Re: Approximation glitch in v1.1.5.7

2003-09-23 Thread A. Alper ATICI
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 11:31:32PM +0100, Bart Oldeman wrote: that might be the approx glitch I was talking about: Great ! Shall we have all related updates (keymap, * + problem, etc) in the next patch/release? that's under comcom right? Right. How do other command.com's do? I'll

Re: Approximation glitch in v1.1.5.7

2003-09-22 Thread A. Alper ATICI
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 01:20:33AM +0100, Bart Oldeman wrote: [...] I'm actually still looking at the approximation strategy, it might be a little broken but fixing the Turkish keymap at least fixes your problem. Yes, thanks, it works after fixing the keymap (and DOTLESS_I approx. is not

Re: Approximation glitch in v1.1.5.7

2003-09-22 Thread Bart Oldeman
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003, A. Alper ATICI wrote: Now comes the next two problems I have not mentioned previously: '(' is typed in place of '*' and '=' is typed in place of '+' Do you think that is related to the little flaw in approximations? No. It's only a problem in terminals, (not in

Re: Approximation glitch in v1.1.5.7

2003-09-22 Thread A. Alper ATICI
On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 05:24:42PM +0100, Bart Oldeman wrote: [...] remove these two lines {*, KEY_8 | SHIFT_MASK }, {+, KEY_EQUALS | SHIFT_MASK }, OK, all seems to work now, provided that I set layout explicitly to tr, otherwise (i.e. in auto mode) DOTLESS_I

Re: Approximation glitch in v1.1.5.7

2003-09-22 Thread Bart Oldeman
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003, A. Alper ATICI wrote: OK, all seems to work now, provided that I set layout explicitly to tr, otherwise (i.e. in auto mode) DOTLESS_I approximation is back in effect. that might be the approx glitch I was talking about: diff -u

Re: Approximation glitch in v1.1.5.7

2003-09-21 Thread Bart Oldeman
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, A. Alper ATICI wrote: U_SMALL_LETTER_DOTLESS_I is a legitimate iso-8859-9 character, yet there exists an approximation for it, so it cannot be typed. Could the related developer please remove it? I don't think that would be the right thing to do. Approximations are only

Re: Approximation glitch in v1.1.5.7

2003-09-21 Thread A. Alper ATICI
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 08:11:35PM +0100, Bart Oldeman wrote: I don't think that would be the right thing to do. Approximations are only used if no alternative is available in the real character set. What do you mean by the real character set (in terms of the dosemurc options) ? Did you

Re: Approximation glitch in v1.1.5.7

2003-09-21 Thread Bart Oldeman
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, A. Alper ATICI wrote: On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 08:11:35PM +0100, Bart Oldeman wrote: I don't think that would be the right thing to do. Approximations are only used if no alternative is available in the real character set. What do you mean by the real character set