[RESEND] Re: DViCO FusionHDTV DVB-T Dual Digital 4 (rev 1) tuning regression

2009-12-07 Thread Robert Lowery
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Vincent McIntyre > wrote: >> Hi Rob >> >> I missed your followup and tested the 'revert.diff' patch, attached >> for reference. >> I have been slow replying because I've been scratching my head over the >> results. >> >> I used 'signaltest.pl' to test[1], which us

Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

2009-12-07 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 09:44:14PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Let me add my view for those questions. > > Jon Smirl wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > >> Jon Smirl writes: > >> > Once again: how about agreement about the LIRC interface > (ke

Re: [RFC] Should we create a raw input interface for IR's ? - Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] lirc core device driver infrastructure

2009-12-07 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 09:42:22PM -0500, Andy Walls wrote: > On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 13:19 -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote: > > On Nov 26, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Andy Walls wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 12:05 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > >> Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > > >>> Andy Walls write

Re: [PATCH] sound/usb: Relax urb data alignment restriciton for HVR-950Q only

2009-12-07 Thread Devin Heitmueller
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 6:26 PM, Devin Heitmueller wrote: > On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 5:15 PM, John S Gruber wrote: >> Addressing audio quality problem. >> >> In sound/usb/usbaudio.c, for the Hauppage HVR-950Q only, change >> retire_capture_urb to copy the entire byte stream while still counting >> e

Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

2009-12-07 Thread Andy Walls
On Sun, 2009-12-06 at 16:23 -0500, Jon Smirl wrote: > On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > > Jon Smirl writes: > > > >>> Once again: how about agreement about the LIRC interface > >>> (kernel-userspace) and merging the actual LIRC code first? In-kernel > >>> decoding can wait

Re: [RFC] Should we create a raw input interface for IR's ? - Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] lirc core device driver infrastructure

2009-12-07 Thread Andy Walls
On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 13:19 -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote: > On Nov 26, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Andy Walls wrote: > > > On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 12:05 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > >> Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > >>> Andy Walls writes: > >>> > I would also note that RC-6 Mode 6A, used by most MCE r

Re: [PATCH 0/4 v11] Support for TVP7002 in DM365

2009-12-07 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Tuesday 08 December 2009 01:44:43 Santiago Nunez-Corrales wrote: > Hans, > > > Hi. Have you had a chance to look at this version of the driver? Sorry, no. I hope to have some time on Thursday. I'm abroad for business at the moment and unfortunately that leaves me with little time for reviewin

Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

2009-12-07 Thread Jon Smirl
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > That is why I think we should go the other way around - introduce the > core which receivers could plug into and decoder framework and once it > is ready register lirc-dev as one of the available decoders. The core needs to allow for RF rem

Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

2009-12-07 Thread Jon Smirl
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 6:44 PM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Let me add my view for those questions. > > Jon Smirl wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: >>> Jon Smirl writes: >>> > Once again: how about agreement about the LIRC interface > (kernel-userspace)

[PATCH v1 - 2/4] V4L-vpfe capture - Make dm6446 ccdc a platform driver

2009-12-07 Thread m-karicheri2
From: Muralidharan Karicheri This combines the two patches sent earlier to change the clock configuration and converting ccdc drivers to platform drivers. This has updated comments against v0 of these patches. In this patch, the probe() function is modified to do the vpss master and slave clock

[PATCH v1 4/4] DaVinci - vpfe capture - converting ccdc drivers to platform driver

2009-12-07 Thread m-karicheri2
From: Muralidharan Karicheri This combines the two patches sent earlier to change the clock configuration and converting ccdc drivers to platform drivers. This has updated comments against v0 of these patches. This adds platform code for ccdc driver on DM355 and DM6446. Reviewed-by: Vaibhav Hir

[PATCH v1 - 3/4] V4L - vpfe capture - Make dm355 ccdc a platform driver

2009-12-07 Thread m-karicheri2
From: Muralidharan Karicheri This combines the two patches sent earlier to change the clock configuration and converting ccdc drivers to platform drivers. This has updated comments against v0 of these patches. In this patch, the probe() function is modified to do the vpss master and slave clock

[PATCH v1 - 1/4] V4L: vpfe_capture - remove clock and ccdc resource handling

2009-12-07 Thread m-karicheri2
From: Muralidharan Karicheri This combines the two patches sent earlier to change the clock configuration and converting ccdc drivers to platform drivers. This has updated comments against v0 of these patches. In this patch, the clock configuration is moved to ccdc driver since clocks are config

Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

2009-12-07 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > Mauro Carvalho Chehab writes: > >> struct input_keytable_entry { >> u16 index; >> u64 scancode; >> u32 keycode; >> } __attribute__ ((packed)); >> >> (the attribute packed avoids needing a compat for 64 bits) > > Maybe { u64 scancode; u32 keyc

Re: Mantis – anyone?

2009-12-07 Thread Matthias Wächter
Hi Manu, Just to give you some feedback on the first issue as well: Am 06.12.2009 13:52, schrieb Matthias Wächter: > • Can’t lock to 19.2/11303h (looks like something new, related to the > change of the transponder’s feed, but other cards – e.g. TBS 6920 and > Tevii 470 – do sync without a proble

Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

2009-12-07 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Christoph Bartelmus wrote: > Hi Jon, > > on 04 Dec 09 at 19:28, Jon Smirl wrote: >>> BTW, I just came across a XMP remote that seems to generate 3x64 bit >>> scan codes. Anyone here has docs on the XMP protocol? >> Assuming a general purpose receiver (not one with fixed hardware >> decoding), is i

Re: architecture part of video driver patch

2009-12-07 Thread Kevin Hilman
"Karicheri, Muralidharan" writes: > Kevin, > > Following patch merged to v4l-dvb linux-next has an architectural > part as attached. If you have not merged it to your next branch > for linux-davinci tree, please do so at your earliest convenience > so that they are in sync. OK, applying to davi

Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

2009-12-07 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Let me add my view for those questions. Jon Smirl wrote: > On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: >> Jon Smirl writes: >> Once again: how about agreement about the LIRC interface (kernel-userspace) and merging the actual LIRC code first? In-kernel decoding can wai

Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

2009-12-07 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Emmanuel Fusté wrote: > Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > >> In summary, >> >> While the current EVIO[G|S]KEYCODE works sub-optimally for scancodes >> up to 16 bytes >> (since a read loop for 2^16 is not that expensive), the current approach >> won't scale with bigger scancode spaces. So, it is neede

Re: [RFC] Should we create a raw input interface for IR's ? - Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] lirc core device driver infrastructure

2009-12-07 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Jarod Wilson wrote: > On Nov 26, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Andy Walls wrote: > >> On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 12:05 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >> Maybe I'm being too conservative here, but I have a personal interest in >> keeping Linux free and unencumbered even in the US which, I cannot deny, >> has

Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

2009-12-07 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 01:34:10PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >> >>> Scancodes in input system never been real scancodes. Even if you look >>> into atkbd it uses some synthetic data composed out of real scancodes >>> sent to the keyboard, and noone cares. If you

dib0090.h need attention - copy-paste errors

2009-12-07 Thread Igor M. Liplianin
Part of dib0090.h: 91 static inline enum frontend_tune_state dib0090_get_tune_state(struct dvb_frontend *fe) 92 { 93 printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: driver disabled by Kconfig\n", __func__); 94 return CT_DONE; 95 } 96 97 static inline int dib0090_set_tune_state(struct dvb_frontend *fe, enum frontend_tu

Re: [RFC] Should we create a raw input interface for IR's ? - Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] lirc core device driver infrastructure

2009-12-07 Thread Jarod Wilson
On Nov 26, 2009, at 2:43 PM, Andy Walls wrote: > On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 12:05 -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >> Krzysztof Halasa wrote: >>> Andy Walls writes: >>> I would also note that RC-6 Mode 6A, used by most MCE remotes, was developed by Philips, but Microsoft has some sort of

Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

2009-12-07 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 09:08:57PM +0100, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > Dmitry Torokhov writes: > > >> There is only one thing which needs attention before/when merging LIRC: > >> the LIRC user-kernel interface. In-kernel "IR system" is irrelevant and, > >> actually, making a correct IR core design w

Re: Details about DVB frontend API

2009-12-07 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Michael Krufky wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 3:02 PM, VDR User wrote: >>> No activity in this thread for 2 weeks now. Has there been any progress? > >> I have stated that I like Manu's proposal, but I would prefer that the >> get_property (s2api) interface were

Re: Details about DVB frontend API

2009-12-07 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Michael Krufky wrote: > On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 3:02 PM, VDR User wrote: >> No activity in this thread for 2 weeks now. Has there been any progress? > I have stated that I like Manu's proposal, but I would prefer that the > get_property (s2api) interface were used, because it totally provides > a

RE: [PATCH 1/5 - v0] V4L-vpfe capture - adding CCDC driver for DM365

2009-12-07 Thread Karicheri, Muralidharan
Sekhar, > >Hi Murali, > >Here is a (styling related) review from an non-video person. The [MK] The styling was mostly done by one of our intern who is new to open source coding. So I will fix it based on your comments. >review is neither complete nor exhaustive (the patch is huge!), >but I tho

Re: New DibCom based ISDB-T device

2009-12-07 Thread Patrick Boettcher
On Monday 07 December 2009 21:25:25 Marcelo Blanes wrote: > Hi Patrick, > > Ok I can test. Should I replace only the file dib8000.c or update the > entire linuxtv project? Yes, please use the v4l-dvb repository from http://linuxtv.org/hg/~pb/v4l-dvb/ not only the dib8000.c PS: Please, don't

Re: [PATCH 0/4 v11] Support for TVP7002 in DM365

2009-12-07 Thread Santiago Nunez-Corrales
Hans, Hi. Have you had a chance to look at this version of the driver? Regards, Santiago. Santiago Nunez-Corrales wrote: This series of patches provide support for the TVP7002 decoder in DM365. Support includes: * Inclusion of the chip in v4l2 definitions * Definition of TVP7002 specific

Which modules for the VP-2033? Where is the module "mantis.ko"?

2009-12-07 Thread Ruediger Dohmhardt
Hi Manu, the driver from http://jusst.de/hg/v4l-dvb/ compiles fine on Suse-11.1 (2.6.27.39-0.2-default). However, it does not build the module "mantis.ko", as it used to be. Where is it? A search for mantis like cd v4l-dvb-ccd0c555c680 find . -name "mantis*.ko" -> ./v4l/mantis_core.

Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

2009-12-07 Thread Krzysztof Halasa
Dmitry Torokhov writes: >> There is only one thing which needs attention before/when merging LIRC: >> the LIRC user-kernel interface. In-kernel "IR system" is irrelevant and, >> actually, making a correct IR core design without the LIRC merged can be >> only harder. > > This sounds like "merge fi

[cron job] v4l-dvb daily build 2.6.22 and up: ERRORS, 2.6.16-2.6.21: WARNINGS

2009-12-07 Thread Hans Verkuil
This message is generated daily by a cron job that builds v4l-dvb for the kernels and architectures in the list below. Results of the daily build of v4l-dvb: date:Mon Dec 7 19:00:05 CET 2009 path:http://www.linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb changeset: 13588:065f9e34e07b gcc version: gcc (

Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

2009-12-07 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 09:34:26PM +0100, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > Jon Smirl writes: > > >> Once again: how about agreement about the LIRC interface > >> (kernel-userspace) and merging the actual LIRC code first? In-kernel > >> decoding can wait a bit, it doesn't change any kernel-user interface

Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

2009-12-07 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 01:34:10PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > Scancodes in input system never been real scancodes. Even if you look > > into atkbd it uses some synthetic data composed out of real scancodes > > sent to the keyboard, and noone cares. If you are unsatisfied with > > m

Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

2009-12-07 Thread Emmanuel Fusté
Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: In summary, While the current EVIO[G|S]KEYCODE works sub-optimally for scancodes up to 16 bytes (since a read loop for 2^16 is not that expensive), the current approach won't scale with bigger scancode spaces. So, it is needed expand it to work with bigger scancod

Re: Success for Compro E650F analog television and alsa sound.

2009-12-07 Thread Steven Toth
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Igor M. Liplianin wrote: > Hi Steve > > I'm able to watch now analog television with Compro E650F. > I rich this by merging your cx23885-alsa tree and adding some modifications > for Compro card definition. > Actually, I take it from Mygica definition, only tuner ty

Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

2009-12-07 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Jon Smirl wrote: > On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: >> Once again: how about agreement about the LIRC interface >> (kernel-userspace) and merging the actual LIRC code first? That's fine for me. >> In-kernel >> decoding can wait a bit, it doesn't change any kernel-user in

Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?

2009-12-07 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Sun, Dec 06, 2009 at 09:03:31AM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: >> Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 12:12:34PM -0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Em Fri, 4 Dec 2009 02:06:42 -0800 Dmitry Torokhov escreveu: > evdev does not reall

Re: Success for Compro E650F analog television and alsa sound.

2009-12-07 Thread Igor M. liplianin
2009/12/7 Samuel Rakitnican : > On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 03:00:03 +0100, Igor M. Liplianin > wrote: > >> I'm able to watch now analog television with Compro E650F. > > That's great news for somebody :) > > Is remote working for this card? My card (T750F) and this card share the > same remote, so I thou

Re: PULL request - http://linuxtv.org/hg/~pb/v4l-dvb/

2009-12-07 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Patrick Boettcher wrote: > Hi Mauro, > > On Sat, 5 Dec 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > >> Patrick Boettcher wrote: >>> Hi Mauro, >>> >>> please pull from >>> >>> http://linuxtv.org/hg/~pb/v4l-dvb/ >>> >>> for the following changeset: >>> >>> DiB8090: Add the DiB0090 tuner driver and STK8096G

Re: New DibCom based ISDB-T device

2009-12-07 Thread Patrick Boettcher
Hi Marcelo, On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, Marcelo Blanes wrote: Dear Mauro and Patrick, This log may help you. It appears when I insert the usb tv stick tunner into one of my usb interfaces: [  759.573180] usb 8-1: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 4 [  759.714026] usb 8-1: configur

DiB0700: streaming buffer size changed

2009-12-07 Thread Patrick Boettcher
Hello DiB0700-users, Soon Mauro will pull in some changes on the dib0700-usb bridge which will change the streaming-buffer-size by default. According to our tests this should not create any problems and unfortunately it won't fix anything except some timeouts on low-bitrate services/sections

Re: PULL request - http://linuxtv.org/hg/~pb/v4l-dvb/

2009-12-07 Thread Patrick Boettcher
Hi Mauro, On Sat, 5 Dec 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: Patrick Boettcher wrote: Hi Mauro, please pull from http://linuxtv.org/hg/~pb/v4l-dvb/ for the following changeset: DiB8090: Add the DiB0090 tuner driver and STK8096GP-board This is the adding support for the DiB809x-device you we

Re: Success for Compro E650F analog television and alsa sound.

2009-12-07 Thread Samuel Rakitnican
On Mon, 07 Dec 2009 03:00:03 +0100, Igor M. Liplianin wrote: I'm able to watch now analog television with Compro E650F. That's great news for somebody :) Is remote working for this card? My card (T750F) and this card share the same remote, so I thought maybe keymap may be shared too. I s

Re: [PATCH 2/2 v3] soc-camera: convert to the new mediabus API

2009-12-07 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Thursday 03 December 2009 15:19:57 Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > Convert soc-camera core and all soc-camera drivers to the new mediabus > API. This also takes soc-camera client drivers one step closer to also be > usable with generic v4l2-subdev host drivers. > > Signed-off-by: Guennadi Liakho

Re: Mantis – anyone?

2009-12-07 Thread Matthias Wächter
Manu, Am 06.12.2009 13:52, schrieb Matthias Wächter: > • Sometimes very slow lock at transponder change, slow enough to trace > it in femon. femon first shows high BER rates and the picture is blocky, > reducing within 3 or 4 Seconds to BER=0 and perfect picture. I should be > able to repeat that