Hi,
I would like to complete release 2.1.1 before next Monday (my time). I
have selected what I hope is the final set of patches.
If you can help us test, and send emails to the lists, CCing me, that
would be great!
Here are the source tar balls for the release:
On 7/13/07, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 7/11/07, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 7/11/07, DAIKI MATSUDA [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello, all.
I found a little bug in crm_mon source code (crm/admin/crm_mon.c).
It
On 2007-07-13T01:02:37, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that these are not being built nightly - at least not as of this
writing :-(. At the moment it's the same as the /dev build, but that
will change.
If you do want a nightly build, just let me know. We've got the
On 2007-07-13T13:39:12, David Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've recently had a look inside ping.c and ping_group.c. It wasn't a
great surprise to find some commonality. I guess one was derived from
other. It means that we've got considerable code duplication, potential
unnecessary
On Friday 13 July 2007, Alan Robertson wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 7/12/07, Lars Marowsky-Bree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-07-12T12:26:35, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew has some more critical bugfixes pending / under development
(one
of them is a STONITH
On 2007-07-13T10:13:28, Max Hofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But what is it good for running regression tests (which i hope you
guys do before releasing a new version) if you pull code from dev to
test branch 3 days before the release should come out?
Well, dev is being constantly tested
Hi,
I have a few things to say here, and a change of mind, which I'll
explain in more detail.
First, I appreciate the work that Andrew and Dejan and Dave and others
have gone to to get us what looks like a really solid release. Awesome
work guys!
Second, I want to apologize for not fully
On 7/13/07, Max Hofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 13 July 2007, Alan Robertson wrote:
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 7/12/07, Lars Marowsky-Bree [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-07-12T12:26:35, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew has some more critical bugfixes pending /
David Lee wrote:
I've recently had a look inside ping.c and ping_group.c. It wasn't a
great surprise to find some commonality. I guess one was derived from
other. It means that we've got considerable code duplication, potential
unnecessary divergence and potential one-but-miss-the-other
On 2007-07-13T13:34:59, Alan Robertson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's the bugzilla for that capability:
http://old.linux-foundation.org/developer_bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1497
This would greatly improve the situation for 2-node clusters and in most
cases would eliminate the possibility of
I agree with the experience dscribed by Eddie.
For the 'monitor' keep in mind that the timeout should be lower than the
interval. It does not make sense to start a 2nd monitor cycle when the
first one did not finish.
In the end it boils down to:
* you have to know what kind of
Message: 4
Hi Andrew,
Please ignore my earlier 2 mails as they were with node 1 and node 2
having same score (1500). The below cib.xml is the result of exact
forced_failedover configuration given on the site.
1. I tried with default_resource_failure_stickiness = -INFINITY and
Robert Wipfel a e'crit:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 9:51 AM, in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Dejan Muhamedagic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 12:37:37PM +0200, FG wrote:
Hi all,
[...]
Yes, you should use STONITH.
Or perhaps somebody knows
I have a cluster on my hands to setup, and I'm a complete newbie to
configuring heartbeat. Not a good combination, huh? But, we've all got
to start somewhere.
The cluster's a fairly simple drbd/nfs cluster. Two hosts, server1 and
server2. drbd is already installed, configured and working
Hi all,
I need some advices about my configuration for high-availability.
I would like to set up an active/passive configuration for our POP/IMAP
server.
We have two servers with each one two HBA cards (FC) attached to a SAN
IBM DS4000 where we store the mailbox.
My concern:
In case of a
What does it mean to be a master server when there is only one machine?
Do you mean you want it to be able to do updates and send the changes
back to the other when the other comes back up?
MySQL has (at least) 2 ways of doing replication. One is master/slave
where everything that changes on a
Can anybody tell whether heartbeat can synchronize files between
primary and secondary during failover? And if so is it possible to
control this synchronization (Sync only when necessary).
Take a look at DRBD (www.drbd.org) and drbdlinks
(http://www.tummy.com/Community/software/drbdlinks/)
It's Heartbeat 2.0.2. I know there's a more recent one (several, in
fact) but I can't use them in this environment. This is the Ubuntu
package for Dapper Drake, and my boss isn't willing for us to use a
self-compiled or backported version, so 2.0.2 is what I've got to work with.
Regards,
Hi,
Can anybody tell whether heartbeat can synchronize files between
primary and secondary during failover? And if so is it possible to
control this synchronization (Sync only when necessary).
Regards,
Arun.
___
Linux-HA mailing list
Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 7/10/07, Pankaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
We are trying to port Linux-HA on an old OS that does not support
shared /
dynamic libraries. We went through module.c code where the hash table is
created dynamically. We basically need to create the same statically.
Afaik, the LOCFG thing wasn't really necessary (but it could be on the
newest ILO version and apparently it's in CPQLOCFG.EXE as Alain
pointed out).
I suggest you give the external/riloe script from the development
trunk a try (it can be placed in a stable older 2.0.7 for instance).
It's
This can help you set it up:
http://wiki.linux-ha.org/DRBD/HowTov2
This can get you started to understand HAv2
http://www.linux-ha.org/HeartbeatTutorials
Watch the video, read the sheets, take some time and test!
Please. Is there any help you guys can give me? All of this confuses
me
Hi Andrew,
you wrote:
Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] 13.07.2007 09:43
i _think_ that the interval is the time between one action ending and the
next one starting (rather than between both starting)
at least i hope that
This is a big difference. So, I would be interested if the
interval
On Friday 13 July 2007, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 7/13/07, Max Hofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with the experience dscribed by Eddie.
For the 'monitor' keep in mind that the timeout should be lower than the
interval. It does not make sense to start a 2nd monitor cycle when the
On 7/12/07, Eddie C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have found a few things:
1) A status or monitor function.. I would set a timeout for more then 30
seconds.
Why? Sometimes developers/administrators do not understand the heartbeat
capability. They only want to to/restart a service quickly. If you
On 2007-07-13T10:07:19, claudemirf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a new problem...(hehehe). Currently I installed heartbeat2 in my box
Suse Linux Enterprise Server 10, I configured a resource Virtual IP
Address, but when I started my cluster, this resource isn?t running. I was
analyzing
I hope my email is not shipped twice, but my last mail seams not to recive the
list.
My messge was:
Is it possible to extent a running cluster with
new cluster nodes?
The extention should be done without any stop of
any resource placed on nodes, which are running
in the cluster before we extend
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 09:13:43AM +0200, Tijl Van den Broeck wrote:
Afaik, the LOCFG thing wasn't really necessary (but it could be on the
newest ILO version and apparently it's in CPQLOCFG.EXE as Alain
pointed out).
I suggest you give the external/riloe script from the development
trunk a
Alan,
Given some of the emails you yourself have written in the last few days (and
many times prior to that) as well as your penchant for making disparaging
remarks in commit messages, I find this development highly hypocritical and
disturbing.
I will neither condone such biased and
On 7/13/07, Dejan Muhamedagic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just tested yesterday: the power method definitely requires
ACPI whereas the button method works in any case, as Guy Coates
suggested. Updated the xml info in external/riloe to that effect.
Ah yes, my bad, mixed up those two :-) Thanks
On 7/13/07, Bernd Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
on a customer system is running an ancient version of heartbeat (2.0.3).
While
looking into an entirely different problem I also see that stonithd is
heavily leaking memory (~200MB over the last 7 days). No idea why this
hasn't
been a
On 7/13/07, Taldevkar, Chetan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Message: 4
Hi Andrew,
Please ignore my earlier 2 mails as they were with node 1 and node 2
having same score (1500). The below cib.xml is the result of exact
forced_failedover configuration given on the site.
1. I tried with
Message: 4
Hi Andrew,
Please find the attachment with the mail.
This attachment has output generated from cibadmin - Q for
forced_failover. It continues to run monitor part of the script on
failed node even after
failing over to another node. The crm_failcount -G -U on failed node
return
On 7/13/07, Max Hofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 13 July 2007, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
On 7/13/07, Max Hofer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with the experience dscribed by Eddie.
For the 'monitor' keep in mind that the timeout should be lower than
the
interval. It does not
Hello list,
I have two nodes (rnd-dev1, rnd-dev2) running RH4 with CentOS based
rpm install of heartbeat 2.0.7
I'm seeing a problem where heartbeat prefers to always run resources
on node2, even when I deliberately make them return 1 on monitor
action.
The only scenario where heartbeat chooses
Is it possible to extent a running cluster with
new cluster nodes?
The extention should be done without any stop of
any resource placed on nodes, which are running
in the cluster before we extend the cluster.
If it is possible, can I use the is_managed attribute
to leave the resources
I thoroughly agree with what you are proposing.
You may find the attached script (my own work) useful for cherry-picking
patches from one mercurial repo to another.
In particular, it preserves the log, timestamp and author which is useful
when trawling through changesets at a later date. It
And attaching the script would probably be helpful...
On 7/13/07, Andrew Beekhof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thoroughly agree with what you are proposing.
You may find the attached script (my own work) useful for cherry-picking
patches from one mercurial repo to another.
In particular, it
On 7/13/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to extent a running cluster with
new cluster nodes?
The easiest way is to configure autojoin any in your ha.cf file,
which is safe if you use sha1 or md5 keys to authenticate in your
authkeys file. This allows every new
node
39 matches
Mail list logo
