My status.

2007-10-05 Thread Ag. D. Hatzimanikas
Hi all, I really don't know how to start and how to finish my email. For a long time I wanted to explain my current situation, but believe it or not, I didn't have neither these few minutes of my time. My/Our life had changed in a such a drastic way that I don't/won't have time in the near

Re: My status on the project

2007-01-12 Thread Randy McMurchy
Gerard Beekmans wrote these words on 07/09/06 20:14 CST: Jim Gifford wrote: Also, does anyone know what's happened to archaic?? I personally have no clue. I did notice that he no longer contributes to the project, however, he does log into the LFS server (quantum) approximately twice a week,

Re: My status at the project

2006-09-13 Thread M.Canales.es
El Miércoles, 13 de Septiembre de 2006 18:11, Alexander E. Patrakov escribió: I am sorry to say this, but it would be better if LFS goes on without me. I hope that at least you continue sending posts and comments. Your contributions are very appreciated. This also means that LFS should

Re: My status at the project

2006-09-13 Thread Nathan Coulson
So, I decided that I should not give any advice to the LFS project at all rather than questionable advice based on Debian and obsolete versions. Thanks for everything you have done for this project. -- Nathan Coulson (conathan) -- nathan at linuxfromscratch org conathan at gmail com --

Re: My status at the project

2006-09-13 Thread Peter Ennis
Alexander E. Patrakov patrakov at ums.usu.ru writes: I am sorry to say this, but it would be better if LFS goes on without me. The reasons are: Your work has been greatly appreciated. 1) I am a troll, because I actually don't use LFS as my primary desktop since 2005. Then that makes

Re: My status on the project

2006-07-15 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 12:21:17PM -0600, Matthew Burgess wrote: It's been a pleasure working with the community for so long. Thanks to everyone for making it such an enjoyable and rewarding experience. (just catching up, I've been without connectivity for 10 days) Matt, it was a

Re: My status on the project

2006-07-10 Thread M.Canales.es
El Sábado, 8 de Julio de 2006 20:21, Matthew Burgess escribió: As such, I think my continued involvement with the LFS project is actually hindering it more than it is helping. It is therefore with some regret I will be resigning from both the LFS-coordinators role and my editors position

Re: My status on the project

2006-07-09 Thread Gerard Beekmans
Matt, Like I said to you in my personal email to you when this first came up, you're always welcome back to the project when you think you can be involved again. Your help over the last 3.5 years has been invaluable and greatly appreciated and won't be forgotten. I hope all goes well with

Re: My status on the project

2006-07-09 Thread Gerard Beekmans
Jim Gifford wrote: Also, does anyone know what's happened to archaic?? I personally have no clue. -- Gerard Beekmans /* If Linux doesn't have the solution, you have the wrong problem */ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/

My status on the project

2006-07-08 Thread Matthew Burgess
Hi folks, As you will have already gathered by the lack of progress on the 6.2 release, I've not been committing much time to the LFS project over the last few months. While there are various reasons for this, they are all very personal, and I would prefer they remain that way. As such, I think

Re: My status on the project

2006-07-08 Thread Andrew Benton
Matthew Burgess wrote: As you will have already gathered by the lack of progress on the 6.2 release, I've not been committing much time to the LFS project over the last few months. While there are various reasons for this, they are all very personal, and I would prefer they remain that way. As

Re: My status on the project

2006-07-08 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 7/8/06, Matthew Burgess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As such, I think my continued involvement with the LFS project is actually hindering it more than it is helping. It is therefore with some regret I will be resigning from both the LFS-coordinators role and my editors position effective

Re: My status on the project

2006-07-08 Thread Jim Gifford
Matt, I personally will hate to see you leave. It looks like LFS has lost a lot of developers recently, you were the only piece holding things together during this transition time of LFS. I wish you well in your future endeavors. Also, does anyone know what's happened to archaic?? --

My status on the LFS project (long)

2005-12-10 Thread Anderson Lizardo
Hi guys, It's been a (very) long time since I don't post or do anything related to LFS. The reason is simple: I've been too busy with real life and the small free time I had I've spent on some other projects... I apologize if anyone here was expecting my presence on the last couple of months.

My status

2005-10-03 Thread Jeremy Huntwork
Hello All, You may have noticed recently that I have been 'back' to some degree. I have done some work on the LiveCD and yesterday Manuel roused my attention with jhalfs and I added some edits. As I mentioned in my emails before to this and other lists, I had fully intended to leave LFS

Re: My status

2005-10-03 Thread Shane Shields
Jeremy Huntwork wrote: Hello All, You may have noticed recently that I have been 'back' to some degree. I have done some work on the LiveCD and yesterday Manuel roused my attention with jhalfs and I added some edits. As I mentioned in my emails before to this and other lists, I had fully

Re: My status

2005-10-03 Thread Steve
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 06:50 -0400, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: Hello All, You may have noticed recently that I have been 'back' to some degree. I have done some work on the LiveCD and yesterday Manuel roused my attention with jhalfs and I added some edits. As I mentioned in my emails before

Re: My status

2005-10-03 Thread Petrus
As a result, this morning I see a malicious message in my Inbox from one of the team members here. It suggested that I created this notion of leaving LFS as a ruse to gain more recognition and ended with the comment that I 'need help'. Jeremy, I will admit that sort of thing was my main

Re: My status

2005-10-03 Thread Peter Danenberg
Richard Stallman *is* a Communist, despite his protestations to the contrary. I'll be your brief confederate in straying from our list's topicality, Petrus; you'll notice, however, that the Communist's appelation is unfashionable these days. Bolshevik, I think, would

Re: My status

2005-10-03 Thread Andrew Benton
Petrus wrote: Richard Stallman *is* a Communist, despite his protestations to the contrary. Who cares if he's Satan or the tooth fairy? You can discuss Animal Farm and whatever you like on LFS Chat http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/mail.html --

Re: My status

2005-10-03 Thread Justin R. Knierim
Jeremy Huntwork wrote: However, (and perhaps this demonstrates the degree to which I love this project and the work), I wasn't able to keep myself away. I am glad to have you back buddy. Just take it easy and don't over do! :) As a result, this morning I see a malicious message in my Inbox

Re: My status

2005-10-03 Thread silverspurg
Everyone has something which takes a large part of their life and occasionally hedges out other important things. If it's going to be LFS it's not such a bad way to go. The trick is to not get too stressed out when you notice other things falling behind. Steven -- --

Re: My status

2005-10-03 Thread Archaic
On Mon, Oct 03, 2005 at 12:22:03AM -0700, Justin R. Knierim wrote: I am glad to have you back buddy. Just take it easy and don't over do! :) Same here. Basically, there is one a**hole in every crowd. Don't let it get to ya. And I doubt that person has the balls to be a man long enough to

Re: My status

2005-10-03 Thread Jim Gifford
Jeremy Huntwork wrote: As a result, this morning I see a malicious message in my Inbox from one of the team members here. It suggested that I created this notion of leaving LFS as a ruse to gain more recognition and ended with the comment that I 'need help'. Whoever did this doesn't share

Re: My status

2005-10-03 Thread silverspurg
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Jim Gifford wrote: I think the person who wrote the email needs to grow up and get a life. So much hostility... :) I've found that the best way to deal with things like that is, if at all possible, to refuse to acknowledge that they exist. Never throw good posts after

Re: My status

2005-10-03 Thread John Kelly
On Mon, 03 Oct 2005 06:50:52 -0400, Jeremy Huntwork [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had fully intended to leave LFS ... I wasn't able to keep myself away. Sounds like an addiction. Manuel roused my attention with jhalfs Since we talked last, I improved my diy-linux scripts to do what I mentioned.

Re: My status

2005-10-03 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: Hello All, Hi Jeremy, I was pleased to see you back. I'm disappointed that not everyone viewed your useful contributions in the same way. Ken -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce --

RE: My status

2005-10-03 Thread Spinner
As a result, this morning I see a malicious message in my Inbox from one of the team members here. It suggested that I created this notion of leaving LFS as a ruse to gain more recognition and ended with the comment that I 'need help'. From what ive observed here; that seems like something

My status

2005-10-03 Thread sash
Welcome back, Jeremy!!! I'm very happy to see you back and was hoping you couldn't stay gone very long - much less forever ;) Jeremy Huntwork wrote: Hello All, You may have noticed recently that I have been 'back' to some degree. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev