hahahahah, thats funny, right as this email arrived I was trying to figure out
the following (pass 2 of binutils):
dev@dev-VirtualBox /mnt/erraticOS/usr/src/binutils-build $ make -C ld
LIB_PATH=/usr/lib:/lib
make: Entering directory `/src/binutils-build/ld'make all-recursivemake[1]:
Entering
I found a quick fix for my problem,
dev@dev-VirtualBox /mnt/erraticOS/tools/x86_64-linux-gnu/bin $ ls
a.out ar as gcc ld ld.bfd nm objcopy objdump ranlib strip
I moved ld and as to .old and created symlinks to the host's ld and as and the
make -C ld LIB_PATH=/usr/lib:/lib finished
what do I do when I get to this part and it just keeps telling me no such file
or directory no such file or directory no such file or directory:
chroot $LFS /tools/bin/env -i \
HOME=/root TERM=$TERM PS1='\u:\w\$ ' \
PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/tools/bin \
/tools/bin/bash
Hi,
The package list specifies using linux kernel: Linux-3.5.2
Obviously the later releases would contain multiple fixes and security
improvements.
Any reason why using the latest 3.5.X release (Currently 3.5.7) would cause
any issues
Thanks
--
*Mitchell
*
The information contained in this
I don't see any specific reason for not using 3.5.X release (from a stable
release). You could always use a different kernel version.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:29 PM, Smith, Mitchell mitchell.sm...@cwc.comwrote:
Hi,
The package list specifies using linux kernel: Linux-3.5.2
Obviously the
On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 10:47 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I believe that cgroups is primarily implemented in the kernel. My
problem is that when is type 'mount' from the command line, I get many
more cgroups than mounted file systems. That's an implementation detail
that is an irritant and
On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 14:18 -0500, alex lupu wrote:
2. In general, if grub 0.97 could be used here, does it have limitations in
other complicated configurations, present and in the foreseeable future?
If I remember correctly, grub1 can't be built on a 64-bit system. That
is, it can boot one
On 11/14/2012 04:59 AM, Smith, Mitchell wrote:
Hi,
The package list specifies using linux kernel: Linux-3.5.2
Obviously the later releases would contain multiple fixes and security
improvements.
Any reason why using the latest 3.5.X release (Currently 3.5.7) would
cause any issues
failfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfailfail
make[2]: Entering directory
`/mnt/erraticOS/usr/src/gcc-build/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgcc'
# If this is the top-level multilib, build all the other
# multilibs.
DEFINES=''
aha,
once again,
dev@dev-VirtualBox /mnt/erraticOS/usr/src/gcc-build $ gcc --version
gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) 4.6.3
Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 06:49:34AM -0800, Paige Thompson wrote:
heres that there script i been usin:
https://github.com/paigeadele/erraticOS/blob/master/usr/src/bootstrap_userland.sh
The *first* time you build LFS, run all the commands through by
hand - pasting from the browser is
thank you for your response!
sorry if I come across as angry at the list I'm not, I just wish this process
was something somebody had figured out by now given all the distress that exist
out there.. it seems far fetched that I have to use pretty much the extent of
my skills to do this sort of
ah interesting:
gcc ../obj_s/tic.o ../obj_s/dump_entry.o ../obj_s/transform.o -I../progs -I.
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -D_GNU_SOURCE -DNDEBUG -I. -I../include -I/tools/include -O2
--param max-inline-insns-single=1200 -fPIC -L../lib -lncurses -L../lib -L
/tools/lib -lncurses-o tic
I added -L
On Nov 14, 2012, at 2:31 AM, Paige Thompson wrote:
what do I do when I get to this part and it just keeps telling me no
such file or directory no such file or directory no such file or
directory:
chroot $LFS /tools/bin/env -i \
HOME=/root TERM=$TERM PS1='\u:\w\$ ' \
On Nov 14, 2012, at 4:52 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 14:18 -0500, alex lupu wrote:
2. In general, if grub 0.97 could be used here, does it have
limitations in
other complicated configurations, present and in the foreseeable
future?
If I remember correctly, grub1 can't
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 07:11:23AM -0800, Paige Thompson wrote:
aha,
once again,
dev@dev-VirtualBox /mnt/erraticOS/usr/src/gcc-build $ gcc --version
gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5) 4.6.3
dev@dev-VirtualBox /mnt/erraticOS/usr/src/gcc-build $ apt-get
I knew I figured this out
thats what I thought you were supposed to do but for some reason I thought that
was a bad idea
On Nov 14, 2012, at 7:28 AM, Ken Moffat zarniwh...@ntlworld.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 07:11:23AM -0800, Paige Thompson wrote:
aha,
once again,
dev@dev-VirtualBox
Hey guys,
Note that we've switched topic in thread, hate to be rude like this but i'm
just making sure that the original help-request is still open and waiting
for a guardian angel to share his/her mighty wisdom and help me work out
why I'm stuck,
Kind regards,
Kaleb.
Link to topic :
so what about compiling the rest of the stuff am I supposed to be using the
host compiler or the 2nd pass built gcc for that?
On Nov 14, 2012, at 7:43 AM, Paige Thompson erra...@devel.ws wrote:
thats what I thought you were supposed to do but for some reason I thought
that was a bad idea
Original-Message (forwarded)
On Thu, Nov 13, 2012 at 07:02 PM oshadha.ro...@gmail.com wrote to me:
Doesn't work, seems like it's not getting loaded at startup. Doesn't
even listed in modules
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Marco Kluth mkl...@web.de
mailto:mkl...@web.de
On Nov 14, 2012, at 9:52 AM, lei huang wrote:
chroot $LFS /tools/bin/env -i \
HOME=/root \
TERM=$TERM\
PS1='\u:\w\$ ' \
PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/tools/bin \
/tools/bin/bash --login +h
root:/sources/glibc-build# bash
dev@dev-VirtualBox /mnt/erraticOS/tools/bin $ strace ./as
execve(./as, [./as], [/* 28 vars */]) = 0
brk(0) = 0x1432000
mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) =
0x7f59289d4000
access(/etc/ld.so.preload, R_OK) = -1 ENOENT
I don't understand.
commit ee9247c38a8def24a59eb5cfb7196a98bef8cfdc
Author: Carlos O'Donell carlos_odon...@mentor.com
Date: Sat Jun 30 08:27:06 2012 -0700
Update NEWS and README.
Final update for 2.16 release.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:38:45AM -0800, Paige Thompson wrote:
dev@dev-VirtualBox /mnt/erraticOS/tools/bin $ strace ./as
execve(./as, [./as], [/* 28 vars */]) = 0
brk(0) = 0x1432000
mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0)
- I'm not looking for fewer unusual problems, I want to learn how this works
and figure out what's going on so I can solve these problems on my own.
- I'm not using bleeding edge version of everything, I've gone through the
trouble to check out the appropriate branches in all repositories and
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:13:03AM -0800, Paige Thompson wrote:
I don't understand.
commit ee9247c38a8def24a59eb5cfb7196a98bef8cfdc
Author: Carlos O'Donell carlos_odon...@mentor.com
Date: Sat Jun 30 08:27:06 2012 -0700
Update NEWS and README.
Final update for
Paige Thompson wrote:
- I'm not looking for fewer unusual problems, I want to learn how
this works and figure out what's going on so I can solve these
problems on my own.
- I'm not using bleeding edge version of everything, I've gone
through the trouble to check out the appropriate branches
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 11:34:00AM -0800, Paige Thompson wrote:
- I'm not looking for fewer unusual problems, I want to learn how this works
and figure out what's going on so I can solve these problems on my own.
Stage one: follow what others have done, and attempt to understand
it. Stage
What does an ldd of a tools/bin/as look like for you?
-Original Message-
From: lfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org
[mailto:lfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org] On Behalf Of Ken Moffat
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 11:52 AM
To: LFS Support List
Subject: Re: [lfs-support]
-Original Message-
From: lfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org
[mailto:lfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org] On Behalf Of Ken Moffat
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 12:05 PM
To: LFS Support List
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] still doesnt work right (after binutils pass 2)
On
-Original Message-
From: lfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org
[mailto:lfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org] On Behalf Of Ken Moffat
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 12:05 PM
To: LFS Support List
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] still doesnt work right (after binutils pass 2)
On
--- Em qua, 14/11/12, Ken Moffat escreveu:
De: Ken Moffat
Assunto: Re: [lfs-support] still doesnt work right (after binutils pass 2)
Para: LFS Support List
Data: Quarta-feira, 14 de Novembro de 2012, 17:05
And you top-posted again, by failing to trim (or in this
case
remove entirely,
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:35:13PM -0800, Paige Thompson wrote:
What does an ldd of a tools/bin/as look like for you?
After pass 1, no idea. And after pass 2 I would only be able to
tell you after I chrooted - assuming I hadn't deleted /tools which I
normally do soon after the system boots.
-Original Message-
From: lfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org
[mailto:lfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org] On Behalf Of Ken Moffat
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 2:43 PM
To: LFS Support List
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] still doesnt work right (after binutils pass 2)
On Wed,
Hi, and thanks for the respond
Throughout the book i've encountered 0 problems or errors and everything
goes according to the book. It just seems weird that everything works as
intended at chapter 6.10 then somewhere between that and compiling
bin-utils and GCC it messes up somewhere, could this
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 02:49:37PM -0800, Paige Thompson wrote:
It could ALSO be the fact that my host is not running kernel 2.6.25 which
seems...absurd because that’s the min version to compile glibc support for
and I'm running like 3. Something.
That _would_ be absurd.
I really hope
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:42:03AM +0100, Kaleb van Ingen Schenau wrote:
Hi, and thanks for the respond
Throughout the book i've encountered 0 problems or errors and everything
goes according to the book. It just seems weird that everything works as
intended at chapter 6.10 then somewhere
Ken Moffat wrote:
I've no idea about virtual machines, maybe someone else can offer
suggestions about specific changes (if any) needed - but I don't
recall seeing problems from them apart from selecting the right
kernel options.
Ken,
I've built LFS several times in different virtual
No intention of keeping em secret just want to maintain control over
it...fitting norms? Lulz, What are you talking about. Said I'd try to stick to
the bottom post... have no idea whether this phone does it right though so ill
..do nothing apparently-- nothing in the settings and the previous
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 07:08:26PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Ken Moffat wrote:
I've no idea about virtual machines, maybe someone else can offer
suggestions about specific changes (if any) needed - but I don't
recall seeing problems from them apart from selecting the right
kernel
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 05:38:05PM -0800, Paige Thompson wrote:
No intention of keeping em secret just want to maintain control over
it...fitting norms? Lulz, What are you talking about. Said I'd try to stick
to the bottom post... have no idea whether this phone does it right though so
ill
For sure, its good to find some of those errors though.. for me it helps to
know what you can't do with some stuff first hand as a means of saying I am
proficient in something and sometimes it takes going down that path to even
realize that some things don't work the way you expect. The cross
On Nov 14, 2012, at 6:19 PM, Paige Thompson erra...@devel.ws wrote:
For sure, its good to find some of those errors though.. for me it helps to
know what you can't do with some stuff first hand as a means of saying I am
proficient in something and sometimes it takes going down that path to
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Yuan Cao yuanca...@gmail.com wrote:
Message: 5
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2012 16:02:54 -0600
From: Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] LFS 7.2 Section 6.4 Chroot Error
To: LFS Support List lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Message-ID:
44 matches
Mail list logo
