Moving to new thread...
No not lib/xml/, that's were we had been. we need the code under lib/
libxml/. the xml/ directory is there only for backward compatibility.
So is this what you are proposing?
lib
libxml.rb
libxml
attributes.rb
attr.rb
Meaning libxml.rb would look
On Jul 12, 6:41 pm, Charlie Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> As a result, I've checked in the older version. Feel free to shout out
> >> if this is the wrong thing to do.
>
> > Well, I'd like to know why the line wasn't working? The line was there
> > in order to support installation of d
Bugs item #21169, was opened at 2008-07-11 08:33
You can respond by visiting:
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1971&aid=21169&group_id=494
Category: General
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Tiago Macedo (tmacedo)
>Assigned to: Charlie Savag
Hi Trans,
As a result, I've checked in the older version. Feel free to shout out
if this is the wrong thing to do.
Well, I'd like to know why the line wasn't working? The line was there
in order to support installation of documentation to standard OS
location --a 3.5.0 feature. If the line ha
On Jul 12, 3:29 pm, Charlie Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looking into the setup.rb issues, I realized two things:
>
> * setup.rb wasn't included in the gems or .tgz packages, that is now fixed
>
> * setup.rb was using an unreleased 3.5.0 version
>
> The problem with the second issue is whe
Hi everyone,
I propose that we push out a 0.7.1 release that fixes the following bugs:
* Fix bug in accessing attribute results for an xpath expression
* Add backwards compatibility code for accessing node.properties (you
should now use node.attributes)
* Fixes to setup.rb so it correctly wo
Hi!
As I've started reading through the libxml-ruby code, I have run
across methods implemented in C that could be implemented in Ruby. I
would like to change them to be implemented in Ruby. Is anyone
opposed to that? I think it would make coding easier, less buggy, and
more fun!
So like Sea
To follow up on this thread, with the updated setup.rb file in SVN, on
Linux 8, this is what I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] libxml-ruby-0.7.1]$ ruby setup.rb test
Running tests...
Loaded suite test
Started
Ok, patch 383 breaks Windows and Linux.
Here is the patch:
Index: libxml.rb
===
-require 'libxml_ruby'
+require 'libxml/libxml_ruby'
The original code was correct.
In the case of a gem, libxml gets installed like this:
gems
lib
Looking into the setup.rb issues, I realized two things:
* setup.rb wasn't included in the gems or .tgz packages, that is now fixed
* setup.rb was using an unreleased 3.5.0 version
The problem with the second issue is when I tried to run setup.rb on
Linux (Fedora 8), it didn't work. The offe
10 matches
Mail list logo
