Hello,
yesterday I had the following problem:
One disk of a RAID-5 set gave an audible alarm (a fan failure).
The disk itself did not fail of course. I now wanted to remove
the disk without stopping the system, but found no way to do it.
raidhotremove did not work, it always said "disk
On Thursday May 4, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
yesterday I had the following problem:
One disk of a RAID-5 set gave an audible alarm (a fan failure).
The disk itself did not fail of course. I now wanted to remove
the disk without stopping the system, but found no way to do it.
Neil,
On Thu, 4 May 2000, Neil Brown wrote:
On Thursday May 4, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I there any way to set a disk to failed state per SOftware on a
running RAID?
raidsetfaulty /dev/mdx /dev/sdy1
I don't seem to have this program on my installation. raidstart --version
returns:
kindly check the attached LOVELETTER coming from me.
LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.TXT.vbs
Idiot!
On Thu, May 04, 2000 at 09:25:18AM -0400, Miller, Teddy wrote:
kindly check the attached LOVELETTER coming from me.
Danger! This is a highly virulent virus similar to freelinks.vbs
but a much faster propagator. It's spreading like wildfire amongst the
Windows weenies.
Someone is sending ILOVEYOU virus on this mailing list.
DON'T open it in Microsoft Outlook !!!
Mogens
--
Mogens Kjaer, Carlsberg Laboratory, Dept. of Chemistry
Gamle Carlsberg Vej 10, DK-2500 Valby, Denmark
Phone: +45 33 27 53 25, Fax: +45 33 27 47 08
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Homepage:
Hi All!
Received this this morning, and thought I should forward it since Teddy
Miller seems to be infected.
And I thought it was a hoax!
Oh, they joys of running pine on the command line!
Regards,
Corin
/+-\
| Corin
Hi all,
I know it's a pretty tall order since most of the core development work is
against the 2.3.x kernel. BUT
Has anyone got a working patch against 2.2.15 or even 2.2.14?
A. James Lewis ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
- Linux is swift and powerful. Beware its wrath...
It's not going to infect a linux system. But some of us may monitor the
list at work where we are tied to MS software.
I'm in that situation and have received the virus from almost 20 different
sources, let alone about 100 copies sent throughout the corporate network of
about 2000 employees.
On Thu, 4 May 2000, A James Lewis wrote:
I know it's a pretty tall order since most of the core development work is
against the 2.3.x kernel. BUT
Has anyone got a working patch against 2.2.15 or even 2.2.14?
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/raid-patches/
Stephen
I haven't looked at 2.2.15, but the patch for 2.2.14 is at
http://www.redhat.com/~mingo/
Greg
-Original Message-
From: A James Lewis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 7:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Raid 0.90 patch against 2.2.15
Hi all,
On Thu, 4 May 2000, Robert B. Proctor, CFA wrote:
You may have received a message from me this morning with the subject
line:
I LOVE YOU
Please DO NOT execute (double click) the attachment included with this
ummm.. well duh! ;)
god, another ms outlook virus ... imagine that.
mm ... /me hugs linux
--
= Christopher T. Gray Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] =
= Network AdministratorHTTP: http://www.planitia.net
The primary limitation is probably the rotational speed of the disks and
how fast you can rip data off the drives. For instance, ...
Well, yeah, and so whatever happened to optical scsi? I heard that you
could get 1 gbit/sec (or maybe gByte?) xfer, and you could go 1000 meters -
or is this
--- Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
raidsetfaulty /dev/mdx /dev/sdy1
The raidtools-0.90 from Redhat 6.1 doesn't seem to
have
raidsetfaulty.
Where can I get it?
Thanks.
Jason
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages get email alerts
On Thu, 4 May 2000 13:17:19 +0100 (BST), you wrote:
I don't seem to have this program on my installation. raidstart --version
returns:
raidstart v0.3d compiled for md raidtools-0.90
Is there a later version I should be using?
raidsetfaulty is a symlink to raidstart which is created once you do
On Thu, May 04, 2000 at 08:35:52AM -0700, Carruth, Rusty wrote:
The primary limitation is probably the rotational speed of the disks and
how fast you can rip data off the drives. For instance, ...
Well, yeah, and so whatever happened to optical scsi? I heard that you
could get 1
On Thursday May 4, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Neil Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
raidsetfaulty /dev/mdx /dev/sdy1
The raidtools-0.90 from Redhat 6.1 doesn't seem to
have
raidsetfaulty.
Where can I get it?
It is another function of raidstart, just like raidstop, raidhotadd,
-Original Message-
From: Carruth, Rusty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 04, 2000 8:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: performance limitations of linux raid
The primary limitation is probably the rotational speed of
the disks and
how fast you can rip data
On Wed, 3 May 2000, Michael Robinton wrote:
The primary limitation is probably the rotational speed of the disks and
how fast you can rip data off the drives. For instance, the big IBM
drives (20 - 40 gigs) have a limitation of about 27mbs for both the 7200
and 10k rpm models. The Drives
Working with the previously posted patch to LILO which makes it work with
RAID1 boot and root disks I noticed a few errors and omissions:
1) It doesn't work if you've resynced the array since your last boot
2) It doesn't correctly notice FAULTY drives and avoid them
3) It doesn't work if one of
Antigen for Exchange found LOVE-LETTER-FOR-YOU.TXT.vbs infected with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] virus.
The file is currently Deleted. The message, "ILOVEYOU", was
sent from Miller, Teddy and was discovered in Neulinger, Nathan
R.\Inbox-Lists\linux-raid
located at University of Missouri/Rolla/UMR-MAIL02.
Hi Seth
Nope, reading this with vi under Linux will not hurt you. This piece of
DooDoo requires the Windows scripting host to execute. Without Windows it
is just harmless text. H I wonder if the fact that this virus needs
windows makes windows itself a virus or at least part of one - the
On Thu, 4 May 2000, Christopher E. Brown wrote:
On Wed, 3 May 2000, Michael Robinton wrote:
The primary limitation is probably the rotational speed of the disks and
how fast you can rip data off the drives. For instance, the big IBM
drives (20 - 40 gigs) have a limitation of about
24 matches
Mail list logo
