You probably have DFSMS installed on your system. The DGTSRVnn worker
machines have a dummy mdisk at addresses x'500' and x'5FF', devtype 3380,
and volid $$. These mdisks should be listed in the EXCLUDE section of
DIRMAINT's EXTENT CONTROL.
Jim Bohnsack
Date:Tue, 7 Dec 2004 20:43:22
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 01:06:31AM -0500, Alan Altmark wrote:
Do the open source solutions deal with STOMITH? SAfLi will perform FORCE
or will use LPAR management APIs to kill off the offending machine.
STO[MN]ITH is important in the clustering techniques that involve all the
machines actively
Thanks for that. The existing guest was active at the time. I shut it
down
and performed the cloning.
Looks like it worked OK but I still get something like:
DVHDRC3428I Changes made to directory entry ZLP1 have just been placed
DVHDRC3428I online.
DVHBIU3450I The source for directory entry
Hi!
On Tuesday 07 December 2004 16:03, Rod Furey wrote:
Tom Duerbusch wrote:
O man...
They left out regina! How can I operate without Rexx!
Simple - you download the latest Regina release and
compile it.
Or get the SLES9 SDK. (But don't ask me where from, I'm just an
engineer... :)
I had a problem with smbmount of Win shares that had more than 400-500
files: ls and mc listed only the first 400-500 file names as if the
others didn't exist. My IBM Suse SLES8 support said its due to a known
bug in SMB on the Win-side, not a Linux bug. Suggested I use cifs
(common internet file
Consider also an external appliance to do the failover. We use a Cisco
Content Switch that sits outside the zSeries equipment so it can still
administer the site if we need to bring down z/VM or the hardware for
maintenance. For example, site 1 gets all the traffic unless it fails,
at which time
Hi Alan,
How does linux
heartbeat between the 2 servers and identify the loss of the primary?
How does the secondary giveback when the primary returns? Would I be
better off to load-share and use DNS round-robin against duplicate
servers
rather than hot standby?
For this functionality you
On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 07:46:31PM -0500, Mark Post wrote:
I just went to freshmeat.net and put in cluster for the search argument.
Mosix, OpenMosix, Linux-HA, Linux Virtual Server, mon, heartbeat. Beowulf
can be used for HPC (High Performance Computing), but I'm not sure about HA.
There is a
I have the following configuration:
CHPID PATH=(34),TYPE=FC,PARTITION=(ZVM01),SWITCH=01
CHPID PATH=(36),TYPE=FC,PARTITION=(ZVM01),SWITCH=01
CNTLUNIT CUNUMBR=FD01,PATH=(34,36),UNITADD=((00,125)),
UNIT=3990,CUADD=0,LINK=(01,03)
IODEVICE ADDRESS=(F900,84),CUNUMBR=(FD01),UNIT=3390,
OK, brief history and then my question. We just purchased a z890, moved our
current z/VM 3.1.0 system to the GP and installed z/VM 5.1 on the IFL. I moved
over 2 different flavors of Linux (Debian and Redhat) to the IFL and they work
great. With the purchase of our new box we received SuSE
Is it the case that IBM will be coming out with a version of CICS that
will run on SUSe Linux ?
I have searched the web, however I have only gotten hits for CICS
Transaction Gateway.
If you know otherwise please share that information. Thanks, Greg Evans
Is this a new McData FICON switch or do you already have items on it.
Larry
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
grodolfi
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 09:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: z800 Shark 750 McData 3232 zVM 4.3 Ficon
1) Do you have zoning keeping the in port from seeing the out port?
2) I had a Fibre Channel problem a few months ago where the devices were
seen by the switch, but couldn't transfer one iota of 'real' data. The
problem was a bad GBIC. I think bad cables can cause similar issues. Swap
in known
I am attempting to get a vnc session started with Tao390 Linux. I have
downloaded a vnc client to my WinXP box. I start the vncserver on Linux and
then start the vnc client on my Windows machine, but nothing happens.
When I look at the WinXP Taskmgr I can see the vnc client running and when I
While the solution below probably works, I think the explanation of the problem
is bogus. SMB and CIFS are two names for the same protocol. The fact that
smbfs and cifs use the same port tells me that they are talking to the same
server process.
Sounds to me like there is a Linux bug,
Which /boot files are you using:
1) - Base SLES8 CDROMs
2) - SP3 SLES8 Update CDROMs
3) - Updates SP3 image fro 20th Feb 2004 from SUSE's website.
If you have tried all three then you have a problem :-)
All the Best
Mark Perry
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL
What does 'vary on path 34 to all' return?
Marcy Cortes
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on
this message or any
On Wednesday, 12/08/2004 at 10:49ZE10, Vic Cross [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Just trying to illustrate that sometimes you don't need *all* the bells
and
whistles.
Of course. Neither am I saying that Tivoli Systems Automation for Linux
is required. :-) Rather, I was just trying to illustrate
I went through the yast panels and added the unit 113e; created the volume
group usrdata; added the physical volume (/dev/dasdd1) to the volume group
usrdata; and added the logical volume /dev/usrdata/srv.
Output from pvscan, vgscan, and lvscan shows:
techlnux:~ # pvscan
PV
Anyone know of a prebuilt OpenOffice 1.1.3 for SLES 8 SP3 31bit? I have
a customer who wants to use it for it's conversion libraries. Or worse
case scenario, any build tips?
*Brandon
--
For LINUX-390 subscribe / signoff /
The only pre-existing build for S/390 that I'm aware of is from Debian.
And, I don't believe it is 1.1.3, but something earlier (could be wrong
about that part). Build tips? I hope you have a _really_, _really_ fast
machine, and a lot of patience. It's _huge_. The last time I built it on a
G5
Perhaps the right combination of special priviledge class and the hcp
module would help.
Marcy Cortes wrote:
A heartbeat-stonith.rpm comes with SLES 8. Never tried it and I would
guess it can't do a FORCE, but here's the info:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] sp3rpms]# rpm -qip heartbeat-stonith.rpm
Name
On Dec 8, 2004, at 4:17 PM, Rich Smrcina wrote:
Perhaps the right combination of special priviledge class and the hcp
module would help.
You'd need to modify heartbeat-stonith's source to execute hcp FORCE
user WITHIN interval but it shouldn't be hard. I don't remember
whether the actual shoot
FORCE may require you to give too many privileges to the virtual machine. You
could use SIGNAL SHUTDOWN which is class C (it's class A also I know). You can
also change the class of the command to restrict it to a class of its own that
the stonith guy belongs to.
-Original Message-
On Dec 8, 2004, at 4:25 PM, Ferguson, Neale wrote:
FORCE may require you to give too many privileges to the virtual
machine. You could use SIGNAL SHUTDOWN which is class C (it's class A
also I know). You can also change the class of the command to restrict
it to a class of its own that the stonith
Richard:
Are you running X in the session you are trying to reach? If you are
running vnc client from windows, you need that. I know vnc connects but
since the X is not running you see nothing.
Try from your browser and point to http://your ip:5801
The java client would have been already
I also noticed that Xvnc gouging the CPU, hitting 100% when only one Linux
is active on our z/VM :-(
__
Ranga Nathan / CSG
Systems Programmer - Specialist; Technical Services;
BAX Global Inc. Irvine-California
Tel: 714-442-7591 Fax: 714-442-2840
On Wednesday, 12/08/2004 at 04:21 CST, Adam Thornton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 8, 2004, at 4:17 PM, Rich Smrcina wrote:
Perhaps the right combination of special priviledge class and the hcp
module would help.
You'd need to modify heartbeat-stonith's source to execute hcp FORCE
user
Greg,
The best that we have at this point is a statement of direction. Rumor
is that it should hit the street sometime next year.
Greg Evans wrote:
Is it the case that IBM will be coming out with a version of CICS that
will run on SUSe Linux ?
I have searched the web, however I have only gotten
My original :( suse kernel doesn't supports cifs..and now I see the kernel
source (2.4.19) doesn't have fs/cifs. May I patch it with
Latest 2.4 Release (gz containing cifs vfs source files and patch for
kernel makefile and configure)
from the url
30 matches
Mail list logo
