Re: Still failing to operate lilypond 2.20.0 64-bit version.

> On Oct 19, 2023, at 12:47, Ian West wrote: > > From the attached photo you will see that I created in 'home' a folder > called 'LilyPondArea', and in that a folder called 'lilypond-2.24.2'. In the > former I placed the downloaded tar, and in the latter the unpacked files of >

Re: Still failing to operate lilypond 2.20.0 64-bit version.

> From the attached photo you will see that I created in 'home' a > folder called 'LilyPondArea', and in that a folder called > 'lilypond-2.24.2'. In the former I placed the downloaded tar, and in > the latter the unpacked files of lilypond-2.24.2 (i.e. 'bin', etc) Looks good. > I use Textedit

Re: Still failing to operate lilypond 2.20.0 64-bit version.

Le samedi 07 octobre 2023 à 17:46 +0100, Ian West a écrit : > Was there a version (or a build) of 2.20.0 that ran on 64 bit machines? Some > say there was not; I think there was and that I used it. Well, at some point there was an *unofficial* build of 2.20 around as a workaround for th

Re: Still failing to operate lilypond 2.20.0 64-bit version.

> On Oct 7, 2023, at 18:46, Ian West wrote: > > I can see that it is a complex business constructing a new software package. > > I was under the impression that, on 12 Aug 2022, I downloaded lilypong02.20.0 > build 20200311175017-darwin-64.tar, unpacked it and ran the packa

Re: Still failing to operate lilypond 2.20.0 64-bit version.

I can see that it is a complex business constructing a new software package. I was under the impression that, on 12 Aug 2022, I downloaded lilypong02.20.0 build 20200311175017-darwin-64.tar, unpacked it and ran the package on my 64-bit M2 MacBookAir running Ventura 13.4.1 It ran successfully

Re: Still failing to operate lilypond 2.20.0 64-bit version.

> On Oct 7, 2023, at 07:43, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > >> libpaper is listed on >> https://ports.macports.org/port/ghostscript/details/ >> >> Well, that's too bad since there is no actual license >> incompatibility due to the use as subprocess, as already noted by >> several others. Not sure if

Re: Still failing to operate lilypond 2.20.0 64-bit version.

>> I think it's ghostscript – there are no pre-built packages >> available either. While LilyPond doesn't link to it in normal >> builds, gs is needed for converting LilyPond's EPS output files to >> PDF. In other words, a MacPorts user still needs a compiler... > > Damn, you are right.

Re: Still failing to operate lilypond 2.20.0 64-bit version.

David Kastrup writes: > msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca writes: > >> On Fri, 6 Oct 2023, Werner LEMBERG wrote: >> >>> Thanks. I think it's ghostscript – there are no pre-built packages >>> available either. While LilyPond doesn't link to it in normal builds, >>> gs is needed for converting LilyPond's

Re: Still failing to operate lilypond 2.20.0 64-bit version.

 > Le 6 oct. 2023 à 23:18, Werner LEMBERG a écrit : > Thanks. I think it's ghostscript – there are no pre-built packages > available either. While LilyPond doesn't link to it in normal builds, > gs is needed for converting LilyPond's EPS output files to PDF. In > other words, a MacPorts

Re: Still failing to operate lilypond 2.20.0 64-bit version.

msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca writes: > On Fri, 6 Oct 2023, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > >> Thanks. I think it's ghostscript – there are no pre-built packages >> available either. While LilyPond doesn't link to it in normal builds, >> gs is needed for converting LilyPond's EPS output files to PDF. In >>

Re: Still failing to operate lilypond 2.20.0 64-bit version.

On Fri, 6 Oct 2023, Werner LEMBERG wrote: > Thanks. I think it's ghostscript – there are no pre-built packages > available either. While LilyPond doesn't link to it in normal builds, > gs is needed for converting LilyPond's EPS output files to PDF. In > other words, a MacPorts user still needs

Re: Still failing to operate lilypond 2.20.0 64-bit version.

>> Ah, now I remember, thanks! I wasn't fluent enough then with the >> 'ports' program to find out which of the dependencies actually uses >> libpaper, since LilyPond itself [doesn't use it]( >> https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/blob/master/textproc/lilypond/Portfile >> ) > > It's most

Re: Still failing to operate lilypond 2.20.0 64-bit version.

Le ven. 6 oct. 2023 à 22:35, Werner LEMBERG a écrit : > > > It's in the non-distributable list: > > > > not-distributable.txt:lilypond "lilypond" is not distributable > > because its license "GPL-3+" conflicts with license "GPL-2" of > > dependency "libpaper" not-distributable.txt:lilypond-devel

Re: Still failing to operate lilypond 2.20.0 64-bit version.

> Ah, now I remember, thanks! I wasn't fluent enough then with the > 'ports' program to find out which of the dependencies actually uses > libpaper, since LilyPond itself [doesn't use > it](https://github.com/macports/macports-ports/blob/master/textproc/lilypond/Portfile) I've even asked to

Re: Still failing to operate lilypond 2.20.0 64-bit version.

> It's in the non-distributable list: > > not-distributable.txt:lilypond "lilypond" is not distributable > because its license "GPL-3+" conflicts with license "GPL-2" of > dependency "libpaper" not-distributable.txt:lilypond-devel > "lilypond-devel" is not distributable because its license

Re: Still failing to operate lilypond 2.20.0 64-bit version.

Hello, Le ven. 6 oct. 2023 à 15:19, Werner LEMBERG a écrit : > > > All of LilyPond's dependencies definitely are GPLv3-compatible (or > > we could not distribute official binaries on lilypond.org). > > I don't have access to my old Mac in the next days, but there is a > possibility to actually

Re: Still failing to operate lilypond 2.20.0 64-bit version.

>> Again: license issues, as far as I know (but not from Apple in this >> case). > > Are you sure? It seems to me that it just wants clang from XCode. > I can't imagine what else could be useful for building LilyPond and > provided by XCode. Well, there are no pre-built 'lilypond' (or

Re: Still failing to operate lilypond 2.20.0 64-bit version.

> Le 6 oct. 2023 à 07:16, Werner LEMBERG a écrit : > Again: license issues, as far as I know (but not from Apple in this > case). Are you sure? It seems to me that it just wants clang from XCode. I can't imagine what else could be useful for building LilyPond and provided by XCode. > There

Re: Still failing to operate lilypond 2.20.0 64-bit version.

> You are very kind. I shall give it a go. But I think you will have > to agree that this is some 5 orders (***) of magnitude more complex > than versions: 2.12.3, 2.18.2-1, and 2.20.0. I never would have got > into Lilypond were I starting from here. Please always bear in mind that *none* of

Re: Still failing to operate lilypond 2.20.0 64-bit version.

> Le 6 oct. 2023 à 01:23, Knute Snortum a écrit : > > I don't think you ever had the ability to just press a button and install > LilyPond. It used to be true on macOS and Windows. There was a (very minimal) GUI application with basically a simple text editor and a menu button to compile

Re: Still failing to operate lilypond 2.20.0 64-bit version.

David, > Perhaps that might be made clearer in the macOS section of > https://lilypond.org/doc/v2.25/Documentation/web/download . Could you provide better wording for this and the other issues you are mentioning? I can then incorporate your changes into the documentation. Werner

Re: Still failing to operate lilypond 2.20.0 64-bit version.

On Thu 05 Oct 2023 at 23:12:44 (+0200), Jean Abou Samra wrote: > > Le 5 oct. 2023 à 22:39, Ian West a écrit : > > Dear David (copied to Jean, and Paul,) > > You are very kind. I shall give it a go. But I think you will have to > > agree that this is some 5 orders (***) of magnitude more

Re: Still failing to operate lilypond 2.20.0 64-bit version.

I'm going to jump in here and hopely not muddy the waters. You say that you need to know the terminal and many other things to install Lilypond 2.24, but I don't think this is true. I'm not on a Mac; I'm on Ubuntu GNU/Linux but they are similar, I believe. First you go to the download page:

Re: Still failing to operate lilypond 2.20.0 64-bit version.

  > Le 5 oct. 2023 à 22:39, Ian West a écrit : > Dear David (copied to Jean, and Paul,) > You are very kind. I shall give it a go. But I think you will have to > agree that this is some 5 orders (***) of magnitude more complex than > versions: 2.12.3, 2.18.2-1, and 2.20.0. I never

Re: Still failing to operate lilypond 2.20.0 64-bit version.

t 2022 till July 2023. Now I cannot, and I have failed (for >> a month) to overcome the problem. I presumed it hit a bug, or developed a >> mutation. I deleated it and tried to re-extracte the zip. >> >> I want to use my current MacBook Air M2 2022, macOS 13.

Re: Still failing to operate lilypond 2.20.0 64-bit version.

> Le 5 oct. 2023 à 21:26, David Wright a écrit : > > I'm sorry—perhaps I attached too much significance to the OP's > "I do not want to use Frescobaldi." If a GUI is required, > I would have thought a Mac editor could supply that, and > drag-and-drop could run LP on the file that's dropped

Re: Still failing to operate lilypond 2.20.0 64-bit version.

On Thu 05 Oct 2023 at 19:43:27 (+0200), Jean Abou Samra wrote: > > Le 5 oct. 2023 à 17:36, David Wright a écrit : > > > > Is this the way you should be going? > > No, it's not going to give him the GUI that he regrets. I'm sorry—perhaps I attached too much significance to the OP's "I do not

Re: Still failing to operate lilypond 2.20.0 64-bit version.

> Le 5 oct. 2023 à 17:36, David Wright a écrit : > > Is this the way you should be going? No, it's not going to give him the GUI that he regrets.

Re: Still failing to operate lilypond 2.20.0 64-bit version.

failed (for a month) to overcome the problem. I presumed it hit a bug, or developed a mutation. I deleated it and tried to re-extracte the zip.  I want to use my current MacBook Air M2 2022, macOS 13.4.1. I picked up the idea somewhere that the 64-bit M2 processor requires a certain version of lilypond

Re: Still failing to operate lilypond 2.20.0 64-bit version.

till July 2023. Now I cannot, and I have failed (for > a month) to overcome the problem. I presumed it hit a bug, or developed a > mutation. I deleated it and tried to re-extracte the zip. > > I want to use my current MacBook Air M2 2022, macOS 13.4.1. I picked up > the

Still failing to operate lilypond 2.20.0 64-bit version.

the problem. I presumed it hit a bug, or developed a mutation. I deleated it and tried to re-extracte the zip. I want to use my current MacBook Air M2 2022, macOS 13.4.1. I picked up the idea somewhere that the 64-bit M2 processor requires a certain version of lilypond, but I find

Re: 64-bit MacBook Air M2 problems

oes not >> exist. I do not know which would be better: use 2.18.x or 2.22.x? > > > In theory, 2.22.x, which is the latest stable version, but to my knowledge > you won’t find a macOS 64-bit download for it like the unofficial bundle of > LilyPond 2.20. You have to use either

Re: 64-bit MacBook Air M2 problems

Le 18/08/2022 à 14:18, Ian West a écrit : Thanks gentlemen. You have been most helpful. * I am motoring with the 2.22.0 manual; so far everything is working. When it does not, I shall search out the 2.20 as you suggest. * I started to load Frescobaldi, and indeed downloaded

Re: 64-bit MacBook Air M2 problems

[List changed to LilyPond-User, from LilyPond-Devel.] > On 16 Aug 2022, at 22:16, Ian West wrote: > > I reset my laptop to abolish 'smart quotes' . Successful. But there must be > other subtleties that are frustrating me. Perhaps if I type the text with > textedit, then copy and paste to feed

64 bit lilypond on MacOs

there was a thread back in February 2021 that recommended Macports for accessing >2.20.0 on MacOS Catalina and beyond. https://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-user@gnu.org/msg143420.html I'd also recommend using Docker: https://hub.docker.com/r/jeandeaual/lilypond mlewis

Re: Lilypond 64-bit binaries

> Le 22 avr. 2021 à 21:07, Marnen Laibow-Koser a écrit : > > > > On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 3:04 PM Jacques Menu > wrote: > Hello, > > Starting yesterday, I ‘m now running LilyPond 2.20.0 on a Apple mini M1 > running under Big Sur 11.2.3. > > Cool! > > I can

Re: Lilypond 64-bit binaries

On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 3:04 PM Jacques Menu wrote: > Hello, > > Starting yesterday, I ‘m now running LilyPond 2.20.0 on a Apple mini M1 > running under Big Sur 11.2.3. > Cool! I can contribute to building Mac OS versions on my machine. > The reason we’re currently doing Mac builds on

Re: Lilypond 64-bit binaries

..@marnen.org>> > Date: Thursday, April 2, 2020 at 2:18 PM > To: Carl Sorensen mailto:c_soren...@byu.edu>> > Cc: LilyPond Users mailto:lilypond-user@gnu.org>>, > Moritz Heffter mailto:mxo...@me.com>> > Subject: Re: Lilypond 64-bit binaries > > >

Re: Lilypond 64-bit binaries

On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 2:32 PM Kieren MacMillan < kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote: > Hi Carl, > > > Do you have thoughts about how we would get access to that Apple > hardware? > > I believe I have a client who might be willing to donate time on an > internet-accessible Apple server. Feel

Re: Lilypond 64-bit binaries

On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 2:48 PM Karlin High wrote: > On 4/22/2021 1:32 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: > > I believe I have a client who might be willing to donate time on an > internet-accessible Apple server. > > I'm pretty sure the original discussion mentioned MacStadium, a macOS > hosting

Re: Lilypond 64-bit binaries

On 4/22/2021 1:32 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote: I believe I have a client who might be willing to donate time on an internet-accessible Apple server. I'm pretty sure the original discussion mentioned MacStadium, a macOS hosting service. "To support

Re: Lilypond 64-bit binaries

Hi Carl, > Do you have thoughts about how we would get access to that Apple hardware? I believe I have a client who might be willing to donate time on an internet-accessible Apple server. Feel free to ping me off-list if that option is worth pursuing. Cheers, Kieren.

Re: Lilypond 64-bit binaries

access to that Apple hardware? Thanks, Carl From: Marnen Laibow-Koser Date: Thursday, April 2, 2020 at 2:18 PM To: Carl Sorensen Cc: LilyPond Users , Moritz Heffter Subject: Re: Lilypond 64-bit binaries On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 1:49 PM Carl Sorensen mailto:c_soren...@byu.edu>> wrote:

Problem with Lily 2.20 and Frescobaldi 4.1- Win10 64 bit

Hi, I have upgraded both software, and I noticed first that LilyPond did not compile any file, but I had only the Frescobaldi preview. I re-installed both programmes, and LilyPond gave me the error message that LIBFONTCONFIG-1.DLL and LIBFREETYPE-6.DLL were missing. I upgraded both DLL in the

Re: Mac OS X Catalina 64-bit compile ?

ite alternative. Of course it would be even better if Apple Inc. would open up it’s 64-bit SDK license so that it could be directly used by Lilypond in its build process to provide an official 64-bit Mac OS binary. The current license requires Apple hardware to use the SDK which raises concern

Re: Mac OS X Catalina 64-bit compile ?

> On 30 May 2020, at 11:15, Mats Behre wrote: > > Perhaps using an installer (or putting lilypond in /opt) prevents the need to > explicitly allowing the application to run, but as you can see from below I > can run it from e.g. Downloads. When downloading the Stockfish chess binaries with

Re: Mac OS X Catalina 64-bit compile ?

> On 30 May 2020, at 11:15, Mats Behre wrote: > > On 2020-05-30 10:27, Hans Åberg wrote: >>> On 30 May 2020, at 10:14, Mats Behre wrote: >>> >>> On 2020-05-29 20:18, Hans Åberg wrote: For an editor app, Frescobaldi is much better, and it runs lilypond externally, and for 2.21,

Re: Mac OS X Catalina 64-bit compile ?

ay for this platform >> >> Has LilyPond come so far now?, When will it be ready to be sold out and >> split for other people's profit? >> >> Regards, >> Wim. >> >>> On 29 May 2020, at 19:43 , Karlin High wrote: >>> >>>

Re: Mac OS X Catalina 64-bit compile ?

t; is almost impossible > - when I register myself, I'am to pay for this platform > > Has LilyPond come so far now?, When will it be ready to be sold out and split > for other people's profit? > > Regards, > Wim. > > >> On 29 May 2020, at 19:43 , Karlin High wrote: >

Re: Mac OS X Catalina 64-bit compile ?

On 2020-05-30 10:27, Hans Åberg wrote: On 30 May 2020, at 10:14, Mats Behre wrote: On 2020-05-29 20:18, Hans Åberg wrote: For an editor app, Frescobaldi is much better, and it runs lilypond externally, and for 2.21, there is the installer that I just posted about [1], which does not

Re: Mac OS X Catalina 64-bit compile ?

At least one (the newest in the list) workes for me. Apparantly some of the links are broken by insertion of strange characters after which Catalina completly blocks running it because of a security issue. Thanks for this list! Regards, Wim. > On 29 May 2020, at 20:41 , Karlin High wrote: >

Re: Mac OS X Catalina 64-bit compile ?

> On 30 May 2020, at 10:14, Mats Behre wrote: > > On 2020-05-29 20:18, Hans Åberg wrote: >> For an editor app, Frescobaldi is much better, and it runs lilypond >> externally, and for 2.21, there is the installer that I just posted about >> [1], which does not require MacPorts, or the

Re: Re: Mac OS X Catalina 64-bit compile ?

On 2020-05-29 20:39, Wim van Dommelen wrote: I've seen this setup. It has (at least) two problems: - most of the links are broken, trying to do a straightforward download is almost impossible - when I register myself, I'am to pay for this platform That is strange, I was able

Re: Mac OS X Catalina 64-bit compile ?

On 5/29/2020 1:39 PM, Wim van Dommelen wrote: most of the links are broken, trying to do a straightforward download is almost impossible Sorry, I should have checked further. Do the links on this other page work for you? -- Karlin High

Re: Mac OS X Catalina 64-bit compile ?

out and split for other people's profit? Regards, Wim. > On 29 May 2020, at 19:43 , Karlin High wrote: > > On 5/29/2020 11:29 AM, Wim van Dommelen wrote: >> Is there somebody already working on a proper 64-bit compile of LilyPond for >> the new Mac OS X 10.15.4 "C

Re: Mac OS X Catalina 64-bit compile ?

> On 29 May 2020, at 18:29, Wim van Dommelen wrote: > > Is there somebody already working on a proper 64-bit compile of LilyPond for > the new Mac OS X 10.15.4 "Catalina" version? > > As an end-user now (but with more than 25 years of software experience, a lot &

Re: Mac OS X Catalina 64-bit compile ?

On 5/29/2020 11:29 AM, Wim van Dommelen wrote: Is there somebody already working on a proper 64-bit compile of LilyPond for the new Mac OS X 10.15.4 "Catalina" version? Yes: Marnen Laibow-Koser has produced this. <https://bintray.com/marnen/lilypond-darwin-64> I haven't

Mac OS X Catalina 64-bit compile ?

Is there somebody already working on a proper 64-bit compile of LilyPond for the new Mac OS X 10.15.4 "Catalina" version? As an end-user now (but with more than 25 years of software experience, a lot of mainframe and Unix hours spend in systems programming, now retired), I liked the

Re: Lilypond 64-bit binaries

Marnen Laibow-Koser writes: > On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 1:17 PM David Kastrup wrote: > [...] > >> >> The Guile team won't bother about Guile 1.8, > > > In fact, they said they’d try to help, though I don’t expect much. > > and Guile 2.x (apart from >> the command line executable) does not run

Re: Lilypond 64-bit binaries

On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 1:17 PM David Kastrup wrote: [...] > > The Guile team won't bother about Guile 1.8, In fact, they said they’d try to help, though I don’t expect much. and Guile 2.x (apart from > the command line executable) does not run reliably with 2.20.0 (and with > awful

Re: Lilypond 64-bit binaries

Marnen Laibow-Koser writes: > On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 12:08 PM Moritz Heffter wrote: > >> Well, with a new installation of Catalina on the same machine everything >> is working perfectly. > > > Huh, interesting. Sorry for the inconvenience and thanks for the > additional info. > > On the new

Re: Lilypond 64-bit binaries

Well, with a new installation of Catalina on the same machine everything is working perfectly. On the new system also both package management systems (brew/port) are now installed. It is not caused by them. Also Command Line Tools an Xcode are installed. And everything works. But what is it

Re: Lilypond 64-bit binaries

On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 12:08 PM Moritz Heffter wrote: > Well, with a new installation of Catalina on the same machine everything > is working perfectly. Huh, interesting. Sorry for the inconvenience and thanks for the additional info. On the new system also both package management systems

Re: Lilypond 64-bit binaries

> On 3 Apr 2020, at 18:08, Moritz Heffter wrote: > > Well, with a new installation of Catalina on the same machine everything is > working perfectly. On the new system also both package management systems > (brew/port) are now installed. It is not caused by them. Also Command Line > Tools

Re: Lilypond 64-bit binaries

> Am 02.04.2020 um 23:33 schrieb Hans Åberg : > > >> On 2 Apr 2020, at 19:49, Carl Sorensen wrote: >> >> I don’t think it’s a general issue. I think it’s a specific issue, that >> varies from machine to machine. > > A way to see if it is a problem with the installation is to make a second

Re: Lilypond 64-bit binaries

> On 2 Apr 2020, at 19:49, Carl Sorensen wrote: > > I don’t think it’s a general issue. I think it’s a specific issue, that > varies from machine to machine. A way to see if it is a problem with the installation is to make a second volume on the computer and install a new MacOS 10.15 on

Re: Lilypond 64-bit binaries

On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 1:49 PM Carl Sorensen wrote: > > > > > *From: *Marnen Laibow-Koser > *Date: *Thursday, April 2, 2020 at 11:07 AM > *To: *Carl Sorensen > *Cc: *LilyPond Users , Moritz Heffter < > mxo...@me.com> > *Subject: *Re: Lilypond 64-bit binaries

Re: Lilypond 64-bit binaries

From: Marnen Laibow-Koser Date: Thursday, April 2, 2020 at 11:07 AM To: Carl Sorensen Cc: LilyPond Users , Moritz Heffter Subject: Re: Lilypond 64-bit binaries On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 1:02 PM Carl Sorensen mailto:c_soren...@byu.edu>> wrote: I note that Moritz mentions he gets th

Re: Lilypond 64-bit binaries

Best, Moritz > Am 02.04.2020 um 16:48 schrieb Marnen Laibow-Koser : > > > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 10:38 AM Moritz Heffter <mailto:mxo...@me.com>> wrote: > Dear Marnen, > > Thanks for providing 64-bit versions of lilypond. I recently updated to macOS > Catali

Re: Lilypond 64-bit binaries

nen Laibow-Koser > *Date: *Thursday, April 2, 2020 at 8:48 AM > *To: *LilyPond Users , Moritz Heffter < > mxo...@me.com> > *Subject: *Re: Lilypond 64-bit binaries > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 10:38 AM Moritz Heffter wrote: > > Dear

Re: Lilypond 64-bit binaries

I note that Moritz mentions he gets the same results from the MacPorts build. Perhaps the MacPorts people could provide some insight. Carl From: Marnen Laibow-Koser Date: Thursday, April 2, 2020 at 8:48 AM To: LilyPond Users , Moritz Heffter Subject: Re: Lilypond 64-bit binaries On Thu

Re: Lilypond 64-bit binaries

On Thu, Apr 2, 2020 at 10:38 AM Moritz Heffter wrote: > Dear Marnen, > > Thanks for providing 64-bit versions of lilypond. I recently updated to > macOS Catalina and was looking for exactly that. > You’re welcome! > Unfortunatly, each time I try to use the LilyPond.app

Re: 64-bit Mac build of 2.20 is now available! (convert.ly issue)

David Kastrup writes: > Zone Dremik writes: > >> Thank you David, Marnen, David and Carl for your excellent >> suggestions and helpful examples. (I will definitely be using more >> variables in the future.) >> For the convert.ly issue, your recommendations inspired me to try >> using BBE. The

Re: 64-bit Mac build of 2.20 is now available! (convert.ly issue)

Zone Dremik writes: > Thank you David, Marnen, David and Carl for your excellent suggestions and > helpful examples. (I will definitely be using more variables in the future.) > For the convert.ly issue, your recommendations inspired me to try using BBE. > The multi-file search & replace

Build of 2.20 for 64-bit Mac

Dear all, There are several threads about the 64-bit version but I'm choosing open a new thread, because issue may be different and not related to the others. I installed the new Darwin binary of version 2.20 on a new machine running 10.15.3. (Catalina). After that I permanently get

Re: 64-bit Mac build of 2.20 is now available!

putting a few more in there should not be a problem). >>> >>> I've created https://gitlab.com/marnen/lilypond-mac-builder/-/issues/23 for >>> this bug. Feel free to subscribe there for updates, or to create new >>> issues there if they're problems with the 64

Re: 64-bit Mac build of 2.20 is now available!

On Wed 18 Mar 2020 at 16:18:02 (+), Zone Dremik wrote: > It was quite a few years ago that copied this code sample from the LilyPond > Notation Reference v2.18.2 webpage: > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/flexible-vertical-spacing-paper-variables > I've compiled hundreds

Re: 64-bit Mac build of 2.20 is now available!

David Kastrup writes: > Marnen Laibow-Koser writes: > >> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 12:18 PM Zone Dremik wrote: >> >>> It was quite a few years ago that copied this code sample from the >>> LilyPond Notation Reference v2.18.2 webpage: >>> >>>

Re: 64-bit Mac build of 2.20 is now available!

Marnen Laibow-Koser writes: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 12:18 PM Zone Dremik wrote: > >> It was quite a few years ago that copied this code sample from the >> LilyPond Notation Reference v2.18.2 webpage: >> >>

Re: 64-bit Mac build of 2.20 is now available!

On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 12:18 PM Zone Dremik wrote: > It was quite a few years ago that copied this code sample from the > LilyPond Notation Reference v2.18.2 webpage: > > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/flexible-vertical-spacing-paper-variables > I've compiled hundreds of

Re: 64-bit Mac build of 2.20 is now available!

It was quite a few years ago that copied this code sample from the LilyPond Notation Reference v2.18.2 webpage: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/flexible-vertical-spacing-paper-variables I've compiled hundreds of Lead-Sheets with it, but haven't up-dated Lilypond since

Re: 64-bit Mac build of 2.20 is now available!

Marnen Laibow-Koser writes: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 6:49 AM David Kastrup wrote: > >> Marnen Laibow-Koser writes: > > [...] > >> >> >> > AFAIK this was never proper syntax to begin with. Does it compile with >> > LilyPond 2.18? I'd be surprised if it does. >> >> It was prior to 2.18, and

Re: 64-bit Mac build of 2.20 is now available!

On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 6:49 AM David Kastrup wrote: > Marnen Laibow-Koser writes: [...] > > > > AFAIK this was never proper syntax to begin with. Does it compile with > > LilyPond 2.18? I'd be surprised if it does. > > It was prior to 2.18, and it was merely discouraged with 2.18 (in the >

Re: 64-bit Mac build of 2.20 is now available!

Davide Liessi writes: > Il giorno mer 18 mar 2020 alle ore 13:07 David Kastrup ha > scritto: >> It doesn't make sense to have convert-ly produce non-working code for >> version 2.19.40 . And convert-ly cannot promise to fix code that never >> worked due to its combination of version statement

Re: 64-bit Mac build of 2.20 is now available!

Il giorno mer 18 mar 2020 alle ore 13:07 David Kastrup ha scritto: > It doesn't make sense to have convert-ly produce non-working code for > version 2.19.40 . And convert-ly cannot promise to fix code that never > worked due to its combination of version statement and old syntax. > > It isn't

Re: 64-bit Mac build of 2.20 is now available!

Davide Liessi writes: > Dear David, > > Il giorno mer 18 mar 2020 alle ore 09:48 David Kastrup ha > scritto: >> For which version number then? Likely the one for issue 4800? > > I may be wrong, but shouldn't it be for the version containing the new > convert-ly rule (that is, by now, later

Re: 64-bit Mac build of 2.20 is now available!

Dear David, Il giorno mer 18 mar 2020 alle ore 09:48 David Kastrup ha scritto: > For which version number then? Likely the one for issue 4800? I may be wrong, but shouldn't it be for the version containing the new convert-ly rule (that is, by now, later than 2.20.0)? If a user has already

Re: 64-bit Mac build of 2.20 is now available!

Marnen Laibow-Koser writes: > On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 12:57 AM Zone Dremik wrote: > >> Hello, convert.ly is not working as you described. Here are some code >> excerpts. >> Let me know if there is anything else I can send that would be helpful. >> >> From a file previously created with

Re: 64-bit Mac build of 2.20 is now available!

Thomas Morley writes: > Am Mi., 18. März 2020 um 07:49 Uhr schrieb Aaron Hill > : >> >> On 2020-03-17 11:05 pm, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: >> > AFAIK this was never proper syntax to begin with. Does it compile with >> > LilyPond 2.18? I'd be surprised if it does. >> >> Definitely valid syntax

Re: 64-bit Mac build of 2.20 is now available!

Am Mi., 18. März 2020 um 07:49 Uhr schrieb Aaron Hill : > > On 2020-03-17 11:05 pm, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: > > AFAIK this was never proper syntax to begin with. Does it compile with > > LilyPond 2.18? I'd be surprised if it does. > > Definitely valid syntax in 2.18.2 [1]: > > > \version

Re: 64-bit Mac build of 2.20 is now available!

On 2020-03-17 11:05 pm, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: AFAIK this was never proper syntax to begin with. Does it compile with LilyPond 2.18? I'd be surprised if it does. Definitely valid syntax in 2.18.2 [1]: \version "2.18.2" \paper { indent = #0 ragged-right = ##f

Re: 64-bit Mac build of 2.20 is now available!

On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 12:57 AM Zone Dremik wrote: > Hello, convert.ly is not working as you described. Here are some code > excerpts. > Let me know if there is anything else I can send that would be helpful. > > From a file previously created with Frescobaldi 2.20 & Lilypond 2.18: > > \version

Re: 64-bit Mac build of 2.20 is now available!

ished Scores/Three White Gulls/Three White Gulls (Score).ly" Exited with return code 1. On Tuesday, March 17, 2020, 02:28:33 PM EDT, Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote: On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 12:10 PM Zone Dremik wrote: A Big Thank You to Marnen Laibow-Koser —  Mac OS 64 bit Lil

Re: 64-bit Mac build of 2.20 is now available!

On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 7:45 PM Davide Liessi wrote: > Il giorno mer 18 mar 2020 alle ore 00:23 Marnen Laibow-Koser > ha scritto: > > Will that work on Mac OS without the problems that have plagued the > other 3.x versions of Fresco? > > I solved some problems, but unfortunately not all. > The

Re: 64-bit Mac build of 2.20 is now available!

Il giorno mer 18 mar 2020 alle ore 00:23 Marnen Laibow-Koser ha scritto: > Will that work on Mac OS without the problems that have plagued the other 3.x > versions of Fresco? I solved some problems, but unfortunately not all. The main packaging problem concerning PyQtWebEngine, which caused

Re: 64-bit Mac build of 2.20 is now available!

On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 7:17 PM Davide Liessi wrote: > Il giorno mar 17 mar 2020 alle ore 22:36 Arle Lommel > ha scritto: > > #2: Update.ly doesn’t work for me when invoked from Frescobaldi. I get > this message about a bad CPU type when I run it from Frescobaldi. > > Known problem, depending

Re: 64-bit Mac build of 2.20 is now available!

Il giorno mar 17 mar 2020 alle ore 22:36 Arle Lommel ha scritto: > #2: Update.ly doesn’t work for me when invoked from Frescobaldi. I get this > message about a bad CPU type when I run it from Frescobaldi. Known problem, depending only on Frescobaldi, see

Re: 64-bit Mac build of 2.20 is now available!

en/lilypond-mac-builder/-/issues/23 for >> this bug. Feel free to subscribe there for updates, or to create new >> issues there if they're problems with the 64-bit Mac packaging rather than >> LilyPond itself. >> >> >> Great. Glad it seems solvable. >> > > Yeah, if

Re: 64-bit Mac build of 2.20 is now available!

y a script > that sets a few variables and calls the real executable, so putting a few > more in there should not be a problem). > > I've created https://gitlab.com/marnen/lilypond-mac-builder/-/issues/23 for > this bug. Feel free to subscribe there for updates, or to create new > issues

Re: 64-bit Mac build of 2.20 is now available!

new issues there if > they're problems with the 64-bit Mac packaging rather than LilyPond itself. Great. Glad it seems solvable. > #2: Update.ly <http://update.ly/> doesn’t work for me when invoked from > Frescobaldi. > > You mean convert-ly? Yes. My mistake. > I get

  1   2   >