[Fwd: Re: [leaf-devel] Configuration]

2004-09-25 Thread Chad Carr
r has their act together now, it seems. Thanks, Chad -Forwarded Message- > From: Chad Carr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: leaf-devel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] Configuration > Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 11:38:32 -0700 > > On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 09:53, M

[leaf-devel] Test to list

2004-09-25 Thread Chad Carr
Sorry for the noise, but it appears my mail service provider is being rejected by the sourceforge mail servers. I will be contacting them shortly. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: host mail.sourceforge.net[66.35.250.206] said: 550-Postmaster verification failed while checking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 550-

Re: [leaf-devel] source config

2004-07-12 Thread Chad Carr
On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 09:54, Mike Noyes wrote: > On Tue, 2004-07-06 at 13:53, Eric Wolzak wrote: > > It seems the discussion starts again :) > > Eric, > Yes. :-) Yes. We have a lot to talk about. I have begun coding again. We should talk before things get out of hand... ;-) > > Did anybody t

Re: [leaf-devel] leaf-tools overview (cdb, trig, tmpl)

2004-07-06 Thread Chad Carr
Ray, I have deleted some stuff below not because I ignored it, but because I wanted to focus some immediate discussion on some of your points: On Jul 5, 2004, at 11:07 PM, Ray Olszewski wrote: At 09:41 PM 7/5/2004 -0700, Chad Carr wrote: 1) Unconfigured interfaces tend not to route packets to

Re: [leaf-devel] leaf-tools overview (cdb, trig, tmpl)

2004-07-05 Thread Chad Carr
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chad Carr Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2004 6:04 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] leaf-tools overview (cdb, trig, tmpl) sqlite would certainly work, but the cdb utility would need to be rewritten in C or C++ and would no longer be hand

Re: [leaf-devel] Source: config

2004-07-05 Thread Chad Carr
On Jul 5, 2004, at 9:58 PM, S Mohan wrote: Chad and list, Are the triggers asynchronous or synchronous? I imagine triggers can be used for semantic validation across packages and take appropriate decisions. If it does come to an irresolvable state, then errors have to be directed back to the ini

Re: [leaf-devel] leaf-tools overview (cdb, trig, tmpl)

2004-07-05 Thread Chad Carr
There is a lot here; let me begin. Comments inline. If I choose not to comment, that means I have nothing to add, not that I missed it. On Jul 5, 2004, at 7:15 PM, Ray Olszewski wrote: At 04:14 PM 7/5/2004 -0700, Chad Carr wrote: All, I started to draw this out, but I just simply do not have

Re: [leaf-devel] leaf-tools overview (cdb, trig, tmpl)

2004-07-05 Thread Chad Carr
On Jul 5, 2004, at 5:43 PM, Tom Eastep wrote: Mike Noyes wrote: On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 16:14, Chad Carr wrote: I say we all take a look at it, stamp it with approval or disapproval, and move on to more pressing questions, like when to back up changes and how the hell to write a full-featured

[leaf-devel] inverting exit status

2004-07-05 Thread Chad Carr
Shell gurus, Is there a reliable cross-platform way to write an inverted if statement? Something like bash's: if ! /usr/bin/false # with some other command, obviously then # do something true else # do something false fi Your assist

Re: [leaf-devel] leaf-tools overview (cdb, trig, tmpl)

2004-07-05 Thread Chad Carr
hand-run the trigger scripts, thus saving them from the peril of using a graphical user interface. That is, of course, in my mind. On Jul 5, 2004, at 5:20 PM, Mike Noyes wrote: On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 16:14, Chad Carr wrote: 6) This data is inserted into cdb's backing store (whatever that ha

[leaf-devel] leaf-tools overview (cdb, trig, tmpl)

2004-07-05 Thread Chad Carr
All, I started to draw this out, but I just simply do not have skills in that area. Some would question my verbal skills as well, but here goes: Each of the tools (cdb, trig and tmpl) represents a data store. cdb -> abstract configuration variables trig -> abstract actions tied to those variabl

Re: [leaf-devel] Source: config

2004-07-05 Thread Chad Carr
On Jul 5, 2004, at 2:19 PM, Ray Olszewski wrote: Some discussion of this might be profitable. I think so, too. Shall we start? I really do think we can work through this, I do. We just need to talk it through. We should probably start up a task force of some kind consisting at least one each

Re: [leaf-devel] Source: config

2004-07-05 Thread Chad Carr
On Jul 5, 2004, at 1:24 PM, Erich Titl wrote: Your analysis is convincing, especially as it covers the most important part of getting the system configured the way the user wants it. My suggestion to allow the inverse way was wrong in the way it was formulated. I would actually love if the UI sh

Re: [leaf-devel] Source: config

2004-07-05 Thread Chad Carr
On Jul 5, 2004, at 12:17 PM, Ray Olszewski wrote: At 10:30 AM 7/5/2004 -0700, Chad Carr wrote: On Jul 5, 2004, at 9:47 AM, Ray Olszewski wrote: Erich -- I'll be a bit happier when this discussion starts to attract comments from someone other than the two of us (and Mike). Until then, a coup

[leaf-devel] cvs ssh keys?

2004-07-05 Thread Chad Carr
Is it possible to use a key and ssh-agent to access the sourceforge cvs repository? Thanks, Chad --- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defe

Re: [leaf-devel] Source: config

2004-07-05 Thread Chad Carr
On Jul 5, 2004, at 9:47 AM, Ray Olszewski wrote: Erich -- I'll be a bit happier when this discussion starts to attract comments from someone other than the two of us (and Mike). Until then, a couple of small responses to what you wrote. I guess you probably meant myself, Lynn or Eric, hmm? (After

Re: [leaf-devel] leaf-tools source

2004-02-02 Thread Chad Carr
updates have already been made against my current repository under devel. I made one set and Eric made another. Good idea to check, though. -- ---- Chad Carr [EMAIL PROTECTED] When a stupid man is

[leaf-devel] leaf-tools (cdb, tmpl, trig)

2003-10-26 Thread Chad Carr
Is anybody using these in production (or even just in new development)? How are they working out? -- --- Chad Carr [EMAIL PROTECTED

[leaf-devel] mkfs.minix gone on redhat 9?

2003-08-30 Thread Chad Carr
I feel like I am awakening from a deep sleep. Has anyone noticed that redhat 9 has decided that mkfs.minix no longer belongs on a default install of the OS? Does anyone know which package (if any) they put it in? TIA -- --- Chad Carr

RE: [leaf-devel] Web Config for Interfaces File

2003-03-06 Thread Chad Carr
e in a comment if you open "tmpl" and search for "TARGET SYNTAX" -- --- Chad Carr [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [leaf-devel] Web Config for Interfaces File

2003-03-05 Thread Chad Carr
my cvs repository at http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/leaf/devel/ccarr/devel/leaf-tools/ which I think will probably be the base of the thing with minor modifications. -- --- Chad Carr [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[leaf-devel] config-db framework

2003-02-25 Thread Chad Carr
construct! -- --- Chad Carr [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- --- This sf.net email

Re: [leaf-devel] New LEAF Configuration System

2003-02-18 Thread Chad Carr
esented by this method, I will be happy to take a look at it and modify cdb if necessary. -- --- Ch

[leaf-devel] Re: [off-list] Config system

2003-02-15 Thread Chad Carr
> Those should be documented on the leaf page wth a comment what the var is for. > This to prevent the use of the same name in different packages or versions for > different purposes. The hierarchical layout creates a pseudo-namespace which prevents some of this, but you are

Re: [leaf-devel] Package Repository

2003-02-12 Thread Chad Carr
ated how difficult it is to come up with comprehensible GUIs for these two items (by failing to do so). -- --- Chad Carr [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Question

2003-02-12 Thread Chad Carr
ectory you are sitting in. -- ------- Chad Carr [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- --- This SF.NET email is

Re: [leaf-devel] Config system

2003-02-10 Thread Chad Carr
On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 21:58, Lynn Avants wrote: > On Sunday 09 February 2003 10:15 am, Chad Carr wrote: > > > Okay. We are speaking the same language, but mine is a bit more > > abstract (could be considered good or bad). A group of changes (say ip > > address, mask and

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Question

2003-02-10 Thread Chad Carr
ev 1.11 - tag 1_0_REL myproj/baz.cc - rev 1.47 - tag 1_0_REL That way you can check out 1_0_REL and get the proper revisions of each file without having to remember. Then file revisions are just mechanical; tags, rtags and branches become symbolic. -- ---

Re: [leaf-devel] Config system

2003-02-09 Thread Chad Carr
ake a look in devel/ccarr/devel/leaf-tmpl in CVS if you like. It isn't completely cooked yet. I have some more ideas for it but am not sure how to execute. I will have more in a few days. Let me know if you have ideas. > Sorry dreaming above the infrastructure ; ) That is a-okay! It is one of the major reasons we are d

Re: [leaf-devel] Config system

2003-02-08 Thread Chad Carr
ptional value > > > > > > and a default value. > > > > varname type optionstochose default "helpfull name" > > > eth1_ipN - 192.168.1.254 "IP Address" > > > > > >

Re: [leaf-devel] Config system

2003-02-08 Thread Chad Carr
alues in the database > exists they are not replaced . If you don't need new values, then you > could extract the data also from the "define script" > but The central database wins. > This is the way to implement vars that are not there yet ( for example > after an update, or a change to a new package or a change b

Re: [leaf-devel] Config system

2003-02-07 Thread Chad Carr
On Fri, 2003-02-07 at 14:15, Matt Schalit wrote: > > Lynn Avants wrote: > > On Friday 07 February 2003 07:23 am, Chad Carr wrote: > > >>The api makes the hierarchy "feel" like name=value pairs. The output > >>from the api _is_ name value pairs; the i

Re: [leaf-devel] Config system

2003-02-07 Thread Chad Carr
On Fri, 2003-02-07 at 08:06, Lynn Avants wrote: > On Friday 07 February 2003 07:23 am, Chad Carr wrote: > > On Fri, 2003-02-07 at 00:30, Erich Titl wrote: > > > > For a single key=value file there is one already in Bering and I believe > > > in Dachstein too, lrp.

Re: [leaf-devel] Config system

2003-02-07 Thread Chad Carr
to assist the installation of vim (to unhobble my serial boxes ;-)) Take a look at the code in cvs when you get a chance. I think that it will put your fears at bay. -- --- Chad Carr [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

Re: [leaf-devel] Config system

2003-02-07 Thread Chad Carr
n files and do whatever else needs to be done. This adds strength to the LEAF framework; a base from which to proceed and a consistency for package maintainers to build upon. The key is to build the complexity into the core components so that packages and features laid on top become ever more

Re: [leaf-devel] Config system

2003-02-06 Thread Chad Carr
s description still applies. Sorry for the insanity, but I am tremendously overworked. -- --- Chad Carr [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- -

Re: [leaf-devel] Config system

2003-02-05 Thread Chad Carr
On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 10:11, Mike Noyes wrote: > On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 20:18, Chad Carr wrote: > > I am not trying to convince folks. I am not even sure that the > > technical hurdles can be overcome without perl. I am no C guru, but I > > can hold my own and would be wil

Re: [leaf-devel] The ideas presented so far...

2003-02-04 Thread Chad Carr
On Tue, 2003-02-04 at 14:19, Matt Schalit wrote: > > > Chad Carr wrote: > > > > May I suggest that the config-db be maintained as a "config-tree," with > > the root at /leaf-cdb (or something shallow like that) and keys may be > > nested as deeply a

Re: [leaf-devel] Config system (long)

2003-02-04 Thread Chad Carr
ply say: leaf-cdb del tree interfs prior to doing your thing and it would have the same effect, so it may not be necessary to do anything implicit unnecessarily. Well, what do you think? Completely in the weeds?

Re: [leaf-devel] The ideas presented so far...

2003-02-03 Thread Chad Carr
r than having them swallowed up by some other global package. Feel free to discard. -- --- Chad Carr [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- msg06119/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [leaf-devel] Template system [was Webconfiguration]

2003-02-01 Thread Chad Carr
On Sat, 01 Feb 2003 14:46:10 -0800 "Matt Schalit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Chad Carr wrote: > > On Sat, 1 Feb 2003 12:16:10 +0100 > > > > 1) a centralized configuration "database" and "api" for adding and > > removi

Re: [leaf-devel] Template system [was Webconfiguration]

2003-02-01 Thread Chad Carr
y implementations, even in shell. If anyone wants to start kicking around design ideas, I would be glad to help. I will start working on the configuration database immediately. -- --

Re: [leaf-devel] Kernel 2.5 to include IPSec and Crypto

2002-11-05 Thread Chad Carr
On Sat, 2 Nov 2002 01:46:53 -0500 "Eric B Kiser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Joey, > > Thanks for submitting this to the list. Very interesting stuff. > > Eric > > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:leaf-devel-admin@;lists.sourceforge.net]On Behalf Of Joey Office

Re: [Leaf-devel] cvs src tree

2002-08-29 Thread Chad Carr
ss of hosting, which I would rather > not see. SF has been exceptionally nice in the free hosting and services > offered. Again, we need to address it, but in doing so to look at it as a philosophical obligation rather th

Re: [Leaf-devel] Mobile IP for LEAF

2002-08-22 Thread Chad Carr
books free of charge. I am sure other notebook manufacturers wil be soon to follow. It is a good thing, I think? -- ---- C

[Leaf-devel] Mobile IP for LEAF

2002-08-21 Thread Chad Carr
hread. -- Chad Carr [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for

[Leaf-devel] (no subject)

2002-08-20 Thread Chad Carr
Okay, trolling here. Anybody know anything (or want to know anything) about mobile ip HA/FA support for LEAF? -- Chad Carr [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [Leaf-devel] [OT?] Upcoming Conferences

2002-07-17 Thread Chad Carr
3-15. Anyone going to O'Reilly OSCON in San Diego? If so maybe I'll see you there. -- Chad Carr [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: [Leaf-devel] is Bering GNU?

2002-07-13 Thread Chad Carr
one of the best support lists out there. -- ---- Chad Carr [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This

Re: [Leaf-devel] is Bering GNU?

2002-07-13 Thread Chad Carr
, somewhat quick and dirty. I will write a doc if it looks useful to anyone at first glance. I suspect, however, that it is not that much different than what others might be using for their custom projects. I hope that this helps some. -- -

Re: [Leaf-devel] RE: Booting Bering from /dev/hda2

2002-04-17 Thread Chad Carr
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002 13:47:32 -0700 "Richard Herrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Leaf-Developers, > > [Ignore previous truncated message] > > I'm trying to boot Bering from a small partition in the front of my hard > drive, but I don't think that it's running the /linuxrc script. > > I

[Leaf-devel] packages for slink libcrypto and libssl

2002-04-10 Thread Chad Carr
feedback before beating my head against a wall for (potentially) a couple of days. Thanks in advance, Chad Carr ___ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

[Leaf-devel] (forw) [ccarr@franzdoodle.com: porting scripts from ifconfig and awk to iproute and sed]

2002-03-24 Thread Chad Carr
--- Chad Carr [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- --- Begin Message --- I am attempting to port freeswan scripts that