friendlier place. This is not easy, and required hard
> decisions by many people.
>
>
h <stambau...@gmail.com>
Příjemce: kicad-developers@lists.launchpad.net
Datum: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 11:00:17 -0500
Předmět: Re: [Kicad-developers] About collaboration, simulation,
documentation, organisation, usability and documentation
> My responses below are pretty well known to most of the d
Hello
I'm just a lurker and still not started to contribute, but I have some
ideas:
- Indian Institute of Technology Bombay: I see technological and
educational institutions as potential contributors at this stage of
development. Indian Institute of Technology Bombay developed the Oscad
package
36 matches
Mail list logo