provide a list of possibilities for HOSTTYPE now, and in the
book? I've had allot of segmentation errors on prior builds, and I think
it's related to hosttype.
Is there a 'gruesome' test for proper kernel configure testing?
Dave
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ
://carolina.mff.cuni.cz/~trmac/blog/mlocate/
I installed this package in my BLFS system with no errors, and it works
fine. After the first time updatedb is run, it really is much faster than
the original.
Dave
Or maybe it could just be made available in BLFS?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman
'
make[1]: *** [/usr/src/mozilla-release/xulrunner-build-dir/Makefile] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/mozilla-release'
make: *** [build] Error 2
Python-2.7.5 is installed. Neither Firefox nor Xulrunner shows a Python
dependency. Any help? Thanks.
Dave
I tried to post this yesterday
the problem occurs? Doesn't stop any function ability. Just bugs me.
Just reset the triplet and go on?
Dave
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
William Harrington wrote:
On Jul 22, 2013, at 11:51 AM, Dave wrote:
I haven't
gone on from here, but I've fought this item for around 3 yrs now.
Final build triplet always comes out as x64 unknown linux. Is this where
the problem occurs? Doesn't stop any function ability. Just bugs
OK, forget the keyboard thing. I just discovered that I managed to get a
couple of bogus lines into the inputrc file. Removing them fixed the
problem.
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Dave Wagler dw.rebe...@gmail.com wrote:
1. Missing letters on the keyboard:
After I did the first chroot type
I have a brand new LFS 7.3 system that boots with no errors that I know
about. When I ping any IP address outside the LAN I get a 'Destination Host
Unreachable' error. I have an ATT Uverse modem that connects me to the
internet. There is a TP-Link modem wired (ethernet) to the Uverse modem.
The
@Bruce, @Ken: Thanks for the replies. Swapping the IP and GATEWAY addresses
fixed the problem. And that's the final bug in my build. I'm now ready for
BLFS.
Dave
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Dave Wagler wrote:
From Mint 14:
$ ip route list
system, copied them
into LFS, and the error disappeared.
Just thought I'd let you know. I don't know that they can actually be
considered bugs. May just be my unique system.
Dave
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Dave Wagler wrote:
1. Missing letters on the keyboard:
After I did the first chroot type login during the build process, the
lower-case 'c' and the upper-case 'E' were not being recognized. Neither
typing nor
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Ken Moffat zarniwh...@ntlworld.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 02:17:02PM -0500, Dave Wagler wrote:
2. Missing Realtek ethernet controller firmware patches:
My system has a Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168B PCI Express
Gigabit Ethernet
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 7:42 PM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Dave Wagler wrote:
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com
wrote:
Dave Wagler wrote:
This warning occurs while configuring glibc-2.17:
*** These auxiliary programs are missing
@Pierre, thanks for the reply. I dumped the Korora 19 distro for LinuxMint
14, which has a gcc-4.7.2 compiler. It compiles fine, so I'm good.
Thanks again,
Dave
P.S.: Not sure if this is how to respond to your reply. If this response
should go elsewhere, please let me know.
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013
This warning occurs while configuring glibc-2.17:
*** These auxiliary programs are missing or incompatible versions:
autoconf
The configure command is:
$ ../glibc-2.17/configure \
--prefix=/tools \
--host=$LFS_TGT
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Dave Wagler wrote:
This warning occurs while configuring glibc-2.17:
*** These auxiliary programs are missing or incompatible versions:
autoconf
The configure command is:
$ ../glibc-2.17/configure
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Fernando de Oliveira fam...@yahoo.com.brwrote:
Em 09-07-2013 17:28, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
Dave Wagler wrote:
This warning occurs while configuring glibc-2.17:
*** These auxiliary programs are missing or incompatible versions:
autoconf
No other warning messages at all.
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 4:34 PM, William Harrington kb0...@berzerkula.orgwrote:
On Jul 9, 2013, at 3:15 PM, Dave Wagler wrote:
This warning occurs while configuring glibc-2.17:
*** These auxiliary programs are missing or incompatible
versions
This error occurs while compiling gcc-4.7.2:
../../../gcc-4.7.2/libgcc/libgcc2.c: In function '__multi3':
../../../gcc-4.7.2/libgcc/libgcc2.c:559:1: internal compiler error:
Segmentation fault
LFS book 7.3, chapter 5.5
Host: Korora 19 KDE amd64 (this installation is dedicated to this LFS
,
When was I supposed to inject my
own 'vendor- triplett'
Can it be changed after the build?
Dave
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
since BLFS access eludes me, because ATT seems to have a block on that
mail, I have to ask the question here.
I only have WiFi with WEP encryption here, can the WICD pkg and DHCP
alone handle this connect?
Dave
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http
Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers wrote:
On Tuesday 27 November 2012 11:09:33 Dave wrote:
I only have WiFi with WEP encryption here, can the WICD pkg and DHCP
alone handle this connect?
You will need some other packages, like wpa_supplicant, but the answer is yes.
It is late
messages ok now?
Why do messages to me come through twice?
one says lfs-support-bounce@
Dave
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Came up with error --
make[4]: Entering directory `/sources/libpipeline-1.2.1/gnulib/lib'
CC dirname.lo
CC basename.lo
CC dirname-lgpl.lo
CC basename-lgpl.lo
CC stripslash.lo
CC exitfail.lo
CC full-write.lo
CC glthread/lock.lo
CC malloca.lo
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
--- Em seg, 26/11/12, Dave escreveu:
De: Dave
Assunto: [lfs-support] libpipeline error
Para: "LFS Support List"
Data: Segunda-feira, 26 de Novembro de 2012, 9:52
Came up with error --
make[4]: Entering directory
`/sources/libpipeline-1.2.1/
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
--- Em seg, 26/11/12, Dave escreveu:
De: Dave
Assunto: Re: [lfs-support] libpipeline error
Para: "LFS Support List"
Data: Segunda-feira, 26 de Novembro de 2012, 10:10
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
--- Em seg, 26/11/12, Dav
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
--- Em seg, 26/11/12, Dave escreveu:
De: Dave
Assunto: Re: [lfs-support] libpipeline error
Para: "LFS Support List"
Data: Segunda-feira, 26 de Novembro de 2012, 10:33
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
--- Em seg, 26/1
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
--- Em seg, 26/11/12, Dave escreveu:
De: Dave
Assunto: Re: [lfs-support] libpipeline error
Para: "LFS Support List"
Data: Segunda-feira, 26 de Novembro de 2012, 12:51
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
--- Em seg
While compiling audiofile, this error popped up.
undefined reference to symbol 'log10@@GLIBC_2.2.5'
looks like a corrupted link. how do I fix...where could it have came from?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
look for them they are there.
Give me the proper steps and I'll send the resulting error info
Dave--not so newbie
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
That's the fix. I was trying to untar udev into an empty systemd
directory. I didn't realize that both sources had to be there.
Thanks again
Ken Moffat wrote:
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 06:54:50AM -0400, Dave wrote:
I'm at the point of installation, that udev is next. The book
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Dave H wrote:
hi yes the mailer is doing that. i am cutting and pasting it from HTML.
i was wondering if it was something from my cut and pasting too, but i
tried typing in those parts by hand and had the same problem
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Dave H thegenrl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Dave H wrote:
hi yes the mailer is doing that. i am cutting and pasting it from HTML.
i was wondering if it was something from my cut and pasting too
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 6:52 AM, Firerat fire...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 31 January 2012 10:38, Dave H thegenrl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Dave H thegenrl...@gmail.com wrote:
As for the following line,
bash: command substitution: line 47:
This is what i receive
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Firerat fire...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 31 January 2012 14:50, Dave H thegenrl...@gmail.com wrote:
$(readelf -l /bin/sh | sed -n 's@.*interpret.*/tools\(.*\)]$@\1@p')
with this i get
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Firerat wrote:
On 31 January 2012 14:50, Dave H thegenrl...@gmail.com wrote:
$(readelf -l /bin/sh | sed -n 's@.*interpret.*/tools\(.*\)]$@\1@p')
with this i get
|
===
Shouldn't
-dynamic-linker=
now be
-dynamic-linker=/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
?
Thanks again for your time. I'd be back 2 chapters still if it weren't
for your help.
Dave
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs
/chapter06/glibc.html
. it is the first line of cut/paste code.
thanks again,
dave
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
Dave H wrote:
Hi guys running into another snag and was hoping someone could shed
some light on the problem.
At the stage to change the dynamic
be
-dynamic-linker=/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
?
Thanks again for your time. I'd be back 2 chapters still if it wern't
for you guys.
Dave
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
start randomly fixing the problems above,
diverting from the manual i've followed to the letter, then subquently have
more problems later.
thanks for your time,
-dave
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See
change
in the extracted source when installing?
Thank you for your time, really I appreciate it.
-dave
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Firerat fire...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Jan 25, 2012 7:15 PM, Dave H thegenrl...@gmail.com wrote:
hi,
everything up to this point hasn't produced any
ok that makes sense. i will take that route for items that are built
multiple times (like binutils).
thanks for your time,
dave
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Firerat fire...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Jan 25, 2012 7:51 PM, Dave H thegenrl...@gmail.com wrote:
Rats (pun intended), I JUST
for some reason. im still trying to put things
together here. when actually sucessfully build my system, i might go back
and create a custom tasksel for the all of the programs i needed to make it
easier for other peoplee in the future.
again thank you for your replies.
sincerely,
Dave
On Tue
: should /usr/local/bin be in my path variable for user lfs?
currently $PATH=/tools/bin:/bin:/usr/bin.
question: should i be ./configure,make,make install all as root?
any help is greatly appreciated as i am pretty lost here after spending
hours at this.
best regards and thanks for your time,
dave
)
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/chapter05/binutils-pass1.html
thank you for your time and i appreciate your generous work on
linuxfromscratch.
best regards,
dave
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
.
thanks for your time,
dave
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 2:00 AM,
lfs-support-requ...@linuxfromscratch.orgwrote:
Send lfs-support mailing list submissions to
lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote:
There is definitely something wrong. On a production LFS system running
in a virtual envronment, I get:
real 0m18.514s
user 0m8.984s
sys 0m2.697s
I'm still having the same problems after recompiling the
To list,
I built a new LFS 6.8 and everything is kosher save for some
slowness. I built an x86_64 kernel (2.6.38.2) all on a Xen host
(5.6.100) on a Quad Proc Xeon. It boots with no issues until I try to
configure a package. As an example, if I run the ./configure for the
openssh package,
I seem to have encountered this issue (
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lfs.devel/10624 ) just now
though it seems the patch isn't in the patch list nor in the
instructions. Did I miss a step? I manually applied the patch and
had to copy two headers from the kernel headers in order to
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Andrew Benton b3n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 12 Apr 2011 08:00:35 -0600
Dave Hajoglou dhajog...@gmail.com wrote:
I seem to have encountered this issue (
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lfs.devel/10624 ) just now
though it seems the patch isn't
I ran a jhalfs build last night and was wondering if anyone want's the
report. I seem to recall that a while back the developers wanted
these reports. The build took just over 4.5 hours.
-hojo
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 8:33 AM, xinglp xin...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/4/6 Dave Hajoglou dhajog...@gmail.com:
I ran a jhalfs build last night and was wondering if anyone want's the
report. I seem to recall that a while back the developers wanted
these reports. The build took just over 4.5 hours
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Andrew Benton b3n...@gmail.com wrote:
I first posted to this list as I was wondering about building a lfs box
without using a host linux box to compile the files needed to build a lfs
box and I do not want to use files with .rpm or .deb files.
I just want to
as valid when
i switched it over to sda on the new vm, so i figured to avoid that by
making this go an IDE drive. If anyone has lfs going in a vm i'd be
interested.
Thanks.
Dave.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe
so was figuring
it should be there. Googling didn't show me anything on this. Has anyone
else seen this?
Thanks.
Dave.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
to get a look at it and compare with what I have.
Thanks.
Dave.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
, the kernel
line was booting (hd0,1) and the kernel was at /dev/sda2 where /boot is. The
machine is getting just past the kernel loading and freezing. I'm assuming a
missing driver but am not sure what it is. Would my kernel config file help,
it is quite extensive? Thanks.
Dave.
GNU GRUB
, lfs
problem, or an issue with vmware and scsi drives.
Any information I'd appreciate.
Thanks.
Dave.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Hi, have built lfs 6.2 a few times now, and if I have to reboot for any
reason I can only chroot with chap 6.59 chroot, not chap 6.60, with the
result that lfs can't find anything, patch, gcc... What is wrong?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
Please disregard my last post with regard to
diffutils. I built new versions of tar and gzip to
replace the Busybox versions, and the problem just
went away. It's possible that Freescale packages an
older version of Busybox with my board.
Dave Klingler
--- Jim Gifford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may want to look at cross-lfs, we currently have
a ppc build.
http://www.cross-lfs.org.
Thanks, I'll check it out.
First, though, if I can, I'd like to complete this
process without a cross-compiler; I'm pretty close (I
think) and I do
--- Dave Klingler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Jim Gifford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may want to look at cross-lfs, we currently
have
a ppc build.
http://www.cross-lfs.org.
Thanks, I'll check it out.
First, though, if I can, I'd like to complete this
process without
but think that I'm missing a simple
solution, but I'm not seeing it. Does anyone have any
suggestions?
Thanks in advance!
Dave
Get your own web address.
Have a HUGE year through Yahoo! Small Business.
http
and it was very instructive, if
a little frustrating at times.
Dave
--
LFS User #16110 - You know open source makes sense
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
a long story!) so there was *no way* I was looking
for an easy time.
However, for my effort I have a nice, swift, compact desktop that does
exactly what I want. I think that's worth the extra time spent in
building it.
Dave
--
LFS User #16110 - You know open source makes sense
--
http
Hi Amadeus
Apparently this has to do with too new tools on my host system, FC6,
but I am clueless as to how to resolve this.
Have you considered using the LiveCD?
Dave
8o)
--
LFS User #16110
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
straightforward, and not recommended.
See
http://archives.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/lfs-support/2005-July/027828.html
and
http://archives.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/lfs-support/2006-August/031376.html
for some discussion.
Dave
--
LFS User #16110
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman
/027361.html
I hope that helps a little.
Dave
--
LFS User #16110
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
host to use by far
- all the dependencies are guaranteed!
Hope that helps.
Dave
--
LFS User #16110
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Try to check the FS, sometimes it works for JFS.
--
Upper reality oftware.
Dave - Skp Core (skp-it.eu).
--
Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f
Sponsor:
Prestiti Online. Scopri subito se sei finanziabile. in 24 ore senza spese né
anticipi
dir.
- Clean the sandbox for the next package.
Could this ever work?
Or how could i make easly BP during the LFS process?
TNX.
--
Upper reality oftware.
Dave - Skp Core (skp-it.eu).
--
Email.it, the professional e-mail, gratis per te: http://www.email.it/f
Sponsor
Hy,
How could i solve these errors? From where do they came from?
Tnx, regards.
--
Upper reality oftware.
Dave - Skp Core (skp-it.eu).
gcc (GCC) 3.4.6
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1303: dl_main: Assertion
`_rtld_local._dl_rtld_map.l_prev-l_next == _rtld_local
If i were you id have all hard drive based support compiled into the
kernel, and none as modules, its the safest way.
Id try that.
Dave
Luca wrote:
Hi there!
Just finished LFS SVN-20060906 with some modifications (Glibc-2.4
plus Glibc-LibIDN-2.4 built as per book and Linux-2.6.17.11
but the mount command for proc is
being issued only once )
cheers
Dave
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Hi
dave frost wrote:
somehting strange has happened, it seems mount reports proc is mounted
about 15 times, theres also loads of entries in /etc/mtab but
/proc/mounts reports /proc mounted only a single time.
Any thoughts on why proc is being mounted so many times ?
(note ive modified
Dave
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
From have a quick look into /etc/rc it seems that all the services in
each run level must be stopped before the services in the next run level
are started, is this correct ?
If so there are a few more questions ...
cheers
Dave
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ
==
May I safely ignore this failure?
http://archives.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/lfs-dev/2003-October/039044.html
Hopefully that will help.
Dave
--
LFS User #16110
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org
Hi
Chris Staub wrote:
May I safely ignore this failure?
http://archives.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/lfs-dev/2003-October/039044.html
Hopefully that will help.
Dave
That doesn't really help, since it references an old LFS build method.
If you built LFS according to the 6.1.1
for example.
In any case, man pages are always your friends. It is useful to learn
how to get the information from them!
Hope that helps
Dave
--
LFS User #16110
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above
questions of the list because all my issues were
covered by previous posts which I found in the archives.
If there is one thing that could be changed in the book it would be to
emphasise in more places just how useful the archives are!
Dave
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ
?
Thanks much,
Dave
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See
2.6.8.1.
I'd appreciate any clues on where to look to get this
resolved.
Thanks,
Dave
__
Yahoo! DSL Something to write home about.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.
dsl.yahoo.com
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ
82 matches
Mail list logo
