After reading the mentioned article in Maariv, and making some phone
calls, I want to correct one detail in what I wrote to Omer Zak (to
avoid yet another flames, the word I will be replaced by the word
Somebody and the word my will be replaced by the word
Somebody's):
Indeed, the Hetz project
Pardon a slightly dumb question but ...
As far as I know (Open) Motif has been available at source level for
quite some time.
Next, I'd expect any kind of bidi conversion/extension to be the same
whether for classified Chetz usage for a business application. Hebrew is
Hebrew and bidi is bidi.
On Monday 16 February 2004 10:26, guy keren wrote:
eli, the only reason why such a miss-understanding could have resulted, is
because you decided to start talking about this project, and made a few
statements that imply of your involvement.
AFAIR it was Omer who started the thread, and then
The weekend newspapers mentioned the serious security vulnerability due to
Egyptian software developers fixing bugs in Motif, used in the software
which drives the Hetz project.
I want to ask - why didn't the Hetz developers use Lesstif instead, if
they MUST use Motif?
Another point, couldn't
Omer Zak wrote:
The weekend newspapers mentioned the serious security vulnerability due to
Egyptian software developers fixing bugs in Motif, used in the software
which drives the Hetz project.
I want to ask - why didn't the Hetz developers use Lesstif instead, if
they MUST use Motif?
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004, Eli Marmor wrote:
Omer Zak wrote:
[... snipped ...]
I want to ask - why didn't the Hetz developers use Lesstif instead, if
they MUST use Motif?
Another point, couldn't they use English-only version of Motif (the
Egyptians presumably are involved only in BiDi
I believe that this thread was started because of a small
misunderstanding: There are TWO BiDi/Hebrew Support implementations:
IBM's, and mine (AKA El-Mar). IBM sub-contracted parts of the project
to Israeli and Egyptian companies (Applicom in Israel). I've had no
connection with that project
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004, Eli Marmor wrote:
I believe that this thread was started because of a small
misunderstanding: There are TWO BiDi/Hebrew Support implementations:
IBM's, and mine (AKA El-Mar). IBM sub-contracted parts of the project
to Israeli and Egyptian companies (Applicom in Israel).
guy keren wrote:
eli, the only reason why such a miss-understanding could have resulted, is
because you decided to start talking about this project, and made a few
statements that imply of your involvement.
i don't realy see how reading about your clients and their clients and
their
