Misner Passwaters Pelton Roberts
Roche Ryburn Short Singer Sullivan Weller Williams
From: Connie Sheets clshee...@yahoo.com
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Wed, August 17, 2011 4:14:50 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Facts
It is perfectly acceptable to use
smartphone
- Reply message -
From: Willard Ellis willardell...@gmail.com
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Facts
Date: Wed, Aug 24, 2011 8:27 am
Women weren't the only ones to fudge their ages. If I recall
correctly, Jack Benny never passed his 39th birthday. We may
Jones Klein Koyle Laswell McDonald Misner Passwaters Pelton Roberts Roche Ryburn
Short Singer Sullivan Weller Williams
From: Connie Sheets clshee...@yahoo.com
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Wed, August 17, 2011 4:14:50 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Facts
Paula, the age discrepancies I was talking about are for people who age 7 or so
years between censuses!
Sent from my Verizon Wireless Thunderbolt smartphone
- Reply message -
From: Paula Ryburn paula.ryb...@sbcglobal.net
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Facts
Date
@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Facts
Date: Mon, Aug 22, 2011 8:33 am
snip
To the OP: Sometimes the age on census is a year different just because of
the date the census was taken, at least I've found that to be the case with
some of my ancestors.
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http
of the English seem to be rather
like Easter – a moveable feast – so at the end of the day I doubt if it makes
much difference.
Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
From: Paula Ryburn
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 4:33 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Facts
Thanks, Connie
Message -
From: Sherry/Supportmailto:she...@legacyfamilytree.com
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.commailto:LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 8:48 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Facts
I've seen a lot of people age more or less than 10 years between
censuses
And then there are those of us women, who, once we reach age 70, reverse
count. We get a year younger every birthday.
Smiles, Yvonne
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
I've seen a lot of people age more or less than 10 years between
censuses. Sometimes the enumerator would get the information from a
neighbor or someone in the household who is taking a wild guess...
Or a woman who deliberately gets younger as the years pass, until they
get old enough that the
, 2011 4:33 PM
*To:* LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
mailto:LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
*Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG] Facts
Thanks, Connie, for all this detail. I run into this calculating the
best date based on multiple somewhat conflicting sources issue a lot
and appreciate your insights
Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
From: Paula Ryburn
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 4:33 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Facts
Thanks, Connie, for all this detail. I run into this calculating the best
date based on multiple somewhat conflicting sources issue a lot
you are looking for it may not mean the record does not exist.
Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
-Original Message-
From: Eliz Hanebury
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 9:57 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Facts
In the English census there is a Parish problem
Yes, very true, I tried some indexing and found it very hard; even
smudges on the typed information can make for errors. G but I will
take FreeBMD over the census G
Eliz
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Ron Ferguson
ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk wrote:
Eliz,
For interest only: I am currently
of the day I
doubt if it makes much difference.
Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
*From:* Paula Ryburn mailto:paula.ryb...@sbcglobal.net
*Sent:* Monday, August 22, 2011 4:33 PM
*To:* LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
mailto:LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
*Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG] Facts
Thanks
, August 22, 2011 10:06 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Facts
And then there are those of us women, who, once we reach age 70, reverse
count. We get a year younger every birthday.
Smiles, Yvonne
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21
Honestly, I don't think some of our ancestors cared too much what their
actual age was. They gave a not-so-rough estimate, which was good enough
for them and their purposes. I can dig it. :-) I do the same thing and it's
2011.
Jean
Legacy User Group guidelines:
I have a question on citing documentary sources that you know to be
incorrect, especially when you have a primary source to back up the event.
It seems as though census records are particularly prone to error. For
example, I have seen varying information on successive census records for
an
...@gmail.com werl...@gmail.com wrote:
From: werl...@gmail.com werl...@gmail.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Facts
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Date: Wednesday, August 17, 2011, 11:02 AM
I have a question on citing documentary sources that you know to be incorrect,
especially when you have
It is perfectly acceptable to use the best source for a fact. For example,
if I have an original marriage record, I cite that for the date and location of
a marriage, rather than a book of compiled marriage records. Or, if I've been
to a cemetery and saw a tombstone with my own eyes, I cite
I sometimes use the Notes for the individual to highlight any
discrepancies/uncertainties for which I don't have convincing evidence
(birth dates come to mind, as do name variants) and that are still a work
in progress.
As I understand what you are saying, you would cite the full census record
Yes, I would cite the census for the Residence event. I would cite a more
reliable document such as a passenger list for the Immigration event; and I
would make a Comment or Note that I believe the immigration info in the census
is wrong because [explain reason].
And yes, you're absolutely
@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Tue, February 22, 2011 9:45:39 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Facts, Events and Sources
Go to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Event
and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fact
And compare the two.
The word fact can refer to verified information about past or present
circumstances or events which
The recent discussion about whether an Obituary is an event or a source has
prompted me to ask Legacy (and probably the Group) for a better definition of
what constitutes an Event and what constitutes a Fact.
To me, a Fact is not time-based. You may uncover a Fact (eye-colour) in a
document that
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] Facts, Events and Sources
The recent discussion about whether an Obituary is an event or a source has
prompted me to ask Legacy (and probably the Group) for a better definition
of
what constitutes an Event and what constitutes a Fact.
To me, a Fact
Ron,
Must be our common background, that we agree on so much :-)
I'd question whether the Census had any effect on an ancestor. One or two of
mine (and the wife's) seem to have made it a point of honour, to make it as
difficult as possible, for their descendants to find traces of them. Sue
@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Facts, Events and Sources
Ron,
Must be our common background, that we agree on so much :-)
I'd question whether the Census had any effect on an ancestor. One or two of
mine (and the wife's) seem to have made it a point of honour, to make it as
difficult
Good summary Mike. Death is an event (having its own data area), a
funeral is an event, an award ceremony is an event, blue eyes are a
fact, a missing finger is a fact, all of these can be substantiated by
a source (certificate, newspaper article, medical statement, personal
knowledge, etc).
-Harris-Liikala-Jukkara
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 2:42 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Facts, Events and Sources
Good summary Mike. Death is an event (having its own data area), a
funeral is an event, an award ceremony is an event, blue eyes are a
fact, a missing
, it
was a water cooler conversation.
bgj
-Original Message-
From: William Boswell [mailto:whbosw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 8:39 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Facts, Events and Sources
An event, fact or anomaly? My great grandfather was counted
@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Facts, Events and Sources
An event, fact or anomaly? My great grandfather was counted in the 1930 census
only because his casket and body were lying in the parlor at the time. He was
a jokester and nicknamed Ha Ha dying on April Fool's Day no less. I
, February 22, 2011 6:42 AM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Facts, Events and Sources
Good summary Mike. Death is an event (having its own data area), a
funeral is an event, an award ceremony is an event, blue eyes are a
fact, a missing finger is a fact, all of these can
://www.fergys.co.uk/
-Original Message-
From: David C Abernathy
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 3:45 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Facts, Events and Sources
Go to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Event
and
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fact
And compare the two.
The word
@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Facts, Events and Sources
If you read the top of the 1900 census record, it states Include every person
living on June 1, 1900. So, I am sure it followed through on the other census
records. They also didn't include children that were born after June 1, 1900
33 matches
Mail list logo