Re: Moving ledger-mode out of the main ledger repository

2016-09-22 Thread John Wiegley
> thierry writes: > I do not know what went wrong, but I am unable to browse the history of the > *content* of the commits of ledger-mode.texi. Either via github, or via > magit, I can see the *header* (date, commit message) of the commit, but I am > unable to browse the

Re: Moving ledger-mode out of the main ledger repository

2016-09-21 Thread thierry
Hi John and all, One year that I have not posted here, very busy at work, and girlfriend has come in life... I do not know what went wrong, but I am unable to browse the history of the *content* of the commits of ledger-mode.texi. Either via github, or via magit, I can see the *header* (date,

Re: Moving ledger-mode out of the main ledger repository

2016-08-04 Thread John Wiegley
> "A" == Alexis writes: A> can you include the doc/ledger-mode.texi file in the ledger-mode repo A> also? I think it makes sense to move the documentation to the sources. Done, complete with the history for that file along the second merge parent. -- John Wiegley

Re: Moving ledger-mode out of the main ledger repository

2016-08-04 Thread Alexis
Hi John, can you include the doc/ledger-mode.texi file in the ledger-mode repo also? I think it makes sense to move the documentation to the sources. Cheers Alexis -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ledger" group. To unsubscribe from this

Re: Moving ledger-mode out of the main ledger repository

2016-08-04 Thread Craig Earls
I agree. I will work this this weekend. On Thursday, August 4, 2016, Simon Michael wrote: > This is great. It will be clearer what's happening in each project. It's > also nice that ledger-mode's commit history was preserved. > > Craig, how about moving ledger-mode issue

Re: Moving ledger-mode out of the main ledger repository

2016-08-04 Thread Jacob MacDonald
Submitting a quick PR to MELPA here: https://github.com/melpa/melpa/pull/4099, unless @purcell is watching this mailing list? On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 12:10 PM Simon Michael wrote: > This is great. It will be clearer what's happening in each project. It's > also nice that

Re: Moving ledger-mode out of the main ledger repository

2016-08-04 Thread Simon Michael
This is great. It will be clearer what's happening in each project. It's also nice that ledger-mode's commit history was preserved. Craig, how about moving ledger-mode issue tracking to github ? This seems like a great time. -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to

Re: Moving ledger-mode out of the main ledger repository

2016-08-02 Thread Jacob MacDonald
I would suggest just using semver, treating a bump of the required Ledger version as a breaking change and noting the minimum required Ledger version in the release notes. I'm saying this with no knowledge of whether Ledger likes semver or has a problem with unsynchronized version numbers/large

Re: Moving ledger-mode out of the main ledger repository

2016-08-02 Thread Ben Finney
"John Wiegley" writes: > > "BF" == Ben Finney writes: > > BF> Are you de-coupling the release cycles, or will ‘ledger’ and > BF> ‘ledger-mode’ still track the same version and release at the same > BF> time? How will that be

Re: Moving ledger-mode out of the main ledger repository

2016-08-02 Thread John Wiegley
> "CE" == Craig Earls writes: CE> Works for me. As far as synchronizing releases there isnt much necessary. CE> Unless the interface changes ledger-mode is happy with 3.x version. Ok, we now have a new repository under the Ledger organization:

Re: Moving ledger-mode out of the main ledger repository

2016-08-02 Thread Craig Earls
Works for me. As far as synchronizing releases there isnt much necessary. Unless the interface changes ledger-mode is happy with 3.x version. On Tuesday, August 2, 2016, Ben Finney wrote: > "John Wiegley" > > writes: > > >

Re: Moving ledger-mode out of the main ledger repository

2016-08-02 Thread John Wiegley
> "BF" == Ben Finney writes: BF> Are you de-coupling the release cycles, or will ‘ledger’ and BF> ‘ledger-mode’ still track the same version and release at the same time? BF> How will that be managed? They don't need to be exactly synced, unless there is

Re: Moving ledger-mode out of the main ledger repository

2016-08-02 Thread Ben Finney
"John Wiegley" writes: > Just wanted to let you know that I'll be splitting ledger-mode and the > Emacs code into its own repository within the ledger organization on > GitHub soon. Are you de-coupling the release cycles, or will ‘ledger’ and ‘ledger-mode’ still track the

Re: Moving ledger-mode out of the main ledger repository

2016-08-02 Thread Alexis
Much in favor of this :) -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ledger" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ledger-cli+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit

Re: Moving ledger-mode out of the main ledger repository

2016-08-02 Thread Alexandre Rademaker
1+ agree ! It makes sense! Sent from my iPhone > On 2 de ago de 2016, at 19:03, Jacob MacDonald wrote: > > Big fan of the change! I'll be on the lookout for it as I pull it myself > instead of using MELPA. > >> On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:21 PM John Wiegley

Re: Moving ledger-mode out of the main ledger repository

2016-08-02 Thread Jacob MacDonald
Big fan of the change! I'll be on the lookout for it as I pull it myself instead of using MELPA. On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:21 PM John Wiegley wrote: > Hi guys, > > Just wanted to let you know that I'll be splitting ledger-mode and the > Emacs > code into its own repository