Hi;
Am Mittwoch, 21. Dezember 2016, 15:41:15 schrieb Ecran Total:
> Hi Leaf team,
>
>
>
> Missed strongswan package in
> Bering-uClibc_6.0.1_geode_syslinux_serial115200 !!
>
> (6.0.1-rc1 changelog: strongswan updated to upstream version 5.5.1)
Indeed; it hasn't been packaged and added to
Hi Leaf team,
Missed strongswan package in
Bering-uClibc_6.0.1_geode_syslinux_serial115200 !!
(6.0.1-rc1 changelog: strongswan updated to upstream version 5.5.1)
Thanks.
Sam.
--
Developer Access
Am Sonntag, 30. Oktober 2016, 07:20:06 schrieb n22e113:
> On 10/23/2016 12:26, kp kirchdoerfer wrote:
> > * Support for PCEngines APU2 incl watchdog support and booting from SD
> > card
>
> Many thanks!
> Is the earlier PCEngines alix2d13 (with CF card) continue to be supported as
> well?
yes.
Hi kp,
yes openvpn has not migrated first go, nor has TOR.
I copied the configdb updated syslinux and put the new packages on. I had to
extract and install new hardware firmwares.
Unfortunately I am very busy at the moment and can't concentrate on these
issues.
I've looked for obvious
Hi Marko
Am Dienstag, 25. Oktober 2016, 18:27:59 schrieb Mark Berndt:
> I have some problem with openvpn not starting. I will post another thread
> later when I get a chance to look at it. Other than that, all is good.
>
> cheers
> Marko
Is this still an issue?
just curious
kp
I have some problem with openvpn not starting. I will post another thread
later when I get a chance to look at it. Other than that, all is good.
cheers
Marko
On Monday, 24 October 2016 11:25:41 PM AEDT Mark Berndt wrote:
> I just upgraded to 6. The update was easy and the system is super
I upgraded two Soekris boxen, a net4801 and net6501, to 6.0
On the net4801, I was using both a compact flash (boot) and an external usb
thumb drive (mass storage) , /dev/sda1 and /dev/sdb1 respectively. After
the upgrade, these were swapped. Other than a little confusion on my part
while I
I just upgraded to 6. The update was easy and the system is super fast to
reboot. Everything went very smooth.
Thanks leaf team!
cheers
Marko
On Sunday, 23 October 2016 6:26:18 PM AEDT kp kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Hi all
>
> After a year development started and five month after the first alpha
Hi all
After a year development started and five month after the first alpha release
a new major version of LEAF Bering-uClibc is considered stable.
Major features of the 6.0.0 version are:
* upgrading uClibc to uClibc-ng, receiving maintenance and regular updates
(1.0.17)
* upgrading to
On 10/5/2013 1:17 PM, Phil Faris wrote:
When I try to boot Bering-uClibc 5.0.1 on an Alix machine, I only get a
few lines of gibberish and then it hangs. The terminal I am using for
viewing works fine on other leaf systems.
I created the system on the the 2GB compact flash card using a linux
Am Samstag, 5. Oktober 2013, 13:17:35 schrieb Phil Faris:
When I try to boot Bering-uClibc 5.0.1 on an Alix machine, I only get a
few lines of gibberish and then it hangs. The terminal I am using for
viewing works fine on other leaf systems.
I created the system on the the 2GB compact flash
When I try to boot Bering-uClibc 5.0.1 on an Alix machine, I only get a
few lines of gibberish and then it hangs. The terminal I am using for
viewing works fine on other leaf systems.
I created the system on the the 2GB compact flash card using a linux
system (fedora 17) by doing the
Hi.
Do you write MBR code to flash?
05.10.2013 23:17, Phil Faris пишет:
When I try to boot Bering-uClibc 5.0.1 on an Alix machine, I only get a
few lines of gibberish and then it hangs. The terminal I am using for
viewing works fine on other leaf systems.
I created the system on the the 2GB
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 00:59 +0200, Juergen Northe wrote:
2011/4/2 davidMbrooke dmb.leaf-u...@ntlworld.com:
Hi,
I have a requirement for a RADIUS server on my network, for non-PSK WPA2
using PEAP/EAP-MSCHAPv2. This is not supported by the Cistron v1.6.8
RADIUS server in the existing
Hi David,
better 2 votes than none ;) Since there are several useful backends
for freeradius2 like mysql or ldap it makes things not easier to
implement.
I would appreciate to see freeradius2 available in Bering ! At my
point of view, there is no hurry.
I'm looking forward to test it.
JN
2011/4/2 davidMbrooke dmb.leaf-u...@ntlworld.com:
Hi,
I have a requirement for a RADIUS server on my network, for non-PSK WPA2
using PEAP/EAP-MSCHAPv2. This is not supported by the Cistron v1.6.8
RADIUS server in the existing Bering-uClibc 4.x radius.lrp. This Cistron
code is no longer being
Hi,
I have a requirement for a RADIUS server on my network, for non-PSK WPA2
using PEAP/EAP-MSCHAPv2. This is not supported by the Cistron v1.6.8
RADIUS server in the existing Bering-uClibc 4.x radius.lrp. This Cistron
code is no longer being developed and the website at
Hi KP
Am 10.02.2011 00:44, schrieb KP Kirchdoerfer:
Am Mittwoch, 9. Februar 2011, um 18:13:11 schrieb Michal Kepien:
Greetings,
I'm trying to get Openswan running on a test Bering-uClibc 4.0 beta 2
installation. Unfortunately, the init scripts for IPSec rely heavily on
ifconfig, which is
Greetings,
I'm trying to get Openswan running on a test Bering-uClibc 4.0 beta 2
installation. Unfortunately, the init scripts for IPSec rely heavily on
ifconfig, which is not included in the system by default. I've been
searching both for a Bering-uClibc package containing ifconfig and for a
Am Mittwoch, 9. Februar 2011, um 18:13:11 schrieb Michal Kepien:
Greetings,
I'm trying to get Openswan running on a test Bering-uClibc 4.0 beta 2
installation. Unfortunately, the init scripts for IPSec rely heavily on
ifconfig, which is not included in the system by default. I've been
Hello all,
Good day!
I'm quite new in linux and in LEAF.
What I'm trying to do is install the bering uclibc 4.0 to a
harddisk. And truthfully I'm a little lost..
This is what I was able to do as of now..
-run the iso in a cd rom..
The problem is I don't know how to transfer the files to the HD
19.01.2011 19:10, kenneth joachim llanto пишет:
Hello all,
Good day!
I'm quite new in linux and in LEAF.
What I'm trying to do is install the bering uclibc 4.0 to a
harddisk. And truthfully I'm a little lost..
This is what I was able to do as of now..
-run the iso in a cd rom..
The
I think I've got to the bottom of the problem and found a solution.
The dnsmasq code uses a similar approach to handling IPv4 / IPv6
wildcard addresses. In dnsmasq-2.49/src/config.h there's a specific
block of code which sets the IPV6_V6ONLY macro for uClibc platforms
because this is not set as
Hi,
I recently enabled IPv6 support on my firewall (Bering-uClibc
3.1.1-beta3) and mostly it's working fine. There is however a problem
with the ntp daemon from package ntpd.lrp (version 4.2.4p3 Rev 1). I
have been using classic ntpd in preference to openntpd because I have
had problems with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Harrison wrote:
I've run my firewall with this software for several years. Recently
changed ISP and in the confusion something went wrong that I can't
figure out. The firewall is supposed to send web browser requests and
ssh requests to a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Harrison wrote:
Thanks for the quick reply but I'm not sure I understand. Here is the
Shorewall rules file:
#
# Shorewall version 2.0 - Rules File
# /etc/shorewall/rules
# Accept all http and ssh connections to anneMC
DNAT net
Hi
Robert Harrison wrote:
I've run my firewall with this software for several years. Recently
changed ISP and in the confusion something went wrong that I can't
figure out. The firewall is supposed to send web browser requests and
ssh requests to a computer on the local net. The Apache
davidMbrooke wrote:
there are some
other core i2c modules that come from source package i2c, (for example
i2c-dev, i2c-proc). Those are missing.
I found that the i2c-core.o and i2c-proc.o files from the BuC3.1.1b1
release worked on my BuC3.1.1b3 setup.
scott
KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
Am Samstag, 6. Juni 2009 16:45:17 schrieb davidMbrooke:
there are some
other core i2c modules that come from source package i2c, (for example
i2c-dev, i2c-proc). Those are missing.
Thx for reporting;
corrected both issues for the next version.
kp
As a sanity
Am Samstag, 6. Juni 2009 16:45:17 schrieb davidMbrooke:
Hi,
I finally got chance to upgrade to Bering-uClibc 3.1.1-beta3. Hit one
minor problem - while many of the i2c modules are now in modules.tgz
within the ISO image (fixed from beta2) there are still some missing.
The ones from source
Hi,
I finally got chance to upgrade to Bering-uClibc 3.1.1-beta3. Hit one
minor problem - while many of the i2c modules are now in modules.tgz
within the ISO image (fixed from beta2) there are still some missing.
The ones from source package lmsensors are there, but there are some
other core i2c
Am Mittwoch, 25. Februar 2009 22:09:00 schrieb davidMbrooke:
Hi,
I've just been installing Bering-uClibc 3.1.1-beta2. It mostly works
fine but I've noticed a couple of issues:
1. There is no file modules.tgz in the -iso.bin image. Utilities
like /usr/sbin/build-modules rely on the presence
Hi,
I've just been installing Bering-uClibc 3.1.1-beta2. It mostly works
fine but I've noticed a couple of issues:
1. There is no file modules.tgz in the -iso.bin image. Utilities
like /usr/sbin/build-modules rely on the presence of this file. A
workaround is to copy
Ken Gentle wrote:
I'm sorry if this ends up duplicated on the list - I posted it
yesterday and haven't seen it show up.
...
(http://www.lowth.com/cutter/)
Does anyone have a binary or LEAF/Bering uClibc package for this small
program?
I had a quick look into cutter, compilation was not
I'm sorry if this ends up duplicated on the list - I posted it
yesterday and haven't seen it show up.
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 13:21, Ken Gentle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
Thanks again to everyone who makes Bering uClibc such a great package!
I'm running Bering uClibc 3.1.1-beta1 (kernel
Hello!
Thanks again to everyone who makes Bering uClibc such a great package!
I'm running Bering uClibc 3.1.1-beta1 (kernel 2.4.34)
I'm looking for a way to drop established connections and came across
the following thread in the Shorewall group (comp.security.shorewall)
Hello,
I am trying to connect an actiontec gt701 with usb connection (the ethernet
connection is bad on the DSL modem) to my Bering uClibc firewall
(3.1.1-beta1, 2.4.34 kernel version). I have successfully configured it on
another system running Linux kernel 2.4.31 (Slackware 10.2) using the
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 07:15:22AM +, Erich Titl wrote:
Eric
eehouse.org wrote:
I just installed beta-2. dhcpcd is not working to connect to my cable
modem.
Didn't somebody else have this problem within the past few days? For
some reason messages from the new year (2008)
eehouse.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 07:15:22AM +, Erich Titl wrote:
Eric
eehouse.org wrote:
I just installed beta-2. dhcpcd is not working to connect to my cable
modem.
Didn't somebody else have this problem within the past few days? For
some reason messages from the new
I posted this earlier last year, but never got any responses. I'd still
like to get Leaf running on an old laptop, so I don't have the desktop
Leaf roaring away under the desk!
I'm trying to get a laptop running with 3.1-beta1. I've got a couple of
Xircom pcmcia cards in it. The cards get
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 16:35 +, Jim Ford wrote:
I posted this earlier last year, but never got any responses. I'd still
like to get Leaf running on an old laptop, so I don't have the desktop
Leaf roaring away under the desk!
I'm trying to get a laptop running with 3.1-beta1. I've got a
On Monday 07 January 2008 01:34:31 eehouse.org wrote:
I just installed beta-2. dhcpcd is not working to connect to my cable
modem.
Didn't somebody else have this problem within the past few days? For
some reason messages from the new year (2008) aren't in the archive
yet so I can't check.
I just installed beta-2. dhcpcd is not working to connect to my cable
modem.
Didn't somebody else have this problem within the past few days? For
some reason messages from the new year (2008) aren't in the archive
yet so I can't check. Nor can I find any release notes for b2. In
fact, I can't
Eric
eehouse.org wrote:
I just installed beta-2. dhcpcd is not working to connect to my cable
modem.
Didn't somebody else have this problem within the past few days? For
some reason messages from the new year (2008) aren't in the archive
yet so I can't check. Nor can I find any release
@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Bering uClibc AS a http load balancer
Hi Ad,
I think you need some sort of loadbalancing software on the router,
something like balancer (http://www.inlab.de/balance.html) or anything
simular. Balancer only has a command-line interface and no config
Hi guys,
I'm running 3.0.2 Bering with the appropriate e1000.o module.
How do I set this module so eth0 is set to full duplex auto negotiation off
on boot?
Cheers
Ad
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still
Hi Ad,
I think you need some sort of loadbalancing software on the router,
something like balancer (http://www.inlab.de/balance.html) or anything
simular. Balancer only has a command-line interface and no config file, so
better options may exist. An other option which might work is using DNS
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Spakman
Sent: Tuesday, 14 August 2007 6:05 PM
To: Adam Niedzwiedzki
Cc: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Bering uClibc AS a http load balancer
Hi Ad,
I think you need some sort of loadbalancing software on the router,
something like balancer (http
Hi guys,
Has anyone setup a bering uClibc box AS a load balancer, I can find a bunch
of info on load balancing THE router/firewall, but nothing on actually have
a bering machine AS the load balancer for a bunch of web servers behind it.
Can anyone give me some advice on what I need (modules
I'm trying to get a laptop running with 3.1-beta1. I've got a couple of
Xircom pcmcia cards in it. The cards get configured OK and get allocated
to eth0 and eth1, but I can't seem to get a route to the outside world -
eth0 doesn't aquire an address from my ISP. Also, eth1 doesn't get
del 192.168.52.0/24 via 172.22.255.231
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Corey
Betka
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 7:29 PM
To: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Bering uClibc - Adding static routes to local
Hi All,
I am configuring the Bering uClibc3.0.1 firewall for the first time and
can't figure out where I should add definitions for the static routes on
my internal network. If I manually add the routes and then restart
shorewall then the routed subnets are added to the local zone and
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Dillabough, Dave wrote:
Is there any documentation for more complex Bering configurations?
Bering essentially uses Debian style network configs, so the docs from
them are quite helpful:
http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ch-gateway.en.html
For example:
iface
Hi,
where can i find all the patch applied to the Bering-uClibc 3.0.1 ?
Is grsecurity patch is applied ? If not, where i can find a VERY secure
kernel with grsec patch ?
Regards
Franck
--
http://www.linuxpourtous.com
-
Eric Faden wrote:
Found it. hosts.allow.
-Eric
Wow.
I went thorough the same painful discovery of hosts.allow as did Eric
(for me it was p9100). At the time I posted about this issue and made
some suggestions but nothing was agreed upon between all we various
opinions :) Perhaps
Actually, if I remember correctly, the tcp wrapper library can check
a directory in etc as well, so a package like p9100
could create an /etc/hosts.allow.d/p9100 file (don't recall the exact
path).
Frankly, though, tcpwrappers is really obsolete and redundant. I
realize that some folks
Does anyone have some instructions for setting this up? I found a bunch
of sets of instructions online, but nothing that actually worked and
wasn't very outdated. I have tried a bunch of things, but nothing has
worked yet. The PPTPD is up and running as far as I can tell, but I
can't seem
Eric Faden wrote:
Does anyone have some instructions for setting this up? I found a bunch
of sets of instructions online, but nothing that actually worked and
wasn't very outdated.
The documentation at http://www1.shorewall.net/PPTP.htm that deals with
Shorewall configuration is not
Tom Eastep wrote:
Eric Faden wrote:
Does anyone have some instructions for setting this up? I found a bunch
of sets of instructions online, but nothing that actually worked and
wasn't very outdated.
The documentation at http://www1.shorewall.net/PPTP.htm that deals with
Eric Faden wrote:
Tom Eastep wrote:
Eric Faden wrote:
Does anyone have some instructions for setting this up? I found a bunch
of sets of instructions online, but nothing that actually worked and
wasn't very outdated.
The documentation at http://www1.shorewall.net/PPTP.htm that
Eric Faden wrote:
Shorewall Starts up just fine. Status file is attached. Source (vpn
client) 69.139.145.190 is and target (leaf box) is 69.143.12.174.
And did you attempt to connect from the client to the server during the
43 seconds covered by this dump?
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep\
Tom Eastep wrote:
Eric Faden wrote:
Shorewall Starts up just fine. Status file is attached. Source (vpn
client) 69.139.145.190 is and target (leaf box) is 69.143.12.174.
And did you attempt to connect from the client to the server during the
43 seconds covered by
Tom Eastep wrote:
Eric Faden wrote:
Shorewall Starts up just fine. Status file is attached. Source (vpn
client) 69.139.145.190 is and target (leaf box) is 69.143.12.174.
And did you attempt to connect from the client to the server during the
43 seconds covered by
Eric Faden wrote:
Tom Eastep wrote:
Eric Faden wrote:
Shorewall Starts up just fine. Status file is attached. Source (vpn
client) 69.139.145.190 is and target (leaf box) is 69.143.12.174.
And did you attempt to connect from the client to the server during the
43
Tom Eastep wrote:
Eric Faden wrote:
Tom Eastep wrote:
Eric Faden wrote:
Shorewall Starts up just fine. Status file is attached. Source (vpn
client) 69.139.145.190 is and target (leaf box) is 69.143.12.174.
And did you attempt to
Hi Kwon,
Hi,
Trying to load daemontl.lrp with tinydns.lrp, under the lrcfg menu Edit
daemon svscan start/stop script, file /etc/init.d/svscan is a binary
file? I have compared the daemontl.lrp on the
Bering-uClibc_3.0_iso_bering-uclibc-iso.bin and the daemontl.lrp from the
Leaf website
This is not a new daemontl.lrp package, but because the name of the init.d
script and a program are the same (svscan) that file was mistakenly put in
the init.d directory. The package is fixed now and an updated version of
it can be found in CVS:
Hi Kwon,
This is not a new daemontl.lrp package, but because the name of the
init.d script and a program are the same (svscan) that file was
mistakenly put in the init.d directory. The package is fixed now and an
updated version of it can be found in CVS:
http://leaf.cvs.sourceforge.net/leaf/bin/packages/uclibc-0.9/28/
Hi, Eric,
I am getting a 404 HTTP (file not found) error with the above link and the
following error messages:
An Exception Has Occurred
The root leaf is unknown. If you believe the value is correct, then
please double-check
Heh, I spent some time messing with 1680 floppies in a DOS/Windows
environment. What I observed was that 1680 size isn't recognized
properly in pure DOS and/or XP, so it was in my case a very unfriendly
format.
Given how much simpler one's life is with 1440 size disks (including,
one
Fellow Bering-users,
in case you will never use a floppy based Bering
system, please stop reading now in order not to waste
your time. Possibly, you could record for future use
that a maniac wrote something and you will be able to
find it in the list archive, should need arise. The
end
in case you will never use a floppy based Bering
system, please stop reading now in order not to waste
your time.
Up till Bering-uClibc 2.3x, I was still using a single /dev/fd0u1680! With the
arrival of 3.x, a single floppy is less useful and instead, I am using a CD Rom
and one single
The Bering-uClibc team releases the third beta version of the upcoming
Bering-uClibc 3.0.
See
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/bering-uclibc/index.php?module=announceANN_user_op=viewANN_id=37
I just upgraded from b2 to b3 and it seems too easy. Is this really
all there is to it?
(On a WRAP
Hi Eric,
I just upgraded from b2 to b3 and it seems too easy. Is this really
all there is to it?
Yes, could be even easier, see below ;)
(On a WRAP board with CF card for storage)
* Mount .bin on loop device, copy contents to CF card
* Modify initrd.lrp, adding ide-related modules
You can
I just upgraded from b2 to b3 and it seems too easy. Is this really
all there is to it?
Yes, could be even easier, see below ;)
* Modify initrd.lrp, adding ide-related modules
You can also download the initrd_ide.lrp package, rename it to initrd.
lrp and use that one. Instead of
The Bering-uClibc team releases the third beta version of the upcoming
Bering-uClibc 3.0.
See
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/bering-uclibc/index.php?module=announceANN_user_op=viewANN_id=37
thx kp
(note: the usb image may be available one day or two later)
Hi Bob,
So far BU3.0 is good on the WRAP box. To get it up I extracted the 3.0
floppy image and copied everything to a dos formatted (and syslinuxed) CF
card with a windoze box. Then I replaced the initrd.lrp with
initrd_ide.lrp from the CD iso. Other steps included editing syslinux.cfg
to
In B.U. 3.0 beta is only included de.map without german umlauts. The
correct de-latin1.map with german umlauts is missing.
Regards
M. Koelle
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get
I've been testing configuring BU2.x on a WRAP box for a couple of weeks
and decided to start fresh with BU3.0. After a day of struggling I'm
runningagain. The new backup works fine from a shell, but webconf Backup
Packages is broken. That link now generates:
bin/sh: /tmp/7e6c44ee011a.vars: 18:
Hi Bob,
I've been testing configuring BU2.x on a WRAP box for a couple of weeks
and decided to start fresh with BU3.0. After a day of struggling I'm
runningagain. The new backup works fine from a shell, but webconf Backup
Packages is broken. That link now generates:
bin/sh:
-Original Message-
From: Eric Spakman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Bob,
I've been testing configuring BU2.x on a WRAP box for a couple of weeks
and decided to start fresh with BU3.0. After a day of struggling I'm
runningagain. The new backup works fine from a shell, but webconf
I've been using Dachstein on the system described in the attachment for 4
years. Kudos are due to all the participating developers in the LEAF effort! I
am attempting to get Bering uClibc running from a floppy on this system with an
eye to eventually upgrading the hardware and using a CD or
Hi Michael,
I think you missed this step:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/doc/bk02ch13s05.html
dhcpd gets upstream DNS servers while connecting to your ISP and stores
them in /etc/dhcpc/resolv.conf.
Edit /etc/dnsmasq.conf file and point to the /etc/dhcpc/resolv.conf file.
# Change this line if you
Eric,
Thanks. That did the trick. LEAF's superb support team comes through once
again!
Mike
- Original Message -
From: Eric Spakman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: michael hall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2006 11:54 AM
Subject: Re: [leaf-user
Hello,
I would like to know if using multiISP feature (
http://www.shorewall.net/MultiISP.html ) is possible with Bering, due
to fact that it is still using 2.4 kernel?
I would especially like to hear from people who have such setup running.
I am planning on installing bering-uclibc on soekris
Try and mount them as
mount -t msdos /dev/hda1 /mnt or something like that.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of wing newton
Sent: Tuesday, 4 April 2006 12:29 PM
To: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [leaf-user] Bering-uClibc-2.4
PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
You have to include and load the ext2 kernel module
to mount an ext2 fs.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: wing newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: 4-4-06 4:28
Subject: [leaf-user] Bering-uClibc-2.4 mount problem
@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: 4-4-06 4:28
Subject: [leaf-user] Bering-uClibc-2.4 mount problem
Greetings,
I installed initrd_ide.lrp and dmesg showed that
hda1
and hda2 were detected.
However, when I tried to mount -t ext2 /dev/hda1
/mnt
, it returns No such device.
I also tried hdsupp.lrp. fdisk
Hi;
Am Dienstag, 4. April 2006 18:05 schrieb wing newton:
Eric,
Which kernel module ? I am using initrd_ide.lrp.
Does initrd_ide.lrp include all the necessary modules
?
Not for ext2.
just do lsmod and you'll see there is no ext2 module loaded.
If it's enough to load /dev/hda1 after boot,
/hda1
--- Eric Spakman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
You have to include and load the ext2 kernel module
to mount an ext2 fs.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: wing newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: 4-4-06 4:28
Subject: [leaf-user] Bering-uClibc
Hello,
You have to include and load the ext2 kernel module to mount an ext2 fs.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: wing newton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: 4-4-06 4:28
Subject: [leaf-user] Bering-uClibc-2.4 mount problem
Greetings,
I installed initrd_ide.lrp
I have just purchased a Wrap PCEngines board and have
Bering-uClibc 2.3.1 running on it. However, the natsemi.o
network driver doesn't always work in a VLAN config.
I can work around the problem for outgoing connections
using the CLAMPMSS=1456 setting in shorewall, but
incoming connections to my
]
Sent: 2/16/06 11:17:55 PM
To: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.netleaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [leaf-user] Bering-uClibc 2.3.1 natsemi.o VLAN Problems on Wrap
I have just purchased a Wrap PCEngines board and have
Bering-uClibc 2.3.1 running on it. However, the natsemi.o
network driver doesn't
Hi,
I've downloaded Bering-uClibc 2.3 for use in a lab and gotten the basics
configured (took me a while to remember everything, but this is still
just as cool as ever :).
Anyway, there seems to be no dhcrelay package for this distribution, and
I need one. I've found a dhcrelay for glibc
Hello Jack,
Look at the packages page for Bering-uClibc, there is a dhcp-relay package ;)
Eric
-Original Message-
From: Jack Coates[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 1/24/06 10:42:56 PM
To: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.netleaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [leaf-user] bering uclibc package
Eric Spakman wrote:
Hello Jack,
Look at the packages page for Bering-uClibc, there is a dhcp-relay package ;)
Eric
didn't find that one, but I did go look harder and found dhcphlpr, which
is working perfectly. thanks!
--
Jack at Monkeynoodle dot Org: It's a Scientific Venture...
Riding
Hello,
The current documentation details installiung Bering on Diskonchip. Can
this apply also to Bering-uclibc?
The second question, does the current version's (Bering uclibc 2.3)
modules.lrp support 3com's 3c905 PCI adapters?
Thanks.
Sherif bahaa
Sherif,
Hello,
The current documentation details installiung Bering on Diskonchip. Can
this apply also to Bering-uclibc?
Yes, but there may be a few small differences. For example, the fdisk
package is called hdsupp now and you may have to check the module
dependency in the kernel modules
Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eric Spakman wrote:
| Hello Jim,
|
On your windows box, try the following at a prompt:
Or, if you really want your windows box to get a consistent IP, just
add a
stanza for it in the dhcpd config file:
~host
Does anyone have a failsafe system of updating existing packages on
their Bering boxes with new lrp files without doing a wholesale system
update?
Thanks.
Godfried
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log
1 - 100 of 329 matches
Mail list logo
