Faheem Mohammed wrote:
i redid the install all the tests ran okay but i got a warning saying
that there is perl in /tools/lib/perl5/ beyond the scope of the
installation.. how can i fix this?...
Faheem
What do you mean you redid the install? The install for perl or Autoconf?
--
laurent wrote:
Chris Staub wrote:
The host distro is fine. You probably forgot the sed command in chap.
5 util-linux instructions. Using scripts is not a problem - what is a
problem is when you don't put all the correct commands in the scripts,
and that must be what you did.
Sorry Chris
laurent wrote:
Chris Staub wrote:
laurent wrote:
Sorry Chris, but I make the sed command! In bash sripts or by hand
directly but nothing change!
AAARRRGG!!
No you did not, or what you typed was incorrect. Please attach the
script you used.
ok, in this script i
laurent wrote:
Chris Staub wrote:
laurent wrote:
ok, in this script i test at the end if mount was linked with the
good interpreter...
echo Test
cd $installdir
readelf -l /mnt/lfs/tools/bin/mount | grep interpreter
Dan Nicholson wrote:
Missing libz.a is your problem. Go back to the zlib section and make
sure you follow the instructions to create both a shared and a static
library. Then you should be able to return to module-init-tools and
continue.
--
Dan
In addition, you should also rebuild the File
Randy McMurchy wrote:
You are seriously close to being told that you are too inexperienced
to build an LFS system. The error you are getting is one of the most
elementary things in all of Linux. The error message you get even
tells you what to do to fix it.
Yet, you send in mail to the support
Niels Larsen wrote:
Conc. LFS 6.0
I am using Debian Sarge 3.1 as host.
Everything went well until I should install diffutils-2.8.1.tar.bz2
Nothing to do with diffutils...the problem is bzip2. Is this right after
you installed the tar package? Or after bzip2?
Here is a screen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
I am experiencing difficulty with the toolchan readjustment. The attached
file describes the problem. (I am using the current LFS development.)
root:/# mv -v /tools/bin/{ld,ld-old}
`/tools/bin/ld' - `/tools/bin/ld-old'
root:/# mv -v /tools/$(gcc
Chris Staub wrote:
root:/# cc dummy.c -Wl,--verbose dummy.log
root:/# readelf -l a.out | grep ': /lib'
readelf: Error: 'a.out': No such file
root:/#
It seems gcc isn't working, but this output doesn't really help. Please
paste the contents of dummy.log.
And of course, does /tools/bin/cc
elmarsa dice wrote:
I am having some problems in understanding where to put the
Linux Headers. Sections 5.4 and 5.5 are pretty clear that they
go into the -build directories but it is not clear into which
directory Linux-2.6.8.1 is to be placed. The book is unclear to
me when it says ...,set
Angel Tsankov wrote:
Section 8.4. Making the LFS System Bootable says to start the grub
shell and issue a command like root (hd0,3). The root command,
however, cannot mount the partition since we have not yet exited the
chroot environment and grub cannot find any hard drives. Is this right,
elmarsa dice wrote:
Please read section 5.1 carefully. It tells you that all
package
installation instructions assume that you have unpacked the
source
tarball and entered the source dir.
I have read it carefully and I think this is where I have my
problem. I understand I need to enter the
Angel Tsankov wrote:
How do I log into LFS after build and reboot?
You type your username and password.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Angel Tsankov wrote:
Well, what is the password if I have missed to set it in 6.54.3?
It is whatever you want it to be.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Vladimir A. Pavlov wrote:
Hi, all!
I've finished the LFS build but when booting into it I have the error
message like /sbin/udevsettle: no such file or directory. I
found /sbin/udevsettle call in lfs-bootscripts but the file needed
doesn't exist in udev-088 package though udevd and
Angel Tsankov wrote:
Yes, I have run
mkswap -v /dev/hda1
run it without the -v Without any options it will default to the new
type (From Man Page)
Well, the LFS book says, it must be with -v.
Nope, in this case the book is wrong. It was assumed the -v was a
verbose option (as it is for
Angel Tsankov wrote:
I ran the tests in section 3 - Building the LFS System. All coreutils
tests passed as user root. One test failed as user dummy and
some were not run. There seem to be some problems with the glibc and gcc
tests as well.
Are these problem fatal? May I safely ignore them?
Angel Tsankov wrote:
What does it mean if a glibc test fails with:
GCONV_PATH=/builds/glibc-2.3.4/iconvdata LC_ALL=C
/builds/glibc-2.3.4/elf/ld-linux.so.2 --library-path
Pasted directly from section 6.11...
Test the results:
make -k check glibc-check-log 21
grep Error glibc-check-log
The Glibc test suite is highly dependent on certain functions of the
host system, in particular the kernel. In general, the Glibc test
suite is always expected to pass.
Angel Tsankov wrote:
The glibc page (in LFS 6.1.1) does in fact list several tests that
are known to fail.
Honestly, I cannot figure out which tests you are talking about. I
looked both at section 5.6 and 6.11.
Pasted directly from section 6.11...
Test the results:
make -k check
Angel Tsankov wrote:
No need to...just accept that some tests will fail for that reason,
and continue.
OK, if you say so.
I think LFS 6.1.1 does noe mention any reason why a test may fail. It
would probably be fine if it does so in upcoming releases.
The glibc page (in LFS 6.1.1) does in
Angel Tsankov wrote:
This is mentioned in the book. It says that some tests are known to
time out.
Well, can I increase the timeout period so that I know whether or not
the test passes?
No need to...just accept that some tests will fail for that reason, and
continue.
--
Dave Abergel wrote:
snip
==
1 of 10 tests failed
Please report to bug-coreutils@gnu.org
==
May I safely ignore this failure?
http://archives.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/lfs-dev/2003-October/039044.html
Angel Tsankov wrote:
- Original Message - From: Chris Staub [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LFS Support List lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 12:39 PM
Subject: Re: LFS 6.1.1: coreutils tests as user dummy: touch: setting
times of `/': Permission denied
Aurel wrote:
hello,
did someone manage build a LFS system on a Mac or other PPC computer ?
You want Cross-LFS for that. Look at trac.cross-lfs.org.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above
Barrie Stott wrote:
1. Should I expect bash history to work without problem at this point?
I ask this because I already have an example where bash is not working
normally. Outside of lfs I can type the following and the bell rings:
echo $'\a'. I wanted to use this with lfs to tell me when some
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Dexter Stowers wrote:
Hi,
I am using LFS 6.1.1 on Fedora Core 5. I have completed everything
to the letter thus far, once I entered the chrooted environment and I
reached 6.11 Glibc-2.3.4 and I prepared Glibc for compilation I got
errors that gcc was not found
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear LFSers,
Reading through the book, it isn't clear to me whether the gcc working
files can be deleted at the end of section 5.4 in the book (v6.1.1).
It should be clear since it's stated in Section 5.1...
After installing each package, delete its source and
steve crosby wrote:
On 6/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The discussion of hard vs soft links is way outside the scope of this
email thread - suffice it to say the two are very different, and have
different rules (both in how they work, and in how they are created).
Hope that
Chris Whitacre wrote:
I've found several references to it with no apparent fixes and was
wondering has anyone fixed/worked out the issue yet..
My findings are and I do not know what the outcome of this would be is it
has something to do with the patch. If I make a new fresh directory of
Chris Whitacre wrote:
Oh, one other issue I had (which I only found one reference to) was
installing GlibC for some reason when I done the stripping portion of
chapter 5 it hosed all the libraries as well the executables ar, as, and
some others, the second attempt of building LFS I skipped that
Jamie Risk wrote:
I've seen the test screen for the X installation, so all seems to
be going well with LFS 6.1.1. and BLFS 6.1.
However, when I break out of the test screen (ctl-alt-bkspc) I see
an error:
...
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb/xkbcomp: error while loading shared \
libraries:
baldo wrote:
so i change the .. to $LFS/sources/ and it seems to work (is this
correct?!)
everything seems to go fine but at the end i get the following errors
make[3]: Entering directory `/binutils-build/gas/doc'
rm -f gasver.texi
echo '@set VERSION 2.15.94.0.2.2' gasver.texi
touch as.1
Steven Vancoillie wrote:
Hi,
This is my first post on lfs-support and mailing lists in general.
(I did read the netiquette and stuff). Just for information: this is
also my first try at setting up lfs.
Following the LFS-book 6.1.1, in chapter 5.6 I tried to compile
glibc-2.3.4 with gcc.4.0.3
David Barron wrote:
I'm going through the book, everything has been going fine up until now. However, when I issue the ../glibc-2.3.4/configure --prefix-/usr --disable-profile --enable-add-ons --enable-kernel=2.6.0 --libexecdir=/usr/lib/glibc, it runs for a while then fails with
checking for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
i'm using gcc-4.1.1 to build the tool chain,
while it blocked at pass 2,
and gcc reported no limits.h was found.
my patch to gcc source:
in gcc/configure:
change STMP_FIXINC=stmp-fixinc
to STMP_FIXINC=
in gcc/cppdefaults.h:
added
#undef STANDARD_INCLUDE_DIR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
thanks .
i did have problem with expect-5.44.1, which require tkConfig.sh to be
present,
and after install tk it seemed ok, expect was not used much up to now,
so there's little chance for me to find it,
nor did i noticed the claim on expect site.
i do want to try
lfs wrote:
Somebody faced such problem?
Does /tools/include/asm exist, and have those files in it?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
lfs wrote:
Здравствуйте, Chris.
Вы писали 30 июня 2006 г., 21:55:45:
No
In a directory/tools/include/at me a directory/linux/
In it all headers
I have unpacked linux-libc-headers-2.6.11.2.tar.bz2 in the created directory
/linux-headers
Here result
Chris Staub wrote:
lfs wrote:
Здравствуйте, Chris.
Вы писали 30 июня 2006 г., 21:55:45:
No
In a directory/tools/include/at me a directory/linux/ In it all headers
I have unpacked linux-libc-headers-2.6.11.2.tar.bz2 in the created
directory /linux-headers
Here result
/linux-headers/linux
1 wrote:
Yes you are right
I have forgotten a command cp-Rv include/asm-i386/tools/include/asm
I shall try to be attentive
Many thanks
Is this correct? You did cp -Rv include/linux /tools/include? If so,
this is wrong, and is probably the reason why you're having problems.
If it is not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/30/06, steve crosby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/30/06, f. l. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+#define DYNAMIC_LINKER /tool/lib/ld-linux.so.2
assuming it's not a typo, this should be tools, not tool, correct?
no , its not a typo, i use a different prefix
/tool =
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/3/06, Chris Staub [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can't do that. You must use /tools. It doesn't matter what $LFS is
and what /tools points to, but it MUST be /tools.
--
i think its ok to use /tool , as long as its point to /lfs/tool
and even
/_anything_ will work
kriss wrote:
can you tell how you make gcc-4.1.1 pass1 ?
cause in it the doc say that bootstrap don't work anymore
I've run make bootstrap on GCC 4.1.1 many times. Where exactly does it
say this?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
seems fixinc.sh have been run, and thus caused this problem,
maybe i have to modify the Makefile.in
No, the problem is you are ignoring the book's instructions and doing
your own thing. Did you even bother reading even one word I wrote? If
you aren't going to listen
Steven Vancoillie wrote:
Hi,
I managed to install my first LFS system, hoera.
I put a kernel option vga=795 in the grub boot menu,
but this doesn't seems to work.
I looked in BLFS, but couldn't find anything.
Is there an obvious reason why this doesn't work?
Do I have to change something in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris,
thanks for your reply, really.
but i think the problem is not as described by you.
as you know, instruction on the lfs-book are some sort of road map,
as long as you know what you are doing, you can do your own stuff, surely.
to this topic, the problem is that
Paul G Rogers wrote:
I'm building binutils in Ch6 and can't make binutils because there are no
ptys. I've checked the things in the FAQ, and most seem OK. I depart
from the book by installing /dev on the real FS, rather than a tempfs.
What exactly do you mean by that last sentence?
But I
Paul G Rogers wrote:
I've just installed 2.6.11.12 with LFS-6.1.1. I want to bring the kernel
current. I thought patch-12 would be approproate but it had many rejects
and I saw a few reversed or already applied fly by. What's the
appropriate path to patch the kernel?
Paul Rogers ([EMAIL
david cuthbertson wrote:
Hi,
I am using the x86-6.2-pre5 of official LFS LiveCD (it has nvidia graphics
support). As a beginner I have been following the instructions to the letter -
only improvising when instructions are absent, such as where I should be
unpacking and configuring, etc. -
Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote:
Hi everyone!
Now, that LFS-BOOK 6.2 is out I did a new try on LFS.
I am using Debian testing (etch) and here the problem starts. The system has
some tools in an version to new for the book.
I am writing some scripts for my LFS build. Here is the output of my
Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote:
Am Samstag, 5. August 2006 16:18 schrieb Randy McMurchy:
Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote these words on 08/05/06 09:03 CST:
I am writing some scripts for my LFS build.
I would abandon that effort until you know it works by simply
following the book. People asking
Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote:
Am Samstag, 5. August 2006 16:09 schrieb Chris Staub:
More information is needed. What do you mean failed GCC build? Is this
binutils pass 1 or pass 2?
Well, as in the reference said: first pass
Then, as I said before - what failed GCC build are you talking
Mag. Leonhard Landrock wrote:
Am Sonntag, 6. August 2006 13:11 schrieb Chris Staub:
Then, as I said before - what failed GCC build are you talking about?
Binutils is the first package installed, so you shouldn't have built GCC
yet. What exactly are you referring to?
The first try (with LFS
Don Clarke wrote:
Thanks to everyone for the responses.
I've solved the problem and I think I know what caused it and what the
solution was.
I think the problem was caused by running the following in the LFS:
./configure.gnu --prefix=/usr \
-Dman1dir=/usr/share/man/man1 \
Юрий Деханов wrote:
Problem with 5.11.1. Re-installation of GCC
I cannot compile GCC. When I enter make command I get this error:
make[1]: *** No rule to make target 'all'. Stop.
Help me.
You probably didn't run configure, or it failed with an error.
--
Mike Murfin wrote:
Hi.
When I run the configure script, it fails with the message: error: cannot compute
suffix of object files
In config.log, I have:
configure:2361: checking for gcc
configure:2377: found /tools/bin/gcc
configure:2387: result: gcc
configure:2631: checking for C compiler
yogesh prabhu wrote:
Dear all,
This is my first email to the groups with the error ...
i am stuck atlast !!
I had finished my LFS installation...
compiled my kernel too...
installed the grub
then i rebooted with my beauty grub into my distro LFS 6.1
everything went well
i
Angel Tsankov wrote:
As what user should I re-adjust the toolchain in Ch. 6 of LFS 6.1.1?
If you need to ask this, you shouldn't be using package users. Besides,
the whole toolchain readjustment only affects stuff in /tools, so it
doesn't make any difference what user you use.
--
Brandon Peirce wrote:
Angel Tsankov wrote:
For LFS 6.1.1 the instructions says Install the adjusted linker by
running the following command from within the binutils-build directory:
The make -C ld ... install command is different to the LFS 6.2
commands but is still manipulating (in 6.1.1
Brandon Peirce wrote:
Why root?
Of course you can always achieve this with root, but that's kind of
missing the point of package users technique, (and also violating
principle of least privelege).
I concede that the motivation for why you would use the package users
technique in the first
Chris Staub wrote:
You're not *supposed* to be using package users in chapter 5. It's only
in chapter 6. The only package installed using package users so far
should be glibc.
From the hint:
Build Chapter 5 exactly as explained by the LFS book. There is only one
little change you have
Angel Tsankov wrote:
You're not *supposed* to be using package users in chapter 5. It's
only in chapter 6. The only package installed using package users so
far should be glibc.
Why glibc only?! What about Linux Libc headers and Man pages - the hint
recommends to install them using PU?
Richard Caldwell wrote:
Hi,
I'm creating my first LFS system on Suse10.1 with book version 6.0(2nd
edition). When running 'make install' for binutils-2.15.91.0.2 in chapter 5 I
get the following error(s):
/usr/bin/install: cannot create regular file '/tools/lib/llibbfd.la' :
Permission
Richard Caldwell wrote:
Hi,
I'm creating my first LFS system with a Suse10.1
host system using book version 6.0.
I'm getting the following error when I run
make BOOT_LDFLAGS=-static bootstrap
*
/tools/i686-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:/usr/lib/libc.so: file
format not recognized;
Denis Silin wrote:
Hello.
Can I use in the LFS the compiler, libraries and other tools directly from my
Linux, and not build them?
Best regards,
Alex
I'm not sure what you mean. The whole point of LFS is to use the host
system tools to build the LFS system.
--
Angel Tsankov wrote:
Hello!
I am using package users during an LFS installation and I wonder who
should copy bzImage, System.map and .config to /boot: the package user
used to build the linux package or the root user. In the former case
should /boot be made an installation directory?
Gijo wrote:
Hi,
I had some problems in chapter 6 (lfs6.2) and maybe someone can help me
out, before i chroot, i did:
echo 'main(){}' dummy.c
cc dummy.c
readelf -l a.out | grep ': /tools'
and got:
[Requesting program interpreter: /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2]
but after entering the chrooted
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
compiling and installing everything went smooth, but I noticed I already
have binaries when I issued the cp commands Ive been told to do. I figure
I accidently left /tools untouched but thought that maybe the installation
of the new binaries and libs would have the old
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ive followed the guide so far using the packages of 6.2. In chapter 6.7 of
the LFS book one should patch the headers with the unifdef. This doesnt
apply to stable(6.2) right?
~djr
If you're using 6.2, then you shouldn't even be seeing anything
referring to unifdef. I
Kevin Williams wrote:
I tried searching thru' the forums/mailing lists of openoffice.org, I
don't see any thread that is related to compiling openoffice. All the
threads I see on openoffice.org are related to installing and setting
up binary versions !
Fortunately enough, I stumbled upon a page
Tapio Kelloniemi wrote:
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 09:25:18AM -0500, Chris Staub wrote:
No, it's not - it is completely unnecessary. $LFS/sources is only
mentioned once in LFS (well, ok, twice...), and even then it's really
just a suggestion - the source directory could be anywhere and called
Wit wrote:
Wit wrote:
Confirmed! I get the same results as you now.
Executive summary: the text in the book can be interpreted to mean both
commands (Configure and ./configure) should be run. I did that and the
results caused the problem.
The proper interpretation of the text is closer to
Colin Dean wrote:
I recently finished a build of LFS 6.2, and quickly realized that there
is no way to get the packages for BLFS or other packages from within a
fresh built LFS environment.
There's probably been discussion on this before, but I couldn't find
anything when I search on
Arden wrote:
In the 'more_control_and_pkg_man' hint, while installing Shadow, it
suggests removing parts of a line in the makefile, what editor or
command is available to do this?
thanks, Arden
--http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ:
Arden wrote:
On Dec 8, 2006, at 6:29 PM, Chris Staub wrote:
Arden wrote:
In the 'more_control_and_pkg_man' hint, while installing Shadow, it
suggests removing parts of a line in the makefile, what editor or
command is available to do this?
thanks, Arden
--http://linuxfromscratch.org
Arnie Stender wrote:
Hi Ken,
I'm running gnome-2 built from BLFS-svn-20060904 which is where I got
the gnome-print from. Why did you think I was running gnome-1?
Arnie
That version of GNOME Print is in the list of GNOME 1.4 libs in BLFS.
--
Max Tilford wrote:
Hello
I am running the LFS live CD 6.2 and following the
book.
I have gotten to chapter 5.4 without a hitch but when
I try to uncompress gcc-4.0.3.tar.bz2 it produces a
long string of errors saying
cannot create directory '...' No space left on
decice
I am installing
Aleksandar Adam wrote:
But you didn't tell us *what* error message you got, so nobody can
give you a reasonable suggestion about what is wrong!
Here comes output what went wrong:
I used command:
patch -Np1 -i ../linux-libc-headers-2.6.12.0-inotify-3.patch | tee patch.txt
and then I
bojster wrote:
bojster wrote:
Nadav Vinik wrote:
The drawback is that you have to manually set files suid root (but on
the other hand, it gives you more control over packages - you decide
what should be suid) and that some packages need some tweaking, as
their install process behaves
Galaxy Travel wrote:
How do you install this?
Unpack the tarball and read the README.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Galaxy Travel wrote:
Unpack the tarball and read the README.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
I did that it says make menuconfig which I did then what? it dont tell
Ag. Hatzimanikas wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, at 08:30 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you please specify what the bug is, and perhaps provide a link to the
patch?
I guess he is referring to include/MKhashsize.sh
Particularly in the following variable.
TABSIZE=`grep -v '^[ #]' $CAPS | grep -v ^$
Galaxy Travel wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Dan Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LFS Support List lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2007 5:17 PM
Subject: Re: Udev Errors?
On 2/14/07, Galaxy Travel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Im having a couple
Nick Bowes wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Dan Nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LFS Support List lfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 7:09 PM
Subject: Re: first pass GCC bootstrap problem
If it's your first time following the book, chances are that
Bartlomiej P. Lyson wrote:
Hello,
I've got a problem with running the test coreutils.
My lfs version is 6.2.
an example:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# /usr/sbin/useradd -m test
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /etc/passwd | grep test
test:x:1001:1002::/home/test:/bin/bash
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~#
Bartlomiej P. Lyson wrote:
Hello,
I've got a problem with running the test coreutils.
My lfs version is 6.2.
an example:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# /usr/sbin/useradd -m test
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# cat /etc/passwd | grep test
test:x:1001:1002::/home/test:/bin/bash
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~#
nick bowes wrote:
Hi,
I can't figure out what should happen in ch6.8. the first command your
asked to run is make install but where should I run it from? should I be
running it as root in the previously untared man-pages-2.42 dir?
Sorry I know this should be obvious but as you will have
John Rodenbiker wrote:
Actually, it says Downloaded packages and patches will need to be
stored somewhere that is conveniently available throughout the entire
build. It goes on to say that a working directory will also be
required and that $LFS/sources can work for both. The text does not
Kai Ulrich wrote:
Hey,
in chapter I supose to create a /etc/sysconfig/clock file.
by executing the comand
cat /etc/sysconfig/clock EOF
# Begin /etc/sysconfig/clock
UTC=1
# End /etc/sysconfig/clock
EOF
i get the message,
/etc/sysconfig/clock: No such file or directory
Bob Newell wrote:
I am trying to build my LFS 6.2, and I am currently in
section 5.4.1 (building GCC). So far I havent
deviated from the book other than the mount point of
my LFS sources. When I got to the make install
command, here is what I get
[EMAIL
Peter Santimauro wrote:
After mkdir -v ../glibc-build and cd ../glibc-build, I tryed to run
the configure script. I get the following as and output:
...
the config.log says:
...
configure:2631: checking for C compiler version
configure:2634: gcc --version /dev/null 5
Peter Santimauro wrote:
ls -l /bin/gcc returns
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 14 May 29 19:25 /bin/gcc - /tools/bin/gcc
and
ldd /bin/gcc
/tools/bin/ldd: line 124: /bin/gcc: No such file or directory
when under /tools/bin I ran 'ls | grep gcc' and got
gcc
gccbug
i686-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
jordan krohn wrote:
I am on the second pass of gcc(5.11.1, p64) and i am having some problems.
when i enter
cp -v gcc/Makefile.in{,.orig}
sed '[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED] true@' gcc/Makefile.in.orig
gcc/Makefile.in
it tells me no such file or directory. so where do i need to
Spahn, Daniel wrote:
Pete,
I ran into this last week when I performed the installation. What I found was
that I had to chown lfs:lfs the folders... also, you may need to re-check the
chmod steps in the environment setup to make sure that directories are set as
sticky, and that the LFS user
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi to all:
This is my first post to the list, so let me say Hi to all and congratulation
for such a great book, I allways think that build a linux system from point
zero was a very dificulta task (I work with linux from 5 years ago), but
your book is perfectly
John Gnew wrote:
Does anyone have a script that would read the MD5SUMS files and then
verify the MD5s against each source file?
John
Isn't this what md5sum -c does?
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe:
kefir wrote:
The binutils build as the lfs user fails:
lfs:/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build$ time { ../binutils-2.16.1/configure
--prefix=/tools --disable-nls make make install; }
...
The $LFS directory listing and the permissions:
lfs:/mnt/lfs$ ls -la
total 36
drwxr-xr-x 5 root
Nicolas FRANCOIS wrote:
Hope this can be of some help. Maybe a note in the book ? Or maybe this
is up to the user of the book to be aware of this ? I remember there were
a few pages a while ago, in gcc, or glibc... to signal that optimization
was know to break some packages...
\bye
I
Nicolas FRANCOIS wrote:
Le Mon, 30 Jul 2007 13:23:15 -0400 Chris Staub [EMAIL PROTECTED] a
écrit :
As for a note in the book - it already says on page 6.1 that compiling
with optimizations can have unexpected results, and that the solution
when you have problems with them is simply
101 - 200 of 460 matches
Mail list logo
