> Out of curiosity, exactly where does open() call lock_kernel()? Although
> there are loads of places it gets called in fs/*.c, I didn't notice any on
> the path for open().
if (filp->f_op->open) {
lock_kernel();
ret = filp->f_op->open(inode,filp);
Am Mittwoch, 28. April 2004 02:16 schrieb Greg KH:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 09:06:50AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Am Montag, 19. April 2004 04:55 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > > On Sun, 18 Apr 2004, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > > Am Sonntag, 18. April 2004 16:36 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > > > > > A spin
Hi all,
I get a stacktrace with kernel 2.6.5 and a usb bluetooth dongle from 3com.
First I load the affix kernel module then I load affix_usb and this
results in the following stacktrace.
I am using affix-kernel 2.1.2 It works on another platform using an uhci
controller from intel.
That's why I p
ÓÉÓÚ¸½¼þÖк¬ÓÐ:.pif .exe .com .bat .vbs .scr .cpl .mp3 .ceo .rm .avi .wav .mpeg
µÈÎļþ£¬ÒѾ±»·þÎñÆ÷¹ýÂË!
Èç¹ûÈ·Ðè·¢ËÍ´ËÀàÐ͵ÄÎļþ£¬Ç뽫ÎļþѹËõ³Érar¸ñʽ»ò¸ÄÃûºóÖØз¢ËÍ¡£
Your message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
could not delivery as of filter blocking.
The original message header fields are:
From: [EM
**
** Óʼþ·þÎñÆ÷ÌáʾÐÅÏ¢£º·¢ËÍÔÝûÓгɹ¦ **
** ·þÎñÆ÷ÈÔÔÚ×Ô¶¯ÖØ·¢£¬ÇëÔݲ»ÔÙ·¢Í¬Ò»ÐÅÏ¢ **
**
ÔʼÐÅÏ¢·¢Ë͵Äʱ¼äÊÇ Wed, 28 Apr 2004 11:17:03 +0800 (CST)
Ô·¢ËÍÖ÷»ú [210.22.151.22]
No message body: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Original message follows.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam
Zawartość wysłanej z Twojego konta wiadomości została uznana przez
skaner antywirusowy jako niebezpieczna. Wiadomość nie została więc
dostarczona do adresata.
Prawdopodobne jest, iż Twój komputer został zarażony przez wirusa.
Zalecamy jak najszybsze sprawdzenie systemu programem antywirusowym!
P
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at isl.net.tw.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. vpopmail (#5.1.1)
--- Below this line is a c
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 09:51:34PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 09:06:50AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > That's an advantage. Using the knowledge that sys_open() takes BKL in
> > > an example driver is not nice.
> >
> > But it's
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 09:06:50AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > That's an advantage. Using the knowledge that sys_open() takes BKL in
> > an example driver is not nice.
>
> But it's a fact of life. We need an external lock (from the internal
> device stru
On Tue, 2004-04-27 at 18:07, David Brownell wrote:
> What does /proc/rndis/0 (or whatever) have to say? At a guess,
> I'd say that it'll NOT be in the RNDIS_DATA_INITIALIZED state,
> it'll be in RNDIS_INITIALIZED instead.
yep, that's correct
~ # cat /proc/rndis/000
Config Nr. 0
used : y
st
Subject of the message: Mail Delivery (failure [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Recipient of the message: æåå
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g
Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g.
Take an Oracle 10g cla
David Meggy wrote:
Hmm, why isn't it xmitting?
Regardless of any Windows problems, I put a printk at the top of
ether.c: eth_start_xmit, which never gets called. And I see at line
2427: net->hard_start_xmit = eth_start_xmit;
So this should really be getting called.
Here is a little snippet of my
David Meggy wrote:
CDC ethernet works again (dumb mistake on my part). I still get the
warning message, but at least it works.
If you change bcdUSB to "0110" (1.1), does Windows like it better?
RNDIS still doesn't work. Same messages as Friday afternoon. Any
suggestions are appreciated.
Grab t
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 09:06:50AM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Montag, 19. April 2004 04:55 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > On Sun, 18 Apr 2004, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > Am Sonntag, 18. April 2004 16:36 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > > > > A spinlock could replace it. But that is a small detail.
> > > >
>
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 12:04:39PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> Here is a slight revision of patch as246b. This one allocates all the new
> interfaces before changing any other state; otherwise it's the same.
Thanks a lot for doing this work, It looks good. I've applied it to my
trees and will sh
Hmm, why isn't it xmitting?
Regardless of any Windows problems, I put a printk at the top of
ether.c: eth_start_xmit, which never gets called. And I see at line
2427: net->hard_start_xmit = eth_start_xmit;
So this should really be getting called.
Here is a little snippet of my networking
~ # mo
On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 11:41:59AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 5 14:38:27 2004
> On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 08:39:56AM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 01:56:14PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 12:44:09
CDC ethernet works again (dumb mistake on my part). I still get the
warning message, but at least it works.
RNDIS still doesn't work. Same messages as Friday afternoon. Any
suggestions are appreciated.
David
--
David Meggy
Engineering
Technical Solutions I
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 01:04:05PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Here's a patch against 2.6.6-rc2 that replaces the use of atomic_t in
> >the ehci driver with a kref. It builds for for me here, any objections
> >to me adding it to the main kernel tree?
>
> Looks like
Greg KH wrote:
Hi,
Here's a patch against 2.6.6-rc2 that replaces the use of atomic_t in
the ehci driver with a kref. It builds for for me here, any objections
to me adding it to the main kernel tree?
Looks like a nice update, but it didn't build for me:
CC [M] drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.o
In
> Have you decided to go through and change all those interface indices to
> interface numbers?
It's on my TODO list, which isn't saying much.
Ciao,
Duncan.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The Robotic Monkeys at ThinkGeek
For a limited
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at mx2.pce.de.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
213.185.66.186 failed after I sent the message.
Remote host said: 550 5.7.1 virus
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, David Bashaw wrote:
> the actual endpoint number of a hub's "status change endpoint"?
It can be anything from 1 to 15.
> from the 2.0 usb spec -
> 11.12.1 Endpoint Organization -
> The Hub Class defines one additional endpoint beyond Default Control
> Pipe, which is r
The CPiA USB driver calls usb_driver_release_interface() during its
disconnect() routine. That doesn't appear to be necessary, since it
didn't call usb_driver_claim_interface() beforehand and since the
interface will be released automatically when disconnect() returns.
Please let me know if th
the actual endpoint number of a hub's "status change endpoint"?
from the 2.0 usb spec -
11.12.1 Endpoint Organization -
The Hub Class defines one additional endpoint beyond Default Control
Pipe, which is required for all hubs:
the Status Change endpoint. The host system receives port an
I can't tell if this test is correct, but the dvb-ttusb-budget driver
appears to need it. It changes altsettings for interface 1, so apparently
it wants to be bound to that interface.
Please let me know if this patch is right or not.
Alan Stern
= drivers/media/dvb/ttusb-budget/dvb-ttusb-
On Tue, Apr 27, 2004 at 06:49:36PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 27. April 2004 17:53 schrieb Greg KH:
> > - atomic_read (&qh->refcount), ehci->periodic_sched);
> > + atomic_read (&qh->kref.refcount), ehci->periodic_sched);
>
> This is ugly. If you are usin
Am Dienstag, 27. April 2004 17:53 schrieb Greg KH:
> - atomic_read (&qh->refcount), ehci->periodic_sched);
> + atomic_read (&qh->kref.refcount), ehci->periodic_sched);
This is ugly. If you are using an opaque data structure, keep
it opaque.
Regards
Hi,
Here's a patch against 2.6.6-rc2 that replaces the use of atomic_t in
the ehci driver with a kref. It builds for for me here, any objections
to me adding it to the main kernel tree?
thanks,
greg k-h
= drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c 1.113 vs edited =
--- 1.113/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hc
On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 10:59:51PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Apr 2004, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 04:29:14PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > --- 1.22/drivers/usb/misc/uss720.cThu Mar 4 11:57:51 2004
> > > +++ edited/drivers/usb/misc/uss720.c Thu Apr 22 16
Delivery failed 5 attempts: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Original message follows.
Received: from SMTP32-FWD by superedition.com
(SMTP32) id A06880902; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 05:29:55
Received: from superedition.com [202.51.77.123] by mail003.readyhosting.com with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-8.05) id A61412A00D2; Tue, 2
Hi Sunil,
> When I connected the device I found that the probe function is called
> more than once. First time when the probe gets called it returns success
> with the number of bulk ins and outs as one. For the rest of the probe calls
> the bulk ins and outs are zero and the probe returns NULL an
Hi,
When I connected the device I found that the probe function is called
more than once. First time when the probe gets called it returns success
with the number of bulk ins and outs as one. For the rest of the probe calls
the bulk ins and outs are zero and the probe returns NULL and hence it fai
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Am Dienstag, 27. April 2004 00:14 schrieb Greg KH:
> On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 04:05:17PM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote:
> > diff -Nru a/drivers/usb/core/devio.c b/drivers/usb/core/devio.c
> > --- a/drivers/usb/core/devio.c Mon Apr 26 13:48:28 2004
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/core/devio.c Mon Apr 26
36 matches
Mail list logo
