We'll think about this (and some more, when I'm back and we're ready with our
current job ...). OK, Janek?
Best
Urs
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com schrieb:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 5:31 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
There are also a few advantages [of using MuseScore]:
a)
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Urs Liska li...@ursliska.de wrote:
We'll think about this (and some more, when I'm back and we're ready with our
current job ...). OK, Janek?
ok
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Totally agree Wasil. A beautiful sheet, the syntax is only very small part.
Lilypond make other default setting great. We just focus on music and
syntax. These are the key of music.
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Wasil Sergejczyk szelga@gmail.comwrote:
There is a chance, but only when
On 29 mai 2012, at 23:56, Lucas Gonze wrote:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Nils l...@nilsgey.de wrote:
AFAIK musescore dropped Lilypond export support because of a lack of
interest and in favour of musicXML (whatever that means, I read it somewhere
on the musescore twitter account or
Jan Nieuwenhuizen janneke at gnu.org writes:
Wouldn't LilyPond have been a technically superior choice for this
sponsoring project? What are we missing?
Somebody who was willing to run a Kickstarter project and make it happen.
The people who put the project together choose their tools,
Carl Sorensen carl.d.soren...@gmail.com writes:
Jan Nieuwenhuizen janneke at gnu.org writes:
Wouldn't LilyPond have been a technically superior choice for this
sponsoring project? What are we missing?
Somebody who was willing to run a Kickstarter project and make it
happen.
It is not
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 1:16 AM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
I know I'm rehashing old ground, but I think that these projects stand to
mutually benefit from each other if and only if they evolve in natural
directions given their goals. ... In general, the idea of LilyPond is to
build a
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 5:31 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
There are also a few advantages [of using MuseScore]:
a) MusicXML export means the results are usable in a variety of notation
programs making use of an open standard.
Indeed, having MusicXML exprort can give Lily more
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 17:31:49 +0200
From: David Kastrup d...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Re: musescore lands sponsoring?
Message-ID: 87fwahu1lm@fencepost.gnu.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Carl Sorensen carl.d.soren...@gmail.com writes:
Jan
Just to make sure you have seen
http://www.opengoldbergvariations.org/b-sendorfer-sponsors-open-goldberg-project-providing-concert-grand-ceus-recording-technology-0
Wouldn't LilyPond have been a technically superior choice for this
sponsoring project? What are we missing?
Jan
--
Jan
On 29 mai 2012, at 09:56, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Just to make sure you have seen
http://www.opengoldbergvariations.org/b-sendorfer-sponsors-open-goldberg-project-providing-concert-grand-ceus-recording-technology-0
Wouldn't LilyPond have been a technically superior choice for this
m...@apollinemike.com m...@apollinemike.com writes:
On 29 mai 2012, at 09:56, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
Just to make sure you have seen
http://www.opengoldbergvariations.org/b-sendorfer-sponsors-open-goldberg-project-providing-concert-grand-ceus-recording-technology-0
Wouldn't
On Tue, 29 May 2012 11:15:08 +0200
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
A SponsorshipMeister is dangerously close to the premise that we can
turn money into LilyPond. The truth is that we can turn enthusiasm into
LilyPond.
Money does prevent enthusiasm from working at a gas station.
Nil
David Kastrup writes:
We're missing consensus. I think that if there were a
SponsorshipMeister, not unlike the BugMeister, we could do really cool
stuff like this. Besides the monetary aid, this brings huge
recognition to the community and gets a lot of people on board.
A
Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org writes:
David Kastrup writes:
We're missing consensus. I think that if there were a
SponsorshipMeister, not unlike the BugMeister, we could do really cool
stuff like this. Besides the monetary aid, this brings huge
recognition to the community and gets a
2012/5/29 Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org:
Just to make sure you have seen
http://www.opengoldbergvariations.org/b-sendorfer-sponsors-open-goldberg-project-providing-concert-grand-ceus-recording-technology-0
Wouldn't LilyPond have been a technically superior choice for this
Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com writes:
2012/5/29 Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org:
Just to make sure you have seen
http://www.opengoldbergvariations.org/b-sendorfer-sponsors-open-goldberg-project-providing-concert-grand-ceus-recording-technology-0
Wouldn't LilyPond have been a
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Federico Bruni fedel...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/5/29 Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org:
Just to make sure you have seen
http://www.opengoldbergvariations.org/b-sendorfer-sponsors-open-goldberg-project-providing-concert-grand-ceus-recording-technology-0
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org wrote:
http://www.opengoldbergvariations.org/b-sendorfer-sponsors-open-goldberg-project-providing-concert-grand-ceus-recording-technology-0
Wouldn't LilyPond have been a technically superior choice for this
sponsoring
2012/5/29 Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com:
What do you mean with technically superior? It's about the output?
I think it's LilyPond output. Can you confirm?
http://www.opengoldbergvariations.org/node/191
This isn't Lily output, it's directly from MuseScore.
You were fooled by the fact
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 4:56 AM, Jan Nieuwenhuizen jann...@gnu.org wrote:
Just to make sure you have seen
http://www.opengoldbergvariations.org/b-sendorfer-sponsors-open-goldberg-project-providing-concert-grand-ceus-recording-technology-0
Wouldn't LilyPond have been a technically
Excerpts from Jan Nieuwenhuizen's message of Tue May 29 09:56:14 +0200 2012:
Wouldn't LilyPond have been a technically superior choice for this
sponsoring project? What are we missing?
Just talking about my personal experience ..
I personally can only say that I've tried teaching lilypond to
On Tue, 29 May 2012 10:15:31 +0200
Marc Weber marco-owe...@gmx.de wrote:
Musecore fails to render some specific cases when printing - but
exporting to lilypond seems to work in all (little) cases I tried.
Thus for simple cases I like that combination: musescore for typing and
lilypond for
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Nils l...@nilsgey.de wrote:
AFAIK musescore dropped Lilypond export support because of a lack of interest
and in favour of musicXML (whatever that means, I read it somewhere on the
musescore twitter account or something like this).
It may still work, but we
On 29-5-2012 23:16, Nils wrote:
On Tue, 29 May 2012 10:15:31 +0200
Marc Webermarco-owe...@gmx.de wrote:
Musecore fails to render some specific cases when printing - but
exporting to lilypond seems to work in all (little) cases I tried.
Thus for simple cases I like that combination: musescore
On 29/05/12 20:44, David Kastrup wrote:
Jan Nieuwenhuizenjann...@gnu.org writes:
How to turn enthousiasm into LilyPond, if people are unaware of it's
existence. Long before we go SponsorshipMeister, I would suggest a
PRMeister.
I don't think that people are unaware of its existence.
Lucas Gonze lucas.go...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Nils l...@nilsgey.de wrote:
AFAIK musescore dropped Lilypond export support because of a lack of
interest and in favour of musicXML (whatever that means, I read it
somewhere on the musescore twitter account or
On 12-05-29 10:36 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
MuseScore is not a GUI for LilyPond, like LilyPond is not a frontend for
PostScript. If it were a GUI for LilyPond, you could send a LilyPond
file to a MuseScore guy, and he would make some amendments with
MuseScore and send you back the changed
There is a chance, but only when the syntax is *obvious* enough.
Currently used syntax isn't obvious enough, but it won't be difficult
to change it, i think.
for me, as a beginner, notes syntax wasn't the difficult part (then again,
i'm used to write programming code), but page layout,
29 matches
Mail list logo
