RE: lingo-l Timeout - Possibly Back On Topic

2006-06-02 Thread chris
You could also do a small windows app in .net 2, there you've got the webbrowser contol standard in the toolbox... and full access to everything... -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Namens David Pyle Verzonden: vrijdag 2 juni 2006 5:29 Aan:

Re: lingo-l Timeout - Possibly Back On Topic

2006-06-02 Thread Mark Hagers
On 2-jun-2006, at 5:29, David Pyle wrote: Using my clients test site I get a script error going to one section. Ignoring that it seems to work although the top nav tends to pop out of view and you can't tab between fields. Is it a Lingo script error, or a Javascript error internal to the

lingo-l Bye....

2006-06-02 Thread Bart Pietercil
Now for me as a longtime Director developer this sounds worrisome Macromedia applications that Adobe is evaluating for Intel support include Dreamweaver, Flash Professional, Flash Basic, Fireworks and Contribute. Is it just me, or is there something missing? Getting real nervous... Bart

Re: lingo-l Bye....

2006-06-02 Thread Alex da Franca
Am 02.06.2006 um 11:48 schrieb Bart Pietercil: Now for me as a longtime Director developer this sounds worrisome Macromedia applications that Adobe is evaluating for Intel support include Dreamweaver, Flash Professional, Flash Basic, Fireworks and Contribute. Is it just me, or is there

Re: lingo-l Bye....

2006-06-02 Thread Bart Pietercil
I stand corrected :-) http://www.macworld.com/news/2006/05/31/adobe/index.php?lsrc=mwrss It's always a good practice to include a link to the source of a citation. we don't know, wher ethe statement comes from and in which context it is to be put. I don't think seeing the context will

Re: lingo-l Bye....

2006-06-02 Thread Alex da Franca
Am 02.06.2006 um 13:12 schrieb Bart Pietercil: I stand corrected :-) http://www.macworld.com/news/2006/05/31/adobe/index.php?lsrc=mwrss which reveals, that this is news from Feb. 1. http://www.macworld.com/news/2006/02/01/adobeplans/index.php anyway, the absence of any official adobe

Re: lingo-l Bye....

2006-06-02 Thread Cole Tierney
At 11:48 AM +0200 6/2/06, Bart Pietercil wrote: Macromedia applications that Adobe is evaluating for Intel support include Dreamweaver, Flash Professional, Flash Basic, Fireworks and Contribute. Is it just me, or is there something missing? Getting real nervous... I highly recommend

Re: lingo-l Bye....

2006-06-02 Thread Bart Pietercil
On 02 Jun 2006, at 15:36, Cole Tierney wrote: At 11:48 AM +0200 6/2/06, Bart Pietercil wrote: Macromedia applications that Adobe is evaluating for Intel support include Dreamweaver, Flash Professional, Flash Basic, Fireworks and Contribute. Is it just me, or is there something missing?

Re: lingo-l Bye....

2006-06-02 Thread Alex da Franca
Am 02.06.2006 um 17:28 schrieb Bart Pietercil: I'm off, back to improving my java skills looks like being the best thing to do right now --- ||| a¿ex [To remove yourself from this list, or to change to digest mode, go to http://www.penworks.com/lingo-l.cgi

lingo-l In lieu of no arguments.caller?

2006-06-02 Thread Mendelsohn, Michael
Hi list... I have a Flash sprite that's calling a lingo function from two places: either within the Flash sprite itself, or from a MUI callback. Called from within the swf sprite, whichClip is a valid reference to the movieclip within the swf, but when called from the MUI, it's void. The