[I was sent this by Tim van Erven - thanks - so I'd appreciate CCs of
any replies since I'm not on the devel list.]
Daniel Glöckner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on Sat, 31 Aug 2002 23:34:34 +0200:
>Licq always sets the timezone offset to the non DST offset but
>calculates the unix time of incoming
I joined the list now, so no more need for copies. :-)
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 05:02:23PM +0200, Daniel Glöckner wrote:
> No, the code for tm_gmtoff is correct. It adds an hour to the negative
> offset in summer. So the offset is the same as in winter.
> The code for the global timezone variable
On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 08:02:32PM +0200, Daniel Glöckner wrote:
> The Windows client doesn't change the timezone offset in summer (winter).
That's too bad. It seems you can't possibly get it right, then.
(But I wonder what the Windows client does when it displays the
time for a user in Australi
The following is a message I wrote to Licq-users a couple of weeks ago,
but apparently no one knew the answer (or wanted to admit to it ).
Do tell me if I'm doing something stupid.
This might be a silly question, but. I'm using Licq 1.2.0a at the
moment with the Qt plugin, but I've noticed this
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 07:48:23AM -0500, Jon Keating wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 September 2002 12:00 pm, Ian Collier wrote:
> > So how can I get proper 8-bit transmission?
> Are you setting the default encoding in the options?
Default encoding is ISO-8859-1; I also tried ISO-8859-15.
Is there any logic to when the "Send through server" box is checked?
I keep unchecking it, then half an hour later when I come to reply to a
message it's checked again. This is Licq 1.2.0a by the way.
imc
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 03:20:53PM +0200, Tim van Erven wrote:
> Licq keeps track of when sending through the server is required. It does
> this very poorly. That's to say, the code is ok, but it's just not
> possible for the program to always know when to send through the server.
When talking to
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 09:17:31AM -0600, Alexander Litvinov wrote:
> I have timezone GMT+6, my co-worker has the same timezone.
> But when we are chating via licq, it shows invalid his time.
> For example: now is 9:16, it shows 21:16:16 (+12 hours).
> Why?
If you view his General Info, does it s
On Tue, Oct 15, 2002 at 12:56:17PM +0200, Thomas Reitelbach wrote:
> The main problem is, that currently the first and last SPACE is used as string
> termination criteria (which could in some cases be part of the configuration
> data/value!!)
> What about taking first and last quotation mark as te
Just been given a Solaris 9 box, so of course 1.2.0a stopped working
and I grabbed a daily snapshot (20021023) from the download site.
1. I always seem to get this message on startup:
QObject::connect: No such slot CMainWindow::showReqAuthDlg()
QObject::connect: (sender name: 'unnamed'
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:38:37AM -0500, Jon Keating wrote:
> Segfaults on startup at what point? While loading the GUI? Connecting to the
> server? Can you provide a backtrace or anymore information?
Sorry, that was a rather useless bug report (but you might have been
able to tell me that 20
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 12:30:17AM -0600, Jon Keating wrote:
> This has been fixed in CVS since yesterday.
Yep, it does seem to be. Thanks! :-)
imc
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future
of Java(TM) technology. Join the
Since I've been using a CVS snapshot (20021031) of Licq, my wife's
first message to me (from ICQ 2002a) has always been through the
server. When I was using 1.2.0a I'm pretty sure the messages were
always sent peer-to-peer.
Has something changed, and have I missed a setting somewhere in the
optio
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 06:59:16PM +0200, Pasi Sjoholm wrote:
> Checkout this website, it's a known bug for ICQ 2001b/2002a.
> http://www.tuneld.com/htm/icq/icqbug.htm
Good, I'm glad I'm not imagining it then!
So... the fix is to say you have SOCKS4, then restart ICQ, then switch
back to the cor
On Wed, Nov 13, 2002 at 02:41:32AM -0600, Alexander Litvinov wrote:
> 14:36:31: [SRV] Added (2147483647) to list from server.
I have no answer, but I notice this is MAXINT for a signed 32-bit word
so it's obviously either a bug in the code or a bit of protocol that the
Licq maintainers hadn't spo
I'm wondering why some messages are received through the server,
so I looked in the log...
13:06:07: [SRV] JMC (123456789) changed status: Online (v8).
13:06:17: [SRV] Message from JMC (123456789).
13:06:18: [TCP] Connection from JMC (123456789) [v8].
These entries were accompanied by the arrival
On Fri, Nov 29, 2002 at 12:09:33AM +0100, Thomas Reitelbach wrote:
> - - Per-user-context menu: Completely removed sub-menu "Info". Instead "Info"
> directly calls the info dialog. Always waiting for the submenu to appear was
> quite annoying.
I agree and might have suggested that if I'd got rou
On Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 03:22:55PM +1100, Chris Phillips wrote:
> Maybe I have just missed come config option, but...
>
> When using licq each time a new message comes *from the same person* it
> opens a new window.
Options -> General -> Chatmode Messageview
Does this help?
imc
-
On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 02:36:15PM +0100, Richard Röjfors wrote:
> I read some previous mails in the mailinglist and found that there is
> problems linking the gui against a static libstdc++, but that should work
> if I pass the -mimpure-text flag to libtool.
Yes, that looks like exactly the probl
Compiling the qt-gui from 1.2.3 release produced the following...
/usr/bin/moc ./authuserdlg.h -o authuserdlg.moc
source='authuserdlg.cpp' object='authuserdlg.lo' libtool=yes \
depfile='.deps/authuserdlg.Plo' tmpdepfile='.deps/authuserdlg.TPlo' \
depmode=gcc /bin/sh ../admin/depcomp \
/bin/sh ../l
On Sat, Jan 25, 2003 at 11:09:10AM -0600, Jon Keating wrote:
> > Is my compiler being too strict, or is the code a bit too sloppy? ;-)
> > Is there a compiler option which will stop the complaints?
> A little bit of both. Qt3 has those members as public, Qt2 has them as
> protected. But then ag
Every so often you see a complaint go by that Licq won't load because
"undefined symbol: _ZN10CLogServer4InfoEPKcz" or some such stuff, and
this is a well known problem because you need to compile Licq, qt-gui
and qt all during the same phase of the Moon to get it to work (one
of many reasons why I
Jon Keating wrote:
>On Sunday 26 January 2003 08:22 am, Ian Collier wrote:
>> Anyway, what amuses me is when I have a perfectly working copy of Licq
>> (1.0 as it happens) but if it's been up for a long time then when I
>> try to exit it it says:
>>
>> l
On Sat, Feb 01, 2003 at 09:04:08AM -0600, Jon Keating wrote:
> On Thursday 30 January 2003 06:13 am, Ian Collier wrote:
> > Nope... apparently not as my newly compiled 1.2.3* said that when I exited
> > it this morning. Totally mystifying!
> What version of Qt are you running?
On Mon, Feb 10, 2003 at 09:45:03AM +0200, Sergey Kononenko wrote:
> I think this is not so easy to add this capability in both variants, via local
> sendmail or add function for connecting to smtp server, there is some with
> threads and locking.
I think invoking /usr/lib/sendmail would be suffi
On Tue, Feb 11, 2003 at 07:57:23AM -0300, Juan F. Codagnone wrote:
> yes, but not all installations have a sendmail utility. I don't have one in my
> workstation. you use mutt, so you need to have it :)
Not all installations have qt either, but Licq still requires it.*
If someone is going to the b
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 14:09, Johann Glaser wrote:
> Since 1.2.0 the cancel button vanishes the complete "Send a message"
> dialog when pressed after the send button. Unfortunately, sometimes the
> receipients then _do_ get the message. I press cancel, but the do get
> the msg.
I think
On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 12:40:54AM +, Nick Maynard wrote:
> I like to select text as I read it - it's one of those little mannerisms
> we all have, but that's by the by.
Oh, I thought that was just me. :-)
(Mind you, I don't usually do it in Licq)
imc
--
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 10:18:24PM -0300, Norberto BENSA wrote:
> Is it possible to auto-delete those users who only talk to you once? I'm
> getting tired of manually delete ads
If someone sends you a spam then hold the control key while you close the
message window and they'll be gone.
imc
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 10:59:26AM -0600, Jon Keating wrote:
> I have recently sold all of the Licq source code to Mirabilis.
Hey it's after midday on this side of the Atlantic, you know!
imc
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 12:13:03PM +0300, Ivan Dimitrov wrote:
> why didn't You tell as earlyer? what will happen with licq? from what i
> know mirabilis don't have linux icq client
Yeah, they do... they have ICQ2Go! ;-)
imc
---
This SF.net em
I only use the console plugin occasionally, but just a couple
of comments...
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 11:07:28AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (oh yeah, you'll need the cdk library, it's
> fairly standard so im sure every distro has a
> package)
Personally I've never heard of it, and I can't s
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 10:47:35AM +0200, wwp wrote:
> is anybody running Licq in GNOME? I do so (FC3, GNOME 2.8.0) and see that
> licq main window's geometry is altered each time I open it. Its origin
> position is shifted by 1 pixel to the left and to the top.
I use fvwm and Licq has shifted by
On Fri, Dec 02, 2005 at 04:41:14PM +0900, Jon Keating wrote:
> Yes, please do. So far everyone is using 0.9.7 and having this error, so
> perhaps
> it is an OpenSSL issue.
>
> I've asked others to test different versions, but no one has reported back to
> me about it.
I am running Licq 1.3.0 com
Quoth Jon Keating:
> It'd be nice to have something that can only modify the patch files,
> but still allow them to patch cleanly.
I guess you could try something of the form:
Take a copy of the source file
Apply patch
Apply GNU indent
run diff -uw on the original and patched files to generat
35 matches
Mail list logo
