Sorry, didn't get a chance tonight. Hopefully will get to it at work
tomorrow.
Leland
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lucius, Leland
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 7:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Did some extensive
Putting my toe in the water with Linux for S/390 for the first time. I
installed the Marist distribution and configured Linux virtual CTCA to our
VM/TCPIP stack to provide full connectivity to our network. With no joy.
I spoke to IBM who recommended I use Suse distribution but this would appear
Try Debian. It takes a rather different approach, you only download the
bits you need as you install them rather than downloading everything and
then using what you need to install. Its a bit harder to install, but once
installed its much easier to maintain although it you are not familiar with
Red Hat has a free 30 day trial of there RHEL AS 3.0 with free updates for
the 30 days, and it works great. Send an email to Red Hat.
Larry Davis
-Original Message-
From: Paul Burke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 05:12 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Linux for
On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 10:02:24AM +0100, David Goodenough wrote:
Try Debian. It takes a rather different approach, you only download the
bits you need as you install them rather than downloading everything and
then using what you need to install. Its a bit harder to install, but once
I installed domino notes on a Suse 7.2. ...
I assume you are referring to the Domino (server part) here not the
Notes client? If yes, it is ONLY suported on SUSE SLES 8 with service
pack 3 (might be SP2, but you should be at SP3). Several things were
added to get Domino 6.5 to work.
Jim
Does anyone have a contact at Sybase, that they have worked with. I would
like to add my needs, wants and support, for a Sybase implementation on
z/Series and S/390.
I ( Our IT people ) would even be willing to volunteer to do any Sybase
testing to get it certified.
TIA,\|/
(. .)
The linuxthreads implementation is from the same source tree as all the other
platforms. There is architecture specific code but only to implement the same
function, semantics, and behaviours.
-Original Message-
Hi,
Is it implementation of linuxthreads on Linux for zSeries different
On Thu, 2004-06-03 at 23:10, Megh Bhatt wrote:
Hi,
Is it implementation of linuxthreads on Linux for zSeries different from
that on Linux on IA32 in terms of behavior in certain signals and stuff? Any
ideas ? Thanks.
I'm unaware that it is. What problems have you run into?
On Fri, 2004-06-04 at 04:11, Paul Burke wrote:
Can anyone recommend an alternative distribution or a site which will be
quicker than a day.
Debian.
The boot-floppies (actually a card deck) are very small--less than
10M, I think.
Then you do a network install, and it only downloads the
Don't even suggest it in jest! There are way too many control freaks who
would love such an idea.
What next shrink wrapped java applet email.
__
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it
Hello,
I use two osa card defined in QDIO mode.
Primary card port 0 and Secondary card port 1 are used in my VSWITCH1,
ip address is 172.18.1.0/24.
Primary card port 1 and Secondary card port 0 are used in my VSWITCH2 ip
address is 192.168.6.0/24.
VSWITCH1 as PRIROUTER set on.
I defined a
On Friday, 06/04/2004 at 04:04 ZE2, Monteleone [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello,
I use two osa card defined in QDIO mode.
Primary card port 0 and Secondary card port 1 are used in my VSWITCH1,
ip address is 172.18.1.0/24.
Primary card port 1 and Secondary card port 0 are used in my VSWITCH2 ip
Hello,
Yes i did. It seems that no routing is possible thru the OSA card. The
packet seems to be blocked by CP.
Gerard MONTELEONE
Ingenieur Systeme Reseau
SI.TE.C Z.I du vazzio 20090 AJACCIO
( +33495236809 È +33687727032
www.sitec.fr
-Message d'origine-
De : Linux
Is there any method of allowing Linux to perform reverse DNS lookups using
the /etc/hosts file or some other file? I currently have the interface
addresses in /etc/hosts but now have a requirement to perform a reverse
name lookup. I use an external DNS as well but that is under another
I'd should probably keep my mouth shut, but what-the-hey, it's Friday.
To the best of my knowledge, you cannot do a reverse DNS lookup using
/etc/hosts. If you really want to do this, I think that you will end up
needing to (1) have /etc/hosts entries put in your outside DNS server,
or (2)
On Fri, 2004-06-04 at 09:59, Monteleone wrote:
Hello,
Yes i did. It seems that no routing is possible thru the OSA card. The
packet seems to be blocked by CP.
Are you absolutely sure PRIROUTER is set on the OSA? What you're
describing is exactly the behavior if PRIROUTER is unset.
Adam
Peter E. Abresch Jr. - at Pepco wrote:
Is there any method of allowing Linux to perform reverse DNS lookups using
the /etc/hosts file or some other file? I currently have the interface
addresses in /etc/hosts but now have a requirement to perform a reverse
name lookup. I use an external DNS as
I have a customer that runs BIND on Linux for S/390 as a slave DNS
server to the main windows DNS server(s). The zones are replicated to
the slave every so often. This way, a DNS request is satisfied over the
Guest LAN instead of hitting the 'real' network.
On Fri, 2004-06-04 at 10:14, Phil
Hi,
You have two OSA cards. VSWITCH1 (with PRIROUTER enabled) is connected to
one card and VSWITCH2 is connected to the second card. I assume these two
OSA cards are connected to two different physical LAN segments in the real
world and your router is the only network link between them.
You
Sorry if this got posted twice.
Does anyone have a contact at Sybase, that they have worked with. I would
like to add my needs, wants and support, for a Sybase implementation on
z/Series and S/390.
I ( Our IT people ) would even be willing to volunteer to do any Sybase
testing to get it
How do I check if the PTF for APAR VM63282 is applied in z/VM 4.4?
IBM people said that the PTF UM30889 is applied, but our linux guests are still always
in Q3, when idle
or not. They have the timer patch.
Thanks in advance,
Ronan
If your system is at service level 0301 or later, you have it (Q CPLEVEL
to find out). If not, get the latest RSU applied as the current level is
now 0402.
Kurt Acker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ronan C. Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port [EMAIL PROTECTED]
06/04/2004 01:32 PM
Please
- Original Message -
From: Kurt Acker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2004 1:51 PM
Subject: Re: APAR VM63282
If your system is at service level 0301 or later, you have it (Q CPLEVEL
to find out). If not, get the latest RSU applied as the current level is
Q CPLEVEL
z/VM Version 4 Release 4.0, service level 0402 (64-bit)
It means that we have the PTF applied??
But our linux guests are still always in Q3. If we put down our eth0 and
do a rmod qdio, the linux guest go to other queues.
Thanks,
Ronan
Kurt Acker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado Por:
Look at VMFINFO to determine if an APAR is applied.
This APAR is for CP and has two PTFs 1 for z/VM 430 UM30888 and 1 for 440
UM30889
Issue the command
VMFINFO ZVM comp ( SETUP
Where comp is CP or CPSFS
Put an S next to the line for PTFs/APARs, and hit enter
Put UM3088x on the PTF
If I read the APAR correctly, it does not eliminate the need for guest to
be dropped from the Q3 dispatch list, it just eliminates some network type
activity from increasing the VMDIOACT counter field that may unnecessarily
keep guest in a dispatch list. If the commands below only move you into
Ronan,
The results of the Q CPLEVEL does not necessarily mean that the APAR is on
your system. You need to look more deeply.
Kurt,
Any time a user is in Q3 (unnecessarily) and you can find a way to change
that, it is good for your user farm. Q3 users get an enormous slice of the
pie compared to
Just downloaded Samba 3.0.4 to upgrade from Version 2.2.5-SuSE.
I am following the normal install procedure. It seems that there are some
patches for SuSE. But there is a caveat that goes with that.
While the SPEC file shows who the original author was, these files imply
no warranty of fitness
I've got it to build for 2.4.21-83 and even made a source rpm for it. I'm
currently testing it... seems to fill up memory a little too quick for my
tastes, but we'll see how it is over the long haul. Figure I'll test it for
a week. :)
On Thursday 03 June 2004 05:15 pm, Post, Mark K wrote:
If
30 matches
Mail list logo
