I was provided this link in some of my correspondence with IBM on this
subject:
http://www-03.ibm.com/support/techdocs/atsmastr.nsf/WebIndex/PRS4016
See page 2.
The Oracle document mentioned in the IBM doc confirms the intent to
provide support and availability 1Q2011.
Tim
-Original
Is it certified? Supported?I'm hunting for descriptive documents on
Oracle's site, but none are forthcoming. I see on this forum that
question was asked 2 years ago, but has it changed in 2 years?
Tim
tim.mo...@srpnet.com
Hello all,
I'm interested in installing Tomcat Version 6 on my RHEL for 390 system.
Redhat provides plenty of packages for V5, but no v6. Has anybody had
any luck (or deadends) with a version 6 install? Did you have to go
find and compile the source file(s)?
Tim
tim.mo...@srpnet.com
does properly enumerate all members in tim
test, but that's my next task.
I welcome any comments or suggestions about the kludgy second AD group
solution.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Moeur Tim C
Sent: Wednesday, April
be (are) others interested.
Dave Gibney
Information Technology Services
Washington State University
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Moeur Tim C
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 9:03 AM
To: LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu
Subject: Re: MQ
?
If you don't mind, could you share your steps? We had a customer that
tried a year+ ago and their experience wasn't pretty...
Thanks,
Lee
On 4/9/2010 12:16 PM, Moeur Tim C wrote:
I am in the process of rolling that out. I've done it successfully
on
a proof-of-concept machine several months ago
I am in the process of rolling that out. I've done it successfully on
a proof-of-concept machine several months ago, and I'm now replicating
those steps to deploy a test machine that my real users will hit.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:linux-...@vm.marist.edu] On
I did try that but with no success. I'm pretty certain that the root
cause is the absence of the 'Boot from FCP' feature on my z890, as the
regulars here have suggested. As I say, the most telling clue is the
instant drop into a CP program interrupt. I went so far as to code up
bad zipl.conf
Hey list -
I've been hunting through IBM documents for this answer but so far no
gold. Perhaps one of you will save me a lot of time.
I'm building zLinux images to use zfcp file systems as the /boot
directory. This works well here at home on our Z10. Our DR machine,
however, is an older
the
load panel on your z890 HMC/SE, do you see SCSI stuff?
Regards,
Ray Higgs
System z FCP Development
Bld. 706, B24
2455 South Road
Poughkeepsie, NY 12601
(845) 435-8666, T/L 295-8666
rayhi...@us.ibm.com
Moeur Tim C tim.mo...@srpnet.com
Sent by: Linux on 390 Port LINUX-390@vm.marist.edu
03/18/2010
Lee,
It was I that started that last iteration of this thread. While I never
tested the 2G change, I can attest the 2 vcpus did indeed mean the
difference between success and failure. Mark is correct, you don't have
to leave it at high memory or more vcpus than planned after the install
is
Hello list -
I've been building some of my newer Red Hat 5.4 zLInux images using FCP
devices for the boot device. I noticed yesterday, however, that when I
IPL an machine (through VM) that I'm not offered a boot menu. This went
unnoticed because we haven't had to revert to old kernels or
Moeur
to continue' requirement that both Sue
and I saw is also resolved by adding that second CPU.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Moeur Tim C
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2010 1:27 PM
To: 'Linux on 390 Port'
Subject: RE: Rhel 5.4 install problems
I, too, have had the same experiences. My old
I, too, have had the same experiences. My old RHEL 5.2 installation
process worked (and still works) properly catching that redhat.conf
file. Under 5.4, however, the redhat.conf file is ignored I have to
specify by hand the network settings.
We use a kickstart process here and so I don't
Hello list,
I have a problem looking for a solution and I'm hoping that someone here
might have some suggestions.
We have recently implemented FCP on our zLinux machines. Our /boot
directory is still 3390, but after the IPL some of the filesystem are
FCP. I've discovered that the
Hello Everybody,
I'd like to solicit your thoughts and opinions for the best backup
methodology for zLinux systems. This isn't the databases or application
data, but rather the components needed to restart only the zLinux
operating system at our DR site.We use EMC and its related SRDF/a
I just opened a similar thread but perhaps I should have made a branch
from Lionel's original question. I'm not so concerned about data
integrity for the databases or applications (I'm assuming that we'll use
provided recovery procedures for those), rather I would like to verify
that a zLinux
'ifconfig' should show you all of the active interfaces. Perhaps yours
isn't showing up with that commend because it isn't started? Check the
definition in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-hsi0 (or hsi1) to
insure that it's defined properly. Also, don't forget to verify that
there is a
Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mark Post
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 7:33 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Linux password and the VM console
On Tue, Oct 2, 2007 at 6:00 PM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Moeur Tim C
[EMAIL PROTECTED
In our case, should network troubles or other events render the normal
SSH path unavailable, we will likely be restarting the crippled system
in run level 1, which won't ask for the password. We'll then fix the
problem, and reboot the system. It's assumed that the only time that we
really need
I found it from my RH Network pages. After I logged into RHN I clicked
on the large, blue 'Software Downloads' icon in the lower left. I
drilled into the Red Hat Enterprise Linux (v. 5 64-bit IBM zSeries)
Beta link and found .iso images.
Good luck.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on
Have any of you IFL/zLinux users also bought into IBM's Ziip Engine for
DB2 work? If so, I'd like to hear about your experiences off list.
Please contact me at your convenience.
Sorry for the mostly non-390-Linux question, but I suspect that there
may be a fair amount of overlap within this
what the
vipa is gaining. Of course I could be missing something - David
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port on behalf of Moeur Tim C
Sent: Thu 3/8/2007 4:48 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Help with Virtual IP's.
To anyone in the midst of composing a reply, thank you
I'm setting up VIPA's, zebra, quagga, and ospfd under my Redhat AS 4
zLinux running under VM 5.2 It nearly works, but not quite and I'm
hoping to get some insight from this list group.
I have an environment with two OSA's into a single Vswitch. On the
zlinux machine I have two devices:
eth0
Good morning List,
I have a question of general test and production architecture. We
currently have some production zLinux guests running under z/VM 5.1.
z/VM is installed as an LPAR on our single Z9 server. We had, until
recently, a second Z9 on which I was running a test VM which I could
Moeur Tim C wrote:
Good morning List,
I have a question of general test and production architecture. We
currently have some production zLinux guests running under z/VM 5.1.
z/VM is installed as an LPAR on our single Z9 server. We had,
until
recently, a second Z9 on which I was running
I had a similar situation when installing Redhat AS 4. Similar, but
still a bit different, perhaps the solution is common to both.
On the Redhat installation, I'm able to use the VSWITCHes just fine to
install the base software. I have no problem starting ssh and VNC to
address the installation
What am I doing wrong? Fame and glory promised to he (or she) that
first identifies the trouble.
Here's the situation. We are using z/VM 5.2 for the first times with
several zLinux guests. Until recently I've had a single zLinux image in
an LPAR. I do have the zLinux guests up and they are
it dynamically, if you want the attach to be there after
you IPL then you need to add the disk to the system config file on
maints cf1 disk
john
MOEUR TIM C
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
om
To
Sent by: Linux on LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
All,
Thanks for the many replies. My problem is resolved, and it seems to
due to running mkinitrd and zipl AFTER I've done the various YaST work.
Thanks again for the suggestions to get me back on track.
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Hello all,
I've been fighting an LVM problem and searching through the archives and
I stumbled on this from Mark Post from a while back:
Re: /tmp as a logical volume
Post, Mark K
Tue, 21 Jun 2005 21:35:24 -0700
I'm beginning to have doubts about LVM (version 1 at least) on 64-bit
systems.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
John Schnitzler Jr
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 11:52 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: LVM, SLES9 and 64 bit
Tim are you running the mkinird and the zipl after defining the LVM?
You didn't
Sorry about that -
I'm on SLES9 with Linux version 2.6.5-7.244-s390x
No, I haven't been running mkinitrd and zipl, (forgive me, I'm new at
the Linux on s390 stuff). I was pretty certain that for the successful
LVM that I created that I hadn't done that, but it was some time back,
and I might
Hello all,
I've been hunting around for this answer but as yet I haven't found it
so I'll pitch it here. I'm still building our zLinux system on Suse in
an LPAR (Not VM). As I use YaST to activate additional DASD that new
dasd will be assigned the next logical device node. What happens when I
Is the system already up and running with one, and you are going to set
up a second? If so, YaST works very well to discover and configure the
second OSA.
-Original Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kittendorf, Craig
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006
I fetched mine a bit differently -
I started at www.novell.com and selected the Products and Solutions
pull-down window. From that I selected the Suse Linux enterprise Server
link.
That took me to a page which includes a description and a link to learn
more about Service Pack 3.
Toward the
Hello,
I'm new to the whole Suse maintenance thing, so I might be missing
something easy, but it's not clear to me. Perhaps one you has already
seen this problem or can help me figure this one out.
Because Novell recently announced the SP3 version fixes for SLES 9
running on zSeries I figured
D'oht!
I see now, Novell has the two links backwards. The clearly marked '31
bit' link will take you to the s390x versions, the 64 bit link goes to
s390. I'll try the 31 bit links to see if the iso's contain what I
need.
Tim
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ted,
Here's how I did this.
Instead of 3 (FTP) I used 1 NFS. BUT FIRST, you need to do some stuff.
- Before you choose NFS find a nearby Linux desktop machine that is on
your network.
- Make a copy of CD #1 (or you can take it out of the HMC, but two
copies are easier).
- Put CD #1 in the
Everybody,
Thanks for all of the good information that you've provided. I've
answered many questions and roughed out an early-phase architecture that
I'll begin to set up. From what I've learned, it appears I'll have:
SLE 9.0
TSM 5.3 and appropriate drivers.
Some number of new fiber
I've done this with no trouble. I used YAST, Network Devices, Network
Card, and it found the various OSA's on the system. As I recall, it
should see three addresses since the OSA's work with separate input,
output, and control channels. That's normal.
Don't confuse the default gateway as a
Has anybody done this? I'm trying to configure our STK 9310 powderhorn
robotics to work with TSM running under Suse LE 9. If you've down
this, I'd love to see some outline of where to start. STK support
hasn't been too helpful with this venture.
Tim
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Of
MOEUR TIM C
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 2:31 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: SLES 9, zSeries, and dropping OSA-G's
Hello,
I have an odd situation and I'm wondering if anybody else has
encountered the same and if so, what they did to correct the situation.
I'm running a test Suse
Hello,
I have an odd situation and I'm wondering if anybody else has
encountered the same and if so, what they did to correct the situation.
I'm running a test Suse Linux ES 9.0 on a zseries 890 in LPAR mode. The
machine has on it two OSA Gigabit adapters which are shared with a
production z/OS
45 matches
Mail list logo
