Juha Manninen wrote:
I only started writing in this thread because I also fond the same
behaviour as the original poster did and it seemed like that report
was shunned as being bogus.
So I wanted to chip in with my observations to help *the developers*
to nail down and fix the problem, but now
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Mark Morgan Lloyd
wrote:
> I'll leave somebody else to comment on the current status of GTK3, which I
> think would be of general interest.
It would need somebody to finish the implementation and to maintain it.
Anybody?
The
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Bo Berglund wrote:
> If this means that Raspbian is using LXDE is beyond me but it seems
> like it is using gtk3 by this wording.
>
> When I try to find a gtk3 setting inside Lazarus I only do so in the
> dialog Tools/Configure_BuildLazarus,
On 03/07/2016 10:15 AM, Bo Berglund wrote:
When I try to find a gtk3 setting inside Lazarus I only do so in the
dialog Tools/Configure_BuildLazarus, where it is contained in a
dropdown box labelled "LCL widget type" and named "gtk3 (alpha)".
There seems to be no way to build an *application*
Bo Berglund wrote:
I have located the release document for Raspbian Jessie here:
https://www.raspberrypi.org/blog/raspbian-jessie-is-here/
A little bit down they write the following:
the appearance of Raspbian is now based on version 3 of GTK+,
the user interface toolkit used for the LXDE
On Mon, 7 Mar 2016 03:09:26 +0200, Juha Manninen
wrote:
>On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Bo Berglund wrote:
>> I have no idea what you mean by this statement...
>> What is LXDE and how do I test Lazarus for LXDE?
>
>Bo, I have a strong feeling
On Sun, 6 Mar 2016 23:47:19 +0100, Giuliano Colla
wrote:
>Il 06/03/2016 18:27, Bo Berglund ha scritto:
>[...]
>> I have no idea what you mean by this statement...
>> What is LXDE and how do I test Lazarus for LXDE?
>A general hint: whenever you don't know what an
Juha Manninen wrote:
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Bo Berglund wrote:
I have no idea what you mean by this statement...
What is LXDE and how do I test Lazarus for LXDE?
Bo, I have a strong feeling that you are playing dummy. Why do you do it?
You must know the
On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Bo Berglund wrote:
> I have no idea what you mean by this statement...
> What is LXDE and how do I test Lazarus for LXDE?
Bo, I have a strong feeling that you are playing dummy. Why do you do it?
You must know the concept of desktop
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 2:01 AM, Luiz Americo Pereira Camara
wrote:
> According to a previous message he is using Mate
Not in his Raspbian in Raspberry Pi2. It most likely has LXDE although
he has not confirmed it.
Juha
--
___
2016-03-06 19:47 GMT-03:00 Giuliano Colla :
> Il 06/03/2016 18:27, Bo Berglund ha scritto:
> [...]
>
>> I have no idea what you mean by this statement...
>> What is LXDE and how do I test Lazarus for LXDE?
>>
> [...]
>
>> Apart fromn that I
>> have no idea how to use
Il 06/03/2016 18:27, Bo Berglund ha scritto:
[...]
I have no idea what you mean by this statement...
What is LXDE and how do I test Lazarus for LXDE?
[...]
Apart fromn that I
have no idea how to use svn, which I assume you mean I should do.
A general hint: whenever you don't know what an
On Sat, 5 Mar 2016 19:55:46 +0200, Juha Manninen
wrote:
>On Mar 5, 2016 4:48 PM, "Bo Berglund" wrote:
>> I looked at Lazarus Tools/Configure "Bild Lazarus" I see that the LCL
>> widget type is set to gtk2.
>> That is the same as in my Linux Mint
On Mar 5, 2016 4:48 PM, "Bo Berglund" wrote:
> I looked at Lazarus Tools/Configure "Bild Lazarus" I see that the LCL
> widget type is set to gtk2.
> That is the same as in my Linux Mint 17.3 Mate installation.
Yes, the widgetset is obviously GTK2 unless you have explicitly
On Wed, 02 Mar 2016 10:08:36 +0100, Bo Berglund
wrote:
>In fact one does not even need to compile the default project, the
>Lazarus IDE is likewise afflicted. Cannot reduce width of Object
>Inspector, Code editor or the main top window. Only possible to make
>them bigger.
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 17:21:51 +0100, Ondrej Pokorny
wrote:
>On 01.03.2016 16:02, zeljko wrote:
>>> Another observation (bug?):
>>> I put a button on the empty form of the default project.
>>> Then I doubleclicked it hoping to get to the OnClick event handler in
>>> code editor
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 17:39:53 +0100, zeljko wrote:
>On 03/01/2016 05:32 PM, Bo Berglund wrote:
>
>> Either that fix is not part of that revision or the fix does not work.
>
>Maybe I've wrongly connected this thread and issue
>http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=29563 in my
steveg has Lubuntu with LXDE. I guess Raspbian also has LXDE. This may
be a LXDE related issue.
Please confirm.
Then you guys should find which revision broke it for LXDE or if it
was always broken.
Juha
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 16:02:57 +0100, zeljko wrote:
>> However Lazarus Release 1.6 shows SVN 51666 when I check it so I guess
>> 51768 is the Lazarus revision.
>
>Issue was opened about constraints. If there's another issue with gtk2
>forms please open issue and attach example
On 01.03.2016 16:02, zeljko wrote:
Another observation (bug?):
I put a button on the empty form of the default project.
Then I doubleclicked it hoping to get to the OnClick event handler in
code editor (which normally will be created), but nothing at all
happened.
Probably because of recent
On 03/01/2016 03:09 PM, Bo Berglund wrote:
Lazarus Help/About shows SVN rev 51768 but I don't know if this is for
FPC 3.0.0 or Lazarus trunk...
However Lazarus Release 1.6 shows SVN 51666 when I check it so I guess
51768 is the Lazarus revision.
Issue was opened about constraints. If there's
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 14:27:05 +0100, Bo Berglund
wrote:
>>> Most likely a GTK2 library version dependent issue.
>>
>>I've fixed that issue (gtk3 also).
>>
>
>I guess I can make a test by checking out Lazarus trunk and make a "Trunk"
>Lazarus...
And this is what I did
On Tue, 01 Mar 2016 13:37:51 +0100, zeljko wrote:
>>> Yes! I'm updating mantis with the information immediately...
>>
>> Most likely a GTK2 library version dependent issue.
>
>I've fixed that issue (gtk3 also).
>
Does this mean I should switch to Lazarus trunk (1.7.xxx) from
On 03/01/2016 11:51 AM, Juha Manninen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Péter Gábor wrote:
Yes! I'm updating mantis with the information immediately...
Most likely a GTK2 library version dependent issue.
I've fixed that issue (gtk3 also).
z.
--
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 11:44 AM, Péter Gábor wrote:
> Yes! I'm updating mantis with the information immediately...
Most likely a GTK2 library version dependent issue.
Juha
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
> did you bisect for the guilty revision of your bug?
Yes! I'm updating mantis with the information immediately...
--
Péter Gábor
p...@freemail.hu
--
___
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 12:00 AM, Bo Berglund wrote:
> I checked out the release tag for 1.6 when I installed Lazarus 1.6.
> That should be what you need to find the revision number.
I didn't quite understand you but for bisecting you need trunk.
Then use the binary search
On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 11:11:33 +1030, steveg
wrote:
>I find any and all forms in a running Laz program can not be reduced in
>size below the original startup size. (neither height nor width can be
>reduced)
>It is possible to increase the size, but can only be reduced back
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 23:13:32 +0200, Juha Manninen
wrote:
>Object Inspector is the right place to set Constraints, yes.
>Select the Constraints title and then right-click.
>The entries for setting Min and Max values has been there since
>Lazarus 1.4.x IIRC, so they are
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:58 PM, Bo Berglund wrote:
> Do you mean that if I select the form and use Object Inspector to set
> Constraints I am getting to the wrong place?
> If so exactly how do I reach this new local menu?
Object Inspector is the right place to set
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 22:49:33 +0200, Juha Manninen
wrote:
>I would say you have accidentally set Constraints. It now has local
>menu entries to set the Min and Max values.
Do you mean that if I select the form and use Object Inspector to set
Constraints I am getting to
On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 10:01 PM, steveg wrote:
> Not too sure if its the same here. Mine seems to be only limited to not
> resizing 'below' the original size.
> Other than that, all works fine
I would say you have accidentally set Constraints. It now has local
menu entries
On Sun, 28 Feb 2016 11:11:33 +1030, steveg
wrote:
>I find any and all forms in a running Laz program can not be reduced in
>size below the original startup size. (neither height nor width can be
>reduced)
>It is possible to increase the size, but can only be reduced back
On 29/02/16 03:56, Péter Gábor wrote:
I reported an issue (related to .Constraints) that seems to be similar:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=29563
Unfortunately no one else of the commenters could reproduce it yet.
2016-02-28 01:41 keltezéssel, steveg írta:
I find any and all forms
On 28/02/16 20:00, Denis Kozlov wrote:
No form resizing issues with Lazarus 1.7 r51739 FPC 3.0.0 using
win32/gtk2 widgets on Windows 7.
Can you reproduce it with a new & clean application?
Denis
On 28/02/2016 00:41, steveg wrote:
I find any and all forms in a running Laz program can not
I reported an issue (related to .Constraints) that seems to be similar:
http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=29563
Unfortunately no one else of the commenters could reproduce it yet.
2016-02-28 01:41 keltezéssel, steveg írta:
> I find any and all forms in a running Laz program can not be
No form resizing issues with Lazarus 1.7 r51739 FPC 3.0.0 using
win32/gtk2 widgets on Windows 7.
Can you reproduce it with a new & clean application?
Denis
On 28/02/2016 00:41, steveg wrote:
I find any and all forms in a running Laz program can not be reduced
in size below the original
37 matches
Mail list logo