On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 1:29 AM, Tomasz Chmielewski man...@wpkg.org wrote:
On 28.10.2010 00:55, Chris Mason wrote:
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 03:29:38PM +0200, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
There are a couple of problems when running KVM guests with images stored
on btrfs filesystem.
One of them
hello,
i really need to stop recklessly doing this stuff to my laptop... i'm
finishing a new initramfs hook to support many features of btrfs; when
considering how i was going to mount the target subvol as / for the
booting system, i decided to play with --bind and --move.
in short, everything
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net wrote:
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:16 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net wrote:
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 10:51 AM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.me
wrote:
i'm on 2.6.36.2
Try 2.6.35 or later. I tested something similar
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:25 PM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.me wrote:
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net wrote:
Still curious about your test scenario though. Can you double check
it? A write on the snapshot should not appear on the parent
filesystem
On Dec 24, 2010, at 2:46 PM, Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com wrote:
This is going to be the building block for our 2.6.38 pull
request to Linus.
hooray christmas came early this year! what a nice gift, thanks!
heh, thanks for all the great work guys. I'm doing my best to spread
the good
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Marcin Kuk marcin@gmail.com wrote:
Rsync is good, but not for all cases. Be aware of databases files -
you should do snapshot filesystem before rsyncing.
We script a dump of all
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:07 PM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.me wrote:
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Marcin Kuk marcin@gmail.com wrote:
Rsync
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Carl Cook cac...@quantum-sci.com wrote:
On Fri 07 January 2011 08:14:17 Hubert Kario wrote:
I'd suggest at least
mkfs.btrfs -m raid1 -d raid0 /dev/sdc /dev/sdd
if you really want raid0
I don't fully understand -m or -d. Why would this make a truer raid0
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Leonidas Spyropoulos
artafi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey all,
I run into no space left on device on a virtualbox
After installing Debian 6 on a virtual machine
I tried installing the KDE desktop
The system HDD is 8Gb
Both root (/) and /home are btrfs
over LVM.
On May 6, 2011 4:20 PM, cac...@quantum-sci.com wrote:
On Friday 6 May, 2011 13:51:37 Peter Stuge wrote:
cac...@quantum-sci.com wrote:
I don't understand this.
Clearly. Please continue the discussion in a debian or grub forum..
It really has nothing to do with btrfs.
No thanks. This
On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 8:51 PM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.me wrote:
On May 6, 2011 4:20 PM, cac...@quantum-sci.com wrote:
On Friday 6 May, 2011 13:51:37 Peter Stuge wrote:
cac...@quantum-sci.com wrote:
I don't understand this.
Clearly. Please continue the discussion in a debian
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 2:41 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha l...@fajar.net wrote:
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Sander san...@humilis.net wrote:
Li Zefan wrote (ao):
As the lzo compression feature has been established for quite
a while, we are now ready to replace zlib with lzo as the default
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:00 AM, Stephane Chazelas
stephane_chaze...@yahoo.fr wrote:
2011-05-27 13:49:52 +0200, Andreas Philipp:
[...]
Thanks, I can understand that. What I don't get is how one creates
a subvol with a top-level other than 5. I might be missing the
obvious, though.
If I
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 2:32 PM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@xtfx.me wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Andreas Philipp
philipp.andr...@gmail.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 31.05.2011 19:40, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:00 AM
hello,
i'm trying to setup a seeded FS -- was only able to find this:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/10529
... and announcement-like info from 2009 or so. i keep hitting
bugs/oops, and even though the FS *appears* to work correctly
afterwards, sometimes mount/strace/etc
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:40 AM, Geoff Ritter geoff.rit...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 04:20 -0500, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
i tried with loop devices at first, then real devices -- this is all
under KVM/QEMU, and with FSs that are/will be smaller than 1G.
I have tried the seed
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Victor Stinner
victor.stin...@haypocalc.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a new fast computer to run many virtual machines. Everything looks
very fast, except the installation of new operating systems in KVM. The
installation is very fast until it begins to write on
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 2:59 PM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@xtfx.me wrote:
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Victor Stinner
victor.stin...@haypocalc.com wrote:
) is caching enabled on the image? ()
oops, disregard that ... remainder left over from editing copy/paste :-)
C Anthony
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:47 PM, David Sterba d...@jikos.cz wrote:
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 12:16:44AM +0800, Zhong, Xin wrote:
I believe I have submit a similar patch months ago:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-btrfsm=130208585106572w=2
You did! I was not aware of that. I believe adding a helper
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
Try the instructions on the wiki at [1]. (And please feed back
and/or fix any issues you have with the instructions -- they're still
quite new and probably have awkward corners).
[1]
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 10:54 PM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@xtfx.me wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
Try the instructions on the wiki at [1]. (And please feed back
and/or fix any issues you have with the instructions -- they're still
quite new
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Billy Crook billycr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 19:34, ivo welch ivo...@gmail.com wrote:
curiosity question---could btrfs be licensed in multiple ways to allow
Apple and other vendors to adopt it?
Great question, Ivo.
And it turns out, btrfs
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 6:33 PM, Justin Gottula jus...@jgottula.com wrote:
Hi,
I recently created a Btrfs volume on top of a software (mdadm) raid5 array
(since Btrfs currently lacks raid5 support at the FS level). On this 640 GB
volume, I stored a ~400 GB tar file. After a couple weeks of
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:44 AM, Jeff Liu jeff@oracle.com wrote:
On 09/07/2011 12:37 PM, cwillu wrote:
1. Create and format two images, the 1st in 400Mbytes, and 2nd in
286Mbytes.
root@pibroch:/btrfs-progs# ls -lh /usr/src/linux-3.0/img*
-rw-r--r-- 1 jeff jeff 400M 2011-09-07 12:00
out. AFAIK a
snapshot will not traverse beyond it's own boundaries.
--
C Anthony Risinger
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-btrfs in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
hello,
i maintain an unofficial initrd hook in Arch Linux that allows BTRFS
to be used as the root device. i am trying to update the hook to use
the more extensive btrfs command, adding support for users to change
their default subvolume from within the initrd (i'm creating a sort of
rollback
need super root? in my ubuntu10.04 with latest btrfs-progs:
$ ./btrfs subvolume list /media/sda3-100g/
ERROR: can't perform the search
$ sudo ./btrfs subvolume list /media/sda3-100g/
ID 258 top level 5 path misc/snap/snap-4-26
ah sorry, i forgot to mention that it doesn't work as super user
I am using ubuntu-10.04-rc with kernel compiled from the almost
lastest source , the btrfs-progs is latest too.
You can modify line
fprintf(stderr, ERROR: can't perform the search\n);
to
fprintf(stderr, ERROR: can't perform the search: %s\n, strerror(errno));
to see what happened on
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Hubert Kario h...@qbs.com.pl wrote:
On Monday 26 April 2010 19:23:21 C Anthony Risinger wrote:
I am using ubuntu-10.04-rc with kernel compiled from the almost
lastest source , the btrfs-progs is latest too.
You can modify line
fprintf(stderr, ERROR
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:10 PM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.me wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Hubert Kario h...@qbs.com.pl wrote:
On Monday 26 April 2010 19:23:21 C Anthony Risinger wrote:
I am using ubuntu-10.04-rc with kernel compiled from the almost
lastest source
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 3:51 PM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.me wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 2:10 PM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.me wrote:
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Hubert Kario h...@qbs.com.pl wrote:
On Monday 26 April 2010 19:23:21 C Anthony Risinger wrote:
I am using
hi,
i'm working on an initrd hook
[http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33376] to support
non-volatile system rollbacks (promoting a temporary rollback snapshot
to the new active/default). when the system is installed to the
default/. subvolume (as many users probably initially do), it is
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi,
moving along to a question... can the default subvolume be
swapped/removed/renamed/popped/shifted?
I think btrfs subvolume list; btrfs subvolume set-default id path
does what you need.
- Chris.
maybe i'm missing
i'm not a C developer, but i like to think i know enough to be
dangerous (pragmatic) :-D
building from git master failed with:
..
..
gcc -Wp,-MMD,./.btrfsck.o.d,-MT,btrfsck.o -Wall -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -Werror -Os -c btrfsck.c
cc1: warnings being treated
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 9:01 AM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.me wrote:
..
i need a way, programmatically and safely, to move the users
installation from the original subvolume into an isolated subvolume
..
or to generate a new, empty default/root subvolume and place
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Clemens Eisserer linuxhi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Recently Amarok started to reject some of music files.
Some files seem to be simply corrupted (mplayer is still able to play
them), other have zero length.
Btrfsck reports:
root 5 inode 1371 errors 400
found
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 12:24 AM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.me wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 9:01 AM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.me wrote:
..
i need a way, programmatically and safely, to move the users
installation from the original subvolume into an isolated subvolume
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 7:22 PM, David Brown bt...@davidb.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 06:06:23PM -0500, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
# btrfs subvolume create new_root
# mv . new_root/old_root
can i at least get confirmation that the above is possible?
I've had no problem
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 8:06 PM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.me wrote:
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 7:22 PM, David Brown bt...@davidb.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 06:06:23PM -0500, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
# btrfs subvolume create new_root
# mv . new_root/old_root
can i at least get
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 12:47 PM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.me wrote:
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 8:06 PM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.me wrote:
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 7:22 PM, David Brown bt...@davidb.org wrote:
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 06:06:23PM -0500, C Anthony Risinger wrote
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Daniel Baumann dan...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
this is basically a forward from
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=587253
rename(2) allows for the atomic replacement of files. Being able to
atomically replace subvolume snapshots would be equally
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 07:44:12PM -0500, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Daniel Baumann dan...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
this is basically a forward from
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 09:26:11AM -0500, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 07:44:12PM -0500, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
On Sat
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli kreij...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, July 02, 2010, Chris Mason wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 09:26:11AM -0500, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
[...]
what about this: would it be possible to have TWO subvolumes by
default? the regular one
Try using btrfs tool; btrfsctl is/will be deprecated I think... and
it's better anyway.
C Anthony [mobile]
On Jul 23, 2010, at 3:04 PM, K. Richard Pixley r...@noir.com wrote:
Using btrfsctl from ubuntu maverick, (built and running on
ubuntu-10.04), I get:
r...@eisenhower btrfsctl -s snap1
Try to add replacement, rebalance, then remove missing
C Anthony [mobile]
On Jul 31, 2010, at 2:04 PM, Michael Kofler mich...@kofler.info wrote:
on Ubuntu 10.10 alpha with btrfs 0.19 and a 2.6.35
(2.6.35-12-generic #17-Ubuntu SMP Mon Jul 26 18:48:06)
I created a btrfs raid 1 system:
#
i'm not an expert, but ill do my best to answer. replies interspersed below.
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Evert Vorster evors...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there.
Has anybody got a btrfs root filesystem that is running on a bare
block device? Would lilo be able to boot an initramfs that is
On Aug 12, 2010, at 10:58 AM, K. Richard Pixley r...@noir.com wrote:
And should I be worried about what umount -l might be leaving
behind? (eg, any unfreed kernel resources) Or is that a reasonable
way to deal with this situation on an ongoing basis?
--rich
On 8/12/10 08:55 , K. Richard
On Sep 18, 2010, at 6:55 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk r...@karlsbakk.net
wrote:
- Original Message -
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk
r...@karlsbakk.net wrote:
Hi all
I've been on this list for a year or so, and I have been following
progress for some more. Are
On Sat, Sep 18, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Roy Sigurd Karlsbakk r...@karlsbakk.net
wrote:
Stable is a pretty subjective term; many don't even think ext4 is
stable. I've used it on my personal machine since .30-31-ish without
problems, and on a server w/raid 1 for about a year (btrfs + lxc is
niiice,
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:12 AM, K. Richard Pixley r...@noir.com wrote:
On 9/18/10 17:43 , C Anthony Risinger wrote:
I remeber someone recently using it for
continuous build servers successfully
That's probably me and I wouldn't call the effort successful yet. There
are at least several
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
Hi,
can anyone point me in the right direction? it looks like maybe
the SSD is failing to me (all the slow link and capacity
changed to 0 stuff), but i really don't know. i knew there was
a reason they were
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Evert Vorster evors...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there...
I'm not an expert. however, since you don't care about the data on
the SSD anymore, reformat it, and fill it up, then verify what you
have written.
However, if the capacity has changed, would that not
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 05:21:06PM -0500, Mitch Harder wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Diego Calleja dieg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jueves, 21 de Octubre de 2010 17:46:58 David Nicol escribió:
Does this mixing
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 8:37 PM, Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 08:32:12PM -0500, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 05:21:06PM -0500, Mitch Harder wrote:
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 6:31 AM, Jérôme Poulin jeromepou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Jérôme Poulin jeromepou...@gmail.com wrote:
...
p4 jerome # btrfs device scan /dev/dm-22
Scanning for Btrfs filesystems in '/dev/dm-22'
p4 jerome # echo $?
0
This is OK.
p4 jerome
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com wrote:
Oh, and it shouldn't work on the root of the FS either ;)
-chris
This is not 100% related but...
Will removing [replacing] the top-level root be something that
can/will be supported? I've asked in the past about this
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Mitch Harder
mitch.har...@sabayonlinux.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 12:02:18PM -0600, Mitch Harder wrote:
Update the mkfs.btrfs man page for the -M option to mix data and
metadata
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Wenyi Liu qingshen...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/11/23, david grant d...@david-grant.com:
I thought I would try btrfs on a new installation of f14. yes, I know
its experimental but stable so it seemed to be a good time to try it.
I am not sure if I have missed
i have read just recently and in the past that btrfs supports COW for
_any_ file/directory (this is reflinks, yes?), and today i
accidentally noticed that i can mount a directory as well (if it's in
the top level volume at least).
eg. if i have a regular directory (not a subvolume) in the
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 4:07 AM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.me wrote:
On Nov 27, 2010, at 10:22 PM, Calvin Walton calvin.wal...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 21:19 -0600, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
eg. if i have a regular directory (not a subvolume) in the top-
level:
/__boot
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Li Zefan l...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
Hi Chris,
Here's the updated patchset. As I still haven't got a kernel.org
account, I have set up a git tree in another public git repository,
and I'll use it for now.
You can pull from:
On Nov 29, 2010, at 3:48 PM, Andrey Kuzmin andrey.v.kuz...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm not sure why zfs came up, they don't own the term :). As to
zfs/overhead topic, I doubt there's any difference between clone and
writable shapshot (there should be none, of course, it's just two
different names
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Li Zefan l...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
C Anthony Risinger wrote:
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 8:08 PM, Li Zefan l...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
You can pull from:
git://repo.or.cz/linux-btrfs-devel.git lzo-support
Lzo is a much faster compression algorithm than
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com wrote:
=== How do we want subvolumes to work from a user perspective? ===
1) Users need to be able to create their own subvolumes. The permission
semantics will be absolutely the same as creating directories, so I don't
think
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Chris Mason chris.ma...@oracle.com wrote:
Excerpts from C Anthony Risinger's message of 2010-12-01 09:51:55 -0500:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com wrote:
=== How do we want subvolumes to work from a user perspective? ===
1)
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Hugo Mills hugo-l...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 09:21:36AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
=== Quotas ===
This is a huge topic in and of itself, but Christoph mentioned wanting to
have
an idea of what we wanted to do with it, so I'm putting it
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 07:33:39PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
Another point that I want like to discuss is how manage the pivoting
between
the subvolumes. One of the most beautiful feature of btrfs is the snapshot
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:48 PM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.me wrote:
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 07:33:39PM +0100, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
Another point that I want like to discuss is how manage the pivoting
between
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com wrote:
+ if (!ret) {
+ spin_lock(block_gruop-lock);
+ block_group-disk_cache_state = BTRFS_DC_SETUP;
+ spin_unlock(block_group-lock);
+ }
misspelling:
block_gruop -
Did you fix that typo I posted?
C Anthony [mobile]
On Dec 2, 2010, at 6:05 PM, Johannes Hirte johannes.hi...@fem.tu-ilmenau.de
wrote:
On Thursday 02 December 2010 21:34:10 Josef Bacik wrote:
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 10:40:29PM +0100, Johannes Hirte wrote:
On Wednesday 01 December 2010
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 11:42 AM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.me wrote:
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 4:07 AM, C Anthony Risinger anth...@extof.me wrote:
On Nov 27, 2010, at 10:22 PM, Calvin Walton calvin.wal...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, 2010-11-27 at 21:19 -0600, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
eg
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 7:40 PM, Li Zefan l...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
Michael Niederle wrote:
Hi!
I'm not sure whether this *should* be possible, but I think it *shouldn't*
crash:
It's currently not allowed to mount a subvolume which is not created in
the root directory of the default
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Konstantin Dmitriev
ksee.zelga...@gmail.com wrote:
Dipl.-Ing. Michael Niederle mniederle at gmx.at writes:
I reinstalled over 700 packages - plt-scheme beeing the only one failing due
to
the btrfs link restriction.
I have hit the same issue - tried to run
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:36 AM, Arnd Hannemann a...@arndnet.de wrote:
Am 29.07.2012 21:13, schrieb C Anthony Risinger:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Konstantin Dmitriev
ksee.zelga...@gmail.com wrote:
Dipl.-Ing. Michael Niederle mniederle at gmx.at writes:
I reinstalled over 700 packages
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 2:51 PM, dg1727 dg1...@hushmail.com wrote:
permissions of the directories in /dev are drwx-- for the NTFS
and dr-xr-xr-x for the Btrfs.
How can the OS be set up so that the Btrfs will automount
read/write?
try:
chmod u+w /path/to/btrfs/mount
... for whatever
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 6:13 AM, Hugo Mills h...@carfax.org.uk wrote:
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 01:20:20PM +0200, Brendan Hide wrote:
On 2012/12/17 06:23 PM, Hugo Mills wrote:
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 04:51:33PM +0100, Sebastien Luttringer wrote:
Hello,
snip
I get the feeling that RAID1 only
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Dan Garton dan.gar...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
1327 btrfs-vol -a
1328 btrfs-vol -a /nuvat
1329 btrfs-vol -a asdasd /nuvat
1330 btrfs-vol -a missing /nuvat
1331 btrfs-vol -a /dev/sdc /nuvat
1332 btrfs-vol -a /dev/sdb /nuvat
1334 btrfs-vol -a
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Dan Garton dan.gar...@gmail.com wrote:
Assuming that this is the case, do I stand a chance of retrieving that
volume and accessing that data again?
Or does destructive imply total loss? (In which case, I'll cut my
losses)
unfortunately i really don't know
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Danny Piccirillo
danny.picciri...@member.fsf.org wrote:
The case has been made on Phoronix for F-Trees: They makes use hard
drive speeds, not (relatively slow) access times; beat SSD's; and scale
perfectly across multiple cores with hundreds of millions of
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net wrote:
On 06/08/2012 09:24 PM, Matthew Hawn wrote:
I just converted my root filesystem to btrfs with btrfs-convert. However,
since I am running Ubuntu, I would like to have the same subvolume structure
as a default install,. How
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Arne Jansen sensi...@gmx.net wrote:
On 13.06.2012 09:04, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
a) have a lot of data
b) need to do this via script
c) ???
... because in a), data will *copied* the slow way, and in b) you
leave a bunch of junk laying around in the old
82 matches
Mail list logo
