RE: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames

for sharing info, you are right about that. Jerry Sent from my android device. -Original Message- From: Mark Lang markl...@adam.com.au To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Sent: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 11:35 PM Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames Howard, I usually

RE: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames

. of child 10. Use 33 years per generation from any known date. Howard Cady - Original Message - From: Jerry jerrysemailgro...@gmail.com To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2012 1:16 PM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames

Re: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames

can't test. kb - Original Message - From: David C Abernathyda...@schmeckabernathy.com To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 12:12:26 PM Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames I use what info I have about the couple, i.e

Re: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames

-Prot Antivirus == -Original Message- From: britton...@comcast.net [mailto:britton...@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 8:47 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames Thanks, Michele, Bob and Jan

RE: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames

with only assumed/acquired surnames Hi David. I like your use of the ? and I do something very similar. But would you mind giving me a couple examples of what you place in the LAST NAME field and what you place in the FIRST NAME FIELD, so I'm sure of what you are doing? Thanks, Jerry Boor

Re: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames

://www.SchmeckAbernathy.com == All outgoing and incoming mail is scanned by F-Prot Antivirus == -Original Message- From: Jerry [mailto:jerrysemailgro...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2012 10:10 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames Hi

Re: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames

known date. Howard Cady - Original Message - From: Jerry jerrysemailgro...@gmail.com To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2012 1:16 PM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames Thanks for those samples, David. What I could not quite

Re: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames

Thanks, Michele, Bob and Jan for thinking about this. My main concern is unanticipated side effects. Placeholders like Mr. or Firstwife work well for the original compiler, who has Legacy and external files, but wider distribution and less capable software must be anticipated. Legacy too

RE: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames

...@comcast.net [mailto:britton...@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 8:47 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames Thanks, Michele, Bob and Jan for thinking about this. My main concern is unanticipated side effects

Re: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames

@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames Thanks, Michele, Bob and Jan for thinking about this. My main concern is unanticipated side effects. Placeholders like Mr. or Firstwife work well for the original compiler, who has Legacy and external files, but wider

Re: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames

or Ancestry, which I can't test. kb - Original Message - From: David C Abernathy da...@schmeckabernathy.com To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 12:12:26 PM Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames I use what info I have about the couple

Re: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames

:36:04 PM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames kb, For your phantom people you could mark them as private and then when you export to a gedcom they won't transfer unless you include private data in the export. Russ Legacy User Group guidelines: http

[LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames

One of my lines has a Richard Pratt with a spouse Richord, per IGI and other sources. Her PCC Will gives the true tale. She describes herself as Richard Pratt, widow, and her daughters by surname, e.g. my daughter Osmond. A collateral Pratt line was then nationally famous, Lords Chief

RE: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames

explained in the notes. I think this is the best you can do for now. Michele -Original Message- From: britton...@comcast.net [mailto:britton...@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 11:09 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired

Re: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames

[mailto:britton...@comcast.net] Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2012 11:09 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames One of my lines has a Richard Pratt with a spouse Richord, per IGI and other sources. Her PCC Will gives the true tale. She

RE: [LegacyUG] Persons with only assumed/acquired surnames

Hmm! And I thought I had problematic families! Sorry, can't offer any advice though. Cheers Jan -Original Message- From: britton...@comcast.net [mailto:britton...@comcast.net] Sent: Thursday, 15 March 2012 02:09 To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Persons with only