Re: dynamic marks on multiple lines between piano staves

Thank you R.Shann and Noeck, your solution { bes' -\markup \column { \line { "1." \dynamic "p" } \line { "2." \dynamic "f" } } } works perfectly and it is pretty simple. s. On 21 October 2016 at 21:51, Noeck wrote: > Hi, > > Am 21.10.2016 um

Re: dynamic marks on multiple lines between piano staves

Dear Urs and Simon I'm not sure to understand how to correctly use your solution: > << > \new Staff { c'1 } > \new Dynamics { s1 \p } > \new Dynamics { s1 \f } > \new Staff { \clef bass c1 } > >> My apologize if my question is naif, but in case I need to apply my dynamics not at the

Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox

2016-10-22 0:17 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > Thomas Morley writes: > >> 2016-10-21 23:30 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : >>> Thomas Morley writes: >>> I mostly use self-compiled LilyPond which seems to work as it

Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox

Thomas Morley writes: > 2016-10-21 23:30 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : >> Thomas Morley writes: >> >>> I mostly use self-compiled LilyPond which seems to work as it should. >>> I'd call it a bug not to have access to all

Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox

2016-10-21 23:30 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > Thomas Morley writes: > >> I mostly use self-compiled LilyPond which seems to work as it should. >> I'd call it a bug not to have access to all guile-modules in released >> version. > > libreadline is not a Guile

Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox

Thomas Morley writes: > I mostly use self-compiled LilyPond which seems to work as it should. > I'd call it a bug not to have access to all guile-modules in released > version. libreadline is not a Guile module. It can be loaded at runtime by Guile. Maybe check

Re: Tie settings question

2016-10-21 22:48 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley : > 2016-10-21 22:39 GMT+02:00 Karol Majewski : >> OK, this does change skyline-padding in chords, but unfotunately it also >> changes skyline-padding between single notes (see example: c'8~ c'4). I'd >> like tied

Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox

2016-10-21 22:20 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > Thomas Morley writes: > >> 2016-10-21 22:06 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley : >>> 2016-10-21 21:55 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : >> Different version number? Or missing support

Re: Tie settings question

Yes, now it does what I want. Thx a lot. This is the final code - without color indicators: hint = \override TieColumn.before-line-breaking = #(lambda (grob) (let ((ties (ly:grob-array->list (ly:grob-object grob 'ties (if (> (length ties) 1) (for-each (lambda (tie)

Re: Tie settings question

2016-10-21 22:39 GMT+02:00 Karol Majewski : > OK, this does change skyline-padding in chords, but unfotunately it also > changes skyline-padding between single notes (see example: c'8~ c'4). I'd > like tied chords to have different skyline-padding value than tied single > notes.

Re: Tie settings question

OK, this does change skyline-padding in chords, but unfotunately it also changes skyline-padding between single notes (see example: c'8~ c'4). I'd like tied chords to have different skyline-padding value than tied single notes. hint = \override TieColumn.before-line-breaking = #(lambda

Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox

Thomas Morley writes: > 2016-10-21 22:06 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley : >> 2016-10-21 21:55 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > >>> Different version number? Or missing support at compilation time? What >>> does >>> >>> ldd >>> >>> state

Re: Zapateado in Lilypond

Noeck writes: > Hi Harm, > >> I'd go for drummode. Feels more appropriate, leading to: > > Wow, very nice! When I saw the question, I thought it sounds like some > kind of drummode and the staccato dot could be moved to produce the dot. > But I would not have been able to

Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox

Thomas Morley writes: > 2016-10-21 19:34 GMT+02:00 David Sumbler : >> On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 18:56 +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > >>> For the record, I get >>> >>> p guile-1.8- >>> libs >>> - Core Guile >>> libraries >>> >>> i guile-1.8- >>>

Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox

2016-10-21 22:06 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley : > 2016-10-21 21:55 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : >> Different version number? Or missing support at compilation time? What >> does >> >> ldd >> >> state here? >> >> On my self-compiled LilyPond I see >> >>

Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox

2016-10-21 21:55 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup : > Thomas Morley writes: > >> 2016-10-21 19:34 GMT+02:00 David Sumbler : >>> On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 18:56 +0200, David Kastrup wrote: >> For the record, I get p guile-1.8-

Re: Zapateado in Lilypond

Hi Harm, > I'd go for drummode. Feels more appropriate, leading to: Wow, very nice! When I saw the question, I thought it sounds like some kind of drummode and the staccato dot could be moved to produce the dot. But I would not have been able to do this nice coding. One question: is 1,1,1 the

Re: dynamic marks on multiple lines between piano staves

Hi, Am 21.10.2016 um 10:25 schrieb Richard Shann: > <>^\markup\scale #'(1 . 1)\column{\line{1. \dynamic p > }\line{2. \dynamic f} > } Why the \scale? Otherwise, my suggestion would have been very similar: { bes' -\markup \column { \line { "1." \dynamic "p" } \line {

Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox

2016-10-21 19:34 GMT+02:00 David Sumbler : > On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 18:56 +0200, David Kastrup wrote: >> For the record, I get >> >> p guile-1.8- >> libs >> - Core Guile >> libraries >> >> i guile-1.8- >> libs:amd64 >> - Core Guile >> libraries >> >> >> with the above

Re: Configurable Rests

Kieren MacMillan writes: > Hi Werner, > >> to show you what I want: > > I believe the following gives the output you want: > > %%% SNIPPET BEGINS > \version "2.19" > > hornI = { > \partcombineApart > c''4 \once \partcombineUnisono r c'' r > g' \once

Re: Configurable Rests

Hi Werner, > to show you what I want: I believe the following gives the output you want: %%% SNIPPET BEGINS \version "2.19" hornI = { \partcombineApart c''4 \once \partcombineUnisono r c'' r g' \once \partcombineUnisono r c' r \bar "|." } hornII = { g'4 r g'8 r c'' r r4 r e'8 g'

Re: Start volta after time signature change (instead of before)?

On 21 October 2016 at 19:52, David Kastrup wrote: > Risto Vääräniemi writes: > > > On 20 October 2016 at 22:16, Risto Vääräniemi > wrote: > > > >> On 20 October 2016 at 21:40, David Kastrup wrote: > >> > >>> Risto Vääräniemi

Re: Configurable Rests

Hi Kieren et al. to show you what I want: === snip = \version "2.18.2" hornI = { c''4 r c'' r g' r c' r \bar "|." } hornII = { g'4 r g'8 r c'' r r4 r e'8 g' c''4 } hornIA = { c''4 b'4\rest c'' r g' b'4\rest c' r } hornIIA = { g'4 s g'8

Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox

On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 18:56 +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > Mark Knoop writes: > > > > > At 17:11 on 21 Oct 2016, David Sumbler wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Given that, on my 64-bit Linux system, I have Guile 1.8 >

Re: Start volta after time signature change (instead of before)?

Risto Vääräniemi writes: > On 20 October 2016 at 22:16, Risto Vääräniemi wrote: > >> >> On 20 October 2016 at 21:40, David Kastrup wrote: >> >>> Risto Vääräniemi writes: >>> >>> > Is there a way to start the volta

Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox

Mark Knoop writes: > At 17:11 on 21 Oct 2016, David Sumbler wrote: >>> > > > > Given that, on my 64-bit Linux system, I have Guile 1.8 > ^^ > >>> > > I downloaded lilypond-2.19.48-1.linux-64.sh from http://lilypond. >

Re: Start volta after time signature change (instead of before)?

On 20 October 2016 at 22:16, Risto Vääräniemi wrote: > > On 20 October 2016 at 21:40, David Kastrup wrote: > >> Risto Vääräniemi writes: >> >> > Is there a way to start the volta repeat after the time signature >> change? >> >> Something

Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox

At 17:11 on 21 Oct 2016, David Sumbler wrote: >> > > > > Given that, on my 64-bit Linux system, I have Guile 1.8 ^^ >> > > I downloaded lilypond-2.19.48-1.linux-64.sh from http://lilypond. ^^ >Yes.  The output from

Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox

On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 17:44 +0200, Thomas Morley wrote: > 2016-10-21 17:00 GMT+02:00 David Sumbler : > > > > On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 13:59 +0100, David Sumbler wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 11:34 +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > David Sumbler

Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox

2016-10-21 17:00 GMT+02:00 David Sumbler : > On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 13:59 +0100, David Sumbler wrote: >> On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 11:34 +0200, David Kastrup wrote: >> > >> > David Sumbler writes: >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > Given that, on my 64-bit Linux system,

Re: No readline in scheme-sandbox

On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 13:59 +0100, David Sumbler wrote: > On Wed, 2016-10-19 at 11:34 +0200, David Kastrup wrote: > > > > David Sumbler writes: > > > > > > > > > > > Given that, on my 64-bit Linux system, I have Guile 1.8 installed > > > complete with readline, I'd be very

Re: Spanish terms for LH and RH

2016-10-21 16:43 GMT+02:00 Francisco Vila : > 2016-10-21 10:18 GMT+02:00 Andrew Bernard : > >> I am engraving the Soler Fandango, an 18c Spanish piece. the LH and RH >> indications in the MS I am working from are a little unclear. Given that >>

Re: Spanish terms for LH and RH

2016-10-21 10:18 GMT+02:00 Andrew Bernard : > I am engraving the Soler Fandango, an 18c Spanish piece. the LH and RH > indications in the MS I am working from are a little unclear. Given that > mano izqueirda is left hand and mano derecha is right hand I would have >

Re: dynamic marks on multiple lines between piano staves

Hi Richard, >> Ah, of course it's also a matter of how often you need that. > > surely not? Isn't it a matter of whether you want the various > occurrences to be horizontally aligned or not? Not really… one can easily tweak the horizontal alignment on a single multi-line dynamic. The

Re: Configurable Rests

Hi Werner, > - a "r4", if the instrument is on a single staff > - a "r4", if the instrument is \voiceOne but doesn't have this rest > common with the other instrument > - a "h4\rest" for a common rest if the instrument is used as \voiceOne > and > - a "r4" for a not common rest on \voiceTwo and >

Re: Configurable Rests

Hi Werner, I think you're looking for tags: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/different-editions-from-one-source#using-tags HTH, Pierre 2016-10-21 11:24 GMT+02:00 Werner Arnhold : > Hi all, > > I am new to this list so it might be that my question

Re: dynamic marks on multiple lines between piano staves

On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 10:50 +0200, Urs Liska wrote: > > Am 21.10.2016 um 10:41 schrieb Simon Albrecht: > > Or you just use one markup for the two indications :-) > > Ah, of course it's also a matter of how often you need that. surely not? Isn't it a matter of whether you want the various

Configurable Rests

Hi all, I am new to this list so it might be that my question is just answered. I did not find a hint in the archives. I try to set an orchestral work. To get a partitura as well as single sheet for the instruments I want to write the music for them in different files and then combine them to a

Re: Line cap style in scheme

2016-10-21 2:31 GMT+02:00 Andrew Bernard : > So, in partial answer to my own question, we can achieve control over line > cap style using a markup context, and the following code works fine: > > > > (if is-rest? > > empty-stencil > >

Re: dynamic marks on multiple lines between piano staves

On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 10:28 +0200, Sirius Barras wrote: > > What is the partial solution you found so far (would be very helpful > to > > know)? > > > Difficult to answer, found many things:) > > > When I have not been able to solve my problem with what I thought it > was the correct (but

Re: dynamic marks on multiple lines between piano staves

Am 21.10.2016 um 10:41 schrieb Simon Albrecht: > Or you just use one markup for the two indications :-) Ah, of course it's also a matter of how often you need that. If it's something that happens throughout the score the approach with two dynamics contexts is the way to go, if it's just a

Re: dynamic marks on multiple lines between piano staves

On 21.10.2016 10:28, Sirius Barras wrote: 1) I separated left and right hand using two variables. To generate the output I do: \score { \new PianoStaff << \new Staff = "right" {\right} \new Staff = "left" { \left} >> \layout { } } Then, even if possible it would be

Re: dynamic marks on multiple lines between piano staves

Am 21.10.2016 um 10:28 schrieb Sirius Barras: > > What is the partial solution you found so far (would be very helpful to > > know)? > > Difficult to answer, found many things:) > > When I have not been able to solve my problem with what I thought it > was the correct (but ugly)... > > \mark

Re: dynamic marks on multiple lines between piano staves

On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 09:06 +0200, Sirius Barras wrote: > I would like to write *between* the piano staves, on two different > lines > > > 1.p > 2.f > > > where p and f are dynamic marks. What I should do? I wonder if you are just looking for some markup? e.g. <>^\markup\scale #'(1 .

Re: dynamic marks on multiple lines between piano staves

> What is the partial solution you found so far (would be very helpful to > know)? Difficult to answer, found many things:) When I have not been able to solve my problem with what I thought it was the correct (but ugly)... \mark \markup \column {"1.\dynamic p" "2.\dynamic f"} bes'2.-3

Spanish terms for LH and RH

I am engraving the Soler Fandango, an 18c Spanish piece. the LH and RH indications in the MS I am working from are a little unclear. Given that mano izqueirda is left hand and mano derecha is right hand I would have expected to see I. and D., but the writer uses m. and D. Is this normal? I am not

Re: dynamic marks on multiple lines between piano staves

Am 21.10.2016 um 09:06 schrieb Sirius Barras: > I would like to write *between* the piano staves, on two different lines > > 1.p > 2.f > > where p and f are dynamic marks. What I should do? And by the way do > you suggest a different typographical solution? > Thank you, s. > > P.S. I read the

dynamic marks on multiple lines between piano staves

I would like to write *between* the piano staves, on two different lines 1.p 2.f where p and f are dynamic marks. What I should do? And by the way do you suggest a different typographical solution? Thank you, s. P.S. I read the manual, googled online but I found only partial solution to my