Re: [leaf-devel] CVS

On 02/16/2012 09:24 AM, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > Am 30.01.2012 21:31, schrieb Mike Noyes: >> Everyone, >> I backed up our old CVS repository, uploaded it to the SF FRS, truncated >> CVS with adminrepo, hid our leaf-cvs-commits mailing list (delete?), and >> disabled CVS. >> >> Revision *1.4* - (*sh

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS

Am 30.01.2012 21:31, schrieb Mike Noyes: > Everyone, > I backed up our old CVS repository, uploaded it to the SF FRS, truncated > CVS with adminrepo, hid our leaf-cvs-commits mailing list (delete?), and > disabled CVS. > > Revision *1.4* - (*show annotations* >

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Backups

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 1/31/2011 3:18 PM, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > I tried browsing the subversion repository, and it didn't seem to > work...I'm not sure if that's due to there being nothing there or a > result of the recent security issues with SF. I should have a

Re: [leaf-devel] cvs cleanup

Am Dienstag, 28. Dezember 2010, um 23:36:10 schrieb KP Kirchdoerfer: > Am Dienstag, 30. November 2010, 15:55:23 schrieb KP Kirchdoerfer: > > Am Samstag, 27. November 2010, 22:30:13 schrieb davidMbrooke: > > > On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 15:58 +, davidMbrooke wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 07:28

Re: [leaf-devel] cvs structure

On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 23:11 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > Am Montag, 1. November 2010, 22:04:59 schrieb davidMbrooke: > > On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 21:32 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > > > David; > > > > > > Am Sonntag, 31. Oktober 2010, 22:09:54 schrieb davidMbrooke: > > > > On Sun, 2010-10-31 at

Re: [leaf-devel] cvs structure

Am Montag, 1. November 2010, 22:04:59 schrieb davidMbrooke: > On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 21:32 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > > David; > > > > Am Sonntag, 31. Oktober 2010, 22:09:54 schrieb davidMbrooke: > > > On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 20:50 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > > > > Am Freitag, 29. Oktober 20

Re: [leaf-devel] cvs structure

On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 21:32 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > David; > > Am Sonntag, 31. Oktober 2010, 22:09:54 schrieb davidMbrooke: > > On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 20:50 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > > > Am Freitag, 29. Oktober 2010, 20:25:58 schrieb Andrew: > > > > > > Ok; I propose: > > > - just "c

Re: [leaf-devel] cvs structure

David; Am Sonntag, 31. Oktober 2010, 22:09:54 schrieb davidMbrooke: > On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 20:50 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > > Am Freitag, 29. Oktober 2010, 20:25:58 schrieb Andrew: > > > > Ok; I propose: > > - just "core" and "contrib" repository (names are not fixed), testing > > isn't nee

Re: [leaf-devel] cvs structure

On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 20:50 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: -snip- > Ok; I propose: > - just "core" and "contrib" repository (names are not fixed), testing isn't > needed - we can also put packages in contrib which we consider for testing > or provided as-is. > - lrp's and sources are required fo

Re: [leaf-devel] cvs structure

On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 20:50 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > Am Freitag, 29. Oktober 2010, 20:25:58 schrieb Andrew: > > Ok; I propose: > - just "core" and "contrib" repository (names are not fixed), testing isn't > needed - we can also put packages in contrib which we consider for testing > or

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS access problems - No write permission

On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 10:18 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote: > On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 18:06 +, davidMbrooke wrote: > > Hi, > > I have been trying to check in some changes to package "ntp" as per my > > postings to leaf-user in January. I tried a couple of times on Monday > > and again yesterday si

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS access problems - No write permission

On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 18:06 +, davidMbrooke wrote: > Hi, > I have been trying to check in some changes to package "ntp" as per my > postings to leaf-user in January. I tried a couple of times on Monday > and again yesterday since I know that sometimes SourceForge has issues. > >

Re: [leaf-devel] cvs commits

Hi kp, > it seems that the cvs-commit mailinglist or the feature that commits activate > a message on that list is broken. > I've heard of various pb's with the latest SF platform update, maybe this ir > related? as discussed off list, the missing cvs-commit messages from our new team memeber

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS migration to SVN?

On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 20:57 +0100, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > I do not see a real need to migrate. > > The current cvs usage "just works" and I haven't heart complains from users > that there are any difficulties using cvs. Not to mention performance pb's > with the few checkouts a week. a simpl

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS migration to SVN?

Hi all, > -Original Message- > From: KP Kirchdoerfer [mailto:kap...@users.sourceforge.net] > Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 7:58 PM > To: leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [leaf-devel] CVS migration to SVN? > > Am Donnerstag, 12. März 2009 18:56:

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS status

On Thu, 2009-03-12 at 12:43 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote: > On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 12:17 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote: > > 2009-03-10: Service CVS unplanned downtime - UPDATE > > http://apps.sourceforge.net/wordpress/sourceforge/2009/03/11/2009-03-10-service-cvs-unplanned-downtime-update/ > > 2009-03-10: Ser

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS migration to SVN?

Am Donnerstag, 12. März 2009 18:56:09 schrieb Mike Noyes: > Everyone, > I think we should migrate to SVN. SVN integrates with Track well, and: > > 1. Availability will be better on other services; we > have a more scalable and resilient infrastructure under them > 2. Perfo

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS status

On Wed, 2009-03-11 at 12:17 -0700, Mike Noyes wrote: > 2009-03-10: Service CVS unplanned downtime - UPDATE > http://apps.sourceforge.net/wordpress/sourceforge/2009/03/11/2009-03-10-service-cvs-unplanned-downtime-update/ 2009-03-10: Service CVS unplanned downtime - UPDATE 2 http://apps.sourceforge.

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS checkin glitch

Mike Noyes schrieb: .. > > KP & Erich, > I noticed that issue a while ago. I'll try to attend to it next week. Thanks that would be great, there is a copy of r1000 in the contribute limb so removing the wrong one at the root should be enough > > Note: my track record for attending to r

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS checkin glitch

On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 02:09, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > On Tuesday 03 July 2007 09:08:29 Erich Titl wrote: > > Hi Folks > > > > I just happened to look into CVS and found a r1000 directory right at > > the root. This is certainly due to me doing an inapropriate checkin to > > the wrong location some

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS checkin glitch

On Tuesday 03 July 2007 09:08:29 Erich Titl wrote: > Hi Folks > > I just happened to look into CVS and found a r1000 directory right at > the root. This is certainly due to me doing an inapropriate checkin to > the wrong location some time ago. Could someone with admin rights please > move the thin

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Pbm

KP KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 12. April 2007 13:41:33 schrieb Erich Titl: >> luna > ./buildtool.pl build buildenv >> make the list of required source packages: linux,buildenv [0.K.] >> >> source/package: linux >> >> downloading: buildtool.cfg from server cvs-s

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Pbm

Am Donnerstag, 12. April 2007 13:41:33 schrieb Erich Titl: > luna > ./buildtool.pl build buildenv > make the list of required source packages: linux,buildenv [0.K.] > > source/package: linux > > downloading: buildtool.cfg from server cvs-sourceforge type viewcvs > wget fail

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Pbm

luna > ./buildtool.pl build buildenv make the list of required source packages: linux,buildenv [0.K.] source/package: linux downloading: buildtool.cfg from server cvs-sourceforge type viewcvs wget failed: /data/leaf/bering-uclibc/devel/latest/src/bering-uclibc/buildtool/so

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Pbm

Am Donnerstag, 12. April 2007 08:13:58 schrieb Erich Titl: > Mike > > Mike Noyes wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 15:06, Erich Titl wrote: > >> Hi Mike, KP if you read along > >> > >> there is more to it, I changed the server name in sources.cfg to see > >> where it leads to... > > > > > > > >> It

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Pbm

Hi Erich Titl wrote: > Mike > > Mike Noyes wrote: >> On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 15:06, Erich Titl wrote: >>> Hi Mike, KP if you read along >>> >>> there is more to it, I changed the server name in sources.cfg to see >>> where it leads to... >> >>> It appears that the path on the server has changed to

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Pbm

Mike Mike Noyes wrote: > On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 15:06, Erich Titl wrote: >> Hi Mike, KP if you read along >> >> there is more to it, I changed the server name in sources.cfg to see >> where it leads to... > >> It appears that the path on the server has changed too. Looks like >> cgi-bin moved some

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Pbm

On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 15:06, Erich Titl wrote: > Hi Mike, KP if you read along > > there is more to it, I changed the server name in sources.cfg to see > where it leads to... > It appears that the path on the server has changed too. Looks like > cgi-bin moved somewhere else. Erich, When the SF s

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Pbm

Hi Mike, KP if you read along there is more to it, I changed the server name in sources.cfg to see where it leads to... Erich Titl schrieb: > Hi Mike > > Mike Noyes schrieb: >> On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 13:12, Erich Titl wrote: >>> Erich Titl schrieb: You are more familiar to the SF procedures

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Pbm

Hi Mike Mike Noyes schrieb: > On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 13:12, Erich Titl wrote: >> Erich Titl schrieb: >>> You are more familiar to the SF procedures than I am. I would not even >>> know where to look. Could you give me a hand? >> I somehow managed to enter an SR. Will see where this leads to. > > E

Re: [leaf-devel] cvs pb's

On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 12:13, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 11. April 2007 19:40:51 schrieb Mike Noyes: > > On Wed, 2007-04-11 at 07:56, Erich Titl wrote: > > > Sorry again, even more info > > > > > > 16:55:45.633503 IP cvs.sourceforge.net > luna.think.ch: icmp 68: host > > > cvs.sourceforge

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS tags

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Erich Titl wrote: > Charles Steinkuehler wrote: >> Erich Titl wrote: >>>- adding a tag does not create overhead to the CVS archive (unless we >>>use subversion) >> >> Tags do not create overhead in subversion, either. > > I must have misunderstood y

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS tags

Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Erich Titl wrote: > > >>- adding a tag does not create overhead to the CVS archive (unless we >>use subversion) > > > Tags do not create overhead in subversion, either. I must have misunderstood you then, proba

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS tags

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Erich Titl wrote: > - adding a tag does not create overhead to the CVS archive (unless we > use subversion) Tags do not create overhead in subversion, either. - -- Charles Steinkuehler [EMAIL PROTECTED] -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS tags

On Sun, 2006-05-07 at 10:07, Erich Titl wrote: > Mike Noyes wrote: > > On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 13:17, Martin Hejl wrote: > > > >>>Ideally, building from a local working-copy of the repository will be > >>>fairly easy (it sounds like this is getting tested RealSoonNow). This > >>>would separate down

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS tags

Mike Noyes wrote: > On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 13:17, Martin Hejl wrote: > >>>Ideally, building from a local working-copy of the repository will be >>>fairly easy (it sounds like this is getting tested RealSoonNow). This >>>would separate download problems from actually building the source >>>(possibl

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS tags

On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 13:17, Martin Hejl wrote: > > Ideally, building from a local working-copy of the repository will be > > fairly easy (it sounds like this is getting tested RealSoonNow). This > > would separate download problems from actually building the source > > (possibly important for tho

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS tags

Hi Charles, > This is where subversion's branching would really shine. You would > simply change the repository URL in the main config file and 'head' > would point to the latest version of that branch, which is probably what > you'd want (ie: security updates/bug fixes included). Ah, ok, I get i

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS tags

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Martin Hejl wrote: > Hi Erich, > >> I assume the code within buildtool to access a certain file is pretty >> central. How difficult is it for this piece of code to use an >> environment variable specifying a TAG (defaulting to HEAD). > > It is, but th

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS tags

Hi again, Martin Hejl wrote: > * Check out src/bering-uclibc/buildtool for the release branch of 2.4.1 > * check out src/bering-uclibc/apps for the release branch of 2.4.1 > * modify cvs-sourceforge use the "file" target for server > cvs-sourceforge and make it point to the cvs checkout of > s

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS tags

Hi Mike, > Is buildtool able to use a checked out working copy to build from? It is, if one adjusts the main config (changes the "cvs-sourceforge" server setting in conf/sources.cfg to use the "file" type, which will use the local filesystem rather than CVS). But wether that will work to build an

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS tags

Hi Erich, > I assume the code within buildtool to access a certain file is pretty > central. How difficult is it for this piece of code to use an > environment variable specifying a TAG (defaulting to HEAD). It is, but that doesn't solve the problem. The idea behind buildtool is that it can use wh

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS tags

Hi Mike; Am Freitag, 5. Mai 2006 19:24 schrieb Mike Noyes: > On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 09:10, Martin Hejl wrote: > > Mike Noyes wrote: > > > Tagging the release in cvs is easier. > > > > > > http://ximbiot.com/cvs/manual/cvs-1.11.21/cvs_4.html#SEC48 > > > > Adding the tag is not the problem. >

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS tags

Martin Martin Hejl wrote: ..> Adding the tag is not the problem. Updating buildtool to use the tag/branch is. That's why creating a snapshot of a buildenv "base" (all the sources downloaded, but nothing compiled yet) is much easier for us than tagging the release, creating a maintenance branch (

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS tags

On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 09:10, Martin Hejl wrote: > Mike Noyes wrote: > > Tagging the release in cvs is easier. > > > > http://ximbiot.com/cvs/manual/cvs-1.11.21/cvs_4.html#SEC48 > > Adding the tag is not the problem. Martin, Agreed, and this is probably causing me confusion. > Updating bu

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS tags

Hi Mike, Mike Noyes wrote: > Subject was: Re: [leaf-devel] Glitch in initrd backup when using > alternative initrdfile > > On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 02:58, Eric Spakman wrote: > >>>How does one to go about building the buildenv for a specific release, >>>e.g. does CVS have release tags? For example

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS tags

Hi Mike, >> The Bering-uClibc team will make a snapshot of the current tree and put >> the sources in a tarball in the File release area. > > Eric, > Please reconsider this decision. Tagging the release in cvs is easier. > > http://ximbiot.com/cvs/manual/cvs-1.11.21/cvs_4.html#SEC48 > If this is

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

On Sun, 2004-06-27 at 04:38, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > Mike Noyes wrote: > > I'll see if I can rsync our repository from > > Charles through my dial-up connection. > > That will take forever. If you want, I can burn a couple of CDs > and mail an initial copy of the archive to you. Once yo

Re: [leaf-devel] cvs ssh keys?

On Mon, 2004-07-05 at 10:46, Chad Carr wrote: > Is it possible to use a key and ssh-agent to access the sourceforge cvs > repository? Chad, Yes, as far as I know. Please let me know if these documents fail to answer your question(s). SF Site Docs E5. Guide to generating, posting and using SSH ke

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

Charles FYI here is the output of the rsync job, looks like it takes 8 seconds to complete (without changes) Maybe you want to upgrade your rsync server someday. From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 29 10:00:08 2004 Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 10:00:01 +0200 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Cron Daemon) To

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

Erich Titl wrote: Charles At 19:29 27.06.2004 -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] charles]$ crontab -l # DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE - edit the master and reinstall. # (/tmp/crontab.29831 installed on Fri Aug 8 08:17:52 2003) # (Cron version -- $Id: crontab.c,v 2.13 1994/01/17 03:20

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

Charles At 19:29 27.06.2004 -0500, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: >... >[EMAIL PROTECTED] charles]$ crontab -l ># DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE - edit the master and reinstall. ># (/tmp/crontab.29831 installed on Fri Aug 8 08:17:52 2003) ># (Cron version -- $Id: crontab.c,v 2.13 1994/01/17 03:20:37 vixie Ex

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

Erich Titl wrote: Mike At 18:56 27.06.2004, Mike Noyes wrote: On Sun, 2004-06-27 at 09:00, Erich Titl wrote: > Isn't there the possibility to use rsync at SF? The first download will be > horrible, but afterwards daily backups should not be that bad. Erich, SourceForge doesn't make a CVS repository

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

Mike At 18:56 27.06.2004, Mike Noyes wrote: On Sun, 2004-06-27 at 09:00, Erich Titl wrote: > Isn't there the possibility to use rsync at SF? The first download will be > horrible, but afterwards daily backups should not be that bad. Erich, SourceForge doesn't make a CVS repository rsync service ava

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

On Sun, 2004-06-27 at 04:38, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > Mike Noyes wrote: > > I'll see if I can rsync our repository from > > Charles through my dial-up connection. > > That will take forever. If you want, I can burn a couple of CDs > and mail an initial copy of the archive to you. Once yo

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

On Sun, 2004-06-27 at 09:00, Erich Titl wrote: > Isn't there the possibility to use rsync at SF? The first download will be > horrible, but afterwards daily backups should not be that bad. Erich, SourceForge doesn't make a CVS repository rsync service available. It's a service that is often reque

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

Hi everyone At 04:17 27.06.2004, K.-P. Kirchdörfer wrote: Am Samstag, 26. Juni 2004 19:40 schrieb Mike Noyes: > On Sat, 2004-06-26 at 09:44, K.-P. Kirchdörfer wrote: > > Am Samstag, 26. Juni 2004 18:27 schrieb Mike Noyes: > > > We should have multiple backups of our repository. My limited bandwid

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

Mike Noyes wrote: On Sat, 2004-06-26 at 19:17, K.-P. KirchdÃrfer wrote: Am Samstag, 26. Juni 2004 19:40 schrieb Mike Noyes: > wget http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cvstarballs/leaf-cvsroot.tar.bz2 > Length: 959,993,540 [application/x-bzip2] Well, I need about three to four hours to downlo

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

Am Sonntag, 27. Juni 2004 05:23 schrieb Mike Noyes: > On Sat, 2004-06-26 at 19:17, K.-P. KirchdÃrfer wrote: > > Am Samstag, 26. Juni 2004 19:40 schrieb Mike Noyes: > > > wget > > > http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cvstarballs/leaf-cvsroot.tar.bz2 Length: > > > 959,993,540 [application/x-bzip2] >

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

On Sat, 2004-06-26 at 19:17, K.-P. KirchdÃrfer wrote: > Am Samstag, 26. Juni 2004 19:40 schrieb Mike Noyes: > > wget http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cvstarballs/leaf-cvsroot.tar.bz2 > > Length: 959,993,540 [application/x-bzip2] > > Well, I need about three to four hours to download it;

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

Am Samstag, 26. Juni 2004 19:40 schrieb Mike Noyes: > On Sat, 2004-06-26 at 09:44, K.-P. KirchdÃrfer wrote: > > Am Samstag, 26. Juni 2004 18:27 schrieb Mike Noyes: > > > We should have multiple backups of our repository. My limited bandwidth > > > prevents me from downloading leaf-cvsroot.tar.bz2.

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

Mike Noyes wrote: > Charles makes our repository available for rsync. > > rsync rsync.leaf-project.org:: > leaf-cvsLEAF Project CVS Archives I have no idea how big the tarball is? K.-P., It is large. I'm not sure how big the tarball is (I decompress it as it's downloaded),

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

On Sat, 2004-06-26 at 09:44, K.-P. KirchdÃrfer wrote: > Am Samstag, 26. Juni 2004 18:27 schrieb Mike Noyes: > > We should have multiple backups of our repository. My limited bandwidth > > prevents me from downloading leaf-cvsroot.tar.bz2. Charles is the only > > project member I'm aware of that reg

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

Am Samstag, 26. Juni 2004 18:27 schrieb Mike Noyes: > On Sat, 2004-06-26 at 08:40, K.-P. KirchdÃrfer wrote: > > Am Samstag, 26. Juni 2004 17:39 schrieb Mike Noyes: > > > Everyone, > > > How many of you periodically download our nightly repository? > > > > > > http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cvst

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

On Sat, 2004-06-26 at 08:40, K.-P. KirchdÃrfer wrote: > Am Samstag, 26. Juni 2004 17:39 schrieb Mike Noyes: > > Everyone, > > How many of you periodically download our nightly repository? > > > > http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cvstarballs/leaf-cvsroot.tar.bz2 > I'm not aware that a member of

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Nighly tar.bz2

Am Samstag, 26. Juni 2004 17:39 schrieb Mike Noyes: > Everyone, > How many of you periodically download our nightly repository? > > http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cvstarballs/leaf-cvsroot.tar.bz2 Mike; I'm not aware that a member of the Bering-uClibc team does it. Why do you ask? kp

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Question

On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 03:32, Greg Morgan wrote: > Mike Noyes wrote: > > That may be the cause, but I'd need the exact import command you used to > > The fatal captain's log from the history file: > cd /home/edrive/leaf/devel/dr_kludge/GilaMonster Greg, Is this a checked out cvs tree/module? Impo

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Question

Mike Noyes wrote: > On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 23:56, Greg Morgan wrote: > > > I followed the CVS document Mike Noyes wrote at > > http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=9960&group_id=13751. > > Greg, > That may be the cause, but I'd need the exact import command you used to The fatal ca

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Question

Chad, Thanks for all your help with my CVS qustions. I think I have the hang of it now. Greg Morgan --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Question

On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 23:56, Greg Morgan wrote: > I followed the CVS document Mike Noyes wrote at > http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=9960&group_id=13751. > > I wound up with two problems. One I have two directories in my checkin. > Two, I must of fouled up something because I r

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Question

On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 23:56, Greg Morgan wrote: > I followed the CVS document Mike Noyes wrote at > http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=9960&group_id=13751. > > I wound up with two problems. One I have two directories in my checkin. > Two, I must of fouled up something because I r

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Question

I followed the CVS document Mike Noyes wrote at http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=9960&group_id=13751. I wound up with two problems. One I have two directories in my checkin. Two, I must of fouled up something because I received a trace back. Does anyone see what I did wrong?

Re: [leaf-devel] CVS Question

On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 05:21, Greg Morgan wrote: > Is this correct? I understand you can do many things with CVS. I want > to checkin some of my stuff. Do I just want to think in directory > structure under my directory? > ..\devel\dr_kludge\thingtwo > ..\devel\dr_kludge\and > ..\devel\dr_kludge

Re: [Leaf-devel] cvs src tree

On Sat, 2002-08-24 at 20:42, guitarlynn wrote: > I've been doing some thinking about a good way to setup the > LEAF src tree, as there is still nothing there. As I need to upload > my own src for a package binary and working on others, I need > somewhere to put it within the tree. My thoughts on

Re: [Leaf-devel] cvs src tree

On Mon, 26 Aug 2002 14:11:13 -0500 "guitarlynn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > +packages +glibc-2.0 > > > +glibc-2.1 > > > +glibc-none > > > +binaries > > > > > > I believe the seperation of glibc within packages will avoid > > > confusion between p

Re: [Leaf-devel] cvs src tree

On Monday 26 August 2002 12:49, Mike Noyes wrote: > Lynn, > Thank you for opening this topic for discussion again. :-) > Remember I'm not a programmer when reading my comments below. No problem, as discussed many times over the last yearthis needs to be done! > > > +packages +glib

Re: [Leaf-devel] cvs src tree

On Sat, 2002-08-24 at 20:42, guitarlynn wrote: > I've been doing some thinking about a good way to setup the > LEAF src tree, as there is still nothing there. Lynn, Thank you for opening this topic for discussion again. :-) Remember I'm not a programmer when reading my comments below. > src

Re: [Leaf-devel] cvs src tree

On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 10:06, Vladimir I. wrote: > Actually WISP-Dist CFSLRP packages are not backwards compatible with LRP. Any > ideas about a good place for them? Vladimir, Anything release/branch specific should be in the release/branch trees. Example: http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/view

Re: [Leaf-devel] cvs src tree

> src +bering > +dachstein > +oxygen > +packetfilter > +wisp-dist > +packages +glibc-2.0 > +glibc-2.1 > +glibc-none +glibc-2.2 For WISP-Dist ;) Actually WISP-Dist CFSLRP packages are not b

RE: [Leaf-devel] cvs src tree

This seems to be about the same as what was proposed last time this thread went around. I think this solution makes perfect sense. It has my vote! Regards, Eric -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of guitarlynn Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2002 11

Re: [Leaf-devel] CVS structure ???

On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 15:50, Michael D. Schleif wrote: > [2] Since cvs does not retain group, mode nor ownership attributes, [1] > is further complicated and requires another kludge to correct directory > and files attributes. Michael, This should only be an issue when exporting for public distri

Re: [Leaf-devel] CVS structure ???

On Wed, 2002-07-17 at 15:50, Michael D. Schleif wrote: > I've been considering using whatever structure I settle on as my > development environment. I have cvs setup on my own network and hope to > integrate leaf development into my other development projects. However, > cvs doesn't lend itself

Re: [Leaf-devel] CVS structure ???

David Douthitt wrote: [ snip ] > My model has been the following: > > archives/ > .tar.gz > .bz2 > ... > > iproute2/ > distinfo > Makefile > patches/ > .diff > .diff > ... > work/ {temporary dir; created and used to

Re: [Leaf-devel] CVS structure ???

On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 03:21:32PM -0500, Michael D. Schleif wrote: > > Jeff Newmiller wrote: > > CVS is designed to handle directories full of information... so a > > directory tree of html documents is a natural thing to enter. > > > > An idea... > > > > net-snmp/ > > README.txt > >

Re: [Leaf-devel] CVS structure ???

Jeff Newmiller wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Michael D. Schleif wrote: [ snip ] > > I am starting to realize that, perhaps, I should take a directory based > > approach to helices' cvs tree. > > > > I have not settled on any particular structure. However, I am wondering > > about several th

Re: [Leaf-devel] CVS src tree structure

On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 14:41, David Douthitt wrote: > On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 10:28:00AM -0700, Mike Noyes wrote: > > > I think a system similar to "BSD Ports" or "Gentoo Portage" would be > > great. David already has sample implementation available. > > > > http://cvs.leaf-project.org/cgi-bin/vi

Re: [Leaf-devel] CVS structure ???

On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 01:01:27PM -0700, Jeff Newmiller wrote: >On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Michael D. Schleif wrote: >CVS is designed to handle directories full of information... so a >directory tree of html documents is a natural thing to enter. > >An idea... > > net-snmp/ >README.txt >packa

Re: [Leaf-devel] CVS structure ???

On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 02:19:58PM -0500, Michael D. Schleif wrote: >[1] Should I have separate trees for different underlying versions of >net-snmp? For example, I committed net-snmp v4.2.4. I am contemplating >building and committing both v4.2.5 and the totally different >distribution v5.x.

Re: [Leaf-devel] CVS structure ??? [LONG]

Ugh, I just reverted to the prior enforce script. I'll take a look at it again in the morning. Currently lowercase name enforcement is active. On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 17:12, Mike Noyes wrote: > Everyone, > I just removed the lowercase enforcement from our repository. If win > clients start leavin

Re: [Leaf-devel] CVS structure ??? [LONG]

Everyone, I just removed the lowercase enforcement from our repository. If win clients start leaving broken stub files in our repository, we'll need to reexamine this issue. On Thu, 2002-07-11 at 16:59, Mike Noyes wrote: > On Thu, 2002-07-11 at 16:12, Manfred Schuler wrote: > > You should not fo

Re: [Leaf-devel] CVS src tree structure

On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 14:05, David Douthitt wrote: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 11:38:49AM -0700, Mike Noyes wrote: > > > Both of these actions are performed using "import" from a directory > > outside of your checked out tree. > > Does this mean that I can't operate in the cvs checked out director

Re: [Leaf-devel] CVS src tree structure

On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 10:28:00AM -0700, Mike Noyes wrote: > I think a system similar to "BSD Ports" or "Gentoo Portage" would be > great. David already has sample implementation available. > > http://cvs.leaf-project.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/leaf/devel/ddouthitt/base/ Now I've actually (with M

Re: [Leaf-devel] CVS src tree structure

On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 11:38:49AM -0700, Mike Noyes wrote: > Both of these actions are performed using "import" from a directory > outside of your checked out tree. Does this mean that I can't operate in the cvs checked out directory structure until all directories have been imported? I'll try

Re: [Leaf-devel] CVS src tree structure

On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 11:15, David Douthitt wrote: > On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 10:28:00AM -0700, Mike Noyes wrote: > > On Sat, 2002-07-13 at 07:48, Mike Noyes wrote: > > > I will create this tree on Monday. However, this tree will need a > > > consensus on its structure before commits can begin. > >

Re: [Leaf-devel] CVS src tree structure

On Mon, Jul 15, 2002 at 10:28:00AM -0700, Mike Noyes wrote: > On Sat, 2002-07-13 at 07:48, Mike Noyes wrote: > > I will create this tree on Monday. However, this tree will need a > > consensus on its structure before commits can begin. > > leaf/src/packages > This is done. The floor is now op

Re: [Leaf-devel] CVS structure ???

On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 01:14:07PM -0700, Mike Noyes wrote: > On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 13:01, Jeff Newmiller wrote: > > David Douthitt has advocated (and it sounds good to me but I haven't done > > it myself) a mechanism whereby sources obtained from other sources are > > kept in original form and a

Re: [Leaf-devel] cvs commit directory structure ???

On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 06:52, Michael D. Schleif wrote: > > Mike Noyes wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 22:39, Michael D. Schleif wrote: > > > > > > No matter how hard I try, I cannot commit a directory structure to cvs. > > [ snip ] > > > I looked at your commit messages, and I think I und

Re: [Leaf-devel] cvs commit directory structure ???

Mike Noyes wrote: > > On Mon, 2002-07-15 at 22:39, Michael D. Schleif wrote: > > > > No matter how hard I try, I cannot commit a directory structure to cvs. [ snip ] > I looked at your commit messages, and I think I understand what you were > trying to accomplish. Here is a sequence that I bel

Re: [Leaf-devel] cvs commit directory structure ???

On Tue, 2002-07-16 at 06:32, Michael D. Schleif wrote: > I now believe that all of my cvs study led me to conclude that I was > creating and modifying ``modules''; but, modules can only exist at the > top level under CVSROOT. Therefore, you are probably correct that cvs > import is the solution h

Re: [Leaf-devel] cvs commit directory structure ???

I now believe that all of my cvs study led me to conclude that I was creating and modifying ``modules''; but, modules can only exist at the top level under CVSROOT. Therefore, you are probably correct that cvs import is the solution here. In an effort to correct my miscreant behaviour, I tried

  1   2   >