Re: Need Help - boot fails - This cause?

2011-09-26 Thread scrat
On 09/25/2011 10:44 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: [putolin] I'm lost here (probably because it is late) - you've used the same host to build LFS twice, first on the old disk, and then on the new disk ? Yes that is correct. The scripts produced a LFS system that booted and worked on the old hard

Need Help - boot fails

2011-09-25 Thread scrat
I have completed the LFS-6.8 book to the chapter on rebooting to the new LFS system. The kernel appears to load but fails at the point of: [ 1.433897] Freeing unused kernel memory: 400k freed It stops there and a hard reset is required. What is the next step in the boot process. The new LFS

Re: Need Help - boot fails

2011-09-25 Thread Andrew Benton
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 08:52:02 -0400 scrat baho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote: I have completed the LFS-6.8 book to the chapter on rebooting to the new LFS system. The kernel appears to load but fails at the point of: [ 1.433897] Freeing unused kernel memory: 400k freed It stops there and

Re: Need Help - boot fails

2011-09-25 Thread scrat
On 09/25/2011 10:33 AM, Andrew Benton wrote: On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 08:52:02 -0400 scratbaho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote: I have completed the LFS-6.8 book to the chapter on rebooting to the new LFS system. The kernel appears to load but fails at the point of: [ 1.433897] Freeing unused

Re: Need Help - boot fails

2011-09-25 Thread Bruce Dubbs
scrat wrote: On 09/25/2011 10:33 AM, Andrew Benton wrote: On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 08:52:02 -0400 scratbaho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote: I have completed the LFS-6.8 book to the chapter on rebooting to the new LFS system. The kernel appears to load but fails at the point of: [ 1.433897]

Re: Need Help - boot fails

2011-09-25 Thread scrat
On 09/25/2011 12:51 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: scrat wrote: On 09/25/2011 10:33 AM, Andrew Benton wrote: On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 08:52:02 -0400 scratbaho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote: I have completed the LFS-6.8 book to the chapter on rebooting to the new LFS system. The kernel appears to load

Re: Need Help - boot fails

2011-09-25 Thread Dustin Essington
@linuxfromscratch.org Reply-To: LFS Support List lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org Subject: Re: Need Help - boot fails On 09/25/2011 12:51 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: scrat wrote: On 09/25/2011 10:33 AM, Andrew Benton wrote: On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 08:52:02 -0400 scratbaho-u...@columbus.rr.com wrote: I have

Re: Need Help - boot fails

2011-09-25 Thread Andrew Elian
Hello, On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 01:56:28PM -0400, scrat wrote: snip I have completed the LFS-6.8 book to the chapter on rebooting to the new LFS system. The kernel appears to load but fails at the point of: [ 1.433897] Freeing unused kernel memory: 400k freed It stops there and a

Re: Need Help - boot fails - This cause?

2011-09-25 Thread scrat
I think I may have found the error of my ways I am building for i686 When reviewing my build process logs I found this under Chapter 6.16 GCC-4.5.2... When doing the compile test ie echo main(){} dummy.c...etc. From the book: Next, verify that the new linker is being used with the correct

Re: Need Help - boot fails - This cause?

2011-09-25 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 07:46:54PM -0400, scrat wrote: I think I may have found the error of my ways I'm sorry, I disagree. I am building for i686 When reviewing my build process logs I found this under Chapter 6.16 GCC-4.5.2... When doing the compile test ie echo main(){}

Re: Need Help - boot fails - This cause?

2011-09-25 Thread scrat
On 09/25/2011 08:51 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 07:46:54PM -0400, scrat wrote: I think I may have found the error of my ways I'm sorry, I disagree. OK I've been completely wrong before ;) I am building for i686 When reviewing my build process logs I found this under

Re: Need Help - boot fails - This cause?

2011-09-25 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 09:32:04PM -0400, scrat wrote: hmm, I didn't intend to still be awake at this time, really I didn't, but I'm nursing my current dekstop build scripts :-( This is a five year old lapdog machine so it is not to beastky fast ;) That is odd, because the log timestamp