Re: [RFC] How to pass camera Orientation to userspace

2009-02-23 Thread Hans de Goede
Trent Piepho wrote: On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede wrote: Trent Piepho wrote: On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede wrote: Trent Piepho wrote: On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede wrote: Yes that is what we are talking about, the camera having a gravity switch (usually nothing as advanced

Re: POLL: for/against dropping support for kernels 2.6.22

2009-02-23 Thread VDR User
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 2:15 AM, Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote: Should we drop support for kernels 2.6.22 in our v4l-dvb repository? _: Yes _: No Yes. Optional question: Why: The reasons already stated, those resources could be better used doing other things. Aside of that, of

Haupauge Nova-T 500 2.6.28 regression dib0700

2009-02-23 Thread Janne Grunau
Hi, I have some difficulties with the Hauppauge Nova-T 500 and 2.6.28 kernels. Following USB errors appear with 2.6.28.4 every 100ms: Feb 15 02:46:03 golem [ 7720.876132] usb 2-1: events/3 timed out on ep1in len=0/6 Feb 15 02:46:03 golem [ 7720.976039] usb 2-1: events/3 timed out on ep1in

Re: [PATCH] Add Sony PlayTV to dibcom driver

2009-02-23 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 23:32:36 -0500 CityK ci...@rogers.com wrote: Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 15:04:13 -0500 CityK ci...@rogers.com wrote: I don't think the Patchwork tool picked it up, as I don't see it in the queue :(

PULL request (once more)

2009-02-23 Thread Patrick Boettcher
Hi Mauro, can you please pull this very important bugfix patch from my repository (http://linuxtv.org/hg/~pb/v4l-dvb/) . - [PATCH] software IRQ watchdog for Flexcop B2C2 DVB PCI cards This one is high-priority and has to go to 2.6.29 for its release. In the meantime I rebuilt and cleaned up

Re: [RFC] How to pass camera Orientation to userspace

2009-02-23 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 12:53:57 +0100 Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote: Hi Adam, Sorry for the late reply, it's been very busy. Me too. 1) Reuse the existing HFLIP and VFLIP controls, marking them as read-only Pros : No change needed to videodev2.h Cons: It is confusing to have

Re: [RFC] How to pass camera Orientation to userspace

2009-02-23 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 08:34:08 +0100 Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote: On Monday 23 February 2009 00:56:40 Trent Piepho wrote: On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Hans Verkuil wrote: On Sunday 22 February 2009 23:54:42 Hans de Goede wrote: Trent Piepho wrote: On Sun, 22 Feb 2009, Hans de Goede

Re: TT 3650

2009-02-23 Thread Andreas Kurz
Hi again! Concerning this card (TT 3650 CI) in combination with the non-repo-driver (suggested below): which tuner should I use? Is there a special one needed? Original-Nachricht Datum: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 10:33:53 +0100 Von: Jean-Francois Moine moin...@free.fr An: Andreas

Re: mercurial problems?

2009-02-23 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:58:13 +0100 Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote: Hi, When I try to push changes to my tree I get these errors: pushing to ssh://hverk...@linuxtv.org/hg/~hverkuil/v4l-dvb-ng-ctrls searching for changes remote: ** unknown exception encountered, details follow

Re: mercurial problems?

2009-02-23 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:58:13 +0100 Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote: Hi, When I try to push changes to my tree I get these errors: pushing to ssh://hverk...@linuxtv.org/hg/~hverkuil/v4l-dvb-ng-ctrls searching for changes remote: ** unknown exception encountered, details follow

Re: POLL: for/against dropping support for kernels 2.6.22

2009-02-23 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:15:01 +0100 Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote: Hi all, There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually determine someone's opinion. So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly to me with your yes/no answer and

Re: POLL: for/against dropping support for kernels 2.6.22

2009-02-23 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Hans, There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually determine someone's opinion. So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly to me with your yes/no answer and (optional but welcome) a short explanation to your standpoint. It doesn't

Re: POLL: for/against dropping support for kernels 2.6.22

2009-02-23 Thread Trent Piepho
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Jean Delvare wrote: There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually determine someone's opinion. So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly to me with your yes/no answer and (optional but welcome) a short explanation

Twinhan 2033, Mantis

2009-02-23 Thread Henrik Beckman
Any CAM support on this board today or planned ? Are willing to try bleeding edge code and provide feedback. Card info, 25.180805] Mantis :00:07.0: PCI INT A - GSI 18 (level, low) - IRQ 18 [ 25.180843] Mantis :00:07.0: setting latency timer to 64 [ 25.180856] irq: 18, latency: 64 [

Re: POLL: for/against dropping support for kernels 2.6.22

2009-02-23 Thread Douglas Schilling Landgraf
Hello Hans, On Sun, 22 Feb 2009 11:15:01 +0100 Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote: Hi all, There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually determine someone's opinion. So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly to me with your yes/no

Re: POLL: for/against dropping support for kernels 2.6.22

2009-02-23 Thread David Ellingsworth
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote: Hi all, There are lot's of discussions, but it can be hard sometimes to actually determine someone's opinion. So here is a quick poll, please reply either to the list or directly to me with your yes/no answer and

Re: POLL: for/against dropping support for kernels 2.6.22

2009-02-23 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:26:57 -0300 Mauro Carvalho Chehab mche...@infradead.org wrote: I'm right now working on another way of allowing backport that will better scale, and will allow developers to use -git, without losing backport for users. I have an incomplete skeleton for the backport

[PATCH] remove redundant memset after kzalloc

2009-02-23 Thread Matthias Schwarzott
Hi there! While having a look at the allocation of struct dvb_frontend in *_attach functions, I found some cases calling memset after kzalloc. This is redundant, and the attached patch removes these calls. I also changed one case calling kmalloc and memset to kzalloc. Signed-off-by: Matthias

Re: Haupauge Nova-T 500 2.6.28 regression dib0700

2009-02-23 Thread Devin Heitmueller
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 4:52 AM, Janne Grunau j...@jannau.net wrote: Hi, I have some difficulties with the Hauppauge Nova-T 500 and 2.6.28 kernels. Following USB errors appear with 2.6.28.4 every 100ms: Feb 15 02:46:03 golem [ 7720.876132] usb 2-1: events/3 timed out on ep1in len=0/6 Feb

Question regarding detail in dropping support for kernels 2.6.22 (related to Re: POLL: for/against dropping support for kernels 2.6.22)

2009-02-23 Thread Tobias Stoeber
Hello Hans, Hans Verkuil schrieb: We still need to support kernels from 2.6.22 onwards. Although I think the minimum supported kernel is something that needs a regular sanity check, right now there are no technical reasons that I am aware of to go to something newer than 2.6.22. Whether we

Re: Question regarding detail in dropping support for kernels 2.6.22 (related to Re: POLL: for/against dropping support for kernels 2.6.22)

2009-02-23 Thread Hans Verkuil
Hello Hans, Hans Verkuil schrieb: We still need to support kernels from 2.6.22 onwards. Although I think the minimum supported kernel is something that needs a regular sanity check, right now there are no technical reasons that I am aware of to go to something newer than 2.6.22. Whether

Re: PVR x50 corrupts ATSC 115 streams

2009-02-23 Thread David Engel
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 02:35:00PM -0500, CityK wrote: David Engel wrote: I'll start with what worked. ... [test results of BER and UNC under varying configurations ] ... Steven Toth wrote: I think CityK confirmed that the nxt2004 driver statistics are probably bogus so I doubt

Re: PVR x50 corrupts ATSC 115 streams

2009-02-23 Thread Steven Toth
David Engel wrote: On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 02:35:00PM -0500, CityK wrote: David Engel wrote: I'll start with what worked. ... [test results of BER and UNC under varying configurations ] ... Steven Toth wrote: I think CityK confirmed that the nxt2004 driver statistics are probably bogus

[cron job] ERRORS: armv5 armv5-ixp armv5-omap2 i686 m32r mips powerpc64 x86_64 v4l-dvb build

2009-02-23 Thread Hans Verkuil
(This message is generated daily by a cron job that builds v4l-dvb for the kernels and architectures in the list below.) Results of the daily build of v4l-dvb: date:Mon Feb 23 19:00:03 CET 2009 path:http://www.linuxtv.org/hg/v4l-dvb changeset: 10653:359d95e1d541 gcc version:

Re: PVR x50 corrupts ATSC 115 streams

2009-02-23 Thread Devin Heitmueller
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Steven Toth st...@linuxtv.org wrote: Do you still see high BER and high UNC? I won't be able to try anything more until tomorrow evening. I think you're missing something, though, Steven. The In every case was in reference to without an x50 installed and

Re: [RFC] How to pass camera Orientation to userspace

2009-02-23 Thread Adam Baker
On Monday 23 February 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 12:53:57 +0100 Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote: Hi Adam, Sorry for the late reply, it's been very busy. Me too. 1) Reuse the existing HFLIP and VFLIP controls, marking them as read-only Pros : No

Re: PVR x50 corrupts ATSC 115 streams

2009-02-23 Thread David Engel
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 05:03:28PM -0500, Devin Heitmueller wrote: On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Steven Toth st...@linuxtv.org wrote: I'm out of time. Someone else want to jump in and assist? - Steve Given David's last summary of results, it seems like the BER indicator for that

running multiple DVB cards successfully.. what do I need to know?? (major and minor numbers??)

2009-02-23 Thread sonof...@iinet.net.au
Hi All Some of you may have read some of my posts about an incorrect firmware readback message appearing in my dmesg, shortly after a tuner was engaged. I have isolated this problem, but the workaround so far has not been pretty. On a hunch I removed my Dvico Fusion HDTV lite card from

Re: PVR x50 corrupts ATSC 115 streams

2009-02-23 Thread Devin Heitmueller
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 5:48 PM, David Engel da...@istwok.net wrote: The BER isn't totally unreliable. Yes, when it's low, it does seem to be meaningless. However, when it's high, as in my recent attempts to try a 115 by itself, it indicates that nothing will work. Maybe I am missing

Re: running multiple DVB cards successfully.. what do I need to know?? (major and minor numbers??)

2009-02-23 Thread sonof...@iinet.net.au
Thanks Mike Is this likely to stop the Incorrect Readback of kernel version issue as well? cheers Allan On Mon Feb 23 17:57 , Michael Krufky sent: On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 5:49 PM, sonof...@iinet.net.au sonof...@iinet.net.au wrote: Some of you may have read some of my posts about an

Re: [RFC] How to pass camera Orientation to userspace

2009-02-23 Thread kilgota
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, Adam Baker wrote: On Monday 23 February 2009, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: On Sat, 21 Feb 2009 12:53:57 +0100 Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote: Hi Adam, Sorry for the late reply, it's been very busy. Me too. big snip The interest in detecting if a driver

Re: [PATCH] sh-mobile-ceu-camera: set field to the value, configured at open()

2009-02-23 Thread morimoto . kuninori
Dear Guennadi Ok, you're right again. But that's not the problem with my previous patch this time, it's that one more patch was missing - this one. And this time I even actually tested it - at least with the capture-example. I would need an mplayer or gstreamer for migor... Testing video

Re: PVR x50 corrupts ATSC 115 streams

2009-02-23 Thread pat-lkml
Devin Heitmueller wrote: On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 5:48 PM, David Engel da...@istwok.net wrote: The BER isn't totally unreliable. Yes, when it's low, it does seem to be meaningless. However, when it's high, as in my recent attempts to try a 115 by itself, it indicates that nothing will work.

Re: POLL: for/against dropping support for kernels 2.6.22

2009-02-23 Thread Trent Piepho
On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, David Ellingsworth wrote: On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote: Optional question: Why can't we drop support for all but the latest kernel? Why: As others have already pointed out, it is a waste of time for developers who

Re: [PATCH 2/2] soc-camera: configure drivers with a default format on open

2009-02-23 Thread Magnus Damm
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:20 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski g.liakhovet...@gmx.de wrote: Currently soc-camera doesn't set up any image format without an explicit S_FMT. It seems this should be supported, since, for example, capture-example.c from v4l2-apps by default doesn't issue an S_FMT. This

Re: POLL: for/against dropping support for kernels 2.6.22

2009-02-23 Thread Hans Verkuil
On Tuesday 24 February 2009 06:04:48 Trent Piepho wrote: On Mon, 23 Feb 2009, David Ellingsworth wrote: On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 5:15 AM, Hans Verkuil hverk...@xs4all.nl wrote: Optional question: Why can't we drop support for all but the latest kernel? Why: As others have