On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 6:23 PM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
> On 11.01.2018 12:51, Ext-Strii-Houttemane Philippe wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>We are using btrfs filesystem on local disks (RAID 1) as underlying
>> filesystem to host our Oracle 12c datafiles.
>> This allow us to cold backup databases
On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Chris Mason wrote:
>
> On 08/02/2017 04:38 AM, Brendan Hide wrote:
>>
>> The title seems alarmist to me - and I suspect it is going to be
>> misconstrued. :-/
>
>
> Supporting any filesystem is a huge amount of work. I don't have a problem
> with Redhat or any di
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Paul Verreth wrote:
> Dear all.
>
> When I download a video using Firefox DownloadHelper addon, the
> filesystem suddenly turns read only. Not a coincedence, I tried it
> several times, and it happened every time again
>
> Info:
> Linux wolfgang 4.2.0-35-generic #
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 8:20 AM, james harvey wrote:
> Request for new btrfs subvolume subcommand:
>
> clone or fork [-i []
>Create a subvolume in , which is a clone or fork of source.
>If is not given, subvolume will be created in the
> current directory.
>Options
>-i
>
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 2:06 PM, Ingvar Bogdahn
wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Benchmarking over time seems a good idea, but what if I see that a
> particular database does indeed degrade in performance? How can I then
> selectively improve performance for that file, since disabling cow only
> works for n
On Wed, Dec 31, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 12/30/14 10:06 PM, Wang Shilong wrote:
>>> I used CentOS7 btrfs myself, just doing some tests..it crashed easily.
>>> I don’t know how much efforts that Redhat do on btrfs for 7 series.
>>
>> Maybe use SUSE enterprise for btrfs will be a be
On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 01, 2014 at 08:45:59AM +0200, Tor Houghton wrote:
> > Well, I probably should have looked at the logs first and not tried to
> > delete
> > some old data, but as the command (rm -rf) hung, I got suspicious:
> >
> > Jun 30 23:51:0
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 12:52:04PM +0100, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
>> And it looks the dependency is ~1 GB of new packages? O_o
>
> That seems painful, but at the same time, the alternative, nroff/troff sucks.
>
> Part ofyour problem however se
(resending to the list as plain text, the original reply was rejected
due to HTML format)
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 10:05 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
>
> Igor M posted on Thu, 05 Jun 2014 00:15:31 +0200 as excerpted:
>
> > Why btrfs becames EXTREMELY slow after some time (months) of usag
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 5:15 AM, Igor M wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Why btrfs becames EXTREMELY slow after some time (months) of usage ?
> # btrfs fi show
> Label: none uuid: b367812a-b91a-4fb2-a839-a3a153312eba
> Total devices 1 FS bytes used 2.36TiB
> devid1 size 2.73TiB used 2.38Ti
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Le Nguyen Tran wrote:
> I now need to understand the operation of btrfs source code to
> determine. I hope that one of you can help me
Have you read the wiki link?
--
Fajar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Le Nguyen Tran wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am Nguyen. I am not a software development engineer but an IC (chip)
> development engineer. I have a plan to develop an IC controller for
> Network Attached Storage (NAS). The main idea is converting software
> code into hardware
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 6:39 PM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 06:18:34PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
>> I writing slides about btrfs for an upcoming talk (at linuxcon) and I was
>> trying to gather a list of companies that contribute code to btrfs.
>
> https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 10:23 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> It sounds like either a grub.cfg misconfiguration, or a failure to correctly
> build the initrd/initramfs. So I'd post the grub.cfg kernel command line for
> the boot entry that works and the entry that fails, for comparison.
>
> And then
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Austin S Hemmelgarn
wrote:
>
> AFAIK, ZFS does background data scrubbing without user intervention
No, it doesn't.
> BTRFS however works differently, it only scrubs data when you tell it
> to. If it encounters a checksum or read error on a data block, it
> fir
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 1:33 AM, valleysmail-l...@yahoo.de
wrote:
>
>
>
> I'd like to know if there are drawbacks in using btrfs with non-ECC RAM
> instead of using ext4 with non-ECC RAM.
Non-ECC RAM can cause problems no matter what fs you use.
> I know that some features of btrfs may rely on
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've observed a rather strange behaviour while trying to mount two
> identical copies of the same image to different mount points.
> Each modification to one image is also performed in the second one.
>
> Example:
> dd if=/dev/sda?
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:30 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 26. Februar 2013 schrieb Fajar A. Nugraha:
>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Mike Fleetwood
>>
>> wrote:
>> > On 25 February 2013 23:35, Suman C wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Mike Fleetwood
wrote:
> On 25 February 2013 23:35, Suman C wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think it would be great if there is a lvm volume or zfs zvol type
>> support in btrfs.
> Btrfs already has capabilities to add and remove block devices on the
> fly. Data can be s
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> is btrfs ready for production use in 3.6.6? Or should i backport fixes from
> 3.7-rc?
>
> Is it planned to have a stable kernel which will get all btrfs fixes
> backported?
I would say "no" to both, but you shou
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 5:32 AM, Hugo Mills wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 05:28:01AM +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 5:16 AM, cwillu wrote:
>> >> btrfs fi label -t /btrfs/snap1-sv1
>> >> Prod-DB-sand-box-testing
>> >
>>
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 5:16 AM, cwillu wrote:
>> btrfs fi label -t /btrfs/snap1-sv1
>> Prod-DB-sand-box-testing
>
> Why is this better than:
>
> # btrfs su snap /btrfs/Prod-DB /btrfs/Prod-DB-sand-box-testing
> # mv /btrfs/Prod-DB-sand-box-testing /btrfs/Prod-DB-production-test
> # ls /btrfs/
> Pr
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Oct 26, 2012, at 9:03 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
>
>>
>> So back to the original question, I'd suggest NOT to use either
>> send/receive or set-default. Instead, setup multiple boot environment
>&
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 8:58 AM, cwillu wrote:
>> I haven't tried btrfs send/receive for this purpose, so I can't compare. But
>> btrfs subvolume set-default is faster than the release of my finger from the
>> return key. And it's easy enough the user could do it themselves if they had
>> reaso
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Joel Pearson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using SL 6 (RHEL 6) and I've been playing around with running
> PostgreSQL on btrfs. Snapshotting works ok, but the computer keeps
> rebooting without warning (can be 5 mins or 1.5 hours), finally I
> actually managed to get a Kern
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 3:16 AM, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
>> I suggest you start by reading
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org/msg18827.html
>>
>> After that, PROBABLY start your database by preloading libeatmydata to
>> disable fsync completely.
>
> Which will cure the sympt
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Cesar Inacio Martins
wrote:
> My problem:
> * Using btrfs + compression , flush of 60 MB/s take 4 minutes
> (on this 4 minutes they keep constatly I/O of +- 4MB/s no disks)
> (flush from Informix database)
> * OpenSuse 12.1 64bits, running over VmWare ESXi 5
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Casper Bang wrote:
>> Anand Jain oracle.com> writes:
>> archive-log-apply script - if you could, can you share the
>> script itself ? or provide more details about the script.
>> (It will help to understand the work-load in question).
>
> Our setup entails a
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 1:07 PM, ching lu wrote:
> Is it possible to specify UUID for btrfs when creating the filesystem?
Not that I know of
> or changing it when it is offline?
This one is a definite no.
> i have several script/setting file which have hardcoded UUID and i do
> not want to upd
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> Am Samstag, 8. September 2012 schrieb Marc MERLIN:
>> I was migrating a backup disk to a new btrfs disk, and the backup had a
>> lot of hardlinks to collapse identical files to cut down on inode
>> count and disk space.
>>
>> Then, I sta
On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 2:49 PM, ching wrote:
> On 09/09/2012 08:30 AM, Jan Steffens wrote:
>> On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 2:03 AM, ching wrote:
>>> 2. Is there any command for the fragmentation status of a file/dir ? e.g.
>>> fragment size, number of fragments.
>> Use the "filefrag" command, part of
Hi,
I'm experimenting with btrfs on top of zvol block device (using
zfsonlinux), and got oops on a simple mount test.
While I'm sure that zfsonlinux is somehow also at fault here (since
the same test with zram works fine), the oops only shows things
btrfs-related without any usable mention of zfs
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:09 PM, cwillu wrote:
>>> If I understand correctly, if I don't use LVM, then such move and resize
>>> operations can't be done for an online filesystem and it has more risk.
>>
>> You can resize, add, and remove devices from btrfs online without the
>> need for LVM. IIRC
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
> Can you just elaborate on the qgroups feature?
> - Does this just mean I can make the subvolume sizes rigid, like LV sizes?
Pretty much.
> - Or is it per-user restrictions or some other more elaborate solution?
No
>
> If I create 10 LVs t
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Kyle Gates wrote:
> Also, I think the current grub2 has lzo support.
You're right
grub2 (1.99-18) unstable; urgency=low
[ Colin Watson ]
...
* Backport from upstream:
- Add support for LZO compression in btrfs (LP: #727535).
so Ubuntu has it since prec
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Ben Leverett wrote:
> could you please send me a copy of the btr driver/kernel?
I wonder if using "live.com" email has something to do with how you
ask that question :P
Anyway, depending on what you want to use it for, you might find it
easier to just download la
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Daniel Pocock wrote:
>
>
> I notice this question on the wiki/faq:
>
>
> https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/UseCases#What_is_best_practice_when_partitioning_a_device_that_holds_one_or_more_btr-filesystems
>
> and as it hasn't been answered, can anyone make an
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> So, clearly, there is something wrong with the samsung 830 SSD with linux
> It it were a random crappy SSD from a random vendor, I'd blame the SSD, but
> I have a hard time believing that samsung is selling SSDs that are slower
> than hard dr
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Gareth Pye wrote:
> My proposed upgrade method is:
> Boot from a live CD with the latest kernel I can find so I can do a few tests:
> A - run the fsck in read only mode to confirm things look good
> B - mount read only, confirm that I can read files well
> C -
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 5:23 PM, Shavi N wrote:
> Hence I'm asking.. I know that I get fast copy/write speeds on the
> btrfs volume from real life situations,
How did you know that? So far none of your posted test result have
shown that btrfs vol in your system is FAST.
--
Fajar
--
To unsubscri
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Shavi N wrote:
> So btrfs gives a massive difference locally, but that still doesn't
> explain the slow transfer speeds.
> Is there a way to test this?
I'd try with real data, not /dev/zero. e.g:
dd_rescue -b 1M -m 1.4G /dev/sda testfile.img
... or use whatever n
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> TL;DR:
> I'm going to change the FAQ to say people should use TRIM with dmcrypt
> because not doing so definitely causes some lesser SSDs to suck, or
> possibly even fail and lose our data.
>
>
> Longer version:
> Ok, so several months later I
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 12:13 PM, eric gisse wrote:
> Basically, phoronix showed there is a --repair option. After enabling
> snapshotting and playing around with the various discussed options, I
> discovered that --repair and no special mount options was sufficient
> to get the files removable.
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 8:42 PM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 07:40:05AM +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
>> Are there any known btrfs regression in 3.4? I'm using 3.4.0-3-generic
>> from a ppa, but a normal mount - umount cycle seems MUCH longer
>> com
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 05:10:13PM +0200, Swâmi Petaramesh wrote:
>> After I had shifted, I tried to defragment and compress my FS using
>> commands such as :
>>
>> find /mnt/STORAGEFS/STORAGE/ -exec btrfs fi defrag -clzo -v {} \;
>>
>> During
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 9:23 PM, Richard Cooper
wrote:
>>> If so, how?
>>
>> https://blogs.oracle.com/linux/entry/oracle_unbreakable_enterprise_kernel_release
>> http://elrepo.org/tiki/kernel-ml
>
> Perfect, thank you! I was looking for a mainline kernel yum repo but my
> google-fu was failing me
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Richard Cooper
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have two machines where I've been testing various btrfs based backup
> strategies. They are both Cent OS 6 with the standard kernel and btrfs-progs
> RPMs from the CentOS repos.
>
> - kernel-2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.x86_64
> - btr
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 1:28 AM, Aaron Peterson
wrote:
> Billy,
>
> Thank you! I will look into FUSE.
>
> Ultimately, I want my / to be mounted with these rules, I will need a
> boot loader to be able to handle it.
Try looking at how ubuntu live cd works. Last time I check, it can use
unionfs-fu
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 10:22 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> a. Make a snapshot of the current root;
> b. Mount said snapshot;
> c. Install the new distro on the snapshot;
> d. Change the bootloader configuration *inside* the snapshot to point
> to the snapshot as the root;
> e. Install the bootloa
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 6:35 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 06/19/2012 07:22 AM, Calvin Walton wrote:
>>
>> All subvolumes are accessible from the volume mounted when you use -o
>> subvolid=0. (Note that 0 is not the real ID of the root volume, it's
>> just a shortcut for mounting it.)
>>
>
> Coul
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 4:44 PM, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Arne Jansen wrote:
>> On 13.06.2012 09:04, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
>>> ... because in a), data will *copied* the slow way
>> What I don't understand is why you think data will be copied.
> at one po
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Fajar A. Nugraha posted on Wed, 13 Jun 2012 08:49:47 +0700 as excerpted:
>
>> As for "lose their filesystems", are there recent ones that uses one of
>> the three distros above, and is pu
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 9:52 PM, Randy Barlow
wrote:
> I personally run Gentoo, but I've been told by some coworkers that the Ubuntu
> installer offers btrfs as an option to the users without marking it as
> experimental, unstable, or under development. I wonder if that is why we see
> so many peo
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Björn Wüst wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, I do not have a disk to test it right now. The disk I am
> planning to use is with the post service still :) .
you can use sparse files. Possibly with losetup, if necessary.
> Thank you for your replies to this email (bjoern.
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 2:39 PM, Helmut Hullen wrote:
>> And you can use three BTRFS filesystems the same way as three Ext4
>> filesystems if you prefer such a setup if the time spent for
>> restoring the backup does not make up the cost for one additional
>> disk for you.
>
> But where's the gain
On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Clemens Eisserer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a quite unreliable SSD here which develops some bad blocks from
> time to time which result in read-errors.
> Once the block is written to again, its remapped internally and
> everything is fine again for that block.
>
> Woul
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 5:46 PM, Helmut Hullen wrote:
> For some months I run btrfs unter kernel 3.2.5 and 3.2.9, without
> problems.
>
> Yesterday I compiled kernel 3.3.4, and this morning I started the
> machine with this kernel. There may be some ugly problems.
> Data, RAID0: total=5.29TB, us
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:31 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
> On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 03:18:01PM +, Yo'av Moshe wrote:
>> Is there anything else I can try?
>>
>> I'm using kernel 3.2 on Ubuntu 12.04.
>
> In approximate order:
>
> * Try a 3.3 or 3.4-rc5 kernel. I don't think those will do anything
>
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Chu Duc Minh wrote:
> Hi, i have some questions when using Btrfs on multi-devices:
> 1. a large file will always be stored wholely on a device or it may
> spread on some devices/partitions?
IIRC:
- in raid1 mode, it will be written on all disks (or was it TWO disks
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
> On 05/02/2012 06:28 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
>>> From Kconfig:
>>>
>>> "Btrfs filesystem (EXPERIMENTAL) Unstable disk format"
>>> ^
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Bardur Arantsson wrote:
> On 05/01/2012 09:35 PM, Martin wrote:
>>
>> How well does btrfs perform across a mix of:
>>
>> 1 SSD and 1 HDD for 'raid' 1 mirror for both data and metadata?
>> The idea is to gain the random access speed of the SSDs but have the
>> HDDs
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Matthias G. Eckermann wrote:
> On 2012-04-10 T 20:48 +0700 Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
>> How can I create config for /data or other directories (other than
>> manually creating the config file and .snapshots directory)?
>
> This should do it:
>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Arvin Schnell wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 08:18:45AM +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
>> I noticed that openSUSE buildservice now provides debs for ubuntu as
>> well. I can't seem to find a way to add it to apt source list though,
>
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Arvin Schnell wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 05:37:38PM +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've created snapper packages for Ubuntu, available on
>> https://launchpad.net/~snapper/+archive/stable. For those new to
>
es to create .snapshots dir unconditionally.
Signed-off-by: Fajar A. Nugraha
---
snapper/Snapshot.cc |3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/snapper/Snapshot.cc b/snapper/Snapshot.cc
index 8e9cc37..277fad7 100644
--- a/snapper/Snapshot.cc
+++ b/snapper/Snapsh
Hi,
I've created snapper packages for Ubuntu, available on
https://launchpad.net/~snapper/+archive/stable. For those new to
snapper, it's a tool for managing btrfs snapshots
(http://en.opensuse.org/Portal:Snapper). It depends on libblocxx
available from https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-esser-n/+archi
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Arvin Schnell wrote:
> We have now created a project in the openSUSE buildservice were
> we provide snapper packages for various distributions, e.g. RHEL6
> and Fedora 16. Please find the downloads at:
>
> http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/filesystems:/snap
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 3:35 AM, Avi Miller wrote:
>
> On 30/03/2012, at 2:22 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:08 AM, member graysky wrote:
>>> Are there plans to integrate btrfsck with the userlevel API for fsck?
>>
>> There isn'
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:08 AM, member graysky wrote:
> Are there plans to integrate btrfsck with the userlevel API for fsck?
There isn't even a stable, working, fixing btrfsck yet :)
> AFAIK, it currently does not work as such (i.e. `shutdown -rF now`
> does not trigger a check on the next boo
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 5:24 AM, Matthias G. Eckermann wrote:
> While the time measurement might be flawed due to the subvol
> actions inbetween, caching etc.: I tried several times, and
> "cp --reflinks" always is multiple times faster than "mv" in
> my environment.
So this is cross-subvolume re
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Felix Blanke wrote:
> On 3/26/12 10:30 AM, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
>> Is there some tool like rsync that I could copy all the data and
>> snapshots to a backup system, but still only use the same amount of
>> space as the source filesystem.
> I'm not sure if
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Skylar Burtenshaw wrote:
> Fajar A. Nugraha fajar.net> writes:
>
>> Didn't Chris' last response basically say "use kernel 3.2 or newer,
>> mount the fs (possibly with -o ro), and copy the data elsewhere"?
>
>
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Skylar Burtenshaw wrote:
> Hey - been a few days, not meaning to pester but I wanted to make sure my
> previous message didn't slip through the cracks. If I offended, I apologize -
> I
> certainly didn't mean to, and my attempts at joviality can come across as
> a
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 12:59 AM, Arnd Hannemann wrote:
> Am 14.11.2011 19:24, schrieb Arnd Hannemann:
>> Am 14.11.2011 15:57, schrieb Arnd Hannemann:
>>
>>> I'm using btrfs for my /usr/share/ partition and keep getting the following
>>> error
>>> while installing a debian package which should ta
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Anand Jain wrote:
>
>> (notably the direct modification of
>> crontab files, which is considered to be an internal detail if I
>> understand correctly, and I'm fairly certain is broken as written),
>
>
> I did came across that point of view however, using crontab c
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 6:50 PM, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> Is 2010-06-01 really the last time the tools were considered
> stable or are Ubuntu just being conservative and/or lazy about updating?
The last one :)
Or probably no one has bugged them enough and point out they're
already using a git s
On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 8:48 PM, Arvin Schnell wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 04:54:06PM +0700, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:38 AM, Matthias G. Eckermann
>> wrote:
>
>> > are available in the openSUSE buildservice at:
>> >
>
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 7:13 AM, Travis Shivers wrote:
> # ./btrfs-zero-log /dev/sdh
> parent transid verify failed on 5568194695168 wanted 43477 found 43151
> parent transid verify failed on 5568194695168 wanted 43477 found 43151
> parent transid verify failed on 5568194695168 wanted 43477 found
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Anand Jain wrote:
>
>
> autosnap code is available either end of this week or early
> next week
I thought you stopped working on this :D
Alternatives are good though. Will test yours when it's out.
FWIW, I also have another one, based on zfsonlinux's autosnaps
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:38 AM, Matthias G. Eckermann wrote:
> Ah, sure. Sorry. Packages for "blocxx" for:
> Fedora_14 Fedora_15
> RHEL-5 RHEL-6
> SLE_11_SP1
> openSUSE_11.4 openSUSE_Factory
>
> are available in the openSUSE buildservice at:
>
>
mungles it).
Signed-off-by: Fajar A. Nugraha
---
utils.c | 18 +-
1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/utils.c b/utils.c
index 178d1b9..a62 100644
--- a/utils.c
+++ b/utils.c
@@ -649,6 +649,9 @@ int resolve_loop_device(const char* loop_dev,
char
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
> On 20/02/2012 15:00, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Hubert Kario wrote:
>>>
>>> On Monday 20 of February 2012 14:41:33 Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
>>>>
>&g
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Hubert Kario wrote:
> On Monday 20 of February 2012 14:41:33 Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
>> Lot of small files (like compressed email from Maildir), and lot of
>> hardlinks, and probably low free space (near 15% I suppose).
>>
>>
>> So I think I have my answer :)
>>
>
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Curtis Jones wrote:
> Chris,
>
> Thank you for those kernel-update instructions. That was the least painful
> kernel update I could have imagined. I rebooted and verified (via uname) that
> I am in fact running the new kernel. After looking at dmesg I can confir
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Nikos Voutsinas wrote:
>>> If not, what is the formal way to find out which subvolume is mounted;
>>
>> Not right now, see detailed answer to a similar question:
>> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/15385
> Assuming that pools with multiple s
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 7:49 AM, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
> Am 28.01.2012 00:20, schrieb Chester:
>> It should be okay to mount with compress or without compress. Even if
>> you mount a volume with compressed data without '-o compress' you will
>> still be able to correctly read the data (but newly w
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Swapnil Pimpale wrote:
> I can successfully boot into Ubuntu 11.10 (3.0.0-14-generic-pae) with
> a btrfs root filesystem and an ext2 /boot partition.
> But when I installed the latest vanilla (3.3.0-rc1+) and booted into
where did you get the kernel from? kernel.o
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Jérôme Poulin wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
>> some files, unmount, and mount it again. If second mount does not show
>> any error message then I'm pretty sure you're safe.
>
> I just upgrade
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Jérôme Poulin wrote:
> I did a preemptive fsck after a RAID crash and got many errors, is
> there something I should do if everything I use works?
Probably just ignore it.
Recent kernels (e.g. 3.1 or 3.2) is smart enough to automatically fix
certain types of erro
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Niels de Carpentier
wrote:
>>> ... and depending on which SSD you use, it shouldn't matter. Really.
>>>
>>> Last time I tried with sandforce SSD + btrfs + -o discard, forcing
>>> trim actually made things slower. Sandforce (and probably other modern
>>> SSD) contro
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 3:12 AM, Sandra Schlichting
wrote:
>> How is this advantageous over dmcrypt-LUKS?
>
> TRIM pass-through for SSD's. With dmcrypt on an SSD write performance
> is very slow.
... and depending on which SSD you use, it shouldn't matter. Really.
Last time I tried with sandforc
2011/12/30 Jaromir Zdrazil :
>> > And if I am not mistaken, current version does not yet support a mountable
>> filesystem.
>>
>> You're mistaken :) With some extra work, you can even use it as root:
>> - http://zfsonlinux.org/example-zpl.html
>> -
>> https://github.com/dajhorn/pkg-zfs/wiki/HOWTO-i
2011/12/30 Jaromir Zdrazil :
>> > Just to add, I would like to see a two way mirror solution, but if it will
>> > not
>> work now/is not implemnted yet, I would propably choose between drbd in
>> asynchronous mode or make a some kind if "incremental" snapshot to a remote
>> mapped disk (I do not k
2011/12/30 Jaromir Zdrazil :
> Sorry fo the typo in the subject!
>
> Just to add, I would like to see a two way mirror solution, but if it will
> not work now/is not implemnted yet, I would propably choose between drbd in
> asynchronous mode or make a some kind if "incremental" snapshot to a remo
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Li Zefan wrote:
>> Or would some data
>> block group can be converted to metadata, and vice versa?
>>
>
> This won't happen. Also empty block groups won't be reclaimed, but it's
> in TODO list.
Ah, OK.
6G for metadata out of 50G total seems a bit much, but I can
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 5:51 PM, Remco Hosman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Something i could not find in the documentation i managed to find:
> if you mount with compress=lzo and rebalance, is compression on for that
> filesystem or only a single volume?
>
> eg, can i have a @boot volume uncompressed and @ an
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Li Zefan wrote:
> Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Martin Steigerwald
>> wrote:
>>> But BTRFS does not:
>>>
>>> merkaba:~> fstrim -v /
>>> /: 4431613952 bytes were trimmed
>>&
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 11:21:14 +0700
> "Fajar A. Nugraha" wrote:
>
>> I'm trying fstrim and my disk is now pegged at write IOPS. Just
>> wondering if maybe a "btrfs fi balance" would be more u
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:21 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> I'm trying fstrim and my disk is now pegged at write IOPS. Just
> wondering if maybe a "btrfs fi balance" would be more useful,
Sorry, I meant "btrfs fi defrag"
--
Fajar
--
To unsubscribe from this l
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:57 PM, Martin Steigerwald
wrote:
> But BTRFS does not:
>
> merkaba:~> fstrim -v /
> /: 4431613952 bytes were trimmed
> merkaba:~> fstrim -v /
> /: 4341846016 bytes were trimmed
and apparently it can't trim everything. Or maybe my kernel is
just too old.
$ sudo fs
1 - 100 of 174 matches
Mail list logo
