Re: [lfs-support] on bringing up ver 7.0

Em 08-02-2016 17:07, geist1...@juno.com escreveu: > > > -- Original Message -- > From: Bruce Dubbs > To: LFS Support List > Subject: Re: [lfs-support] on bringing up ver 7.0 > Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 13:21:58 -0600 >

Re: [lfs-support] O/T - loading distros *after* lfs

Em 04-02-2016 19:09, Ken Moffat escreveu: > This time, I would like to be able to use distros (different from > what other people are using to test) to build release candidates. > > Ideally, I want to be able to install/replace these in the future, > telling them to only use their own partition,

Re: [lfs-support] Problem in section 5.3 of lfs book

Em 17-11-2015 11:18, Joseph Hesse escreveu: > Also, I had to stop work and shut down my host system. When I restarted > it I had a gdm that displayed my name and the name "lfs". If I selected > "lfs" nothing happened, I was back to the gdm prompt. The only way I > can be user "lfs" is to log in

Re: [lfs-support] init.d/functions

Em 22-08-2015 15:39, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: Attached, you find a patch with the necessary fix, if you don't want to modify in a non-standard way your system. It is for 5.0.0, but will probably be OK with your version. Never mind, your non-LSB compliant symlink is the best

Re: [lfs-support] init.d/functions

is not very old. Wayne Sallee wa...@waynesallee.com Attached, you find a patch with the necessary fix, if you don't want to modify in a non-standard way your system. It is for 5.0.0, but will probably be OK with your version. -- []s, Fernando Submitted By:Fernando de Oliveira famobr

Re: [lfs-support] Using package managers in LFS

Em 09-08-2015 09:45, Richard Melville escreveu: There's a difference between a package manager and a package logger. I'm still a big fan of Paco/Porg, which is a package logger. I like its simplicity. It doesn't get in the way of anything else. It logs every package that's installed, and

Re: [lfs-support] Não aparecem letras acentuadas no console lfs

Em 21-06-2015 19:41, Ken Moffat escreveu: On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 07:02:37PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: I will more or less interpret (not exactly translate) some lines. Thanks. Esse [?] é um quadrado branco com interrogação dentro dele. Qualquer This [?] is a white square

Re: [lfs-support] error: /dev/sdc: No medium found

On 14-03-2015 23:56, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Since yesterday, tying to go on starting BLFS and updating what I could in the way. But this error has to be fixed. Found several references in the web but not solution, most with sdb, not sdc. Most are related to systemd

Re: [lfs-support] error: /dev/sdc: No medium found

On 14-03-2015 20:52, Ken Moffat wrote: On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 06:53:15PM -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Since yesterday, tying to go on starting BLFS and updating what I could in the way. But this error has to be fixed. Found several references in the web but not solution, most

[lfs-support] error: /dev/sdc: No medium found

Since yesterday, tying to go on starting BLFS and updating what I could in the way. But this error has to be fixed. Found several references in the web but not solution, most with sdb, not sdc. Most are related to systemd or udev, it has hit Ubuntu, and I think it is related to something in

Re: [lfs-support] HW issues

On 09-11-2014 00:50, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Ken Moffat wrote: Might be the jpeg symlinks! With turbo, the libjpeg.so.7 or libjpeg.so.8 version is ostensibly older than what jpegsrc provided. When ldconfig runs, e.g. during the SM or firefox install, it will see that and remake the symlink

Re: [lfs-support] HW issues

On 08-11-2014 15:45, Ken Moffat wrote: On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 02:16:05AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Bruce Dubbs wrote: Just for discussion, here is the dmesg log from my experiment with CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G. I also tried to set mem=4G on the kernel command line, but that did not seem to have

Re: [lfs-support] Bash-4.2 (for older systems)

On 30-09-2014 04:10, loki wrote: On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 21:58 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: For anybody still running bash-4.2, and who does not wish to update to 4.3 (which apparently needs current readline - Fernando reported that broke apps linked agaisnt readline, such as fcron, until they were

Re: [lfs-support] all done

On 10-09-2014 15:12, Bruce Dubbs wrote: Ken Moffat wrote: Also, for LFS the UUID stuff in grub.cfg is not needed, and will cause pain if you ever have to restore backups to a new disk. You can specify a partition uuid. No initrd required. For example: linux /bzImage

Re: [lfs-support] Please, teach me how to fix problems.

On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Simon Geard delga...@ihug.co.nz wrote: On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 10:27 -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: You are probably trying to select the commands from a pdf before pasting. That's a problem with the pdf generation. Use the html instead. Out of curiosity,

Re: [lfs-support] Need help regarding eth0 not found and key board mis behaving

Em 10-06-2014 17:16, Armin K. escreveu: On 06/10/2014 09:33 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Em 10-06-2014 05:17, BSV Ramesh escreveu: Dear Team, I am facing a problem with eth0 not found during LFS booting time. for your reference here i am attaching the screenshot (LFS2.png

Re: [lfs-support] Network configuration (chapter 7)

Em 19-06-2014 09:19, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: One thing I know is that you need /etc/sysconfig/ifconfig.wifi0. Name is not important. Could be ifconfig.wlan0, ifconfig.wlp13s0. What matters is the correct interface name inside: IFACE=wlp13s0 One thing is that you can have the older

Re: [lfs-support] Multiple CPU cores, Make and Parallel Builds

Em 15-06-2014 08:33, Baho Utot escreveu: -j works for all LFS packages MKFLAGS=-j $(getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN) make ${MKFLAGS} If MKFLAGS is set (I think, normally, in /etc/profile), race problem appears, and one likes it to remain like that, just unset or define it to be -j 1, before

Re: [lfs-support] iso8859-15 spanish accented characters in lfs-7.5

Em 24-05-2014 13:51, ALZ (phyglos.org) escreveu: Maybe some Portuguese LFS user has found that before. In olpc/ directory there are only two keymaps for ES and PT keyboards. Yes. Older versions of LFS worked out of the box (IIRC), then problem started. One solution, I posted in this thread. I

[lfs-support] udev-lfs support files [Was: ... r10567 ... ]

Em 19-05-2014 21:44, bdu...@higgs.linuxfromscratch.org escreveu: Author: bdubbs Date: Mon May 19 17:44:22 2014 New Revision: 10567 Log: Remove unneeded confiugure switches from gcc. Restore installation of udev-lfs support files. Modified: trunk/BOOK/chapter06/eudev.xml