KR> LSA Operation

, March 18, 2016 1:37 PMey Subject: Re: KR> LSA Operation Lee Parker wrote: > I had a friend that spent a year in jail. Was there something egregious in the circumstances, like somebody was killed or injured?? I'd be surprised if you would get a year as the result of a ramp check when ther

KR> LSA Operation

I had a friend that spent a year in jail. From: Gary via KRnet To: KRnet Cc: Gary Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 9:48 PM Subject: Re: KR> LSA Operation Quick answer on Google says: "The maximum penalty for flying in command as a pilot without being certified is up to thr

KR> LSA Operation

Lee Parker wrote: > I had a friend that spent a year in jail. Was there something egregious in the circumstances, like somebody was killed or injured? I'd be surprised if you would get a year as the result of a ramp check when there were no extenuating circumstances. Mark Langford ML at

KR> LSA Operation

KRnetDate: Thu, Mar 17, 2016 2:15 PMTo: Ronald Wright;KRnet;Cc: Randall Smith;Subject:Re: KR> LSA OperationI have a friend that had an accident with his maule in Alaska. He has not had a physical for eight years. Can't pass one. Told the FAA he has been flying light sport. They explained to

KR> LSA Operation

To: krnet at list.krnet.org ; ronwright5 at yahoo.com Cc: billjacobs386 at yahoo.com Subject: Re: KR> LSA Operation What if? "Theoretical of course" in a land far away... you grew up flying and have been flying under the radar so to speak. Ramp check and no license. What is t

KR> LSA Operation

it as a nice check with someone who just might like to look at your neat toy.. Above all, be nice and smile! Ron On Thu, 3/17/16, n357cj via KRnet wrote: Subject: Re: KR> LSA Operation To: "KRnet" Cc: "n357cj" Date: T

KR> LSA Operation

Sid, What prompted the ramp check This is the only thing that scares me about flying... Joe Horton - Original Message - From: "Sid Wood via KRnet" >My hangar partner has a Pulsar XP with a 80 hp Rotex engine. > After operating for four years without a medical, he has >had one

KR> LSA Operation

My hangar partner has a Pulsar XP with a 80 hp Rotex engine. With only him onboard he cruises at 141 Kts and 4600 RPM. He found that the plane will cruise at 120 Kts with 4200 RPM. He wrote a letter to the Washington FSDO (the local FAA cognizant office) reporting those parameters and stated

KR> LSA Operation

ur neat toy.. Above all, > be nice and smile! > > Ron > > > > On Thu, 3/17/16, n357cj via KRnet wrote: > > Subject: Re: KR> LSA Operation > To: "KRnet" > Cc: "n357cj" > Date: Thursday, March 17, 2

KR> LSA null and void?

I guess I am looking at it from my point of view. That is where I have a full private (no LSA when I went through the whole license thing) and only interested in the medical side. I don't have an issue with the medical yet, but I am not getting any younger. Kevin Golden Harrisonville, MO

KR> LSA null and void?

IF the introduced legislation for your 3rd class medical can be your drivers license for aircraft up to 250 knots and 6000 lb gross weight goes through, don't that make all this talk about LSA null and void?

KR> LSA null and void?

No. It's still cheaper to get a 'Sport Pilot' license (less hours required) than a full Private, but more versatile than the old 'Recreational Pilot' that almost no one got because you couldn't do anything but circle your home airport... On 12/16/2013 6:55 PM, Tinyauto at aol.com wrote: > IF

KR> LSA

I guess if you want to learn to fly, it should not matter what kind of plane you need to learn to fly in. I learned in a 172 and have not flown in a 172 in 22 years. Lee Sent from my iPhone On Oct 21, 2010, at 5:00 PM, big john wrote: > On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 8:11

KR> LSA

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Hall, Rodney CTR NNSY, C210 < rodney.r.hall@navy.mil> wrote: > Which begs the question why is the LSA weight limit so low? If the > intent was to get more people flying they should have made it at just > above the gross for a Cessna 150 which would have

KR> LSA

On 10/21/2010 08:11 AM, Hall, Rodney CTR NNSY, C210 wrote: > Instead, probably by the request of manufacturers, new planes have > to be purchased to start sport pilot training in most cases. Bingo, you answered your own question. Take a look at the list of representatives that were on

KR> LSA

...@mylist.net [mailto:krnet-boun...@mylist.net] On Behalf Of Brant Hollensbe Sent: Wednesday, October 20, 2010 20:07 To: 'KRnet' Subject: KR> LSA > how is it that Cubs, Champs, and some Ercoups are now being flown > under LSA? Because those Cubs, Champs, and Erocups (C model) we within the

KR> LSA

> how is it that Cubs, Champs, and some Ercoups are now being flown under LSA? Because those Cubs, Champs, and Erocups (C model) we within the LSA specs when they were built. As an example, the later models of Ercoups weigh more than the LSA limits so they can never be operated as LSA under the

KR> KR LSA?

Larry, If you like, you can also refer folks with LSA questions on to http://groups.yahoo.com/group/kr2Sport/ We would be more than happy to take them, and that will get the seemingly unwanted LSA talk off the main Builders site. I have a Link on that site, Back here to KRNET for the

KR> KR LSA?

At 02:56 PM 6/15/2009, you wrote: >Can any of the KR experimental aircraft be LSA certified? >Thanks in advance >Bob ++ Please go to http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp type "lsa certified" in the keyword and hit "submit" and spend the next

KR> KR LSA?

At 02:56 PM 6/15/2009, you wrote: >Can any of the KR experimental aircraft be LSA certified? >Thanks in advance >Bob ++ Please go to http://www.maddyhome.com/krsrch/index.jsp type "lsa certified" in the keyword and hit "submit" and spend the next

KR> KR LSA?

> - Original Message - > From: > Can any of the KR experimental aircraft be LSA certified? > Thanks in advance > > Hi Bob, Strictly speaking, it can't be "LSA certified" since it is a plans built aircraft, but what I think you meant is "Can any of the KR

KR> KR LSA?

NO Mark Jones (N886MJ) Stevens Point, WI E-mail: flyk...@charter.net Web: www.flykr2s.com - Original Message - From: <bobhu...@yahoo.com> To: <kr...@mylist.net> Sent: Monday, June 15, 2009 2:56 PM Subject: KR> KR LSA? Can any of the KR experimental aircraft be LSA ce

KR> KR LSA?

Can any of the KR experimental aircraft be LSA certified? Thanks in advance Bob

KR> LSA event - Mt Vernon

At 01:36 PM 3/7/2009, you wrote: >Thought I'd mention that a couple weeks after the KR Gathering, Mt. Vernon >Airport will be hosting a Midwest LSA Expo. , October 1-3. See >http://midwestlsashow.com/ for details. Someone dubbed it a "mini Sebring." >Some of you that are close, may want to

KR> LSA event - Mt Vernon

Thought I'd mention that a couple weeks after the KR Gathering, Mt. Vernon Airport will be hosting a Midwest LSA Expo. , October 1-3. See http://midwestlsashow.com/ for details. Someone dubbed it a "mini Sebring." Some of you that are close, may want to return to Mt Vernon for this one.

KR> LSA Certified ?

On Wednesday 18 April 2007, raybeth...@sbcglobal.net wrote: >Kr Netters, >I hesitate to bring this up again, but > I should be ready to have my Kr2s inspected in 2 or 3 months. I don't know > if it is possible to get the plane listed as LSA. How do you know if the

KR> LSA Certified ?

Rating. This could cost much less than annually hiring an A or other properly rated inspector to do it. Ed Janssen > There is no advantage to trying to register your KR LSA. > > David Mikesell

KR> LSA Certified ?

ED & David: That is probably true. Don - Original Message - From: "Ed Janssen" <ejans...@chipsnet.com> To: "KRnet" <kr...@mylist.net> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 1:39 PM Subject: Re: KR> LSA Certified ? > David, > > There is at lea

KR> LSA Certified ?

, an A mechanic, or a certified repair station." Rick Human Houston, Texas - Original Message - From: "Ed Janssen" <ejans...@chipsnet.com> To: "KRnet" <kr...@mylist.net> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 1:39 PM Subject: Re: KR> LSA Certified ? &

KR> LSA Certified ?

You might want to check this out. It may answer all your questions on that subject. http://krbuilder.org/LightSportKR/index.html See N64KR at http://KRBuilder.org - Then click on the pics See you at the 2007 - KR Gathering There is a time for building and a time for FLYING and the time for

KR> LSA Certified ?

At 01:11 PM 4/18/2007, you wrote: >another possibility might be to get another >pilot to go with you on the first flights while you are determining the >actual flight characteristics... > >-Ben + Besides being against the reg's, it's

KR> LSA Certified ?

I hesitate to bring this up again, but I should be ready to have my Kr2s inspected in 2 or 3 months. I don't know if it is possible to get the plane listed as LSA. Ray and Netters Since your version of the plane is unknown how it will perform, you will have to test and prove that it

KR> LSA Certified ?

Kr Netters, I hesitate to bring this up again, but I should be ready to have my Kr2s inspected in 2 or 3 months. I don't know if it is possible to get the plane listed as LSA. How do you know if the stall speed will be low enough before you fly it? I do have an 1835 VW

KR> LSA Certified ?

to register your KR LSA. David Mikesell 23597 N. Hwy 99 Acampo, CA 95220 209-224-4485 skyguy...@skyguynca.com www.skyguynca.com - Original Message - From: <raybeth...@sbcglobal.net> To: "KRnet" <kr...@mylist.net> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 6:41 AM Subj

KR> LSA Certified ?

global.net> To: "KRnet" <kr...@mylist.net> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2007 8:41 AM Subject: KR> LSA Certified ? > Kr Netters, > I hesitate to bring this up again, but >I should be ready to have my Kr2s inspected in 2 or 3 months. I don't > kn

KR> LSA Question

When reviewing the documentation for my KR2 ( 2646D/ Serial;# 1073), the plane seems to meet the qualifications for LSA. Has anyone checked to see what is needed to be done for a plane with a current N number to be certified as a LSA? Thanks Bill Hawkins

KR> LSA Question

...@mylist.net] On Behalf Of bhawk53...@aol.com Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 8:37 AM To: kr...@mylist.net Subject: KR> LSA Question When reviewing the documentation for my KR2 ( 2646D/ Serial;# 1073), the plane seems to meet the qualifications for LSA. Has anyone checked to see what is needed to be d

KR> LSA Question

Bill, The KR may not met this requirement for LSA: Maximum speed in level flight with maximum continuous power (Vh)—138 mph (120 knots) It may be too fast. If yours meets the requirements, the EAA has a Documentation package to convert ultralights to LSA. You could start with that

KR> LSA Question

Thanks, I'll check with EAA. My plane has a Sterba 54x44 prop. At 3200 RPM, max speed is 133 mph. Bill ** See what's free at http://www.aol.com.

KR> LSA Question

Bill, If it already has an "N" number , then it probably has already been certified - probably as an Experimental Home Built. If this is the case, Your KR2 cannot be re-certified as an E-LSA. Ed Janssen > When reviewing the documentation for my KR2 ( 2646D/ Serial;# 1073), the > plane seems

KR> LSA Question

Burlington IA - Original Message - From: "GREG FISHER" <gfisher...@sbcglobal.net> To: "KRnet" <kr...@mylist.net> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 10:20 AM Subject: Re: KR> LSA Q

KR> LSA Question

Built. Rick Human Houston, Texas - Original Message - From: "Ed Janssen" <ejans...@chipsnet.com> To: "KRnet" <kr...@mylist.net> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 10:54 AM Subject: Re: KR> LSA Question > Bill, > > If it already has an "N"

KR> LSA Question

- Original Message - From: <rahu...@peoplepc.com> To: "KRnet" <kr...@mylist.net> Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 12:43 PM Subject: Re: KR> LSA Question > Any aircraft that meets the criteria of the Light Sport Aircraft > regulations (weight, speeds, number of seats, etc.

KR> LSA Question

Any aircraft that meets the criteria of the Light Sport Aircraft regulations (weight, speeds, number of seats, etc.) can be operated under those regulations - there is no need to for an E-LSA certification! This applies to normal certified aircraft and those certified as Experimental Amateur

KR> LSA Question

.krnet.org Date: 04/07/07 02:52:25 To: KRnet Subject: RE: KR> LSA Question Any aircraft that meets the criteria of the Light Sport Aircraft regulations (weight, speeds, number of seats, etc.) can be operated under those regulations - there is no need to for an E-LSA certification! This appl

KR> LSA

t.org Date: 04/07/07 02:52:25 To: KRnet Subject: RE: KR> LSA Question Any aircraft that meets the criteria of the Light Sport Aircraft regulations (weight, speeds, number of seats, etc.) can be operated under those regulations - there is no need to for an E-LSA certification! This appl

KR> LSA Repairman certificates FAR 65.107

The regs FAR 65.107 state that you can work on other airplanes. There are two types of LSA repairman certificates. You can have either an inspection rating or a maintenance rating. The inspection rating is a 16 hour course and you are limited to aircraft that you own and by class. The

KR> LSA KR-Thanks!

Thanks to all who provided me some insite into the KR LSA questions that I had. I believe my best choice and best bet for getting into the air under the LSA rules would be to go with a plane like the Sonex or the 601XL. I do still like the KRs though (also the corvair power plant) and it might

KR> LSA KR-Thanks!

IA 52601 af...@att.net wrote: > Thanks to all who provided me some insite into the KR LSA questions that I > had. I believe my best choice and best bet for getting into the air under > the LSA rules would be to go

KR> LSA & Corvairs

Be careful when looking at aircraft manufacturers that offer several models and ONE fits LSA or ELSA. The XL model I believe is the only one that fully qualifies for the program. Also, WW is now selling through Chris Heinz the designer/manufacturer a firewall forward kit just for the Zodiac

KR> LSA KR-Thanks!

I have a friend who is close to completing a 601. Personally, I don't like it. That center, flip over stick, looks like it could really be a problem. The plane is big and looks bulky. It costs as much as an RV. All the parts did not fit well. This guy has completed 4 RVs and this was a

KR> LSA / 601

At 08:06 AM 5/5/2006, you wrote: >I have a friend who is close to completing a 601. Personally, I >don't like it. That center, flip over stick, looks like it could >really be a problem.All the parts did not fit well. This guy >has completed 4 RVs and this was a real "experience" for him.

Réf. : KR> LSA KR-Thanks!

et> Envoyé par : krnet-bounces+serge.vidal=sagem@mylist.net 05/05/2006 15:06 Veuillez répondre à KRnet Remis le : 05/05/2006 15:07 Pour : KRnet <kr...@mylist.net> cc :(ccc : Serge VIDAL/DNSA/SAGEM) Objet : KR> LSA KR-Thanks! I have a friend who is clo

KR> LSA KR

Hello all, Is anyone out there in KR land considering (or now building) a KR2 that would meet the qualifications for LSA certification? I made a search of the archives but there didn't seem to be a lot there as far as LSA and KRs go. I am also considering the Sonex. I just want to be sure

KR> LSA KR

...@att.net List-Post: krnet@list.krnet.org Date: 2006/05/02 Tue AM 06:30:52 CDT To: kr...@mylist.net Subject: KR> LSA KR Hello all, Is anyone out there in KR land considering (or now building) a KR2 that would meet the qualifications for LSA certification? I made a search of the archi

KR> LSA KR

At 07:01 AM 5/2/2006, you wrote: >I made a search of the archives but there didn't seem to be a lot >there as far as LSA and KRs go. >Kenny >+++ I went to the following site, which is listed at the bottom of every e-mail,

KR> LSA KR

HERE WE GO AGAIN, Virg On Tue, 02 May 2006 11:30:52 + af...@att.net writes: > Hello all, > > Is anyone out there in KR land considering (or now building) a KR2 > that would meet the qualifications for LSA certification? I made a > search of the archives but there didn't seem to be

KR> LSA KR

Kenny:: I have taken over a KR2 project and am kind of "Rolling the Dice" on this one. The craft must meet of couse meet all of the requirements of the "Sport Plane" catagory. The most difficult to achieve of these to meet is the construction of the craft so that its top speed "clean" in

KR> LSA KR

Hi Don, Where did you getthe AirCalc program and how much did it cost? i would like to try it, I don't think its a big deal to redesign the KR to be an LSA and call it something else. sincerely Jim On Tue, 02 May 2006 09:54:42 -0500 D F Lively writes: > Kenny:: > > I have

KR> LSA KR

At 07:30 AM 5/2/06, you wrote: >Hello all, > >Is anyone out there in KR land considering (or now building) a KR2 >that would meet the qualifications for LSA certification? I made a >search of the archives but there didn't seem to be a lot there as >far as LSA and KRs go. After today's spate

KR> LSA KR

Sorry, didn't mean that last post to go to the list :-( Regards, RonB

KR> LSA KR

Thanks , I was loking for that. Jim On Tue, 02 May 2006 12:15:21 -0400 Ron Butterfield writes: > Sorry, didn't mean that last post to go to the list :-( > > > Regards, > RonB > > > ___ > Search the KRnet Archives at >

KR> LSA KR

Kenny: I downloaded it from the net for the best price of all--- Free! Just type in "AirCalc" into your search engine and I thik you will find it. I stumbled on it it while looking for ways to to lower the stall speed of wings using L.E. slots/slats. I think I have the back up for it as well.

KR> LSA KR

How about the KR-1b, Virg On Tue, 02 May 2006 12:14:29 -0400 Ron Butterfield writes: > At 07:30 AM 5/2/06, you wrote: > >Hello all, > > > >Is anyone out there in KR land considering (or now building) a KR2 > > >that would meet the qualifications for LSA

KR> LSA KR

At 03:56 PM 5/2/06, VIRGIL N SALISBURY wrote: > How about the KR-1b, Virg Ran the numbers, 45hp stock 1600, 800lb, 91sf, Airfoil is funny; center is RAF48 (CL 1.42), outer wings start as GAW(2) (CL 2.04) tapering to GAW(1) at tip (CL 1.8). Rough average CL of 1.76 Stall 44Top

KR> LSA KR

Ron: I do not think spoilers results count because LSA stipulates stipulates "CLEAN" which means that the deployment of lift destroying devices or any device that alters the wing geometry is unacceptable to meet the requirement. That is why I looked at L.E. Slots/Slats but could not find

KR> LSA KR

AM To: KRnet Subject: Re: KR> LSA KR Ron: I do not think spoilers results count because LSA stipulates stipulates "CLEAN" which means that the deployment of lift destroying devices or any device that alters the wing geometry is unacceptable to meet the requirement. That is why I

KR> LSA KR

Kruyssen > Cairns, Australia > k...@bigpond.com > http://www.users.bigpond.com/kr2/kr2.htm > > -Original Message- > From: krnet-boun...@mylist.net [mailto:krnet-boun...@mylist.net] On Behalf > Of D F Lively > Sent: Wednesday, 3 May 2006 8:48 AM > To: KRnet > Subje

KR> LSA

Ed I can almost bet money that a KR2 or KR2S built to plans with no modifications to accomodate the requirements of LSA for flight, stall speeds, etc... will be rejected for certification under the rules, JUST BECAUSE there are so many other examples of higher performing aircraft out there

KR certification; was Re: KR> LSA

Colin, Yup, and if you check my previous post, I did qualify my comments by saying that the KR must not have been previously registered or certified, such as a KR in the building stage. My understanding is that once an aircraft has been registered and certified, it can't be re-certified into a

KR> LSA

: krnet-boun...@mylist.net [mailto:krnet-boun...@mylist.net]On Behalf Of Colin Rainey Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2005 8:49 PM To: kr...@mylist.net Subject: KR> LSA One of the netters called the local FSDO about an answer to a question, and had to answer the "Well, what do you think?&q

KR> LSA

Ed You missed MY point when I stated that I am referring to an UNMODIFIED KR is the same as a completed KR already certified. That is my point. If you build the KR2 or KR2S per the plans, you will NOT be able to conform to LSA, period. There is too many examples and too much information

KR> LSA

You could build per plans if you wanted to limit gross weight to something less than 950 pounds and fit into the eLSA rule. This would bring the wing loading into line with the Sonex and Waiex sLSA's. Then you would need to limit prop pitch too, to limit the top speed. That would

KR> LSA

- Original Message - From: "Colin Rainey" <brokerpilot9...@earthlink.net> To: <kr...@mylist.net> Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2005 10:20 PM Subject: KR> LSA > Ed > You missed MY point when I stated that I am referring to an UNMODIFIED KR is the same as a

KR> LSA

Colin is absolutely right, there is no way to certify a LR-2 as a LSA, most of them that fly with two people are well over 1,000 lb. more like 1,200 lb and the oly way toget that to stall under 51 MPH is with a Fowler flap and maybe slats. I like the construction tecnique of the KR Ken developed

KR> LSA

Ed I don't believe anyone is saying that it can't be done, FAA exempted (depending on the inspector). I've heard a lot of why's but this is however an experimental class of aircraft so anything is possible in theory. A complete redesign would be in order though since the wings would have to be

KR> LSA

People keep bringing up flaps, but it makes no difference. The LSA required stall speed is with no flaps. Still should be no problem getting there with a light KR with a bigger wing. Personally, I would make a Hershey bar wing if I really had to have an LSA KR. Brian Kraut Engineering

KR> LSA alternative

To elaborate on Mark's comment, if working with wood and fiberglass is your thing, consider the Vision, which by all my observations is the next generation KR2S, and install a Corvair engine, and get a sweet flying airplane, plans built like the KR, glass like the KR but with a long wing

KR> LSA alternative

209-339-4833 skyguy...@skyguynca.com www.skyguynca.com - Original Message - From: "Colin & Bev Rainey" <crain...@cfl.rr.com> To: <kr...@mylist.net> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 5:40 PM Subject: KR> LSA alternative > To elaborate on Mark's comment, if

KR> LSA alternative

>David Mikesell: > My question is why even try to register your plane LSA? Exactly. Not planning to pursue E-LSA registration (what a headache). I plan to register it experimental amateur-built, and if possible operate as a private pilot exercising sport pilot privileges in an airplane registered

KR> LSA alternative

Colin wrote: ".The FAA commentary that I read specifically mentioned that they are watching for aircraft that have previously been certified in other categories to be modified into LSA, and will aggressively prevent this.." Colin, This rule refers to individual aircraft that were

KR> LSA alternative

Although I encourage the development of one's own aircraft several builders and pilots alike on the net here have tried to make sure that builders do not get the wrong impression about what they are building and what their expectations should be for operation. In the commentary that I referred

KR> LSA alternative

> From: "Colin & Bev Rainey" > ...no experimental 2 SEAT aircraft may be operated with 2 seats available > (not converted to single seat) by less than a Private Pilot rating > appropriate for the category of aircraft ( SEL, SES etc...). Certifying the > aircraft as an

KR> LSA alternative

Colin wrote: "The way I read what you cut and pasted is the same thing that has been said all along. If by chance the aircraft receives an Experimental Certificate for operations AS an LSA or ELSA then a Sport Pilot can operate it. If not he is disqualified from its operation even if it is flown

KR> LSA ????????

I really don't want to discourage anyone from building a KR or from participating on the KR-net, but it seems to me that this LSA issue has been beaten to death many times over, and that the general consensus is that even if you could build a "KR" that would qualify, that it would not be a KR, in

KR> LSA ????????

AAAman!! thank you Dan > I really don't want to discourage anyone from building a KR or from > participating on the KR-net, but it seems to me that this LSA issue has been > beaten to death many times over, and that the general consensus is that even > if you

KR> LSA opinion from EAA

I got this from the CorvAircraft list. You could argue it's just the EAA's opinion, but here it is: Q & A: Question of the Week Question for EAA Aviation Services: Given that the builder of a plans- built aircraft is listed as "manufacturer" of the aircraft, and that depending on equipment and

KR> LSA mechanic rules

The new rules for who can perform annual condition inspections only apply to the new classifications, i.e. Special Light Sport and Experimental Light Sport. And remember that you can only have an Experimental Light Sport if the manufacturer has certificated a plane as a Special Light Sport and

KR> LSA mechanic rules

"Or to put it simply, the new rules don't apply to KRs." Wes, If the KR is built strictly to plans I agree it won't qualify as an LSA, but very few are built to plans. I am planning to build my version of a KR2S single place, very light, and have a longer wing. I have no doubt it will meet the

KR> LSA certification

You would basically end up entering a test program very similar to that of a new company to prove that your version was not only a safe version of the plane, but also met the standard set out by the rules. They will not take on "faith" from your recordings, as they do for a normal experimental

KR> LSA mechanic rules

Texas - Original Message - From: "Wesley Scott" <k...@spottedowl.biz> To: <kr...@mylist.net> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 11:25 PM Subject: KR> LSA mechanic rules > The new rules for who can perform annual condition inspections only apply > to > the ne

KR> LSA mechanic rules

How much longer would the wings be??? One of the KR designer rules was NOT to lengthen the wings!!! The spars are not designed for such a load. Do your own engineering on this one, Virg On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 06:34:33 -0600 rhartwi...@juno.com writes: > "Or to put it simply, the new rules

KR> LSA mechanic rules

<> I believe that you are right! At one time There was a speed given clean and another with flaps. But as the rules went into effect, the only stall speed requirement is clean. Joachim

KR> LSA mechanic rules

RE: One of the KR designer rules was NOT to lengthen the wings!!! Interesting that everyone using Dan Diehl, and maybe even Rand, wing skins is using longer wings. That is a lot of KRs. See N64KR at http://KR-Builder.org - Then click on the pics There is a time for building and a time for

KR> LSA rules

I believe that your FAA briefer was attempting to state that the aircraft cannot have a combination of lift enhancing devices, retractable gear, and inflight adjustable prop, which would constitute a complex aircraft. Flaps alone would not be prohibited because they make approaches safer, they

KR> LSA rules

Houston, Texas - Original Message - From: "Colin & Bev Rainey" <crain...@cfl.rr.com> To: "KRnet" <kr...@mylist.net> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 4:29 PM Subject: KR> LSA rules >I believe that your FAA briefer was attempting to state tha

KR> LSA rules

Rick, Thanks for the LSA info. Dick H

KR> LSA mechanic rules

The spars are not longer, just the tip ends, Virg On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 17:18:02 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time) "Dan Heath" writes: > RE: One of the KR designer rules was NOT to lengthen the wings!!! > > Interesting that everyone using Dan Diehl, and maybe even Rand,

KR> LSA rules per Part21

Rick and netters I am not trying to say anyone is wrong, I have just been around the FAA for a long time, and I really don't care what one presenter is saying at a local meeting, until I see it in print in the regs, and so far it is NOT published concerning ELSA just LSA in Part21, I would not

KR> LSA rules per Part21

"b.. Aircraft meeting the above specifications, such as a Piper J-2 or J-3, Aeronca Champ, or early model Taylorcraft, may be flown by sport pilots." Colin, The above statement that you quoted probably says it all. To be operated by a Sport Pilot, an aircraft does not have to be designated as an

  1   2   >