The first is a (very simple) fix to the parsing of the auto_msck and
del_auto_msck chandev verbs. When writing them to /proc/chandev, all you'd
get back is an argument error. (Personally, this is one of the reasons I
like open source...find a problem...fix it...no waiting!)
While I have my own
That was the same thing I suspected, but I didn't know if there was
anything to check to verify it. There must've been an error in the JAVA
parms being fed or the way the application was set up. The applications
person replaced the file containing the program and the problem went
away, almost
Chet, Red Hat do not appear to have made a timer-patch verion of their
kernel available. My testing of Red Hat systems with the timer patch has
been with vanilla (+ patches) 2.4.19 kernel source.
In practical terms, this means that you cannot run a Red Hat system with
the timer patch and get
I have a general administration / setup question for people who are running
multiple Linux/390 systems under z/VM. Do all your Linux instances use the
same virtual addresses for things like DASD, regardless of the actual device
address? Or do you find it better to make the virtual DASD address
On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 09:13, McKown, John wrote:
I have a general administration / setup question for people who are running
multiple Linux/390 systems under z/VM. Do all your Linux instances use the
same virtual addresses for things like DASD, regardless of the actual device
address?
Yes.
I always keep the virtual address different from the real address.
(unless I'm running in a perferred guest system)
RE: That allows me to easily move minidisks to other units without
making any other changes then the user direct file. Also, if you have
multiple minidisks defined on a real
Many years ago I stared using addresses in the range 700-7FF for virtual
DASD on all may guests. I have never had real DASD in this range. That
way when someone says something about a DASD at some address I know if
they are talking about a real address or a virtual address. I also use
the same
Sorry for the major crosspost, but between the three groups, I will get
all the likely suspects...
Our DB2 for VSE conversion isn't looking so good. And now we are
looking at other options.
One option that wasn't considered when we went to DB2 was Oracle. Now
that is seems to be available for
And if you're going to create multiple images, do yourself a favor up
front, go ahead and install DIRMAINT. Create a CMS DASD group and a
Linux DASD group for seamless minidisk allocations. Then talk to your
IBM rep about a class overviewing z/VM basic's, Linux and cloning.
--- Adam Thornton
I can't help you with Oracle. We have it on our Sun systems. They are
testing it on Linux/390. From what I understand, the preliminary report was
written before the test started.
What might be of interest, and I may even do some day, is to run PostgreSQL
under Linux/390, then port the client code
No money. Linux is FREE! I don't know how our marketting rep talked our
management to getting an IFL and z/VM when we upgraded to our z/800. We have
NO consolidation plans or any other plan for how to use Linux/390. Lots of
talk, but no real action at present. The only reason that we are testing
When we bought our MP3000, not only Linux was free, but by committing to
have the business partner install Linux, we got a heafty discount on
the hardware.
I think IBM knows, that once Linux gets into the mainframe, and system
programmers start looking at it, it will be used. And will be used
I'm just in the process of letting YOU go to update a Linux 8.1 test
system. And I have some concerns.
Monday, I couldn't get access to YOU updates. I kept timing out. I
don't know if there were problems at Suse, or if some Penguin farm
updated all their images at the same time and overloaded
On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 10:32, Tom Duerbusch wrote:
What I'm considering is a method to put the recommended updates on a
mindisk, a standalone minidisk, that as each of the Penguins come in, I
can give everyone the same updates. Is this doable? I know I can do it
manually (no, actually I
The error:
Can't find library db2jdbc (libdb2jdbc.so) in java.library.path
java.library.path=/opt/IBMJava2-s390-131/jre/bin:/opt/IBMJava2-s390-131/jre/bin/classic::/usr/lib
Our environment vars:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/db2inst1/sqllib/lib:/opt/IBM/db2/V8.1/lib
On Maw, 2003-06-10 at 12:35, Chet Norris wrote:
Per company demand, I must stay with RedHat. I am running the 2.4.9-38
kernel with the qdio/qeth OCO under z/VM 4.3 and need to get the
k_timer patch. The only download I've found is for a 2.4.19 kernel on
Developerworks.
Is there a rpm
Hello Listers,
I installed the CICS Transaction Gateway v5 for LINUX in an IFL. But I
still need to configure the CTG.INI file. Can anyone send me a copy of a
customized
CTG.INI file so I can use it as sample to build my own.
Thank you for your assistance,
Emilio
GeCad software made a name for itself by developing the first anti-virus
software to run on zLinux, and guess who just bought the technology?
http://www.ravantivirus.com/pages/shownews.php?i=153
I wonder how long it will take before the Linux offerings are withdrawn?
When I do a
cat /proc/sys/kernel/hz_timer
it shows a '1'.
I set it to '0' as suggested for VM types. But after a boot, it is back
to '1'. The documentation on this doesn't say anything about needing to
put it in a boot script. Seems to imply that this is a one time only
thing.
So..
1. Am I
On Tue, 2003-06-10 at 12:31, Tom Duerbusch wrote:
When I do a
cat /proc/sys/kernel/hz_timer
it shows a '1'.
I set it to '0' as suggested for VM types. But after a boot, it is back
to '1'. The documentation on this doesn't say anything about needing to
put it in a boot script. Seems to
This is a kernel compile-time option.
make menuconfig ---
General setup ---
[*] No HZ timer ticks in idle
[*] Idle HZ timer on by default
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Tom Duerbusch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003
I read in another post that MS does not plan to continue GeCad's current offerings.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: Joe Poole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 1:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The meddling continues:
GeCad software made a name for itself by
Does SuSE have an /etc/sysctl.conf?
If so, try putting a kernel.hz_timer = 0 in it... sysctl.conf's purpose
is to hold desired values for runtime-adjustable kernel parameters (like
at boot time), and you'd probably be better served placing your values
here than needing to hunt around for it at
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Tom Duerbusch wrote:
I set it to '0' as suggested for VM types. But after a boot, it is back
to '1'. The documentation on this doesn't say anything about needing to
put it in a boot script. Seems to imply that this is a one time only
thing.
...
3. Is the docs wrong
I just ran a little experiment. I took the Red Hat 2.4.20 kernel SRPM and
looked to see just how many of the IBM patches from developerWorks for
2.4.19 were included. The answer was not enough. Sigh. There was a
whole bunch of stuff from 2.5 included, but apparently the IBM patches
haven't
We're no experts but we basically use the same minidisk addresses for the
various linux guests. We also tend to put application products in their own
filesystem on a separate VM minidisk. So our linux guests have basically the
same minidisks for the SuSE linux filesystems. We didn't have a problem
Hello, again.
Although Alan's suggestion for disabling ECN cleared up the majority of
our listerv mail problems, there are still a few servers that we can't
send mail to. We can ping and traceroute them, but no email makes it
through. I've sniffed the traffic on our end, and it looks like we are
For those of us that have to build for both LPAR and VM, you might consider
adding this code to /etc/init.d/boot.local
if [ $(grep -c version = FF /proc/cpuinfo) != 0 ]
then
/sbin/sysctl -w kernel.hz_timer=0
fi
Regards, Jim
Linux S/390-zSeries Support, SEEL, IBM
On Maw, 2003-06-10 at 18:48, Beinert, William wrote:
I read in another post that MS does not plan to continue GeCad's current offerings.
Look on the bright side. With antivirus built into the MS OS from the
ground up the other vendors are going to be very keen to find an
alternative market
That's assuming the GeCad stuff ever shows up in an MS OS. (You aren't the
only suspicious mind on this list. :)
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Alan Cox [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 5:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The meddling continues:
On
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, McKown, John wrote:
No money. Linux is FREE! I don't know how our marketting rep talked our
management to getting an IFL and z/VM when we upgraded to our z/800. We have
NO consolidation plans or any other plan for how to use Linux/390. Lots of
talk, but no real action at
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Tom Duerbusch wrote:
When I do a
cat /proc/sys/kernel/hz_timer
it shows a '1'.
I set it to '0' as suggested for VM types. But after a boot, it is back
to '1'. The documentation on this doesn't say anything about needing to
Of course
put it in a boot script. Seems
So where is /etc/sysctl.conf documented? I did a grep on the string in the
/usr/src/linux directory and and I found some informaiton on sysctl, bit I
did not find the file (though I did a developer's opinion that one should
read the code to find out how sysctl works!.
So where does one look to
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Jim Sibley wrote:
So where is /etc/sysctl.conf documented? I did a grep on the string in the
/usr/src/linux directory and and I found some informaiton on sysctl, bit I
did not find the file (though I did a developer's opinion that one should
read the code to find out how
This is during install of sles8.
I do the load and the dasd shows up in the window.
I go to another ssh to format and get these results...
I still think this has something to do with the RAMAC 3990-13 controllers
and older RAMAC B23 dasd.
I do not see any disk addrs in the
On Tue, 10 Jun 2003, Tom Duerbusch wrote:
Is there an existing HOWTO on this? What about the shops with hundeds
of Penguins? What do you do?
Not that they're likely to get to hundreds here (but you never know, I
guess), but we're using APT-RPM. I'm sketchy on the details of the
OK, since you started the cross post, I'll answer that way. A previous poster
hit the nail on the head. The VSE Redirector can do this. With a database
on Linux for S/390 (DB2 or Oracle), VSE can access it as if it were a VSAM
file. So any of your COBOL Batch or COBOL/CICS programs can access
I think autoyast2 (alice replacement) can also do things like this. I've
just recently started reading up on it and haven't gotten too deep, but I
did install it and it looks pretty interesting.
http://www.suse.de/~nashif/autoinstall/8.0/html/
Leland
-Original Message-
From: Vic Cross
38 matches
Mail list logo