Re: RHEL3 requires 256MB to be supported?

2003-10-31 Thread John Summerfield
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003, Post, Mark K wrote: Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2003 16:09:34 -0500 From: Post, Mark K [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Linux on 390 Port [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RHEL3 requires 256MB to be supported? I don't think any such assumptions were made.

Re: Filesystem Comparison

2003-10-31 Thread John Cassidy
Hello all, excuse my ignorance, but what does dog mean??. Something to do with cat or fox etc??. John D. Cassidy Dipl.-Ing (Informatique) S390 zSeries Systems Engineering Schleswigstr. 7 D-51065 Cologne EU Tel: +49 (0) 221 61 60 777 . GSM: +49 (0) 177 799 58 56

Re: RHEL3 requires 256MB to be supported?

2003-10-31 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 02:15, Vic Cross wrote: My point was that since Red Hat requires 256MB to be supported, you need to be able to reproduce any sort of problem while running in that configuration. You don't question the 256MB requirement? To me, this is troubling. It also troubles me

AW: Perpetuating Myths about the zSeries

2003-10-31 Thread Ma Lo
well, CPU-Performance is not everything. Its always a question about the whole system (and application behavior). If you need pure CPU-Power then IBM z/Series would be the wrong choice. But most of the systems don't have permanent a cpu high load. If you need availability and scalability

Re: RHEL3 requires 256MB to be supported?

2003-10-31 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 11:06, Rob van der Heij wrote: We do know that the installer needs a minimum amount of memory because The idea of pulling RAM chips out of the PC after you install would probably be very alien to Intel Linux people. So in that case the installer requirements are the

Re: RHEL3 requires 256MB to be supported?

2003-10-31 Thread Vic Cross
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, John Summerfield wrote: In practice, with new hardware, 256 Mbytes is the minimum I'd reommend - why would you stuff arround with memory configurations to yield something between? This is my point. They can get away with that reasoning for discrete servers, but can't

Close session in tn3270 to VM, stop to work connections on Linux.

2003-10-31 Thread Antônio Pires de Castro Jr.
Hi, I have set one of my systems profile exec to have set run on. When we close our tn3270 session to VM, it seems that the system never goes down, but my ssh session terminates and new sessions can not be established until I open a 3270 session to the system again. What is happening? Can someone

Re: Perpetuating Myths about the zSeries

2003-10-31 Thread Eric Sammons
What about memory intensive? And how do you gage the CPU intensive applications? For example we are planning to migrate some of our Solaris (SPARC) applications off of SPARC and into the z/VM Linux world. If I am looking at candidates for this migration I see systems (SPARC) with 10 - 30

Re: Close session in tn3270 to VM, stop to work connections on Linux.

2003-10-31 Thread Elmer Fudd
dont kill your 3270 session; log off from vm with #cp disc (without the quotes). Then your zLinux should be available with ssh ... regards Joachim Stumpf Hi, I have set one of my systems profile exec to have set run on. When we close our tn3270 session to VM, it seems that the system never

Re: Perpetuating Myths about the zSeries

2003-10-31 Thread Joseph Temple
The best way to understand is to take measurements of the running production systems. There are many tools for doing this and you may already be gathering at least the data that you would need. The way to look at utilization is to plot the utilization on intervals for a peak period, day or

Re: Filesystem Comparison

2003-10-31 Thread James Tison
American slang for very poorly performing. --Jim-- James S. Tison Senior Software Engineer TPF Laboratory / Architecture IBM Corporation A bird in hand is safer than one overhead. John Cassidy [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: RHEL3 requires 256MB to be supported?

2003-10-31 Thread Adam Thornton
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 04:06, Rob van der Heij wrote: PS The box of Red Hat 7 for Intel says 32MB, but that's probably text and no GUI. SuSE 9.0 for x86 claims 64MB minimum for graphical install, 128MB recommended. I installed Debian 3.0 on a 16MB Intel system just fine, and I can do that on

2003-10-31 Linux for zSeries code docu drop to developerWorks

2003-10-31 Thread Gerhard Hiller
Please see the What's New page at: http://www10.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linux390/whatsnew.shtml for a change summary of the 2003-10-31 additions and changes to the Linux for zSeries and S/390 developerWorks Web pages. June 2003 stream: o kernel 2.4.21: - kernel bug

Re: Filesystem Comparison

2003-10-31 Thread John Cassidy
Depending on the task their task currently at hand, I would have thought that canines perform quite well John D. Cassidy Dipl.-Ing (Informatique) S390 zSeries Systems Engineering Schleswigstr. 7 D-51065 Cologne EU Tel: +49 (0) 221 61 60 777 . GSM: +49 (0) 177 799 58 56 E-Mail:

Re: RHEL3 requires 256MB to be supported?

2003-10-31 Thread Post, Mark K
It doesn't bother me because I don't plan on ever running Red Hat on my mainframes. I guess that made me a little too complacent about the whole thing. I agree that 256MB is out of line for most routine deployments. The graphical installation does require a fair amount of storage to run, but

Re: OT: New Mac G5

2003-10-31 Thread Robert Reuscher
Virtual PC does not work on a G5, it doesn't contain little endian (I think that's what's missing) emulation support which is critical to Virtual PC's operation. Microsoft has not given any date when they will support a G5 I haven't tried Bochs on Linux/PPC, but if I can make it run on

Re: OT: New Mac G5

2003-10-31 Thread Adam Thornton
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 10:23, Robert Reuscher wrote: Virtual PC does not work on a G5, it doesn't contain little endian (I think that's what's missing) emulation support which is critical to Virtual PC's operation. Microsoft has not given any date when they will support a G5 Well, MS will

Re: Perpetuating Myths about the zSeries

2003-10-31 Thread David Boyes
What about memory intensive? And how do you gage the CPU intensive applications? For example we are planning to migrate some of our Solaris (SPARC) applications off of SPARC and into the z/VM Linux world. Something that occurred to me (and since Joe Temple is kindly answering questions):

Re: RHEL3 requires 256MB to be supported?

2003-10-31 Thread Karsten Hopp
I can't comment about the 256MB limit, I didn't (and wouldn't have) put it in. But my tests showed that it is no problem to run a system with 60Mb or less (with plenty of swap on VDISK) and even compile a kernel on it. And yes, graphical installs were very painful in the past, I did quite a few

Re: Filesystem Comparison

2003-10-31 Thread Post, Mark K
John, No need to ask to be excused because you don't understand another country's slang. I'm sure that I wouldn't recognize any slang from Germany, or France, and I know I don't understand a lot of British slang. ;) If anything, I should have remembered that there are a lot of non-US

Re: Perpetuating Myths about the zSeries

2003-10-31 Thread Post, Mark K
Memory intensive applications are not automatically disqualified, but need to be looked at individually, and in terms of what the impact will be on the rest of the systems/z/VM. As Joe and Barton both recommend (and you say you do), measurement is the only way to get a handle on whether a

Re: Filesystem Comparison

2003-10-31 Thread Richard Troth
Depending on the task their task currently at hand, I would have thought that canines perform quite well Normally, yes. But you should see how some American canines are spoiled/pampered! Then there is the Western American canine (any breed), where during the dog days of summer the animal

Re: Perpetuating Myths about the zSeries

2003-10-31 Thread Barton Robinson
Eric I've published a methodology for doing this kind of migration planning. The presentation can be found at HTTP://velocitysoftware.com/present/ConsTECH Probably for what you want, start at HTTP://velocitysoftware.com/present/ConsTECH/sld015.html One day I'll add some notes to make this a little

Re: Perpetuating Myths about the zSeries

2003-10-31 Thread Barton Robinson
But David, this is now TOTALLY possible using ESALPS. ESALPS collects data from SUN, HP, WinNT, Linux, and anything else that either NETSNMP supports, or has their own native SNMP implementation... (but thanks for asking) And of course when you get to Linux on zVM, ESALPS even provides correct

Re: Filesystem Comparison

2003-10-31 Thread John Campbell
Yes, there's some truth, but the canine's master is usually immobilized by consumption of a colorless, odorless liquid which has an intoxicating affect on certain carbon-based life-forms. John R. Campbell, Speaker to Machines (GNUrd) {813-356|697}-5322 Adsumo ergo raptus

Re: Filesystem Comparison

2003-10-31 Thread Adam Thornton
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 11:48, John Campbell wrote: Yes, there's some truth, but the canine's master is usually immobilized by consumption of a colorless, odorless liquid which has an intoxicating affect on certain carbon-based life-forms. My beer is neither colorless nor odorless, thank you

Re: RHEL3 requires 256MB to be supported?

2003-10-31 Thread Alan Cox
On Gwe, 2003-10-31 at 11:10, Rob van der Heij wrote: On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 11:06, Rob van der Heij wrote: We do know that the installer needs a minimum amount of memory because The idea of pulling RAM chips out of the PC after you install would probably be very alien to Intel Linux people.

Filesystem Comparison

2003-10-31 Thread John Cassidy
Richard Troth wrote: Depending on the task their task currently at hand, I would have thought that canines perform quite well Normally, yes. But you should see how some American canines are spoiled/pampered! Then there is the Western American canine (any breed), where during the dog days of

Re: Filesystem Comparison

2003-10-31 Thread Adam Thornton
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 12:18, John Cassidy wrote: Ah yes, in the west, even the dogs are degenerate.. I have seen some very high performance dogs in Novosibirsk (West Siberia). They have the hunger, the constant hunger, you see. The Capitalist Running Dogs are really more like Capitalist

Re: Perpetuating Myths about the zSeries

2003-10-31 Thread Joseph Temple
I don't know of any plans to make RMF-PM available on other platforms. I will look around, but it will be a week or so; others may be able to help sooner. Joe Temple [EMAIL PROTECTED] 845-435-6301 295/6301 cell 914-706-5211 home 845-338-8794 David Boyes

Re: Filesystem Comparison

2003-10-31 Thread Richard Hitt
From dictionary.com: dog, n. . . . 6. Slang. a. A person regarded as unattractive or uninteresting. b. Something of inferior or low quality: The President had read the speech to some of his friends and they told him it was a dog (John P. Roche). c. An investment that produces a low return or

Re: Question: setting up SuSE SLES7 to automatically be logged o n as root during boot up .....

2003-10-31 Thread Little, Chris
I'm going to have to disagree with that. I need my operators to be able to access the console, however, I don't want them having root access . . . some of them like to experiment. Ok, some sysadmins like to also . . . perhaps not a good example :) but you get the idea. -Original

Re: Question: setting up SuSE SLES7 to automatically be logged o n as root during boot up .....

2003-10-31 Thread Dennis Wicks
Disagreee with what? Letting your operators have access to the linux console has nothing to do with whether or not leaving root logged on and disconnecting the linux virtual console is a security risk. You say operators, does this mean they have access to the OPERATOR account/logon on VM? If so

Sybase on zLinux

2003-10-31 Thread Davis, Larry
Is there any one out there that is currently using Sybase Databases on a zSeries platform under z/VM or is it even available? \|/ (. .) __ooO-(_)-Ooo__ TIA, Larry Davis, x2627