[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Thu, 7 May 1998 12:22:03 -0700 "Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>``is going to cure
>> cancer in two years.''
>&g
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Sue,
Thanks for posting this. I found the following excerpt interesting:
Watson, in a letter to the editor published in today's
> Times, called the experiments ``the most exciting
> cancer research of my life
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Doc,
Unfortunately it is not a cruel hoax. The cocao bean is becoming an
endangered species. I don't think you have to worry about not being able
to get chocolate, but you may be shocked at the price you'll have to pay.
Bill
On
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Thu, 7 May 1998 15:03:53 EDT DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>In a message dated 98-05-07 11:28:47 EDT, you write:
>
><< There's a big difference betwee
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Steve,
Not to worry, old chap, I have a feeling that upon being pinned I won't
be inclined to stay in one place for very long. Oooh, I get the chills
just thinking about it. Her lap will still be available to you. :)
Bill
On Thu,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Tammy,
Welcome to the law list! I look forward to seeing your opinions and
comments about the many issues we are discussing.
Bill
On Thu, 7 May 1998 14:04:17 -0500 "Tammy Linkenhoker"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
You dog, you've got all the hot stocks these days!!! And here I was just
happy to be holding Bristol Myers Squibb. I think you should buy a round
of drinks!
Bill
On Thu, 7 May 1998 12:46:29 -0700 "Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Thu, 07 May 1998 10:13:31 -0700 Leonard Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>Leonard Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>Hi Bill
>
>Interesting how the facts get all twisted around, isn't it? It was
>re
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
>Afternoon,I guess the American Cancer Society are nothing but a
>bunch of fools. Your
>only telling the side of the story that supports Terry's position. It
>seems like the media
>hyped the story ( which I have already
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Wed, 6 May 1998 15:43:06 -0700 "Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>Nope, I've seen that tactic of posting some stupid statement and then
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
>
>The only way this could have been correctly labeled a hoax on the part
>of the
>researchers is if the research itself had not been done, had not been
>done as
>reported, and/or had not yielded the results reported. Ther
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Sue,
I think this was the American Cancer Society posting a release from the
National Cancer Institute.
Bill
On Wed, 06 May 1998 15:46:54 -0700 Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Wed, 6 May 1998 21:08:46 EDT DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>In a message dated 98-05-06 17:15:20 EDT, you write:
>
><< But I
> DO think they should fast trac
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
>
>
>Hi Sue,
>
>I have no quarrel with you. I do with your semantics but that is a
>small
>point. You do not make personal attacks like Mac and Bill when you
>have no
>logic or reason to back you up. I don'
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Wed, 6 May 1998 19:30:29 -0700 "Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>Clinton Said Ready To Appeal
>
>WASHINGTON (AP) - A decision has bee
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Wed, 6 May 1998 14:16:11 -0700 "Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>in spite of
>the results of four separate investigations concluding h
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Wed, 6 May 1998 14:20:10 EDT DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>In a message dated 98-05-06 13:24:27 EDT, you write:
>
><< I think that any trickle down associated w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Kaye,
Hiya Kaysie,
Your wish is my command. :) You've got your work cut out for you,
though. Ed was much closer to being straightened out than I am.
Bill
On Wed, 06 May 1998 14:42:47 -0400 Kaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
&g
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Wed, 6 May 1998 18:31:42 -0700 "Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>For the media to report a "cure for cancer" as it did, is just as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Ron,
I guess this article proves once and for all that this is not a hoax,
cruel or otherwise. The British researchers confirm that the research
drugs do, indeed, show promise in the curing of some cancers.
Bill
On Wed, 6 May 1998 11:11:54
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Wed, 6 May 1998 21:08:51 EDT DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>In a message dated 98-05-06 17:50:54 EDT, you write:
>
><< But the press got a hold of this story and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Sue,
Wasn't there a similar class action suit brought by former flight
attendants who worked during the days when smoking was allowed on
airplanes?
Bill
On Wed, 06 May 1998 11:48:55 -0700 Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Wed, 6 May 1998 21:40:44 EDT DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
>I've done with this discussion. I've stated my opinions, and see no
>need to
>restate t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Wed, 6 May 1998 14:20:12 EDT DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>In a message dated 98-05-06 13:26:21 EDT, you write:
>
><<
> Not for a Grand Juror. T
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Wed, 6 May 1998 13:22:53 -0700 "Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>"The widespread reactions from patients have raised questions
>ab
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Wed, 6 May 1998 15:53:14 -0400 (EDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
>>Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>WASHINGTON--The scientific process
>>has given birth to many me
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Wed, 06 May 1998 13:17:38 -0400 moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
>
>William J. Foristal wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
>&
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Sue,
You know me, willing to do whatever is required for the law list. :)
I've been training for a year for this position. Give it your best shot,
Doc.
Bill
On Tue, 05 May 1998 23:30:34 -0700 Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
Not for a Grand Juror. They are bound by law to keep everything
confidential forever.
Bill
On Tue, 05 May 1998 19:32:02 -0700 Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Tue, 05 May 1998 21:35:49 -0400 moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> >Exactly the point. The press made leaps that the researches di
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
He'll give her use immunity, but he wants to hold something over her head
to get her to say what he wants to hear, so he won't offer complete
immunity.
I expect a big delay on this one also. Did you know that the only
indic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Vi,
No problem. I have a lot of fun here, as you know. ;)
Bill
On Tue, 5 May 1998 19:27:29 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Viola Provenzano)
writes:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Viola Provenzano) writes:
>
>Hi Freakin' Bill,
>You know d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Sue,
I think that any trickle down associated with the Viagara product is a
bad sign and indicates one should call the doctor immediately! :)
Bill
On Tue, 05 May 1998 19:18:50 -0700 Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>Sue
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Kathy,
It's a pleasure to have the opportunity to help keep this great group of
people together and enjoying the interesting discussions that are taking
place.
Bill
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Wed, 6 May 1998 08:34:59 -0700 "Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>Well don't swallow till I get there. They say the stuff acts fast but
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Wed, 6 May 1998 11:23:42 EDT DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>In a message dated 98-05-06 11:05:21 EDT, you write:
>
><< >I'm ready and willing! Just hope
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
The real question is why release ANY of the tapes? It's not up to the
public to indict anyone. It's not up to the public to convict anyone.
Doesn't releasing the tapes poison any jury pool they could hope to draw
from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Wed, 06 May 1998 08:37:07 -0700 Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>
>> << >I'm ready and willing! Just hope he's up for it.
&g
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Tue, 5 May 1998 20:46:03 EDT DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>In a message dated 98-05-05 16:39:35 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
><< How long do you think it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Wed, 6 May 1998 09:56:36 EDT DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>In a message dated 98-05-06 02:23:31 EDT, you write:
>
><< Hi Kathy:
>
> Does that mean h
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Vi,
Whoaslow down, girl. LOL..I never mentioned YOU specifically about
theorizing about visitors from another planet. It was a general comment.
Did you see the planet? I thought you saw the mother ship or something.
Anyway, don'
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hello Doctor,
Oh I'm sure there are a few tidbits that might garner a few bucks for a
former grand juror who wants to break the law. But I agree, there does
not appear to be anything that would cause a lot of whooping and
shouting. Perhap
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
LOL...I don't think you have anything to worry about, Vi. Trust me on
this one.
I agree, it's not our problem, is it?
Bill
On Tue, 5 May 1998 11:23:00 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Viola Provenzano)
writes:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Vio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
Too bad there wasn't a video tape of THIS beating.
Bill
On Tue, 05 May 1998 14:18:18 -0700 Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>Be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Sue,
The Grand Jury members have to be careful that they are not caught
leaking information about what went on in the proceedings. It is against
the law and a person could go to jail for leaking things. Of course, an
anonymous source could
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
>
>>ROTFLMAOYou got me, Vi. Very funnyI've not got tears
>streaming
>>from my eyes.
>Actually, your typed comments caused my tears to role. Or don't you
>believe in Freudian slips either?
Your tea
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Tue, 5 May 1998 14:19:55 -0700 "Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>Anyone can apply their own definitions. I explained my objections to
>the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Tue, 05 May 1998 14:20:38 -0400 moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
>
>William J. Foristal wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Sue,
How long do you think it will be before we read leaks coming from
anonymous former Grand Jury members?
Bill
On Tue, 05 May 1998 12:05:46 -0700 Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTEC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Tue, 5 May 1998 15:23:47 EDT DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>In a message dated 98-05-05 15:19:09 EDT, you write:
>
><< I bet Entremed backs off quite a bit in the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Tue, 5 May 1998 11:20:19 -0400 (EDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
>Hi Doc,
>
>>DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>Honestly, sometimes I think you guys deserve each other! It
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
ROTFLMAOYou got me, Vi. Very funnyI've not got tears streaming
from my eyes.
I think you win the sarcasm prize of the month with this one.
Bill
On Tue, 05 May 1998 11:32:02 EDT [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Viola Provenzano) writes:
&g
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Sue,
Yeah, but have they spent over 20 years in R&D research??? LOL!
Bill
On Tue, 05 May 1998 09:15:35 -0700 Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>http://ww
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Tue, 5 May 1998 11:29:02 EDT DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>Actually it closed at something like $57, but still that's way over
>the $12 it
>was going for earlier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Sue,
LOL...I agree...a quick riser resulting in lots of hard currency. ;) A
real Pfizer symbol.
Bill
On Tue, 05 May 1998 10:16:17 -0700 Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
>
>Afternoon Bill,
> Everything that I've seen reported so far has been positive
>although cautious. Which,
>like any medical breakthrough, needs to be researched more. To call it
>a hoax at this
>juncture is just p
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Spousal abuse, indeed abuse of any kind, is certainly an important issue
in this country. While we "amateurs" may find fun in trying to solve a
puzzle that we are incapable of solving I think it's best left up to the
peop
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Vi,
Psst...latent homosexuality ain't the answer. I've seen people
theorizing that the Holocaust never happened. Yes, I think there IS a
reason to get freaked out over certain types of "theorizing". If people
don'
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Mon, 4 May 1998 20:14:53 -0400 (EDT) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
>>moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Damn, Mac...don't leave me in the foxhole without a back up!
Judging from the people who welcomed you back after your short absence
I'd say that it was your RETURN that was welcomed by all.
Please reconsider. I'll keep the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Mon, 04 May 1998 19:05:46 -0400 moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>
>> Seems to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Kathy,
Shoot, if that's all you need then I'll gladly volunteer. I read every
note anyway so it won't be changing anything.
Bill
On Mon, 04 May 1998 11:39:40 -0400 Kathy E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Kathy E &l
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Sue,
I think they're all a bunch of crooks. They get rich off of the
contributions of poor people. If they were truly emissaries of God they
would turn a lot of that money around and give it to worthy causes.
Someone should tell the p
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Vi,
Oh, you're more than welcome to speculate about anything. That is
certainly your right. As I said, I fall into the "who gives a shit"
group when it comes to anyone's sexual orientation. I find it irrelevant
to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
LOL..now that you mention it, he DID show up on the CTV list didn't he?
:)
Bill
On Mon, 04 May 1998 10:49:15 -0700 Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Jackie,
IMO, the only reason the subject of latent homosexuality ever came up
with respect to Simpson is because people thought this would be a way to
really get to him and cause him much anger and distress. Many experts in
this field refer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
INteresting information coming out about the Hubbell tapes. That whole
fiasco is ridiculous, IMO. And Burton has really made an ass out of
himself.
I haven't heard Bill Clinton's name being mentioned much with respect to
Whit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Fri, 01 May 1998 12:58:19 -0700 Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>Hi Bill:
>
>I knew someone sat on a mountain or something, just didn't know who.
&
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Sat, 02 May 1998 00:18:58 -0400 moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
>
>
>> HI Mac,
>>
>> Nice to see you back! The bunker is a bit muddy but s
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
I'd suggest reading several books on this subject and not relying on the
opinions of any one person regardless of whether people think he or she
is the foremost authority on it. The comments about homosexual
tendencies, latent or overt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Vi,
Excellent reply! Thanks for clarifying your opinion on this one. I
think you've hit on the key element and that is an interaction between
people who are different and who can eliminate their prejudices by
personally experiencing the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Jackie,
I can get it on juno as long as it's a text format. Thanks!
Bill
On Thu, 30 Apr 1998 05:23:18 -0500 Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>Hi Bill
&
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Vi,
Wait a minute!!! Several months ago you were touting the accomplishment
in this country that racism and racial discrimination had been eliminated
from our society. Now you're saying that no progress has been made and it
is useless t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Thu, 30 Apr 1998 05:04:47 -0500 Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>Hi Bill
>
>What you say is true that people do need to ecourage critical
>thinking.
&
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Jackie,
Why an apartment would allow you stay for a very extended period and
charge your expenses to the university, of course.
The market people guarantee that your fish will arrive in a frozen
condition. OF course, if it doesn't i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
Yeah, that's always a problem. Of course that has nothing to do with the
fairness of the system. It has to do with the system's inability to
quickly enforce child support orders and to chase down guys who move to
different
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
The big issue is the kind of immunity she will get. I think Starr will
gladly give her use immunity, but Ginsberg wants total immunity for her.
This thing is going to drag out for a long time, IMO. Ginsberg can
appeal the judge&#
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
I tend to think that there might be an explanation on the physical side
rather than the environmental side. Chemical imbalance perhaps. Genetic
flaw. Or maybe a combination of those and an environmental factor.
Whatever it is, it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Sue,
I missed the press conference but I read about it. My question about the
Grand Jury was because everyone is wondering whether Ken Starr will
indict Hillary and I was thinking that if the Grand Jury hands down the
indictments then Starr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
>No 3
>Hi Sody,
>
>Oooh, you're really treading dangerous ground when you support
>executions
>to eliminate "burdens of society". IMO, it's a lot easier to justify
>locking someone up for 25 years
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
That was Oral Roberts who went up into his prayer tower at ORU and said
that God would call him home unless he got a million dollars in
contributions before two weeks were up. Some race track owner in
Floriday gave a huge chunk of money
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Vi,
Even the LAPD admitted that these cops committed a despicable act and
they would have been suspended and probably fired even if there had been
no criminal charges brought against them. Remember, it was the STATE of
California that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Thu, 30 Apr 1998 19:47:41 -0400 moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
>
>Kathy E wrote:
>
>> Kathy E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> A law
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
I haven't heard a thing from or about the Browns. The charity groups and
support groups seemed to die off rather quickly. I am a bit suspicious
of the real motivations for those groups and wonder if some people made
some quick cas
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Wed, 29 Apr 1998 14:21:21 EDT DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>In a message dated 98-04-29 11:48:22 EDT, you write:
>
><< IMO, things haven't really ch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Kelly,
Very nice to have you here. I look forward to seeing your opinions on
the various issues being discussed. I agree with your assessment of
Robertson.
Bill
On Wed, 29 Apr 1998 12:08:15 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kelly J West)
writes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
Oh, I agree that in most cases the woman's life style suffers after a
divorce, especially when small children are involved. Simply because in
most cases the earning power of the woman is less than the man's. Child
support and/
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Mon, 27 Apr 1998 21:44:56 EDT DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>In a message dated 98-04-27 17:27:34 EDT, you write:
>
><< Oh, I did not intend that as a guess a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Jackie,
I have always had a fear of heights, and I conquered the Space Needle
with no problem. :) Go for it! You'll love it. Also, the market folks
will pack your fish and ship it home for you.
Perhaps you can meet up with Ron a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Joan,
He was not paid money for breaking the law. He was paid money as
compensation for pain and suffering that was due to the police breaking
the law. That is an important distinction. And, as I understand it, the
guy who made the most
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Mon, 27 Apr 1998 15:29:22 -0700 "Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>>Nothing in any of the stories I read mentioned scopes. Perhaps the
&g
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Vi,
I disagree with their decision to drop the charges against Rodney King.
However, when the police choose to break the law and inflict damage and
harm against a citizen, they must pay the price in terms of criminal and
civil trials that may
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Kathy,
In my experience I found the court to be fair to both sides. Perhaps I
was a lucky exception to the rule? I also think a lot has to do with the
reasonableness and civility of the two parties in the divorce. A lot of
money can be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Jackie,
I think society needs to learn from our mistakes of the past. For
example, Lt. William Calley was looked at as a hero by many people after
the My Lai massacre. Why? Because the people he murdered were Vietnamese
and people found it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Vi,
Well, gee Vi, I guess we should just throw up our hands then and say that
no one can change things or solve the problems we have in society. Sort
of like the "boys will be boys" argument, eh? Like the woman who was
raped asking
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
Now you see the key point in this debate. The assumption that she refuses
to testify in order to cover up for Clinton is not reasonable.
Bill
On Mon, 27 Apr 1998 20:22:25 -0700 Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>Sue
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
IMO, for anyone to do something like this they must have very serious
mental problems. So I don't expect them to show the emotions that we
might expect in a normal person. And his attorney is going to say
anything that might garner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Steve,
I think the stealth bomber and several experimental aircraft have a
triangular shape. I've seen several of the stealth bombers around here on
training flights.
Bill
On Tue, 28 Apr 1998 22:02:41 +0100 Steve Wright
<[EMAIL P
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Sue,
Yeah, I agree with the pundits who are saying that he'd have to have a
slam dunk case against the First Lady before he'd indict her. Can a
Grand Jury indict on its own? Or do they simply recommend an indictment
and it&#
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
HI Kathy,
He has that bad combination of being a politician as well as a religious
zealot. He is probably incapable of learning anything and certainly
incapable of keeping his mouth shut. :)
Bill
On Tue, 28 Apr 1998 23:57:03 -0400 Kathy E
1 - 100 of 539 matches
Mail list logo
