According to
http://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons/lib/research/rp99/r
p99-111.pdf
life expectancy for a UK male has gone from about 70 to about
75 in between
1981 2011 - say 7,5% increase, I can't find the exact
figures at the moment but productivity per worker over the
same
What was the results of voting on Thursday?
Dr Michael Benjamin,
Community Psychiatrist
They tried to make us vote for AV, we said No, No, No.Yes vote at 32.1% and the
No vote at 67.9%. ... unless the FA disciplinary committee believes there
has been malpractice and awards the
Or, 26% of the electorate said no, 14% said yes and 60% couldn't be
bothered either way.
How's about a referendum on compulsory voting next time?
On 7 May 2011, at 08:25, Dave Sowden davesow...@hotmail.com wrote:
What was the results of voting on Thursday?
Dr Michael Benjamin,
Were there Local Elections too?
Michael
Dr Michael Benjamin,
Community Psychiatrist
---
myRay: On-line Self-Help CBT
http://www.myRay.com
--
Mental Health:
http//www.MyDoctorExplains.com
Auditing || Quality
!
-Original Message-
From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On
Behalf Of Jim Moran
Sent: 07 May 2011 08:29
To: Dave Sowden
Cc: LEEDS List
Subject: Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?
Or, 26% of the electorate said no, 14% said yes and 60% couldn't be bothered
either way
...@blueyonder.co.uk
Sender: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org
Date: Sat, 7 May 2011 09:09:29
To: 'Jim Moran'j...@jimmoran.co.uk; 'Dave Sowden'davesow...@hotmail.com
Cc: 'LEEDS List'leedslist@gn.apc.org
Subject: Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?
I find compulsory voting an affront to freedom of speech. Or the freedom
...@jimmoran.co.uk;
DaveSowdendavesow...@hotmail.com; LEEDS Listleedslist@gn.apc.org
Subject: Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?
There can never ever be a bar to voting no matter what the erstwhile 'good '
reason.
The minute you permit anyone to ' define' eligibility then along come someone
else with his
As I said, invest[ment] into productive enterprise - if you are a baker,
you probably won't be able to manually make bread anymore (in economically
significant quantities) once your in your 70s - if though you invest in a
bread making machine with some of your surplus during your productive years
According to
http://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons/lib/research/rp99/rp99-111.pdf
life expectancy for a UK male has gone from about 70 to about 75 in between
1981 2011 - say 7,5% increase, I can't find the exact figures at the
moment but productivity per worker over the same period has
Final Salary pensions are perfectly sustainable if they are
properly funded, and if the funding is invested into
productive enterprise (for want of a better word).
I have to say I couldn't agree less. Contributions make up a small part of
the final pot., it is the predictions of growth,
HEAR HEAR !
Damian Walsh wrote:
PS my first IS job in 1985 was reprogramming pension schemes to allow
premium holes and premium holidays so that the employers contributions
did not have to be paid.
Class Traitor.. :-)
___
Cool, so you are all for the coalition in their attempts to reduce the
structural deficit asap I take it?
Just curious like
-Original Message-
From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On
Behalf Of Ian Murray
Sent: 03 May 2011 22:52
To: Joe Skinner
Cc:
No because I don't think that the coalitions's plans are economically sound,
like. They are ideologically driven, like, and have stifled the recovery to the
extent that net growth in our economy over the last 6 months has been 0.0%.
Deficit reduction is one thing, slash and burn quite another.
And Labour's plan to reduce the deficit wouldn't be called slash and burn?
How different was their plan?
But anyway, your analogy about lancing the boil fits very well with the
structural deficit plans over 4, not 5 years. One could argue that Labours
idea to delay the slash and burn by 1 year
But anyway, your analogy about lancing the boil fits very
well with the structural deficit plans over 4, not 5 years.
SNIP
only difference was the timing of and depth of the initial cuts.
trouble is the major cuts aren't really major - despite the real pain that
will be caused to many
Since this long political thread has come round to the subject of The Cuts,
perhaps I could link it back to the original issue.
I understood that the good old generous Royals footed the bill for the
so-called wedding, and all the rest of us had to do was stump up the paltry 20
million quid for
Well the 'prancing around on horses' bit is pretty self explanatory as
they are called the Household Cavalry.
As for the RAF Jets, most of the planes were decommisioned ones. If we are
still being defended by Spitfires, Lancaster Bombers and Typhoons then we
are in the sh*t if someone attacks us
; leedslist@gn.apc.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2011 7:53 PM
Subject: Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?
Since this long political thread has come round to the subject of The
Cuts, perhaps I could link it back to the original issue.
I understood that the good old generous Royals footed the bill for the
so
As for the RAF Jets, most of the planes were decommisioned ones. If we
are
still being defended by Spitfires, Lancaster Bombers and Typhoons then we
are in the sh*t if someone attacks us ala 1941
We are still very much being defended by Typhoons!
It's what the RAF calls a
PLANE SPOTTER ALERT. PLANE SPOTTER ALERT. PLANE SPOTTER ALERT. ;-)
I only saw the flypast on the news, having spent the day building a bin
store and clearing out loads of rubbish.
As for the RAF Jets, most of the planes were decommisioned ones. If we
are
still being defended by Spitfires,
On 04/05/2011 11:50, Tim Leslie wrote:
PLANE SPOTTER ALERT. PLANE SPOTTER ALERT. PLANE SPOTTER ALERT. ;-)
I only saw the flypast on the news, having spent the day building a bin
store
Didn't work though did it? They still found him.
___
Leedslist
14:00
To: Mark Humphries
Cc: Robert Heath; Richard Naef; leedslist@gn.apc.org
Subject: Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?
Maybe we can use the cake and pop tax revenue to fill this deficit you seem
so concerned about?
Or no, we have to offset that against the net loss to the economy of
billions caused
@gn.apc.org
Subject: Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?
PLANE SPOTTER ALERT. PLANE SPOTTER ALERT. PLANE SPOTTER ALERT. ;-)
Ah, you need to get in touch with your inner anorak ;-)
___
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options:
http://mailman
-boun...@gn.apc.org
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 11:57:34
To: 'Robert Heath'rhe...@mis-munich.de; 'Richard
Naef'rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk; leedslist@gn.apc.org
Subject: Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?
Collecting the extra tax revenue from those idiot tourists (from UK and
overseas) who came into town
a shitter.
Indeed.
-Original Message-
From: Ian Murray. [mailto:ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com]
VSent: 04 May 2011 14:00
To: Mark Humphries
Cc: Robert Heath; Richard Naef; leedslist@gn.apc.org
Subject: Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?
Maybe we can use the cake and pop tax revenue to fill
I can see this is all upsetting you, so I will just say it
doesn't matter what the tories (or libdems) thought about the
deregulation of the financial services sector, Labour did the
deed, no one else. I also don't remember reading any other
chancellor in the developed world claiming
; Richard Naef; leedslist@gn.apc.org
Subject: Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?
We would have been in a much worse position under the Tories 1997-2008 since
they would have made vast improvements to healthcare, the schooling system,
ema, minimum wage etc etc etc
for adopting your pedantry, the Tories did not get in. They
had to form a coalition to form a government.
From: mark.humphr...@blueyonder.co.uk
To: ianjamesmur...@hotmail.com
CC: rhe...@mis-munich.de; rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk;
leedslist@gn.apc.org
Subject: RE: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?
Date
cuts and to trust their economic nouse, and some people believe him.
-Original Message-
From: leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On
Behalf Of Richard Naef
Sent: 04 May 2011 17:25
To: leedslist@gn.apc.org
Subject: Re: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?
eh? don't you
On 04/05/2011 14:23, Mark Humphries wrote:
Either way you look at it, it is
Blair/Brown/Darling to blame, not Cameron, not Clegg, not FPTP, not the
Queen and not Ken Bates.
And just how do you know it's not Ken Bates, Mark? Whio knows what shit
the old beardy bastard is dreaming up with his
...@hotmail.com]
Sent: 04 May 2011 17:40
To: mark.humphr...@blueyonder.co.uk
Cc: rhe...@mis-munich.de; rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk;
leedslist@gn.apc.org
Subject: RE: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?
Whereas obviously you're seeing all this through the retrospectoscope.
Hindsight makes prophets of us all
-computers.co.uk; leedslist@gn.apc.org
Subject: RE: [LU] [Non LU] Good omen?
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 17:55:47 +0100
The benefit of the retrospectoscope is that it’s based on cold hard facts, not
mystical powers. Like the assumption Major wouldn’t have invested in public
services with the economic boom just
Final Salary pensions are perfectly sustainable if they are properly funded,
and if the funding is invested into productive enterprise (for want of a
better word).
Today's problem with Final Salary Pensions is the funding. Public Service
pensions are unfunded with the govt making guarantees out
33 matches
Mail list logo
