Gilberto,
On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Gilberto Agostinho
gilbertohasn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi David,
Indeed that exact example is the worst one, but I think that our way of
dealing with engraving rules, spacing, etc. should not be conducted by what
bother us or not. I really think that
Hi all,
I am not too sure if I do agree with some of the automatic beam position
done by LilyPond, and also by the spacing between a time signature and the
first note. First, about the beams. Here is a little code showing the
problem:
beam.ly http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/file/n153538
On 11/08/2013 05:50 PM, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
Hi all,
I am not too sure if I do agree with some of the automatic beam position
done by LilyPond, and also by the spacing between a time signature and the
first note. First, about the beams. Here is a little code showing the
problem:
beam.ly
in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Beam-positions-and-time-signature-spacing-tp153538p153544.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman
On 11/08/2013 08:03 PM, Gilberto Agostinho wrote:
Hi Peter!
Thanks a lot for the scan. I would say that even though she doesn't
condemns
her example a), she still considers b) as bad and c) as the best
compromise.
My corrections above are all similar to her example c)
I interpret her as
Hi,
2013/11/8 Gilberto Agostinho gilbertohasn...@gmail.com:
Hi Peter!
Thanks a lot for the scan. I would say that even though she doesn't condemns
her example a), she still considers b) as bad and c) as the best compromise.
My corrections above are all similar to her example c)
What about
on the gaps, I think
that this could look bad. My guess is that it would make the notes to appear
to float above the staff, and it would make reading more difficult.
Regards,
Gilberto
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Beam-positions-and-time-signature-spacing
Hi Gilberto,
2013/11/8 Gilberto Agostinho gilbertohasn...@gmail.com:
Hi Janek,
I showed him two scores of mine, one with default settings for size, and the
had #(set-global-staff-size 18)
ok, thanks. I supposed smaller staffsize (such problems are more
visible with small sizes).
As for
Hi Peter,
I will ask him about this, and I will also check some other scores of mine
to see if I find these kind of beams.
And if it would not be asking you too much, do you know if Gould says
something on her book about the distance between clef, key signature, time
signature and the first note
Hi Janek,
It indeed does not look bad at all!
Best,
Gilberto
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Beam-positions-and-time-signature-spacing-tp153538p153556.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com
/notation/typesetting-mensural-music.html#white-mensural-ligatures
»Known issues and warnings: Horizontal spacing of ligatures is
poor.«
Well, the distance between the clef and the time signature is
certainly *not* a ligature, so this warning doesn't fit.
Werner
Am 03.10.2013 21:02, schrieb Werner LEMBERG:
Entered as Issue 3598
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3598: Petrucci
clef/time sugnature space too large
and copied to the buglist for diligence.
It seems kind of known: At least horizontal spacing is mentioned in the
docs:
If I say
\override Score.TimeSignature.style = #'mensural
\override NoteHead.style = #'petrucci
\clef petrucci-c3
\time 2/2
c'2 c'4 c'4
I wonder why there is such a large gap between the clef and the time
signature. Looks quite unnatural IMHO.
Werner
inline
- Original Message -
From: Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 12:42 PM
Subject: Petrucci clef/time signature spacing issue
If I say
\override Score.TimeSignature.style = #'mensural
\override NoteHead.style = #'petrucci
\clef
I wonder why there is such a large gap between the clef and the
time signature. Looks quite unnatural IMHO.
Agreed. I think it's because the time sig is always placed in the
same location, and the clef is narrow, so it looks bad. See
attached annotated example.
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org
To: m...@philholmes.net
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 4:12 PM
Subject: Re: Petrucci clef/time signature spacing issue
I wonder why there is such a large gap between the clef and the
time signature
On 13-10-03 09:44 AM, Phil Holmes wrote:
- Original Message - From: Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org
To: m...@philholmes.net
Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2013 4:12 PM
Subject: Re: Petrucci clef/time signature spacing issue
I wonder why there is such a large gap
Entered as Issue 3598
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3598: Petrucci
clef/time sugnature space too large
and copied to the buglist for diligence.
Thanks!
Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Greetings List,
The contemporary piece I am setting uses barlines right after every
change of time signature, before any notes. I am unable to see how to do
this. If I manually place a barline in this location lilypond ignores
the instruction. Can this be done?
Using version 2.17.20
2013/6/28 Andrew Bernard andrew.bern...@gmail.com:
The contemporary piece I am setting uses barlines right after every change
of time signature, before any notes. I am unable to see how to do this. If I
manually place a barline in this location lilypond ignores the instruction.
Can
Am 28.06.2013 15:10, schrieb Janek Warchoł:
2013/6/28 Andrew Bernard andrew.bern...@gmail.com:
The contemporary piece I am setting uses barlines right after every change
of time signature, before any notes. I am unable to see how to do this. If I
manually place a barline in this location
2013/6/28 Andrew Bernard andrew.bern...@gmail.com
The contemporary piece I am setting uses barlines right after every change
of time signature, before any notes. I am unable to see how to do this. If
I manually place a barline in this location lilypond ignores the
instruction. Can
What I'd try first is _moving_ the time signature with its x-offset. But
I don't know if that will lead anywhere.
Urs
The part of your question involving the shift of the time signature
might be solved by something like this:
\relative c' { c d e f
\override Score.BreakAlignment #'break
is there a way to split duration of long notes when chaning time signature:
\time 4/4
c1
to
\time 2/4
c2 ~ c2
i'm intrested in the output?
--
Nesmotren govori kao da mačem probada, a jezik je mudrih iscjeljenje.
Izreke 12:18
___
lilypond-user
Hello,
2013/6/5 Stjepan Horvat zvanste...@gmail.com
is there a way to split duration of long notes when chaning time signature:
Yes:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/notation/displaying-rhythms#automatic-note-splitting
HTH
--
Marek Klein
http://gregoriana.sk
Gregoriana
On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 10:23 +0200, Stjepan Horvat wrote:
is there a way to split duration of long notes when chaning time signature:
\time 4/4
c1
to
\time 2/4
c2 ~ c2
i'm intrested in the output?
There is a command in Denemo to do this, but import from LilyPond into
Denemo is still
notes when chaning time signature:
\time 4/4
c1
to
\time 2/4
c2 ~ c2
i'm intrested in the output?
There is a command in Denemo to do this, but import from LilyPond into
Denemo is still in a very primitive state, so this is not of interest if
you already have spent a lot of time
Hello Stjepan,
2013/6/5 Stjepan Horvat zvanste...@gmail.com
Marek,
i tryed your sugestion and get
warning: rhythmic head is not part of a rhythmic column.
do you have any clue?
Try to post minimal example demonstrating your problem
--
Marek Klein
http://gregoriana.sk
Gregoriana on
I found the problem. I used \new Staff instead of \new Voice.
\version 2.16.2
\new Staff \with {
\remove Note_heads_engraver
\consists Completion_heads_engraver
\remove Rest_engraver
\consists Completion_rest_engraver
} {
\time 2/4 c1
} }
On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Marek Klein
2013/6/5 Stjepan Horvat zvanste...@gmail.com:
is there a way to split duration of long notes when chaning time signature:
\time 4/4
c1
to
\time 2/4
c2 ~ c2
i'm intrested in the output?
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/completion-heads-engraver-within-a-bar-td146640.html#a146648
What is the best way to change the font and size of a time signature?
For the contemporary scores that I am setting, the traditional engraved
old-fashioned face for time signatures just looks out of place, and,
like some other engravers, I am attempting to match a very idiosyncratic
Hi Andrew,
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Andrew Bernard andrew.bern...@gmail.comwrote:
What is the best way to change the font and size of a time signature? For
the contemporary scores that I am setting, the traditional engraved
old-fashioned face for time signatures just looks out
Hi again,
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 9:08 AM, David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Andrew,
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Andrew Bernard
andrew.bern...@gmail.comwrote:
What is the best way to change the font and size of a time signature? For
the contemporary scores that I am
David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com writes:
Hi Andrew,
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Andrew Bernard
andrew.bern...@gmail.comwrote:
What is the best way to change the font and size of a time signature? For
the contemporary scores that I am setting, the traditional engraved
old
David,
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 9:17 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com writes:
\new Staff {
\override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = #ly:text-interface::print
Is that one necessary?
Yes--without this line, you'll get the default stencils.
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 10:05 AM, David Nalesnik
david.nales...@gmail.comwrote:
David,
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 9:17 AM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com writes:
\new Staff {
\override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = #ly:text-interface::print
Hi Werner,
why not simply omitting the three middle bar lines, putting rests into the
empty space?
This should give even more contrast.
Not that I like this solution, but it would be creative :-)
Creative? Yes.
Shows off the awesomeness of Lilypond? Definitely.
Ultimately the best choice?
with
a time signature change — I easily adapted the engraver and my context defaults
to suit.
He is thrilled with the result**, and hence so am I.
(** He goes so far as to say that this should be the standard notation
practice!)
Thanks again,
Kieren
and slightly thicker still for
bar lines concurrent with a time signature change — I easily adapted
the engraver and my context defaults to suit.
He is thrilled with the result**, and hence so am I.
(** He goes so far as to say that this should be the standard notation
practice!)
50% grey
default as the
baseline, and black and slightly thicker still for bar lines concurrent
with a time signature change — I easily adapted the engraver and my context
defaults to suit.
He is thrilled with the result**, and hence so am I.
(** He goes so far as to say that this should
Hi Janek,
This reminds me of an idea i had: make stafflines under rests grey, to
make it immediately obvious where an instrument is resting (see
attached - obviously a bigger example would demonstrate this idea
better, but i don' have one). How do you like it?
I was considering trying the
This reminds me of an idea i had: make stafflines under rests grey,
to make it immediately obvious where an instrument is resting (see
attached - obviously a bigger example would demonstrate this idea
better, but i don' have one). How do you like it?
Well, I don't like it. The contrast is
Hi Werner,
The contrast is not strong enough if you are viewing the image from a greater
distance.
As it is, it looks irritating to my eye.
Agreed — the lighter chosen here is insufficiently light.
However, the concept is one I'm interested in exploring.
Cheers,
Kieren.
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 7:55 PM, Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org wrote:
This reminds me of an idea i had: make stafflines under rests grey,
to make it immediately obvious where an instrument is resting (see
attached - obviously a bigger example would demonstrate this idea
better, but i don' have
The contrast is not strong enough if you are viewing the image from
a greater distance. As it is, it looks irritating to my eye.
Agreed ― the lighter chosen here is insufficiently light.
However, the concept is one I'm interested in exploring.
Mhmm. Your suggestion of handling only
Hi Kieren, hi David K.,
applyContext is good for doing somethind conditionally anywhere in the
music stream:
cond = ##t
mod = \with { \override NoteHead #'color = #red }
\relative c' {
c4 e g b \applyContext #(lambda (context) (if cond
(ly:context-mod-apply! context mod))) c a f d c1
}
Jan-Peter Voigt jp.vo...@gmx.de writes:
Hi Kieren, hi David K.,
applyContext is good for doing somethind conditionally anywhere in the
music stream:
cond = ##t
mod = \with { \override NoteHead #'color = #red }
\relative c' {
c4 e g b \applyContext #(lambda (context) (if cond
in a context.
Yes, OK, my wording is unprecise/incorrect.
The thread started with the question of changing the barline on every
time signature change. The apply context function is executed only once
on the iteration step, it is inserted.
The intended engraver shall watch a context-property
Hi Jan-Peter,
I got to thinking about this [awesome!] engraver you whipped up for me… and I
realised that there are probably lots of places where someone might want an
engraver that says
when X then Y
where X could be any boolean and Y is one or more context or property changes.
How
Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca writes:
Hi Jan-Peter,
I got to thinking about this [awesome!] engraver you whipped up for
me… and I realised that there are probably lots of places where
someone might want an engraver that says
when X then Y
where X could be any boolean
Hi Jan-Peter,
I darkly remember a scheme engraver, that did something, whenever a
time-sig-schange happens. IIRC it is based on snippet from you David.
One might reduce it to the following:
This does exactly what I need it to do!
For the engraver itself — and also for the fact the conductor
On Feb 10, 2013, at 12:22 AM, SoundsFromSound soundsfromso...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm, I think I maybe figured it out. Not 100% sure if it's the most lean,
efficient code but this seems to work great for what I want:
A solo piano piece with no barlines and no time signature.
Looks fine to me
with no barlines and no time signature.
Looks fine to me. As Xavier and David mentioned, probably better to
override the stencil instead of removing the engraver:
\layout {
\context {
\Staff
\override TimeSignature #'stencil = #point-stencil% = ##f also
works
Thanks to everyone for all of the helpful information !
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
I need to create musical examples for instruction
and many of these ideally would have no bar lines
or time signatures. Appended is such an example.
(1) the example below is pretty much what I want expect
that there is space where the time signature would normally go
(I erase the time
where the time signature would normally go
(I erase the time signature with
\override TimeSignature #'transparent = ##t but the space
is still there).
How can I get rid of this space?
\override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f
(or remove Time_signature_engraver but I would not use
On Feb 9, 2013, at 6:53 PM, ivan.k.kuznet...@gmail.com wrote:
(1) the example below is pretty much what I want expect
that there is space where the time signature would normally go
(I erase the time signature with
\override TimeSignature #'transparent = ##t but the space
is still
Thank you for posting this - it helped me with an exercise I was making for
someone.
One question:
How would one do this exact thing but for a solo /piano /staff? I can't seem
to add the global time signature/no bar lines for a grand staff - it messes
it all up. I'm making a mistake somewhere
Hmm, I think I maybe figured it out. Not 100% sure if it's the most lean,
efficient code but this seems to work great for what I want:
A solo piano piece with no barlines and no time signature.
\version 2.17.10
\header {
% Remove default LilyPond tagline
tagline = ##f
}
global
Hello all!
I'm working in Lilypond v2.17.9, and the conductor of my chamber opera (being
performed in April) wants the following stylesheet override: the default
barline type should be dashed or dotted, but the barline should be solid (i.e.,
standard) at every time signature change.
What's
- Original Message -
From: Kieren MacMillan kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca
To: Lilypond-User Mailing List lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 2:56 PM
Subject: change barline type with time signature change
Hello all!
I'm working in Lilypond v2.17.9, and the conductor
Suggest he does what I did in conducting class? Use a pen to mark
the time signature changes... :-)
Hehe, I want to suggest *exactly* the same. What a ridiculous request
IMHO...
Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
Hi Phil,
Suggest he does what I did in conducting class? Use a pen to mark the time
signature changes... :-)
1. The score already has the time signature changes in large print above the
staff.
2. As a composer, I make it a policy not to make such suggestions to conductors
who champion my
Hi Werner,
I want to suggest *exactly* the same. What a ridiculous request IMHO…
I thought it a bit ridiculous when he first suggested it, but the more I look
at it (I fixed it manually in my draft score), the more I believe it may
actually be superior to traditional engraving practice, from
or dotted, but the barline should be
solid (i.e., standard) at every time signature change.
What's the best way to do this, abstracted of course (because this is the
only conductor who has so far requested such a thing).
Here's a thread containing a Scheme engraver which might be able
I thought it a bit ridiculous when he first suggested it, but the
more I look at it (I fixed it manually in my draft score), the more
I believe it may actually be superior to traditional engraving
practice, from the standpoint of ease of reading (which, after
all, is the primary reason for
., standard) at every time signature change.
a) Following the manuals:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/internals/barline
this would do it for the default bar line in 2.17.9:
\layout {
\override Score.BarLine #'glyph-name = #! % dashed
% \override Score.BarLine #'glyph-name
Hi Werner,
the larger the deviation from standard engraving practice, the
more irritating it is to the casual reader (read: musicians who are
constantly lacking enough rehearsals). There must be *very* good
reasons to not follow the engraving tradition
Agreed — for example, the modern (and
) For the time signature you would need an extra
\override Score.BarLine #'glyph-name = #|
Yes: this is essentially what I'm doing currently (in order to get the score
done ASAP, as rehearsals on my chamber opera will begin quite soon).
There is probably a better solution for b), which does not require
required change is this:
\time must be replaced by \customtime
Once that is done in the music, it depends only on the \layout block
whether you have dashed or solid barlines and before a time signature
change, you always have a solid one.
\version 2.17.9
\layout {
\override Score.BarLine
Hi Joram,
It is still not fully compatible with an unchanged \time command,
but perhaps it helps nonetheless.
An excellent band-aid solution, which works very well for the time being.
Thanks!
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 04:04:42PM +0100, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
Suggest he does what I did in conducting class? Use a pen to mark
the time signature changes... :-)
Hehe, I want to suggest *exactly* the same. What a ridiculous request
IMHO...
Phil actually had the elegant solution. I
? Use a pen to mark
the time signature changes... :-)
Hehe, I want to suggest *exactly* the same. What a ridiculous request
IMHO...
Phil actually had the elegant solution. I was going to
suggest a bottle of White-Out for all the OTHER bar lines.
Jim
, and the conductor of my chamber
opera (being performed in April) wants the following stylesheet
override: the default barline type should be dashed or dotted, but
the barline should be solid (i.e., standard) at every time
signature change.
What's the best way to do this, abstracted of course
tl;dr: How does one remove a time signature completely (not just
transparent) without removing the time signature engraver?
I have a song that changes time signature for the chorus (and then back,
obviously, for the next verse).
In the printed version, I do not want to re-assert the time
Hi Christopher,
tl;dr: How does one remove a time signature completely (not just
transparent) without removing the time signature engraver?
I believe this will work:
\once \override TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f
Hope this helps!
Kieren
On 01/15/2013 03:40 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
tl;dr: How does one remove a time signature completely (not just
transparent) without removing the time signature engraver?
I believe this will work:
\once \override TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f
Thanks, Kieren. That doesn’t seem to work
Hi Christopher,
That doesn’t seem to work
You need to specify the context:
songGlobalsVerse = {
s8
\once \override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f
\time 6/8
s2.*8
\bar ||
}
\score { \songGlobalsVerse }
Cheers,
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user
On Jan 15, 2013, at 9:47 PM, Christopher R. Maden wrote:
On 01/15/2013 03:40 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
tl;dr: How does one remove a time signature completely (not just
transparent) without removing the time signature engraver?
I believe this will work:
\once \override TimeSignature
On 01/15/2013 04:05 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
You need to specify the context:
OK... a more complete example is attached.
The time signature is invoked in songGlobalsVerse.
That’s used in a Staff:
songVocals = \new Staff
\clef treble
{
\songGlobalsIntro
\repeat volta 6
On Jan 15, 2013, at 10:18 PM, Christopher R. Maden wrote:
On 01/15/2013 04:05 PM, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
You need to specify the context:
OK... a more complete example is attached.
The time signature is invoked in songGlobalsVerse.
That’s used in a Staff:
songVocals = \new Staff
On 01/15/2013 04:27 PM, james wrote:
As previously noted in kieren's email, you need to add Staff.
before TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f in order to specify the context
that you want the override to take place in.
Yes! Thank you, James. I had not properly understood Kieren. This
works now.
Dear Thomas,
Thank you for this it works perfectly. I just wish I understood it!
Thanks also Eluze even though I couldn't test your suggestion: I am still
on the latest stable (roll on 2.18!).
Kevin
On 20 December 2012 01:58, Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.comwrote:
long
text \textLenghtOff
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Custom-Time-Signature-tp138130p138158.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user
Dear LilyPond experts,
I would like to display the time signature 4/2 as two struck Cs next to one
another (no 'plus' sign), as in the score here:
http://petrucci.mus.auth.gr/imglnks/usimg/4/4d/IMSLP39751-PMLP02062-Schubert-Impromptu-Op90No3.pdf
The best I can do with \compoundtime is to get
Kevin Patrick Barry wrote
Dear LilyPond experts,
I would like to display the time signature 4/2 as two struck Cs next to
one
another (no 'plus' sign), as in the score here:
http://petrucci.mus.auth.gr/imglnks/usimg/4/4d/IMSLP39751-PMLP02062-Schubert-Impromptu-Op90No3.pdf
the quickest I
2012/12/20 Kevin Patrick Barry barr...@tcd.ie:
Dear LilyPond experts,
I would like to display the time signature 4/2 as two struck Cs next to one
another (no 'plus' sign),
Hi,
how about:
\version 2.16.1
doubledTimeSignature =
\override Score.TimeSignature #'stencil =
#(lambda (grob
cue-clef
time-signature
staff-bar
key-cancellation
key-signature
custos)
;;middle-of-line
(left-edge
cue-end-clef
ambitus
breathing-sign
clef
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Thomas Morley
thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
2012/11/15 Nathan when.possi...@gmail.com:
[...]
1. How do I position the bar numbers on the second and third lines
directly
above the bar lines?
You have to override BarNumber: 'break-align-symbols
and
I'm writing a piece in 14/16, and that's not 7/8: it's counted 4+3+3+4
sixteenths.
1. Is there a way to make beaming automatically to 4-3-3-4?
2. If I have a whole measure rest, I find that \times 14/16 {R1} gives a nice
simple notation. Now I want a note that is held for a whole measure look
Il 15/11/2012 20:20, Victor Eijkhout ha scritto:
I'm writing a piece in 14/16, and that's not 7/8: it's counted 4+3+3+4
sixteenths.
1. Is there a way to make beaming automatically to 4-3-3-4?
You find the answer here:
Il 15/11/2012 20:20, Victor Eijkhout ha scritto:
3. I have a part (labeled mastertrack) that is completely empty
except for a bunch of \mark\default and \bar .|. thingies, and
that I overlay on each part. This has worked fine in the past.
However, using \times 14/16 {s1} to get a whole empty
I have two separate questions regarding the following snippet:
\new Staff {
| \bar |: c'1 \break
| \time 3/4 \bar :|: c'2. \break
| \bar :|: c'2. \bar :|
}
1. How do I position the bar numbers on the second and third lines directly
above the bar lines?
2. How do I put the time signatures
Victor Eijkhout vic...@eijkhout.net writes:
I'm writing a piece in 14/16, and that's not 7/8: it's counted 4+3+3+4
sixteenths.
1. Is there a way to make beaming automatically to 4-3-3-4?
Assuming that you have a reasonably recent version (2.16.something), you
can just use
\time #'(4 3 3 4)
Peter O'Doherty-2 wrote
In unmetered/ cadenza-style passages one often finds a time signature in
the form of an 'X'.
could you give a (scanned) example, I don't really see what you mean
thanks
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/unmetered-time
Hi,
In unmetered/ cadenza-style passages one often finds a time signature in
the form of an 'X'. I'm sure I've seen this in the lilypond
documentation but don't seem to be able to find it. Can anyone point me
to the relevant page?
Many thanks,
Peter
Other than that (same with denom), the code looks fine to me.
Works! However, (and there is always a however ;-), the font and font size are
not the same as the regular (default) time signature.
Is there a a way to grab these two pieces of information from the regular
timestamp stencil
pabuhr pab...@fastmail.fm writes:
Other than that (same with denom), the code looks fine to me.
Works! However, (and there is always a however ;-), the font and font
size are not the same as the regular (default) time signature.
\number $(number-string num)
--
David Kastrup
Staff shall be a wider time signature.
I give you an short example:
[...]
Hi Stefan,
next try:
I defined `customTime´ containing all functionality of \time and
printing a wider TimeSignature in DrumStaff only.
Disadvantage:
It has to be used _in_ the DrumStaff or, if used in a global
2012/10/29 Stefan Thomas kontrapunktste...@gmail.com:
[...]
The problem is:
I would like to have a score with drumstaff and a normal staff. And only
in the normal Staff shall be a wider time signature.
I give you an short example:
[...]
Hi Stefan,
next try:
I defined `customTime´ containing
601 - 700 of 1093 matches
Mail list logo
