On Dec 14, 3:02 am, Jorge Ortiz jorge.or...@gmail.com wrote:
Not to beat a dead horse, but... what's the rationale, again, for throwing
an exception after boot? Is there a real danger to some or all RulesSeqs
being mutable after boot? If some, then those rules should selectively be
On Dec 14, 12:10 pm, Viktor Klang viktor.kl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Marius marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 14, 3:02 am, Jorge Ortiz jorge.or...@gmail.com wrote:
Not to beat a dead horse, but... what's the rationale, again, for
throwing
an exception
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Marius marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 14, 12:10 pm, Viktor Klang viktor.kl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Marius marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 14, 3:02 am, Jorge Ortiz jorge.or...@gmail.com wrote:
Not to beat a
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Marius marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 14, 12:53 pm, Viktor Klang viktor.kl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Marius marius.dan...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Dec 14, 12:10 pm, Viktor Klang viktor.kl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun,
On Dec 14, 12:53 pm, Viktor Klang viktor.kl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Marius marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 14, 12:10 pm, Viktor Klang viktor.kl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Marius marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 14,
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Marius marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 14, 3:02 am, Jorge Ortiz jorge.or...@gmail.com wrote:
Not to beat a dead horse, but... what's the rationale, again, for
throwing
an exception after boot? Is there a real danger to some or all RulesSeqs
being
Looks like Hudson was up again, so I pulled in the latest snapshot
from scala-tools and added the log level statement. It didn't seem to
matter much though:
INFO - Service request (GET) / took 35 Milliseconds
Listener added
INFO - Service request (GET) /details.html took 162 Milliseconds
INFO -
David,
I'm not sure where to send feedback on the todo_steps book. I'm
working my way through the todo
project, and I my feedback may be at times very minor in the interests
of doing my bit to help with
the final book product.
There was a warning with the first mvn command:
[INFO]
Hi -
I'm about halfway through the new ToDo Tutorial available here:
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/0d99974c622262d5#
and I wanted to try adding a new column loc (Location).
(NOTE: As pointed out in another threads here today, you have to do
'cd todo' before doing
Hi -
On page 14 of the ToDo tutorial here:
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/0d99974c622262d5#
after I edit the file 'src/main/webapp/index.html' so that it now
reads:
lift:surround with=default at=content
lift:Util.outPlease
lift:menu.item name=LoginLog
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Michael mike...@gmail.com wrote:
Looks like Hudson was up again, so I pulled in the latest snapshot
from scala-tools and added the log level statement.
Hudson's not back. Lift has not been built in a week. I've got an
emergency message out to DavidB to look
Thanks! I'll make the change.
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 7:44 PM, mal3 malcolm.gor...@gmail.com wrote:
David,
I'm not sure where to send feedback on the todo_steps book. I'm
working my way through the todo
project, and I my feedback may be at times very minor in the interests
of doing my
It doesn't; that's not the point of this module. Record will have its own
semantics for accessing data, and I think we'll have a backend that hooks
into JPA if desired, but the point of the code I'm posting now is for people
who want to use JPA directly.
Derek
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 6:49 PM,
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:05 PM, Stefan Scott
stefanscottal...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi -
I'm about halfway through the new ToDo Tutorial available here:
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb/browse_thread/thread/0d99974c622262d5#
and I wanted to try adding a new column loc (Location).
David,
sounds reasonable.
So being able to call prepend/append after boot() makes no sense.
In the light of htis, it shouldn't be possible to call the prepend/append
outside of boot.
I suggest my approach described previously. (Injecting an initialization
context into boot and use that to
I'm doing our SiteMap chapter right now and it strikes me as a little odd
that the default Title for a Loc is the name of the Loc instead of the Loc
text. That means that if I do something like:
def userMenuText = User.name + 's profile
val userMenu = Menu(Loc(usermenu, user :: profile :: Nil,
For some reason, the index.html file is not valid XML.
What development tool/environment are you using? What character encoding
are you using (UTF-8 is the preferred encoding)?
Please attach the failing file to your response so that I can see the exact
problem.
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:25
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 6:51 AM, Viktor Klang viktor.kl...@gmail.comwrote:
David,
sounds reasonable.
So being able to call prepend/append after boot() makes no sense.
In the light of htis, it shouldn't be possible to call the prepend/append
outside of boot.
I suggest my approach
I agree with david, in fact protouser contains several things I don't
need (not a public website) and it's pretty easy to make your own.
On 12/14/08, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
ProtoUser is designed to allow people to get a project up and running
quickly.
In all my
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 4:01 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 6:51 AM, Viktor Klang viktor.kl...@gmail.comwrote:
David,
sounds reasonable.
So being able to call prepend/append after boot() makes no sense.
In the light of htis, it shouldn't
I can browse to the location just fine. There is no proxy or other
wierdness between me and the internet. Just the usual home firewall
(NAT) device.
On Dec 13, 1:45 pm, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 10:34 AM, mike beckerle mbecke...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks David - I'm not an HTML guy myself either - I've avoided web
apps for years because my mind turns to mush when confronted with
dynamic typing - I *love* Scala's type system and what you're doing
with it...
Anyways I was just going to post that I did take a stab at the same
solution you
So LiftConfig would take the role of LiftRules from API perspective
meaning that LiftRules could be completely hidden from Lift users but
available internally to Lift only ?
Still from maintainability perspective initializing LifRules with a
LiftConfig may imply lots of assignments (unless
On Dec 1, 11:30 am, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
Lift has built in DB sharding. You can have multiple RDBMS connection
identifiers. Each record has its connection identifier associated with it
(where it came from) and there's a place in each MetaModel to insert a
Problem gone now.
After a good night's sleep I just repeated your steps exactly as in
the tutorial (only adding the 'cd todo' before the first 'mvn
jetty:run' as already mentioned) and this everything worked fine.
I'm new to Maven and I was trying it out on various projects from
other (older)
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 2:26 PM, Baconeater baconeater...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 1, 11:30 am, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com
wrote:
Lift has built in DB sharding. You can have multiple RDBMS connection
identifiers. Each record has its connection identifier associated with
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Oliver ola...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've got a error on one of our Apache/Tomcat servers with binding, it
works in Jetty and another Apache/Tomcat server.
It looks like lift is calling some of the function setters after
calling a method on a
Marius,
Is there someway you can communicate what the 'from' and 'to' changes
are so that I can have a chance at being able to fix my now broken
code?
Dan
On Dec 13, 12:31 pm, Marius marius.dan...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
I committed a bunch of changes inLiftRules. In a previous thread
Jorge
Okay,
The problem is that your computer is too fast. :-)
Lift assigns function names based on the nano time. It turns out that the
methods are getting called so fast, there's no nano tick and the order of
the function creation is not reflected in the function name.
I've got a fix. I'll roll it
David
Thanks for the prompt reply.
I'll upgrade to the latest version of lift so I can use the fix when
it comes in. Is everything relatively stable at the current snapshot?
cheers
Oliver
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 11:47 AM, David Pollak
feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay,
The problem
Certainly there is nothing blocking java in any way.
However, just trying again, this time it is working better. Somebody
has fixed something on the server end I'm sure. I'm doing the exact
same thing, but it seems to be able to communicate properly with the
associated servers..
However, mvn
In Lift, the snippet is the equivalent of a Rails controller: it is
the instantiation of a class and invocation of a method on the class.
Because you can have multiple snippets on a page, you can call out
multiple logic streams on a given page and there’s no need to choose
the 'primary' logic
Mike,
There was a recent breaking change to Lift (Marius and I are doing major
code cleanup and this means lots of breaks to the APIs... this will all end
by the end of the month.)
Any of the LiftRules stuff that contains append/prepend has a new form:
LiftRules.appendEarly(makeUtf8)
becomes:
OK, I've gotten through the tutorial (page 23).
I was doing a bit of testing - I tried putting a string of length 2
into field 'desc' (which is supposed to be at least 3 characters
long), and I didn't get an error message.
Too tired now to check to see if the validation code for 'desc' is
Thanks for all the help, it appears to all be working now - I had a
feeling I was going to be fed to the lions, wolves, tigers and bears
if I didn't find a fix, and quick.
One question, does the name generation have to be based on a random
number generator? I realize, with the length of the
35 matches
Mail list logo
