Re: Moving ledger-mode out of the main ledger repository

> thierry writes: > I do not know what went wrong, but I am unable to browse the history of the > *content* of the commits of ledger-mode.texi. Either via github, or via > magit, I can see the *header* (date, commit message) of the commit, but I am > unable to browse the

Re: Moving ledger-mode out of the main ledger repository

Hi John and all, One year that I have not posted here, very busy at work, and girlfriend has come in life... I do not know what went wrong, but I am unable to browse the history of the *content* of the commits of ledger-mode.texi. Either via github, or via magit, I can see the *header* (date,

Re: Moving ledger-mode out of the main ledger repository

> "A" == Alexis writes: A> can you include the doc/ledger-mode.texi file in the ledger-mode repo A> also? I think it makes sense to move the documentation to the sources. Done, complete with the history for that file along the second merge parent. -- John Wiegley

Re: Moving ledger-mode out of the main ledger repository

Hi John, can you include the doc/ledger-mode.texi file in the ledger-mode repo also? I think it makes sense to move the documentation to the sources. Cheers Alexis -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ledger" group. To unsubscribe from this

Re: Moving ledger-mode out of the main ledger repository

I agree. I will work this this weekend. On Thursday, August 4, 2016, Simon Michael wrote: > This is great. It will be clearer what's happening in each project. It's > also nice that ledger-mode's commit history was preserved. > > Craig, how about moving ledger-mode issue

Re: Moving ledger-mode out of the main ledger repository

Submitting a quick PR to MELPA here: https://github.com/melpa/melpa/pull/4099, unless @purcell is watching this mailing list? On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 12:10 PM Simon Michael wrote: > This is great. It will be clearer what's happening in each project. It's > also nice that

Re: Moving ledger-mode out of the main ledger repository

This is great. It will be clearer what's happening in each project. It's also nice that ledger-mode's commit history was preserved. Craig, how about moving ledger-mode issue tracking to github ? This seems like a great time. -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: Moving ledger-mode out of the main ledger repository

I would suggest just using semver, treating a bump of the required Ledger version as a breaking change and noting the minimum required Ledger version in the release notes. I'm saying this with no knowledge of whether Ledger likes semver or has a problem with unsynchronized version numbers/large

Re: Moving ledger-mode out of the main ledger repository

"John Wiegley" writes: > > "BF" == Ben Finney writes: > > BF> Are you de-coupling the release cycles, or will ‘ledger’ and > BF> ‘ledger-mode’ still track the same version and release at the same > BF> time? How will that be

Re: Moving ledger-mode out of the main ledger repository

> "CE" == Craig Earls writes: CE> Works for me. As far as synchronizing releases there isnt much necessary. CE> Unless the interface changes ledger-mode is happy with 3.x version. Ok, we now have a new repository under the Ledger organization:

Moving ledger-mode out of the main ledger repository

Works for me. As far as synchronizing releases there isnt much necessary. Unless the interface changes ledger node is happy with 3.x version. On Tuesday, August 2, 2016, Ben Finney > wrote:

Re: Moving ledger-mode out of the main ledger repository

Works for me. As far as synchronizing releases there isnt much necessary. Unless the interface changes ledger-mode is happy with 3.x version. On Tuesday, August 2, 2016, Ben Finney wrote: > "John Wiegley" > > writes: > > >

Re: Moving ledger-mode out of the main ledger repository

> "BF" == Ben Finney writes: BF> Are you de-coupling the release cycles, or will ‘ledger’ and BF> ‘ledger-mode’ still track the same version and release at the same time? BF> How will that be managed? They don't need to be exactly synced, unless there is

Re: Moving ledger-mode out of the main ledger repository

"John Wiegley" writes: > Just wanted to let you know that I'll be splitting ledger-mode and the > Emacs code into its own repository within the ledger organization on > GitHub soon. Are you de-coupling the release cycles, or will ‘ledger’ and ‘ledger-mode’ still track the

Re: Moving ledger-mode out of the main ledger repository

Much in favor of this :) -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ledger" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ledger-cli+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit

Re: Moving ledger-mode out of the main ledger repository

1+ agree ! It makes sense! Sent from my iPhone > On 2 de ago de 2016, at 19:03, Jacob MacDonald wrote: > > Big fan of the change! I'll be on the lookout for it as I pull it myself > instead of using MELPA. > >> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:21 PM John Wiegley

Re: Moving ledger-mode out of the main ledger repository

Big fan of the change! I'll be on the lookout for it as I pull it myself instead of using MELPA. On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:21 PM John Wiegley wrote: > Hi guys, > > Just wanted to let you know that I'll be splitting ledger-mode and the > Emacs > code into its own repository

Moving ledger-mode out of the main ledger repository

Hi guys, Just wanted to let you know that I'll be splitting ledger-mode and the Emacs code into its own repository within the ledger organization on GitHub soon. If anyone has any concerns or issues, please let me know. The initial goal is to reduce Travis activity due to frequent changes in