On 6 Mar 2002, Oleg Goldshmidt wrote:
Shlomi Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I always considered Run Level 5 as a very bad idea, which I'll never want
to use. However, I recently run into a dillema here at the Computer
Networks farm. If I start X from the console and lock it, then a
On Tue, 2002-03-05 at 15:46, Amir Tal wrote:
Didn't know if I should laugh or cry when I saw a post at Newsforge that
says the following :
Microsoft management is now threatening to stop shipping Windows
completely if the next federal court decision goes against them
How real, and how
Hi!
Does anyone know how to set up tcpdump or ethereal (or something else) to watch
X packets? I can see quite clearly how the socket call is set up, but I don't
seem to be able to make the connection between the C code and what the sniffer
utilities need. (On a regular PC X uses Unix sockets
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
UB Microsoft *is* playing by the rules of competitive capitalism.
UB That's how it got to a big near-monopoly. The emergence of such
UB monstrosities is an inevitable consequence of a free market
UB economy.
That's a pretty strange claim. I
Tzahi Fadida [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Microsoft has put its monopolistic interests over the design and
quality of the product.
So make them pull Windows and re-design it from scratch? Maybe we'll
get a decent system in the end? No one will be able to XPerience it
though...
If there was an
Note: Terribly long lines. Please tweak your mailer to cut them.
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
I don't know how this topic became economics 101, but I want to return to the quote.
If you'll open any operating system concepts book, you will see that separating the
shell or the user
well, I never claimed that the windows should completely be redesigned. mind u that
the GUI is well designed and many people like it that way. In any case the problem I
think Microsoft have, is that they are repeating their mistakes over and over.
moreover, the problem is not that their
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
I don't know how this topic became economics 101, but I want to return
to the quote. If you'll open any operating system concepts book, you
will see that separating the shell or the user interface, is very
important in order for the os to have a
I also came under the impression that this thread if hugely off-topic. If
you want to continue it, send me an E-mail and if I'm in the mood I might
answer you and Uri, in person. But I don't think I'm too much in the mood.
One should do Objectivist evanglism starting from points where the person
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Shlomi Fish wrote:
Note: Terribly long lines. Please tweak your mailer to cut them.
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
I don't know how this topic became economics 101, but I want to return to the
quote.
If you'll open any operating system concepts book,
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not what they've told me.
More or less exact answer I've got from them , is that I have to pay
additional fee
and that is pretty expensive program. ( Probably this stems from the fact ,
that
Gamatronic's UPS has no serial port that could be
UB 'inevitable' - always worked out this way so far, I'm extrapolating.
I.e., you claim that every market that is existing long enough and isn't
heavily regulated is by now monopolized? Pretty weird conclusion. Rather
contradicting my knowledge about the world surrounding myself.
UB I was
TF the design and quality of the product. If there was an ethic
TF committee for these kind of violations they would be disbarred,
If there were ethic commitee on this kind of things, all major software
vendors would have been taken out and shot by now. :)
TF to see blood. Microsoft has earned
Actually, there is free options. like 98lite.net. In Lite version it's free.
Alas it works only for
Win98. And there was also talisman, a superb shell replacer. And I think
there is a LiteSTEP for windows. :-)))
My 2 cents on the subj.
GW.
- Original Message -
From: Uri Bruck [EMAIL
TF issue. the issue is that Microsoft has betrayed the trust the
TF public gave it, in that they used a bad design INTENTIONALLY
First, nobody trusted Microsoft with making best OS of all time, or with
anything else like this. There are a lot of people - MS shareholders - who
trusted MS with
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
UB 'inevitable' - always worked out this way so far, I'm extrapolating.
I.e., you claim that every market that is existing long enough and isn't
heavily regulated is by now monopolized?
There is a world of difference between every market ..is
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TF the design and quality of the product. If there was an ethic
TF committee for these kind of violations they would be disbarred,
If there were ethic commitee on this kind of things, all major software
vendors would have been taken out and
UB There is a world of difference between every market ..is
UB monopolized and monopolies arise in a free market.
Did you claim that arising of monopoly is inevitable consequence of a free
market?
UB Continuing with what actually wrote - I guess in the world that
UB surrounds you monopolies
On Wed, 6 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
UB There is a world of difference between every market ..is
UB monopolized and monopolies arise in a free market.
Did you claim that arising of monopoly is inevitable consequence of a free
market?
And then I explained that by 'inevitable' I was
a new version of pptp will be out Real Soon Now(tm). if anyone wants
to test the quirks handling to verify that i works with israeli adsl
modems, please do so. (it works for me).
remember to run it with
/pptp 10.0.0.138 --quirks=BEZEQ_ADSL pppd options here!
- Forwarded message from James
20 matches
Mail list logo
