If you feel comfortable with patching the RHEL's kernel, you can
configure IPSec in so called opportunistic mode with pre-shared keys
when you do not establish an actual tunnel, but force encryption of the
traffic between the two boxes.
If you were running 2.6 kernel, that would probably be the
Hetz
Yes there is a good way - WebDav.
We have just implemented WebDav on Apache in a Linux Server RH3 in
hosting (rackspace) with remote W2003 servers and XP boxes
WebDav is well supported on both O/S's, its quite efficient and
connections are persistent.
You setup WebDav on Apache with
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 10:08:43AM +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
What I'm trying to do - is to make a permanent connection between the
2 servers.
Microsoft Services for UNIX. Free (as in beer, not open source).
Provides you with an almost complete posix environment including a
telnet daemon, a
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 11:57:09AM +0200, Danny Lieberman wrote:
Hetz
Yes there is a good way - WebDav.
What I don't like about webdav is that you can basically only access it
through apache.
Samba is a daemon that is designed to run as root and support multiple
users. Apache is designed
Quoth Geoffrey S. Mendelson:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 10:08:43AM +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
Microsoft Services for UNIX. Free (as in beer, not open source).
It is a reasonable choice. It has the disadvantage of being slow as a dead
elephant swimming up a treakle creek, but over an internet
ביום שלישי, 12 ביולי 2005, 12:38, נכתב על ידי Geoffrey S. Mendelson:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 10:08:43AM +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
What I'm trying to do - is to make a permanent connection between the
2 servers.
Microsoft Services for UNIX. Free (as in beer, not open source).
Provides
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 12:38:00PM +0300, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 10:08:43AM +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
What I'm trying to do - is to make a permanent connection between the
2 servers.
Microsoft Services for UNIX. Free (as in beer, not open source).
cygwin is
Hi,
What I am trying to understand, Hetz, is WHAT kind of a permanent link do
you want between the two machines? Replication? DRP? Failover?
Quite simple...
I need to do some video streaming for an audience who have no clue
about Quicktime, Real Player, or even downloading/installing plugins.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 12:58:31PM +0300, Marc A. Volovic wrote:
It is a reasonable choice. It has the disadvantage of being slow as a dead
elephant swimming up a treakle creek, but over an internet link that should
not be too much of a disadvantage.
SSH seems fine to me. I run it over 100mb
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 12:54:07PM +0300, Diego Iastrubni wrote:
Whats the difference between it and MSYS+MinGW?
Sorry, no idea. If this helps, it's much more integrated than Cygwin,
which IMHO implements a linux emulation layer on top Windows.
In useage IMHO Cygwin is a halfway point between
imho - both Samba and MS services for Unix unsuitable solutions for
connecting systems running in two geographicly separated managed hosting
facilities.
Its an unrealistic solution because:
a) latency b) tco of using vpns or fw vpns c) the average customer
does not want to install any
ssh requires installing WinSCP on the Windows boxes and logging in with
a client side VPN in Youval's scenario
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 12:58:31PM +0300, Marc A. Volovic wrote:
It is a reasonable choice. It has the disadvantage of being slow as a dead
On Tuesday 12 July 2005 12:54, you wrote:
ביום שלישי, 12 ביולי 2005, 12:38, נכתב על ידי Geoffrey S. Mendelson:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 10:08:43AM +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
What I'm trying to do - is to make a permanent connection between the
2 servers.
Microsoft Services for UNIX.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 12:31:26PM +0200, Hetz Ben Hamo wrote:
So now the only solution that I see here is to purchase a minimum
Win2003 package, put all the video clips in the Linux server and
connect between them, so while the apache on the linux serves the
pages, the Windows MMS serves the
Tzafrir
I totally agree - but it really depends on how willing the customer is
to start installing and maintaining software -
Webdav is elegant for the client who wants to stay away from VPN or FTP
client installations - like my client
:-)
danny
Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at
Geoff
Fair enough. ssh is king.
To summarize the thread - the Windows to Linux connection over the WAN
has a few options
ssh - requires MS services for Unix on the Windows boxes, secure, strong
authentication, good for transferring large files, or large numbers of
files over the WAN
Webdav
ביום שלישי, 12 ביולי 2005, 13:51, נכתב על ידי Shlomi Fish:
Whats the difference between it and MSYS+MinGW?
it = MS Services for UNIX
Well, MinGW stands for Minimal GNU for Win32. It's basically a port of the
compiler and other compilation tool-chain, so it will run on Win32, but
without
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ehud Karni
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 2:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
linux-il@linux.org.il
Subject: Re: connectivity question
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 14:42:55 +0200, Danny Lieberman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ssh
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 03:30:56PM +0300, Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 03:02:40PM +0300, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
Are you looking for an ssh client or server? There are a number of good
ssh clients for windows. some are based on openssh. There is also putty.
And
On Tue, Jul 12, 2005 at 03:53:16PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What about SSH tunnel with pptp?
a. pptp is a generic way to tunnel ppp over IP. You can plug in
encryption. Why tunnel it on top of ssh?
b. tunneling on top of TCP is generally a bad idea
c. pptp has only the control
20 matches
Mail list logo
