Re: irq timeout error

insight into the SMART data, and Ken it starting to give me a headache now. Thanks for the insight folks. Mykal Funk -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

irq timeout error

if this is an error that can be safely ignored? Or will it affect the build in some way? If it will affect the build how would I go about fixing the problem? Mykal Funk -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above

Re: irq timeout error

Mike McCarty wrote: Mykal Funk wrote: While running a compile of GCC I got the following error: Oh, if you have a distro which can use SMART, and your disc is SMART capable, you can ask it. # smartctl -i /dev/hda This command showed that the drive was SMART enabled, though

Re: Clock Problems

the clock is still accurate. Problem fixed. Thanks for the ideas, folks. They helped me to learn which is the most important thing in my book. e Mykal Funk -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above

Re: Clock Problems (now off-topic)

William Immendorf wrote: On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Mykal Funk mykalf...@gmail.com wrote: I can say it isn't the hardware. I recompiled the kernel with CONFIG_HZ_100 option set, then rebooted with that kernel. I started the glibc build from 5.7.1 and 12 hours later under high load

Re: Clock Problems

long enough to compile without being 'nice'. Does the clock moving only a tick or two during the entire build break it? No, it doesn't seem to break the build. It's just annoying. Mykal Funk -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs

Re: Clock Problems

Bruce Dubbs wrote: Mykal Funk wrote: I would hate to have to 'nice' the process. An SBU equals about 150 minutes. That is a *really* slow system. My 5 year old P4 has an SBU of 132.5 *seconds*. I'm not sure why you want to do this except that you might just want to see

Re: Clock Problems

and learning. It's been a while since I built a LFS system. Mykal Funk -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: Clock Problems

. The time loss occurs only under high load. When uptime reports a high load average, the system loses time like crazy. When it is just sitting doing nothing it keeps perfect time. I don't know what to make of it. Perhaps someone else can. Mykal Funk -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman

Re: Clock Problems

Bruce Dubbs wrote: Mykal Funk wrote: I replaced the battery and the behavior didn't change. The time loss occurs only under high load. When uptime reports a high load average, the system loses time like crazy. When it is just sitting doing nothing it keeps perfect time. I don't know

Re: Clock Problems

should concern myself about? Any advice would be welcome. Thanks in Advance, Mykal Funk I'm not sure about a permanent fix, but a script to update the time with a ntp server might help. I'm not sure of the best method for offline use

Re: Clock Problems

Mike McCarty wrote: Mykal Funk wrote: I know the cmos battery is running low on this machine. But will the The clock does not run on the battery unless the machine is shut down and turned off. While the power supply is on, the clock runs off the power supply. The crystals supplied

Clock Problems

that it will. That is my main concern. Should I ignore the clock issue? Is this something I should concern myself about? Any advice would be welcome. Thanks in Advance, Mykal Funk -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html

Re: Linux-2.6.30.9 build failure fixed new problem show up

Ken Moffat wrote: 2009/12/7 Mykal Funk mykalf...@gmail.com: Ken Moffat wrote: Do you have CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO=y ? If so, try turning it off. whoops, if not try turning it on. I'm not sure where it appears in menuconfig, but the help says: config COMPAT_VDSO

Re: Linux-2.6.30.9 build failure fixed new problem show up

-p_vaddr == _rtld_local._dl_sysinfo_dso’ failed! and the kernel panics. I'm considering recompiling Glibc but am unsure if that would fix the problem or cause more. Thanks in advance, Mykal Funk -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs

Re: Linux-2.6.30.9 build failure fixed new problem show up

Ken Moffat wrote: 2009/12/7 Mykal Funk mykalf...@gmail.com: Thanks for the pointers. Once I got the configuration right it would go all the way to loading Init. However, it is now givining an error Inconsistency detected by ld.so: rtld.c: 1180: dl_main: Assertion `(void *) ph-p_vaddr

Linux-2.6.30.9 build failure fixed new problem show up

is on. Any ideas on what to do next? Thanks in Advance, Mykal Funk -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Linux-2.6.30.9 build failure

, if that helps. I've googled around and haven't found anything. I can't get this kernel to compile and I'm not sure why. Thanks in Advance, Mykal Funk -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information

Re: Linux-2.6.30.9 build failure

suggestions work. And yes, I think I left this one a bit too long. But I like a challenge. Thats why I bother with an old 486 in the first place. Thanks, Mykal Funk -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above