Hi Mark,
I think those questions were answered. You said you got those
lines during the shutdown, didn't you? Could be that the USB2 driver has
just been unloaded so only the USB1 driver is available to drive the
device (doesn't matter as you are shutting down). Each line I believe is a
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 10:42:50PM +0100, Stephen J. Gowdy wrote:
> So it is going as fast as the bus supports --^
Thanks for the reply. This being the case, and assuming that my bios is
correct when it reports that I have high speed usb2 hub(s), what does the
following message mean?
I don't see it in the archive, do you have ehci_hcd loaded? What is the
output of dmesg and lspci?
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Mark Glassberg wrote:
> Thanks for the reply, but assuming that I have a usb2 device running on a
> usb2 system at less than usb2 speed, how do I correct it?
>
> On Tue, Feb 06,
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Mark Glassberg wrote:
> I ran "dd if=/dev/sdb of=/dev/null" and found that the drive is being
> read at 9.5 Mb/sec. Sorry, you didn't get the device file data, I sent
> it twice. Here it is:
>
> T: Bus=01 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=03 Cnt=01 Dev#= 2 Spd=480 MxCh= 0
So it is going
Hi Mark,
There seems to be a communication problem here. Can you start by
reading the FAQ, especially the bit about reporting bugs? If you don't
know where that is start at http://www.linux-usb.org.
rgeards,
Sorry, I meant 9.5 MB/s.
Thanks again,
Mark
On Wed, Feb 07, 2007 at 04:57:47PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> Your 9.5 Mb/sec figure doesn't seem right. Are you sure you don't mean
> 9.5 MB/s instead ("megabytes-per-second" instead of "megabits-per-second")?
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Mark Glassberg wrote:
> I ran "dd if=/dev/sdb of=/dev/null" and found that the drive is being
> read at 9.5 Mb/sec. Sorry, you didn't get the device file data, I sent
> it twice. Here it is:
>
> T: Bus=01 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=03 Cnt=01 Dev#= 2 Spd=480 MxCh= 0
> D: Ver= 2.0
I ran "dd if=/dev/sdb of=/dev/null" and found that the drive is being
read at 9.5 Mb/sec. Sorry, you didn't get the device file data, I sent
it twice. Here it is:
T: Bus=01 Lev=01 Prnt=01 Port=03 Cnt=01 Dev#= 2 Spd=480 MxCh= 0
D: Ver= 2.00 Cls=00(>ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS=64 #Cfgs= 1
P: Ve
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Mark Glassberg wrote:
> Same problem: getting the drive to operate at the highest possible speed.
> The syslog information seems to relate to the problem. It, together with
> hub.c, seem to indicate the a default configuration is being set for the
> drive.
It's hard to tell
Same problem: getting the drive to operate at the highest possible speed.
The syslog information seems to relate to the problem. It, together with
hub.c, seem to indicate the a default configuration is being set for the
drive. Questions: a) Is that what is happening? b) If so, can I change
the
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Mark Glassberg wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. As you can see from my config file, I have
> uhci_hcd, ehci_hcd and ohci_hcd compiled in my kernel. The messages
> I get confirm this. The problem seems to be in hub.c where a choice
> is apparently made to use a slower speed. I
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Mark Glassberg wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 02:25:14PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Mark Glassberg wrote:
> > > Thanks again for the reply, but what I'm asking is: How do I determine
> > > and
> > > correct "whatever problem is present"?
> >
> > B
Thanks for the reply. As you can see from my config file, I have
uhci_hcd, ehci_hcd and ohci_hcd compiled in my kernel. The messages
I get confirm this. The problem seems to be in hub.c where a choice
is apparently made to use a slower speed. In case it helps, my
/proc/bus/usb/devices file is a
Hello Mark Glassberg,
several things you could do...
Try
lsmod
and see if there is something like
uhci_hcd ehci_hcd or ohci_hcd in the list.
you should have ehci_hcd to have high speed (USB2) support.
If you do not have it, you can try as root (!!)
modprobe ehci_hcd
If it works, than you
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 02:25:14PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
>
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Mark Glassberg wrote:
> > Thanks again for the reply, but what I'm asking is: How do I determine and
> > correct "whatever problem is present"?
>
> By ... asking questions on the mailing lists
OK. For start
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Mark Glassberg wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 01:09:33PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > So let's say your device supports high speed. If it is running at less
> > than high speed then something is wrong with the system setup. Maybe the
> > computer's high-speed USB controller
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 01:09:33PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> So let's say your device supports high speed. If it is running at less
> than high speed then something is wrong with the system setup. Maybe the
> computer's high-speed USB controller isn't working, or maybe the driver
> for it isn't
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Mark Glassberg wrote:
> Thanks for the reply, but assuming that I have a usb2 device running on a
> usb2 system at less than usb2 speed, how do I correct it?
Your question shows that you don't fully understand the terminology.
USB 2.0 is an extension of USB 1.1. It is almost
Thanks for the reply, but assuming that I have a usb2 device running on a
usb2 system at less than usb2 speed, how do I correct it?
On Tue, Feb 06, 2007 at 10:41:20AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Mark Glassberg wrote:
>
> > As promised, I have rebuilt my kernel, and attached the
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007, Mark Glassberg wrote:
> As promised, I have rebuilt my kernel, and attached the new config file as
> well as the dmesg output. I'm still getting the error message when I
> shut down.
You're talking about this message:
usb 3-2: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007, Mark Glassberg wrote:
> As promised, I have rebuilt my kernel, and attached the new config file as
> well as the dmesg output. I'm still getting the error message when I
> shut down.
Please use Reply-to-all so that your data ends up in the mailing list
archives.
And also pl
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007, Mark Glassberg wrote:
> I have an Intel D865GBF motherboard, with built-in usb ports, which my bios
> setup program says are fast. I downdoaded a program from Intel for my W98 SE
> partition, which has my Sony flash drive running very fast. Unfortunately,
> it is much slower
22 matches
Mail list logo
