Hi,
> Op 2 sep. 2020, om 21:07 heeft David Kastrup het volgende
> geschreven:
>
> Maurits Lamers writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> convert-ly does text replacements. It is not a full parser. If text
>>> replacements are supposed to work, you need to write your text in a way
>>> that the replacement
David Kastrup writes:
> Maurits Lamers writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>> convert-ly does text replacements. It is not a full parser. If text
>>> replacements are supposed to work, you need to write your text in a way
>>> that the replacement patterns cover. Stuff like putting # on one line
>>> and a
Maurits Lamers writes:
> Hi,
>
>> convert-ly does text replacements. It is not a full parser. If text
>> replacements are supposed to work, you need to write your text in a way
>> that the replacement patterns cover. Stuff like putting # on one line
>> and a corresponding opening paren on the
Hi,
> convert-ly does text replacements. It is not a full parser. If text
> replacements are supposed to work, you need to write your text in a way
> that the replacement patterns cover. Stuff like putting # on one line
> and a corresponding opening paren on the next line are just too weird
>
Maurits Lamers writes:
> Hi all,
>
> In order to have my braille generator not have to support Lilypond 2.14 I
> tried to upgrade my music library I am building this braille generator on.
>
> However, because of (a lot of) specific "hacks" on the layout, simply running
> convert-ly on the
Hi all,
In order to have my braille generator not have to support Lilypond 2.14 I tried
to upgrade my music library I am building this braille generator on.
However, because of (a lot of) specific "hacks" on the layout, simply running
convert-ly on the entire library doesn't completely finish
specific
than "Re: Contents of lilypond-user digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re:drop down list (yming tsang)
2. Re:LilyPond and FontForge (fasola)
3. score wizard (wmil...@aol.com)
4. upgrading to 2.19.83-1 from 2.18.2 on Linux Mint (wmil...@aol.com)
5. Re:upgrading to 2.19.83-1 f
Aaron Hill writes:
> On 2019-08-09 4:16 pm, Bill via lilypond-user wrote:
>> Oh well I tried
>> i downloaded
>>
>> lilypond-2.19.83-1.linux-64.sh
>> from this
>> GNU/Linux 64: LilyPond 2.19.83-1
>> buttonat
>>
>> http://lilypond.org/development.html
>> I tried to upgrade using Synaptic package
On 2019-08-09 4:16 pm, Bill via lilypond-user wrote:
Oh well I tried
i downloaded
lilypond-2.19.83-1.linux-64.sh
from this
GNU/Linux 64: LilyPond 2.19.83-1
buttonat
http://lilypond.org/development.html
I tried to upgrade using Synaptic package Manager but that only showed
2.18.2 which i have
Oh well I tried
i downloaded
lilypond-2.19.83-1.linux-64.sh
from this
GNU/Linux 64: LilyPond 2.19.83-1
buttonat
http://lilypond.org/development.html
I tried to upgrade using Synaptic package Manager but that only showed 2.18.2
which i have installed.
So, I read up on sh files and got this
I would try going to the command line and typing where lilypond. This
will tell you all the places LilyPond is installed.
Knute Snortum
(via Gmail)
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Daniel Contreras daniel.c.9...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm installing Lily Pond on my Windows machine
Hello everyone,
I'm installing Lily Pond on my Windows machine now. Well trying to. I have an
old version 2.12 installed here, I uninstalled it and try to install the latest
stable release. However when I finish installation and run the example file,
diversion statement says 2.12. Is there
On 20.04.2014 23:02, Janek Warchoł wrote:
https://github.com/openlilylib/snippets/tree/master/notation-snippets/adjust-horizontal-spacing
That's it, worked like a charm :) I thought one can only use 1/(2^n) as
moment... Thanks
regards
--
Marcin Gryszkalis, PGP 0xA5DBEEC7
jabber
On 22 April 2014 09:06, Marcin Gryszkalis m...@fork.pl wrote:
On 20.04.2014 23:02, Janek Warchoł wrote:
https://github.com/openlilylib/snippets/tree/master/notation-snippets/adjust-horizontal-spacing
That's it, worked like a charm :) I thought one can only use 1/(2^n) as
moment... Thanks
Hi
After upgrading to 2.18.2 I noticed that scores are engraved with more space,
causing different splits (and in one particular example my son was working on
- I cannot fit it on one page anymore).
You can see example:
http://stuff.fork.pl/rondo-2-18-1.pdf
http://stuff.fork.pl/rondo-2-18-2.pdf
- Original Message -
From: Marcin Gryszkalis m...@fork.pl
To: lilypond-user mailinglist lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2014 11:21 AM
Subject: too wide score after upgrading 2.18.1 to 2.18.2
Hi
After upgrading to 2.18.2 I noticed that scores are engraved with more
space
Hi Marcin.
There was this big spacing issue 3304, which was fixed between 2.18.1 and
2.18.2.
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3304
I think this could be the reason.
--Karol
Hi
After upgrading to 2.18.2 I noticed that scores are engraved with more
space,
causing
- Original Message -
From: Karol Majewski karo...@wp.pl
To: Marcin Gryszkalis m...@fork.pl
Cc: lilypond-user mailinglist lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2014 11:34 AM
Subject: Odp: too wide score after upgrading 2.18.1 to 2.18.2
Hi Marcin.
There was this big spacing
On 20.04.2014 12:56, Phil Holmes wrote:
Also, simply deleting all the forced line breaks fits the piece on one
page!
That's right - though I wanted to have line break every 4th bar (as you can
see on 2.18.1 sample).
2.18.1 was never actually released: how did you get it?
Gentoo linux
2014-04-20 19:55 GMT+02:00 Marcin Gryszkalis m...@fork.pl:
On 20.04.2014 12:34, Karol Majewski wrote:
There was this big spacing issue 3304, which was fixed between 2.18.1 and
2.18.2. https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3304
I think this could be the reason.
It looks to be
- Original Message -
From: Marcin Gryszkalis m...@fork.pl
To: Phil Holmes m...@philholmes.net; Karol Majewski karo...@wp.pl
Cc: lilypond-user mailinglist lilypond-user@gnu.org
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2014 6:55 PM
Subject: Re: too wide score after upgrading 2.18.1 to 2.18.2
be suitable in the proposed form but that does not mean
we should ignore it.
Forwarded to bug-lilypond. Bug Squad, please look at A documentation
suggestion, was: Problem with remove bar number/ why I'm not upgrading
to the new stable version thread on -user.
This has been added as
http
+1 for updating documentation.
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 3:05 PM, james james.lilyp...@googlemail.com wrote:
Perhaps there is a much simpler solution. Notation reference, 1.3.1 is where
I got the example which I have been using since at least 2.12, because
centering such a new dynamic is
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 2:18 AM, Kevin Patrick Barry barr...@tcd.ie wrote:
Dear LilyPond users,
I have found the recent debate about the difficulty of using LilyPond
interesting and would like to offer my experience, as someone who has
been using it for about six months. I apologise if this
Janek Warchoł janek.lilyp...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 3:05 PM, james james.lilyp...@googlemail.com wrote:
Perhaps there is a much simpler solution. Notation reference, 1.3.1
is where I got the example which I have been using since at least
2.12, because centering such a new
should ignore it.
Forwarded to bug-lilypond. Bug Squad, please look at A documentation
suggestion, was: Problem with remove bar number/ why I'm not upgrading
to the new stable version thread on -user.
Janek
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user
On Oct 26, 2012, at 8:15 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
It would be very helpful to us if you can find some time to *exactly*
point out what background knowledge you are missing.
Knowing what you don't know is always difficult. However, here's an example
where the answer to my question was a bit
james james.lilyp...@googlemail.com writes:
On Oct 26, 2012, at 8:15 PM, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
It would be very helpful to us if you can find some time to *exactly*
point out what background knowledge you are missing.
Knowing what you don't know is always difficult. However, here's an
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 12:07 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
At any rate, in LilyPond 2.16 you _can_ write the above as
rinforzamf =
#(make-dynamic-script
#{ \markup \line { \left-align \normal-text \whiteout \italic rinforza
\hspace #0
Maybe examples can be extended and/or reduced to make them easier
to comprehend.
It's not the examples in the documentation, or at least, I
understand all of the documentation except for the introduction to
scheme, which is fine for me, since I don't use scheme.
Well, as a matter of fact,
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
Maybe examples can be extended and/or reduced to make them easier
to comprehend.
It's not the examples in the documentation, or at least, I
understand all of the documentation except for the introduction to
scheme, which is fine for me, since I don't use
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 2:13 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
LilyPond is supposed to
be useful without having to extend it.
In other words, an a-priori refusal of Scheme isn't helpful if you
want to explore the capabilities of LilyPond.
If you want to _extend_ them. LilyPond is
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
So I ask again: What exactly are the difficulties you have
encountered? What concepts are badly explained, what examples are
`greek' to you, and why? Simply skipping the Scheme code and asking
for a non-Scheme solution isn't helpful either.
Perhaps
james james.lilyp...@googlemail.com writes:
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
So I ask again: What exactly are the difficulties you have
encountered? What concepts are badly explained, what examples are
`greek' to you, and why? Simply skipping the Scheme code and asking
for a
26.10.2012 00:52, David Kastrup:
… 2.17.6 will make a lot of #'xxx and #'(xxx yyy) unnecessary.
… Something like Score.Accidental, previously an
isolated LilyPond syntax element, now has a straightforward and direct
correspondence to Scheme data structures.
Being able to map LilyPond
Am 27.10.2012 14:13, schrieb David Kastrup:
Werner LEMBERG w...@gnu.org writes:
Well, as a matter of fact, LilyPond uses Scheme to extend its
functionality. This won't change.
It is a very unintuitive language to me. But I fear I have to live with
it, when dealing with LilyPond in a bit more
Dear LilyPond users,
I have found the recent debate about the difficulty of using LilyPond
interesting and would like to offer my experience, as someone who has
been using it for about six months. I apologise if this is a bit
long.
For the most part I use LilyPond to do musical examples, for
2012/10/25 David Kastrup d...@gnu.org:
Jay Hamilton i...@soundand.com writes:
Janek-
I'm not going to do that. Here's a few reasons why.
Well, obviously I am rather partial here, but I quite disagree with your
assessment here. What you are witnessing on the user list is the
emergence of
On Oct 25, 2012, at 11:15 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
…
What you are witnessing on the user list is the
emergence of power users, a class of users narrowing the gap between
users and core developers. Yes, they juggle with complex material. But
that does not mean that things have actually
On Oct 26, 2012, at 7:11 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
james james.lilyp...@googlemail.com writes:
On Oct 25, 2012, at 11:15 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
…
What you are witnessing on the user list is the
emergence of power users, a class of users narrowing the gap between
users and core
I re-read the learning manual when a major stable version is
released, just to become familiar with any major changes. I know how
to search the notation reference for the contexts or engravers I
might want to modify, and what modifications I can make to them,
because these kinds of changes
Hi James,
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 1:08 PM, james james.lilyp...@googlemail.com wrote:
My main issue is that when I don't understand how to do something, while
there might be a way to do it that I could understand, because the power
users are the ones that more often than not respond, I'm
David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com writes:
However, there are often questions that can't be answered in any way
but to delve into Scheme. As recently, for example, when a question
was posed about using \draw-line to make a dashed line instead of a
solid one. AFAIK, there's no simple
David,
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 2:42 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com writes:
However, there are often questions that can't be answered in any way
but to delve into Scheme. As recently, for example, when a question
was posed about using \draw-line
2012/10/26 David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com:
David,
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 2:42 PM, David Kastrup d...@gnu.org wrote:
David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com writes:
However, there are often questions that can't be answered in any way
but to delve into Scheme. As recently, for
Harm,
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Thomas Morley
thomasmorle...@googlemail.com wrote:
[...]
Hi David (N),
I think the draw-dashed-line-command is worth putting into the source.
If you agree, I will turn it into a patch the next days.
Unbelievable. You must have sent this when I was
2012/10/26 David Nalesnik david.nales...@gmail.com:
Hi James,
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 1:08 PM, james james.lilyp...@googlemail.com wrote:
My main issue is that when I don't understand how to do something, while
there might be a way to do it that I could understand, because the power
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
I think some intimidation could be present, but how to do it different?
Not answering?
Or (back to the draw-dashed-line) demonstrating how to do it with:
drawing a small line
some padding
drawing a small line with appropriate offset
Janek-
I'm not going to do that. Here's a few reasons why.
I've been using lilypond since some kind of 1 version. Some of the
stable versions have been baby steps and easy to accommodate and
understand. Many many of the changes that have been taking place in V2
have not been like that. It
has improved much (lots of collision and spacing issues
have been tackled), and _lots_ of documents will just convert cleanly
with convert-ly to the rather few syntax changes. So even if you don't
want to make use of any new features or possibilities, upgrading is
likely to improve your existing
.
The typesetting has improved much (lots of collision and spacing issues
have been tackled), and _lots_ of documents will just convert cleanly
with convert-ly to the rather few syntax changes. So even if you don't
want to make use of any new features or possibilities, upgrading is
likely to improve your
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
With 2.16.0 you could use:
\tweak Accidental #'font-size #-2
The way it looks, with 2.17.6 you will likely have to write
\tweak Accidental.font-size #-2
indeed, an incompatible syntax change. convert-ly will cover it,
though. 2.17.6 will
Am 26.10.2012 00:52, schrieb David Kastrup:
Thomas Morley thomasmorle...@googlemail.com writes:
With 2.16.0 you could use:
\tweak Accidental #'font-size #-2
The way it looks, with 2.17.6 you will likely have to write
\tweak Accidental.font-size #-2
indeed, an incompatible syntax change.
Hi,
Perhaps a stupid question - is there any reason NOT to
upgrade from 2.12.x to 2.13.7?
Thanks,
Gerard
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
2009/11/11 Gerard McConnell gerry...@indigo.ie:
Hi, Perhaps a stupid question - is there any reason NOT to
upgrade from 2.12.x to 2.13.7?
Possibly. 2.13.7 could have changes in syntax, or experimental
features. It worths it if you want to help testing it.
--
Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am Mittwoch, 11. November 2009 12:13:49 schrieb Gerard McConnell:
Hi,
Perhaps a stupid question - is there any reason NOT to
upgrade from 2.12.x to 2.13.7?
If you are adjusting the vertical layout (staff spacing, padding etc.), then
things will
On 11.11.2009, at 12:13, Gerard McConnell wrote:
Hi, Perhaps a stupid question - is there any reason NOT to
upgrade from 2.12.x to 2.13.7?
Thanks,
Gerard
I tend to work from the if it ain't broke, don't fix it principle.
So, unless there's something fundamentally broken that you
Hi -
I'm running LilyPond 2.12.2 under Ubuntu 9.10. I have a .ly file I've been
writing/editing for a while using 2.12.2 under Ubuntu 9.9 (I think - Jaunty
Jackalope). I upgraded yesterday, and found I needed to reinstall LilyPond.
The package that came with Ubuntu 9.10 was, if fact, 2.12.2, so I
-ly, not upgrading lilypond. Oh, I am using lilypond on a linux
(ubuntu) box.
Thanks
--
Chip
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
I just download
and extract the latest version over the top of the existing version? The
Application Usage document only mentions 'upgrade' in relationship to
convert-ly, not upgrading lilypond. Oh, I am using lilypond on a linux
(ubuntu) box.
Thanks
--
Chip
only mentions 'upgrade' in
relationship to convert-ly, not upgrading lilypond. Oh, I am using
lilypond on a linux (ubuntu) box.
Thanks
--
Chip
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
2008/11/16 chip [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks Jon, got the 'older' version uninstalled the and new version
installed and made a new entry to my path so it will run from the command
line.
I recommend new Linux users to install as root, being the reason that
it is fully automatic. As normal user, on
Hi list,
after upgrading from 2.11.35 to 2.11.43-2, my call to lilypond-book does
not work anymore.
I used to call lilypond-book the following way:
lilypond-book --pdf --include=BookIn --include=. --output=BookOut
SongBook.tex
and it always worked fine, but after the upgrade, I get
After upgrading my Ubuntu Linux I get the following message (lilypond
2.10.25):
##
lilypond-book (GNU LilyPond) 2.10.25
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/lilypond-book, line 1879, in module
main ()
File /usr/bin/lilypond-book, line 1845, in main
chunks = do_file
The latest stable version is 2.8.7. To upgrade, just uninstall your
current version and
install the new one. Utilities like midi2ly in 2.8.7 should work well on
Windows XP,
but if you want to use lilypond-book, you should rather try the latest
development
version 2.9.22 or wait for 2.10 which
Hi,
I run Windows XP, and I haven't upgraded since v.2.6.5. Is there n easy
way to upgrade, or should I wait for 2.10 to come out? I don't really
stretch LP's capabilities, but I've been unable to use most utilities
because of a problem in the Python distribution included.
Just Wondering,-- ～Ben
After upgrading from 2.6.1 to Lilypond 8.1 I get the following error messages
if I use lilypond-book:
###
dvips -h main.psfonts main.dvi
This is dvips(k) 5.95a Copyright 2005 Radical Eye Software
(www.radicaleye.com)
' TeX output 2006.04.27:1006' - main.ps
dvips: Font Aybabtu-Regular used
Hello,
my current version of LilyPond is 2.8.1-1. I've found a new minor
upgrade. When I tried to install it, the installer said it found
previous version of LilyPond and said a had had to uninstall it first.
Why is it bothering me with it and just doesn't ask: Previous version
of LilyPond
Title: Upgrading from 2.6 to 2.8
Hello, all.
I post this with the hopes that it will prove helpful to someone.
I run on a Gentoo Linux system (thanks to whoever picked up the maintenance for the lilypond ebuild! When will I see 2.8.1, btw?) and ran into a simple issue that took a while
Here's how to get Lilypond 2.8.1 installed from source in Gentoo... it
isn't hard. This includes installing a patched version of Ghostscript
8.53 (which under Gentoo supports the hl1250 printer driver in addition
to the standard drivers).
1. make sure PORTDIR_OVERLAY is declared in
You have already received an answer, but why not take a quick look in
the manual corresponding to your version before sending the question to
the mailing list?
/Mats
Tim Sawyer wrote:
Thanks! That now gets me a dvi I can preview. Unfortunately, it has font
trouble - I appear to be
Excellent, thanks that works!
Tim.
On Monday 14 Nov 2005 01:04, Graham Percival wrote:
On 13-Nov-05, at 2:16 PM, Tim Sawyer wrote:
Thanks! That now gets me a dvi I can preview. Unfortunately, it has
font
trouble - I appear to be missing note heads and the time sig is in
the wrong
I'm trying to upgrade from 2.0 to 2.6, and I'm having trouble.
This fragment, passed to lilypond-book:
\begin[staffsize=20]{lilypond}
\version 2.6.0
up = { \repeat percent 3 { hh8 hh8 hh8 sn8 hh8 hh8 hh8 hh8 sn8
hh8 } hh8 hh8 hh8 sn8 hh8 sn8 sn8 sn8 sn8 \bar |. }
down = { \repeat percent
Tim Sawyer wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade from 2.0 to 2.6, and I'm having trouble.
Anyone any ideas? convert-ly seems to output it the same as it went in.
Check out the manual section on drum notation. There have been some
syntax changes.
--
Han-Wen Nienhuys - [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Cheers for that.
Next problem - my music now goes through lilypond book successfully, but I
don't seem to be able to process the output.
I have a script that does:
rm -r build
mkdir build
cp volume2.tex ./build
cd build
lilypond-book -V --psfonts -o output volume2.tex
cd output
latex
On 13-Nov-05, at 12:12 PM, Tim Sawyer wrote:
! Undefined control sequence.
l.1 \includegraphics
{lily-109005405-1.eps}
?
I believe that in 2.6, you need to add
\usepackage{graphics}
to your lilypond-book file.
Cheers,
- Graham
On 13-Nov-05, at 2:16 PM, Tim Sawyer wrote:
Thanks! That now gets me a dvi I can preview. Unfortunately, it has
font
trouble - I appear to be missing note heads and the time sig is in
the wrong
font.
If I do a dvipdf volume2.dvi it gives the following output:
Try this:
dvips -h
What operating system do you use?
Does the command create any files at all in the directory out/ ?
/Mats
Wolfgang Mechsner wrote:
I am sorry, but after upgrading Lilypond always I get a new problem with
lilypond-book.
The newest one (2.6.3.1.):
###
lilypond-book --psfon ts
MB == Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MB What operating system do you use?
MB Does the command create any files at all in the directory out/ ?
There was a lilypond-book bug in 2.6.3. Someone claimed it was fixed
in cvs 15 minutes after the release. It's on my list to check
messages but should
solve your problem.
/Mats
Wolfgang Mechsner wrote:
Hi,
after upgrading to 2.6.3. (2.6.0 worked fine) I have a problem with
lilypond-book.
After
lilypond-book -o out test.lytex
I get this:
###
..
Layout nach »lily-244139305-1.eps« ausgeben...
Layout
Hi,
after upgrading to 2.6.3. (2.6.0 worked fine) I have a problem with
lilypond-book.
After
lilypond-book -o out test.lytex
I get this:
###
..
Layout nach »lily-244139305-1.eps« ausgeben...
Layout nach »lily-244139305.eps« ausgeben...
test.tex kompilieren...
Schreibe
and error messages but should
solve your problem.
/Mats
Wolfgang Mechsner wrote:
Hi,
after upgrading to 2.6.3. (2.6.0 worked fine) I have a problem with
lilypond-book.
After
lilypond-book -o out test.lytex
I get this:
###
..
Layout nach »lily-244139305-1.eps« ausgeben
to the lilypond-bug
mailing list and waiting for that, you can get rid of the problem by
doing
unset LANG
or
export LANG=en_US
which gives the default English warning and error messages but should
solve your problem.
/Mats
Wolfgang Mechsner wrote:
Hi,
after upgrading to 2.6.3. (2.6.0
or
export LANG=en_US
which gives the default English warning and error messages but should
solve your problem.
/Mats
Wolfgang Mechsner wrote:
Hi,
after upgrading to 2.6.3. (2.6.0 worked fine) I have a problem with
lilypond-book.
After
lilypond-book -o out test.lytex
I get
messages but should
solve your problem.
/Mats
Wolfgang Mechsner wrote:
Hi,
after upgrading to 2.6.3. (2.6.0 worked fine) I have a problem with
lilypond-book.
After
lilypond-book -o out test.lytex
I get this:
###
..
Layout nach »lily-244139305-1.eps
Hello
I've downloaded
version 2.5.29-2 for Windows, but can't run the program. I'm using Windows ME.
I've uninstalled the old version (2.4.3) through Cygwin setup and then installed
2.5.29 and now have an icon on the desktop (marked ly and entitled lilypond)
which didn't exist with the old
If you look through the mailing list archives for the the lilypond-user,
lilypond-devel and bug-lilypond mailing lists over the last week or so,
you will see that there are some problems with Windows ME that hopefully
are being in the process of being solved right now.
/Mats
Sacha Standen
Hello
I've just downloaded an upgrade of version 2.5.29
for windows (from 2.4.3), but can't install it properly; the Cygwin setup only
gives me the option to uninstall, keep or reinstall version 2.4.3. I've
re-downloaded the setup programme, uninstalled LilyPond and tried to reinstall,
but
On 11-Jun-05, at 6:04 AM, Sacha Standen wrote:
I've just downloaded an upgrade of version 2.5.29 for windows (from
2.4.3), but can't install it properly; the Cygwin setup only gives me
the option to uninstall, keep or reinstall version 2.4.3. I've
re-downloaded the setup programme,
MB == Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MB I really recommend you to upgrade to the latest stable version 2.4.x
MB as soon as possible, since it has improved significantly compared to
MB 2.0. Also, since almost nobody on the mailing list uses 2.0, it will
MB be hard to get
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 17.06, Laura Conrad wrote:
MB == Mats Bengtsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MB I really recommend you to upgrade to the latest stable version
2.4.x MB as soon as possible, since it has improved significantly compared
to MB 2.0. Also, since almost nobody on the
Laura Conrad writes:
I use it. It isn't possible for me to switch to 2.4 (or 2.5 in its
current state) because abc2ly is broken in a major way. (It
fails to translate key signatures.)
Can we please have a proper bug report? We do not want to ship known
to be broken software.
Jan.
--
JN == Jan Nieuwenhuizen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JN Laura Conrad writes:
I use it. It isn't possible for me to switch to 2.4 (or 2.5 in its
current state) because abc2ly is broken in a major way. (It
fails to translate key signatures.)
JN Can we please have a proper
I got that error too on 3 machines with a fresh 2.4.2 cygwin lilypond install.
I guess its harmless, except lilytool for jedit would freeze if you tried to
use the jdvi feature :(
If you search the mailing list archives, you'll find out that
it's harmless but you'll also find out how to get rid
On 12-Mar-05, at 7:09 PM, Aaron Dalton wrote:
I run Lilypond under WinXP and Cygwin. I had typeset a number of
William Byrd pieces under Lilypond 2.2 and have now upgraded to 2.4.
Now my pieces don't compile. The top of my source file is as follows:
--BEGIN TOP OF FILE--
\version 2.4.2
Did
Graham Percival wrote:
On 12-Mar-05, at 7:09 PM, Aaron Dalton wrote:
I run Lilypond under WinXP and Cygwin. I had typeset a number of
William Byrd pieces under Lilypond 2.2 and have now upgraded to 2.4.
Now my pieces don't compile. The top of my source file is as follows:
--BEGIN TOP OF
Graham Percival wrote:
On 12-Mar-05, at 7:09 PM, Aaron Dalton wrote:
I run Lilypond under WinXP and Cygwin. I had typeset a number of
William Byrd pieces under Lilypond 2.2 and have now upgraded to 2.4.
Now my pieces don't compile. The top of my source file is as follows:
--BEGIN TOP OF
If you search the mailing list archives, you'll find out that
it's harmless but you'll also find out how to get rid of the
warning.
/Mats
Quoting Aaron Dalton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Graham Percival wrote:
On 12-Mar-05, at 7:09 PM, Aaron Dalton wrote:
I run Lilypond under WinXP and
I run Lilypond under WinXP and Cygwin. I had typeset a number of
William Byrd pieces under Lilypond 2.2 and have now upgraded to 2.4.
Now my pieces don't compile. The top of my source file is as follows:
--BEGIN TOP OF FILE--
\version 2.4.2
\header {
title = Mass for Three Voices
It seems that the situations where convert-ly fails on your input
files is
- Where you put the slur end on another line than the following note:
ef4.( )
f!8
If instead you had written
ef4.(
) f!8
convert-ly would correctly have produced
ef4.(
f!8 )
As you can
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
