Re: [linux-usb-devel] HELP: Problem with HP Laserjet 1022 and USB in Linux 2.6.12

2005-11-11 Thread Neil Brown
On Thursday November 10, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > I'll let you know how it goes. > > Good luck, Thanks. It didn't go as well as I hoped, but I've made progress. I tried: - disabling the return channel, so input requests aren't sent - forcing depth-first rather than breadth first tra

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Device missing after echo '2' >bConfigurationValue

2005-11-11 Thread Alan Stern
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Mike King wrote: > Alan, > > I finally go 2.6.14 running and the same thing happens. On initial connect > my driver is loaded and configuration 1 is selected. When I perform : > >echo '2' >/sys/bus/usb/devices/2-2/bConfigurationValue > > and I read the bConfiguration

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Device missing after echo '2' >bConfigurationValue

2005-11-11 Thread Mike King
Alan, I finally go 2.6.14 running and the same thing happens. On initial connect my driver is loaded and configuration 1 is selected. When I perform : echo '2' >/sys/bus/usb/devices/2-2/bConfigurationValue and I read the bConfigurationValue it is null. Additionally, as expected, my driver

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 5579] New: Microtek driver: error -22 submitting URB, kernel-2.6.14.

2005-11-11 Thread David Brownell
On Friday 11 November 2005 1:40 pm, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Freitag, 11. November 2005 17:38 schrieb David Brownell: > > > Nov 11 10:10:20 decibels microtek usb (rev 0.4.3): error -22 submitting > > > URB > > > Nov 11 10:10:20 decibels microtek usb (rev 0.4.3): error -22 submitting > > > URB >

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 5579] New: Microtek driver: error -22 submitting URB, kernel-2.6.14.

2005-11-11 Thread Alan Stern
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, decibels wrote: > >On Friday 11 November 2005 14:33, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > > > I can sort of replicate it, but I get a different error. > > Please recompile the driver with MTS_DO_DEBUG defined and try again. > > > > Regards > > Oliver > > > > Enabled MT

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 5579] New: Microtek driver: error -22 submitting URB, kernel-2.6.14.

2005-11-11 Thread decibels
On Friday 11 November 2005 15:40, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Freitag, 11. November 2005 17:38 schrieb David Brownell: > > > Nov 11 10:10:20 decibels microtek usb (rev 0.4.3): error -22 submitting > > > URB > > > Nov 11 10:10:20 decibels microtek usb (rev 0.4.3): error -22 submitting > > > URB > >

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 5579] New: Microtek driver: error -22 submitting URB, kernel-2.6.14.

2005-11-11 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Freitag, 11. November 2005 17:38 schrieb David Brownell: > > Nov 11 10:10:20 decibels microtek usb (rev 0.4.3): error -22 submitting URB > > Nov 11 10:10:20 decibels microtek usb (rev 0.4.3): error -22 submitting URB > > EINVAL means some field of the URB was invalid.  Driver error. Is there a

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 5579] New: Microtek driver: error -22 submitting URB, kernel-2.6.14.

2005-11-11 Thread decibels
>On Friday 11 November 2005 14:33, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > I can sort of replicate it, but I get a different error. > Please recompile the driver with MTS_DO_DEBUG defined and try again. > > Regards > Oliver > Enabled MTS_DO_DEBUG in microtek.c . Quite a lot of info: (Kern.

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 5579] New: Microtek driver: error -22 submitting URB, kernel-2.6.14.

2005-11-11 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Freitag, 11. November 2005 21:16 schrieb decibels: > Nope, that is what error get from booting up with the scanner plugged in or > by unplugging/replugging.  Don't even get the chance to do anything else > cause sane can't even find the scanner on 2.6.14. > > I enabled usbmon in the kernel and

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 5579] New: Microtek driver: error -22 submitting URB, kernel-2.6.14.

2005-11-11 Thread decibels
>On Friday 11 November 2005 12:19, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > Here please. Did you do anything special to trigger this? > > Regards > Oliver > Nope, that is what error get from booting up with the scanner plugged in or by unplugging/replugging. Don't even get the chance to do

[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 2/2] pl2303: updates pl2303_update_line_status()

2005-11-11 Thread Luiz Fernando Capitulino
Hi again, Updates pl2303_update_line_status() to handle X75 and SX1 Siemens mobiles Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/usb/serial/pl2303.c |4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff -Nparu -X /home/lcapitulino/tmp/dontdiff a/drivers/usb/serial/pl2

[linux-usb-devel] [PATCH 1/2] pl2303: adds new IDs.

2005-11-11 Thread Luiz Fernando Capitulino
Hi Greg, This patch adds two new Siemens mobiles IDs for the pl2303 driver. Thanks. Signed-off-by: Luiz Capitulino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> drivers/usb/serial/pl2303.c |2 ++ drivers/usb/serial/pl2303.h |2 ++ 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/usb/serial/pl2303.c b/dr

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 5579] New: Microtek driver: error -22 submitting URB, kernel-2.6.14.

2005-11-11 Thread Andrew Morton
decibels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Should I be responding thru here or on the bug report on the > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5579 ? You can add [EMAIL PROTECTED] to cc and all emails will be captures by bugzilla. I do that sometimes, but not in the cases where I expect

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 5579] New: Microtek driver: error -22 submitting URB, kernel-2.6.14.

2005-11-11 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Freitag, 11. November 2005 17:18 schrieb decibels: > On Friday 11 November 2005 06:24, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > Am Freitag, 11. November 2005 12:29 schrieb Andrew Morton: > > > Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Am Freitag, 11. November 2005 11:45 schrieb Andrew Morton: > >

Re: [linux-usb-devel] USB statistics

2005-11-11 Thread Alan Stern
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Aras Vaichas wrote: > Hi, > > my test department tells me that they need to perform immunity tests on the > hardware and therefore I will need to collect statistics on the USB data > being > transferred. > > Can this be done? Do the USB drivers export these sorts of stati

Re: [linux-usb-devel] HELP: Problem with HP Laserjet 1022 and USB in Linux 2.6.12

2005-11-11 Thread David Brownell
> Among the holes still in my understanding is how the 2 bit error count > in the TD header relates to this. > Does a NACK not decrement this counter, or does the HCD driver reset > it regularly? NAK packets are not errors. --- SF.Net email

Re: [linux-usb-devel] USB statistics

2005-11-11 Thread David Brownell
On Thursday 10 November 2005 8:14 pm, Aras Vaichas wrote: > 2. Monitor the data transfer to check if: > (a) data is transferred with no errors; > (b) data is transferred with errors, but then data is re-sent > successfully; > (c) data is lost. For (a) plus the "re-sent" part of (b),

RE: [linux-usb-devel] Non-pci ohci device descriptor read/8, error -71

2005-11-11 Thread Vivek
Hello Olav You are right. The HC is always correctly detected, but the attached USB devices are only sometimes enumerated correctly. I will check if the transceiver is working. Thanks. Regards Vivek -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Olav

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 5579] New: Microtek driver: error -22 submitting URB, kernel-2.6.14.

2005-11-11 Thread David Brownell
> ... ohci_hcd :00:02.0: urb 810030904540 path 2 ep2in 8316 cc 8 > --> status -75 EOVERFLOW means the device wrote too much data ... either too much data to fit in the (bulk?) packet, or too much data to fit in the buffer. The former is a device error, the latter is a driver error.

[linux-usb-devel] ftdi usb serial driver

2005-11-11 Thread Chris Bainbridge
Hi, I have a 4-port Vscom adaptor. When using it I get errors where some of the /dev/tts/USBx devices seem to get disconnected, then be connected again on a different device. eg. /dev/tts/USB2 and USB3 will be involved in some transfer, then will move to /dev/tts/USB4 and USB5. The other ports sta

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 5579] New: Microtek driver: error -22 submitting URB, kernel-2.6.14.

2005-11-11 Thread decibels
On Friday 11 November 2005 06:24, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Freitag, 11. November 2005 12:29 schrieb Andrew Morton: > > Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Am Freitag, 11. November 2005 11:45 schrieb Andrew Morton: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > > > > http://bugzill

[linux-usb-devel] USB video class device

2005-11-11 Thread jwspring
I have a usbsnoop of the Logitech QuickCam Notebooks Pro webcam It's id is 046d:08c3 using the SunPlus 525A chipset. Is there any interest in seeing my dumps. Thanks James Spring --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Tame your development challen

Re: [linux-usb-devel] linux-friendly usb analyzers???

2005-11-11 Thread David Brownell
On Friday 11 November 2005 5:53 am, Olav Kongas wrote: > > On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Alan Stern wrote: > > I have a relatively inexpensive analyzer that you could borrow if it turns > > out to be necessary. > > Hi, > > People, who use usb alalyzers, can you please recommed a one, which: > > - is 2.

[linux-usb-devel] linux-friendly usb analyzers???

2005-11-11 Thread Olav Kongas
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Alan Stern wrote: > I have a relatively inexpensive analyzer that you could borrow if it turns > out to be necessary. Hi, People, who use usb alalyzers, can you please recommed a one, which: - is 2.0 - is usable without having to keep a windows box around - not too exp

Re: [linux-usb-devel] USB statistics

2005-11-11 Thread Greg KH
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 03:14:02PM +1100, Aras Vaichas wrote: > Hi, > > my test department tells me that they need to perform immunity tests on the > hardware and therefore I will need to collect statistics on the USB data > being transferred. What is "immunity tests"? > Can this be done? Do t

[linux-usb-devel] Alguem Lembrou de Voce

2005-11-11 Thread mensageiro
Title: Mensageiro Humortadela.    Olá, Alguém que não tinha nada para fazer (Rafael), numa de suas visitas ao Humor Tadela não sei por que cargas d\'água, lhe recomendou a seguinte página: Piada Animada: Será que é você? Comentários: É dificil eu recomendar alguma coisa, porque

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 5579] New: Microtek driver: error -22 submitting URB, kernel-2.6.14.

2005-11-11 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Freitag, 11. November 2005 12:29 schrieb Andrew Morton: > Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Am Freitag, 11. November 2005 11:45 schrieb Andrew Morton: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5579 > > > > > > > > Summar

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 5579] New: Microtek driver: error -22 submitting URB, kernel-2.6.14.

2005-11-11 Thread Andrew Morton
Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Am Freitag, 11. November 2005 11:45 schrieb Andrew Morton: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5579 > > > > > > Summary: Microtek driver: error -22 submitting URB, kernel- > > >

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 5579] New: Microtek driver: error -22 submitting URB, kernel-2.6.14.

2005-11-11 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Freitag, 11. November 2005 11:45 schrieb Andrew Morton: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5579 > > > > Summary: Microtek driver: error -22 submitting URB, kernel- > > 2.6.14. > > This one is a post-2.6.13 regression.

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [KAWETH] Suppress errors when URB is unlinked

2005-11-11 Thread Oliver Neukum
Am Freitag, 11. November 2005 10:39 schrieb Herbert Xu: > On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 08:38:16PM +1100, herbert wrote: > > > > In fact even now it is possible to get those printks from the resubmit > > function if usb_kill_urb() fails to kill it using unlink. > > > > I'll send you a patch for that to

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 5579] New: Microtek driver: error -22 submitting URB, kernel-2.6.14.

2005-11-11 Thread Andrew Morton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5579 > > Summary: Microtek driver: error -22 submitting URB, kernel- > 2.6.14. This one is a post-2.6.13 regression. --- SF.Net email is s

Re: [linux-usb-devel] Non-pci ohci device descriptor read/8, error -71

2005-11-11 Thread Olav Kongas
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, Vivek wrote: > Hello list > I have ported linux 2.6.12 usb driver to a SOC board consisting of a mips > processor. The SOC is mips processor which has a in-core non-PCI usb 2.0 > host controller which supports ehci/ohci. Because mips is big endian and the > usb host control

[linux-usb-devel] [KAWETH] Suppress errors when URB is unlinked

2005-11-11 Thread Herbert Xu
On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 08:38:16PM +1100, herbert wrote: > > In fact even now it is possible to get those printks from the resubmit > function if usb_kill_urb() fails to kill it using unlink. > > I'll send you a patch for that tomorrow. Here is the patch that I promised: [KAWETH] Suppress erro

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [-mm patch] USB_LIBUSUAL shouldn't be user-visible

2005-11-11 Thread Pete Zaitcev
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 03:09:38 +0100, Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What about my second suggestion to always use libusual in the two > drivers instead of having two code paths in each of them? I don't see how you would be able to mandate libusual, since it adds (a small amount of) bloa

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [-mm patch] USB_LIBUSUAL shouldn't be user-visible

2005-11-11 Thread Pete Zaitcev
I finally received a .config from Reuben Farrelly and reproduced the problem. The libusual.o is being built, but not linked into the kernel image. --- Never one to ignore a good idea, I propose to take a segment of Adrian's patch which addresses this particular problem: > --- linux-2.6.14-mm1-fu

[linux-usb-devel] Fw: [Bugme-new] [Bug 5540] New: PL2303

2005-11-11 Thread Andrew Morton
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5540 > >Summary: PL2303 > Kernel Version: 2.6.14 There seem to be a couple of problems here. I don't see why queue_work() went blam - it thought there was already work pending, even though the work_struct's pending bit was clear. Perh