Hi,
Looks good, ack.
Regards,
Hans
On 04/19/2012 07:10 PM, Pete Batard wrote:
With a few matters out of the way, let's try to get back to business
(provided SF.net fixed their mail issue with gmail servers).
The proposed attached patch adds experimental NetBSD support.
It's basically a
Hi,
All 3 look good to me, ack series.
Regards,
Hans
On 04/20/2012 10:30 AM, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
Hello,
3 new patches to fix 3 (minor) compiler warnings.
The idea to fix every warnings is that _new_ warnings are easy to spot.
Bye
Makes sense, ack.
On 04/20/2012 11:32 AM, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
Hello,
The C compiler is much better than us to know when to inline a function or
not.
This also fixes a lot of compiler warnings:
xusb.c:59:19: warning: function ‘perr’ can never be inlined because it
uses variable
Ack for the new version :)
p.s.
Any chance you could send patches inline? That makes it much easier
to comment on them when reply-ing.
Hint, try git send-email.
Regards,
Hans
On 04/20/2012 11:26 AM, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
Le 20 avril 2012 11:09, Hans de Goedehdego...@redhat.com a écrit :
Le 20 avril 2012 11:39, Hans de Goede hdego...@redhat.com a écrit :
Any chance you could send patches inline? That makes it much easier
to comment on them when reply-ing.
Hint, try git send-email.
It will be hard to use git send-email from work (Microsoft mail
server, etc.) but I will try it
Ref: http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/libusbx/roadmap
I think 1.0.11 target is already quite aggressive.
For 1.0.12, I think we may need more details.
Milestone: v1.0.12
Due in 4 months (09/01/12)
[New features]
* OSX: add HID support
* Windows: libsub0.sys driver support
* Windows: libusbK.sys
Revised patch looks OK to me too, so I will commit/push along with
previous set.
On 2012.04.20 10:57, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
Le 20 avril 2012 11:39, Hans de Goedehdego...@redhat.com a écrit :
Any chance you could send patches inline? That makes it much easier
to comment on them when
On 2012.04.20 11:03, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
I will say OS X HID backend is a nice to have feature
but not absolutely necessary, could be in 1.0.13 or 2.0.
Actually, it was stated for 1.0.11 and I moved it to 1.0.12, as I don't
think we'll have much time to look into it. I don't have a problem
Looks good, ack.
On 04/20/2012 11:37 AM, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
Easy patch.
The default case does nothing so it is harmless to also remove it.
--
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Pete Batard p...@akeo.ie wrote:
On 2012.04.20 11:03, Xiaofan Chen wrote:
I will say OS X HID backend is a nice to have feature
but not absolutely necessary, could be in 1.0.13 or 2.0.
Actually, it was stated for 1.0.11 and I moved it to 1.0.12, as I don't
On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 8:32 AM, Jose Pablo josepablo.cas...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everybody
Can you change the name of this files?
From: To:
libusb.h libusbx.h
libusb-1.0.a libusbx-1.0.a
libusb-1.0.la
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Jose Pablo josepablo.cas...@gmail.comwrote:
What If I use a software which uses libusb-1.0 and then I decide to
install another software which use libusbx-1.0? Do I have to uninstall the
first one to uses the second one? Just because you people can´t decide not
I understand that NOW its not a problem. But in a future may be a problem.
So, why don' t change the names NOW and prevent future problems?
Is an engineering issue, anticipate a future problem and prevent it.
Before the problem blow up in front of you. If it not, it's gonna crash on
an iceberg
13 matches
Mail list logo
