He, Qing wrote:
This patch sets up multiple TSS for real mode emulation on Intel vmx,
one for each vcpu. This is a preparation patch for full SMP real mode
support.
Why are separate tss's needed? Can't all vcpus use the same tss?
Signed-off-by: Qing He [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kvm.h |
Hello,
I have kvm on FC7. I had installed an FC6 guest on it according to the
kvm howto. I can launch the FC6 guest (using kvm) perfectly ok.
During installation, I set the IP address of the guest to be
192.168.0.11/24 and defualt gw to 192.168.0.1.
These definitions are OK (I simply run
-Original Message-
From: Avi Kivity [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 2007年7月12日 16:16
To: He, Qing
Cc: kvm-devel
Subject: Re: [kvm-devel] [PATCH] SMP: Setup multiple tss for real mode
emulation
He, Qing wrote:
This patch sets up multiple TSS for real mode emulation on Intel vmx,
one
This patch adds a `vcpu_id' field in `struct vcpu', so we can
differentiate BSP and APs without pointer comparison or arithmetic.
Signed-off-by: Qing He [EMAIL PROTECTED]
diff --git a/drivers/kvm/kvm.h b/drivers/kvm/kvm.h
index 65ab268..0f7a4d9 100644
--- a/drivers/kvm/kvm.h
+++
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 13:33 +0800, Dong, Eddie wrote:
Here is the update with adding HLT cap.
Thats a good start, but you probably need to make the decision to use
the halt predicated on a halt-specific boolean set by userspace in order
to actually function as we've discussed. This is in
He, Qing wrote:
This patch adds a `vcpu_id' field in `struct vcpu', so we can
differentiate BSP and APs without pointer comparison or arithmetic.
Applied, thanks.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
Dong, Eddie wrote:
Here is the update with adding HLT cap.
diff --git a/drivers/kvm/i8259.c b/drivers/kvm/i8259.c
index f4ae5f7..e84e665 100644
--- a/drivers/kvm/i8259.c
+++ b/drivers/kvm/i8259.c
@@ -411,8 +411,13 @@ static void picdev_read(struct kvm_io_device *this,
static void
Gregory Haskins wrote:
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 13:33 +0800, Dong, Eddie wrote:
Here is the update with adding HLT cap.
Thats a good start, but you probably need to make the decision to use
the halt predicated on a halt-specific boolean set by userspace in order
to actually function
Well, I really wanted to have guest smp in the release, but alas, it was
not to be. It still doesn't like starting X, for example.
Note: on i386 the qemu binary is now named qemu-system-x86_64. This is
to allow migration from 32-bit hosts to 64-bit hosts, and to allow
32-bit userspace on a
On 7/12/07, David Shwatrz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have kvm on FC7. I had installed an FC6 guest on it according to the
kvm howto. I can launch the FC6 guest (using kvm) perfectly ok.
During installation, I set the IP address of the guest to be
192.168.0.11/24 and defualt gw to 192.168.0.1.
Adrian Lambeck wrote:
I just tried out the latest release but it won't compile. The compiler
complains first:
WARNING: sigprocmask [/root/kvm/kvm-29/kernel/kvm.ko] undefined!
What kernel are you compiling against?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
Thanks;
I am not sure I got you !
running ifconfig -a on the host shows the following:
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1B:24:1D:EC:C0
inet addr:192.168.0.31 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
inet6 addr: fe80::21b:24ff:fe1d:ecc0/64 Scope:Link
UP
Thanks a lot,
I was looking at the wrong place. I was trying to launch the
installation as root after sudoing. And as root I didn't have the DISPLAY
variable. Now the installation is proceeding smoothly.
Best regards,
Víctor
Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 03:03:05PM +0300, Avi
Hello,
And I just want to add some info :
running :
brctl show
gives:
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
virbr0 8000. no
which means that there is no interface enslaved to this bridge.
Regards,
DS
On 7/12/07, David Shwatrz [EMAIL
I had the same problem, I missed couple of SDL packages...
here is my package list under debian :
ii libsdl1.2-dev
1.2.11-8Simple DirectMedia Layer development
files
ii libsdl1.2debian
1.2.11-8
Avi Kivity wrote:
Dong, Eddie wrote:
Here is the update with adding HLT cap.
diff --git a/drivers/kvm/i8259.c b/drivers/kvm/i8259.c index
f4ae5f7..e84e665 100644 --- a/drivers/kvm/i8259.c
+++ b/drivers/kvm/i8259.c
@@ -411,8 +411,13 @@ static void picdev_read(struct kvm_io_device
*this,
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 22:20 +0800, Dong, Eddie wrote:
Apply to current kvm.git? Then we need to define false for
irqchip_in_kernel() which makes the patch quit stranger.
I think what Avi is saying is this can be generalized as a separate
feature independent of in-kernel-PIC. Since Avi and I
Dong, Eddie wrote:
Gregory Haskins wrote:
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 22:20 +0800, Dong, Eddie wrote:
Apply to current kvm.git? Then we need to define false for
irqchip_in_kernel() which makes the patch quit stranger.
I think what Avi is saying is this can be generalized as a
QEMU-KVM has a bug where the interruptibility of the CPU is predicated on
pending interrupts. If the reason that a CPU is interrupted is because we
need to inject interrupts, the current code will just keep looping and miss
the event window.
This doesnt seem to cause problems with in-trunk KVM.
Gregory Haskins wrote:
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 22:20 +0800, Dong, Eddie wrote:
Apply to current kvm.git? Then we need to define false for
irqchip_in_kernel() which makes the patch quit stranger.
I think what Avi is saying is this can be generalized as a separate
feature independent of
Avi Kivity wrote:
Dong, Eddie wrote:
Gregory Haskins wrote:
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 22:20 +0800, Dong, Eddie wrote:
Apply to current kvm.git? Then we need to define false for
irqchip_in_kernel() which makes the patch quit stranger.
I think what Avi is saying is this can be
Gregory Haskins wrote:
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 23:39 +0800, Dong, Eddie wrote:
Greg:
I think you need to do the whole patch for this including kernel
side. Will u ?
Ya, I can do that. But I probably wont be able to look at it until
this RT stuff I am working on is done.
Then, Avi:
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 08:37 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
Can you confirm it by backing out that one patch?
Do you know the git commit id by chance?
-- Dave
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express
(don't top post)
Il Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 03:56:07PM +0300, David Shwatrz ha scritto:
Hello,
And I just want to add some info :
running :
brctl show
gives:
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
virbr0 8000. no
which means that
Avi,
A couple of months back, we had a discussion about PMU virtualization
and the difficulty I encountered trying to catch the PMU interrupt
vector in kvm on VM-exit. KVM does not set ack_intr_on_intr. Would
you mind reminding me of the reason for this?
On the topic of scheduler hooks for use
The same error happens on linux-2.6.21.4:
I am using the same config as on 2.6.20 which worked well with kvm-28...
#
Output when compiling:
WARNING: sigprocmask [/root/kvm/kvm-29/kernel/kvm.ko] undefined!
WARNING: kmem_cache_destroy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Avi,
A couple of months back, we had a discussion about PMU virtualization
and the difficulty I encountered trying to catch the PMU interrupt
vector in kvm on VM-exit. KVM does not set ack_intr_on_intr. Would
you mind reminding me of the reason for this?
On the
On 7/12/07, Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
repository: /home/avi/kvm
branch: master
commit ebad9f20e60405fbf01beea7521c8a764391dece
Author: Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu Jul 12 13:20:47 2007 +0300
kvm: external module: rename original kernel's modules when installing
Eddie,
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 08:46:06AM +0800, Dong, Eddie wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Avi,
A couple of months back, we had a discussion about PMU virtualization
and the difficulty I encountered trying to catch the PMU interrupt
vector in kvm on VM-exit. KVM does not set
29 matches
Mail list logo
