Of all my samba servers, this is the first attempt at being something that end
users would directly interface with, just like they do with our Novell file
servers.
I've tried to force myself to use SWAT, but until I get everything working from
the command line, SWAT is just going to have to
Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Tom
Duerbusch
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 11:13 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Samba Authorization another question
Of all my samba servers, this is the first attempt at being something that end
users
@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Tom
Duerbusch
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 11:13 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Samba Authorization another question
Of all my samba servers, this is the first attempt at being something that end
users would directly interface with, just like they do with our Novell
On 4/27/2011 at 11:13 AM, Tom Duerbusch duerbus...@stlouiscity.com wrote:
What I would really like to do, is if a Windows user tries to access a Samba
share, and the username and the share name, match, you are good to go. If
the Windows user doesn't match the share, reject.
Right now, I
On Sun, 2 Jan 2005, Rich Smrcina wrote:
If you want Linux on x86 to be the 'server' it will need to be the one
serving the shares (and has direct access to the shark with a SCSI
card). If you want Linux on x86 to be able to mount a share on a
Windows machine that has direct access to the
What about access through a 2109 fibre switch to the shark??
-Original Message-
From: Rich Smrcina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2005 7:56 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Another question..
If you want Linux on x86 to be the 'server
Message-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Noll,
Ralph
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 11:40 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Another question..
What about access through a 2109 fibre switch to the shark
for all your help
Ralph
-Original Message-
From: Post, Mark K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 11:42 AM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Another question..
With all these one-line questions you're asking, I don't
think anyone has a good idea
by: Linux on LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
390 Port cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IST.EDU Subject
Re: Another question
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 12:20 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Another question..
Ralph,
Have you considered simply upgrading your z800 in order to
obtain sufficient capacity to support the help desk application?
- doug
Noll
cc
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IST.EDU Subject
Re: Another question..
01/03/2005 02:00
PM
Please respond to
Linux on 390 Port
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IST.EDU Subject
Re: Another question..
01/03/2005 01:13
PM
Please respond to
Linux on 390 Port
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Monday, 01/03/2005 at 12:13 CST, Noll, Ralph
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do I get access to the shark from the x86.. On windows I just map a
drive
To the shark.. I have an internal 90gb hard drive on my windows box but
I want to map a 300gb drive on the shark... No problem.. How do I
I have a fibre card in my server that attaches to a 2109 switch that
attaches to the shark..
See attached diagram...
-Original Message-
From: Alan Altmark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 3:59 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Another question
On Monday, 01/03/2005 at 08:00 CST, Noll, Ralph
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a fibre card in my server that attaches to a 2109 switch that
attaches to the shark..
Then you're nearly there, as you are already accessing the Shark from
those other servers. Good. Now run samba on one of those
If you want Linux on x86 to be the 'server' it will need to be the one
serving the shares (and has direct access to the shark with a SCSI
card). If you want Linux on x86 to be able to mount a share on a
Windows machine that has direct access to the shark, you would use the
mount command and need
Yea that something. How do I make linux on x86 do that???
Thanks
Ralph
-Original Message-
From: Rich Smrcina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004 2:47 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Another question..
Something that has direct access
Trying to get my quota of questions for this year 2004 (ha..ha)
How do I go about attaching shark ess 2105-800 storage to a
Linux x86..
Windoz I can map a drive
How do I do the same thing in linux???
Thanks a bunch for you all's help this year and past years
Ralph
'Mapping' a drive is netbios/smb type of function. The equivalent in
Linux is smbmount (or mount -t smb), if you have the samba-client stuff
installed.
But to physically attach a Shark to an Intel system would require a SCSI
interface on the Intel machine, the proper drivers for Linux to access
On Dec 30, 2004, at 1:15 PM, Noll, Ralph wrote:
Trying to get my quota of questions for this year 2004 (ha..ha)
How do I go about attaching shark ess 2105-800 storage to a
Linux x86..
Windoz I can map a drive
How do I do the same thing in linux???
If Windows can map a drive then something is
Subject: Re: Another question..
'Mapping' a drive is netbios/smb type of function. The
equivalent in Linux is smbmount (or mount -t smb), if you
have the samba-client stuff installed.
But to physically attach a Shark to an Intel system would
require a SCSI interface on the Intel machine
Something that has direct access to the Shark and is serving out the
shares will be the 'target' of the mount command. I don't have the
exact syntax handy, but it would be something like:
mount -t smb ipaddress/sharename -o username=userid password=password
the smbmount man page should have more
-
From: Linux on 390 Port [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Noll, Ralph
Sent: Thursday, December 30, 2004 3:06 PM
To: LINUX-390@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Another question..
Yea.. I am looking for the smb mount NOT the scsi..
So how do I carv out 30...40...20gb from a shark and mount
With mount
Thanks for the replies about MVSNFS and Apache works fine now.
I am hoping someone has experience with this other question:
I am experimenting with trying to export an HFS file via nfs and
have tried many permutaions.
Say I have USERID.NFS.HFS and I want to export it.
Do I have to first mount
:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: MVSNFS another question - exporting HFS files
Thanks for the replies about MVSNFS and Apache works fine now.
I am hoping someone has experience with this other question:
I am experimenting with trying to export an HFS file via nfs and
have tried many
Hello,
Without response for my first question, I would like to know if anybody
knows if its possible to run Was4 under SLES8 s/390 ?
Thanks
Gerard MONTELEONE
Ingenieur Systeme Reseau
* 04.95.23.68.09 / 06.87.72.70.32
S.I.TE.C zi du Vazzio
20090 AJACCIO Cedex
to Linux on 390 Port
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:TR : Was 4 Another question
Hello,
Without response for my first question, I would like to know if anybody
knows if it's possible to run Was4 under SLES8 s/390 ?
Thanks
Gerard MONTELEONE
Without response for my first question, I would like to know
if anybody
knows if its possible to run Was4 under SLES8 s/390 ?
Technically, the answer is yes, it does work. As far as I know, IBM has not
yet publically announced that they have certified WAS4 for SLES8, only
SLES7.
Hi, i have a simple question about lvm: if i create one volume, with two
3390-3, for example, i could use the volume with other linux (other image) ?
thanks
--
Alejandro Leyva Rabinovich.
Jefe de la Unidad Departamental de Soporte Ticnico
(Administracisn de Mainframe).
Direccisn General de
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: lvm (another question)
Hi, i have a simple question about lvm: if i create one volume, with two
3390-3, for example, i could use the volume with other linux (other image) ?
thanks
--
Alejandro Leyva Rabinovich.
Jefe de la Unidad Departamental de Soporte Ticnico
]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 10:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: lvm (another question)
Hi, i have a simple question about lvm: if i create one volume, with two
3390-3, for example, i could use the volume with other linux (other image) ?
thanks
--
Alejandro Leyva Rabinovich
]
Subject: lvm (another question)
Hi, i have a simple question about lvm: if i create one
volume, with two
3390-3, for example, i could use the volume with other linux
(other image) ?
thanks
--
Alejandro Leyva Rabinovich.
Jefe de la Unidad Departamental de Soporte Ticnico
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: lvm (another question), now RedHat 7.2
I've asked this question because i found problems installing RedHat 7.2,
the user was defined with the following mdisks:
01711 MDISK 191 3390 0055 0010 430W02 MR ALL SOME FEW
01712 MDISK 200 3390 0001 0556 LINUX1
you'll find that you won't need 80% of what is
included in the everything setup.
Mark Post
-Original Message-
From: Alex Leyva [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 10:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: lvm (another question), now RedHat 7.2
I've asked
Smolinski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 10:49 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ssh success and yet another question
Why not use 'sudo' for getting (restricted) root privileges?
Best Regards
Holger Smolinski
--
Dr. Holger Smolinski, Linux on zSeries Service
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ssh success and yet another question
Unfortunately, / is the home directory for root users on Unix System
Services. Yet another example of IBM getting it wrong in that environment.
:(
Still, I just did a test on a z/OS 1.2 system:
mkdir //.ssh/
worked by creating /.ssh
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 10:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ssh success and yet another question
Mark,
There are many things to complain about with Unix System Services, but
that's not one of them. Each user can have a different home directory
regardless
, January 22, 2003 9:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ssh success and yet another question
Lonny,
True, but most of the documentation tells you to define superusers as having
a home directory of /. In the early days, some things would break if you
did not. I haven't checked
and yet another question
:
|
| Subject: Re: ssh success and yet another question
Thanks to all for setting me straight on ssh. As several people pointed
out, don't assign a passphrase to the host keys! I guess that falls
under the category of RTFMP! So I deleted all of my keys, and recreated
them with an empty passphrase. I still couldn't get to the z/OS boxes
from Linux,
At 20:49 21-01-03, paultz wrote:
Failed to add the host to the list of known hosts (//.ssh/known_hosts).
Doesn't someone assume your home directory is / here? And is that where you want them?
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, paultz wrote:
Now everything is talking, and the only annoyance is this:
When I answer Yes to the question of Are you sure you want to
continue connecting (yes/no)?, I get:
Failed to add the host to the list of known hosts (//.ssh/known_hosts).
HOME seems to be set to
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, paultz wrote:
Thanks to all for setting me straight on ssh. As several people pointed
out, don't assign a passphrase to the host keys! I guess that falls
under the category of RTFMP! So I deleted all of my keys, and recreated
them with an empty passphrase. I still
success and yet another question
On Tue, 21 Jan 2003, paultz wrote:
Now everything is talking, and the only annoyance is this:
When I answer Yes to the question of Are you sure you want to
continue connecting (yes/no)?, I get:
Failed to add the host to the list of known hosts (//.ssh
On Tuesday 21 January 2003 12:20, you wrote:
At 20:49 21-01-03, paultz wrote:
Failed to add the host to the list of known hosts (//.ssh/known_hosts).
Doesn't someone assume your home directory is / here? And is that where you
want them?
I think if you did an ls -a from // you would find that
On 22.01.2003 at 08:12:36, \Post, Mark K\ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately, \/\ is the home directory for root users on Unix System
Services.
Can the home directory for the BPXROOT user be changed? This might work, but of
course it may have undesirable effects for installed software,
47 matches
Mail list logo
