That someone was me, and that was an anomaly of some sort. I've never had
problems outside of that one box.
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, m.w.chang wrote:
in the last few days, I have seen someone mentioning a problem with
symlink to libcs.so.5 or something. does it mean an extra step to clear
all
On Wed, 11 Dec 2002, m.w.chang wrote:
in the last few days, I have seen someone mentioning a problem with
symlink to libcs.so.5 or something. does it mean an extra step to clear
all symlinks before buidling glibc?
my last trial (on a fresh-install COL 3.1) was a failure.I could't
ok. will try again this x'mas eve... ho..ho..ho...
Net Llama! wrote:
That someone was me, and that was an anomaly of some sort. I've never had
problems outside of that one box.
in the last few days, I have seen someone mentioning a problem with
symlink to libcs.so.5 or something. does it
I did, and there was nothing wrong with the compilation process. just
that during make install, the libpthread had error. It was COL 3.1,
fresh-install (purely for testing the upgrade procedure). I would need
to try again this weekend to post the insatll error (hopefully, before
everyone forgot
in the last few days, I have seen someone mentioning a problem with
symlink to libcs.so.5 or something. does it mean an extra step to clear
all symlinks before buidling glibc?
my last trial (on a fresh-install COL 3.1) was a failure.I could't
compile a thing after the upgrade procedure.
Net
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 19:27:49 -0800
begin Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED] spewed forth:
On 11/15/2002 06:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 11:16:24AM -0500, Net Llama! wrote:
I'm trying to build glibc-2.2.5 from the pristine
:
I'm trying to build glibc-2.2.5 from the pristine source, and its
bombingabout 10 minutes in with the error:
exec: illegal option: -C
If something is invoking exec, perhaps it means exec -c. That said,
make accepts a -C option which might be buggering something up.
Well, i found this patch
I'm trying to build glibc-2.2.5 from the pristine source, and its bombing
about 10 minutes in with the error:
exec: illegal option: -C
Anyone have any ideas, or seen this before?
--
~~
Lonni J Friedman
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:16:24 -0500 (EST) Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm trying to build glibc-2.2.5 from the pristine source, and its bombing
about 10 minutes in with the error:
exec: illegal option: -C
Lonni, sorry, I haven't come across this one yet and I've compiled 2.2.5 a
lot
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, Jerry McBride wrote:
On Fri, 15 Nov 2002 11:16:24 -0500 (EST) Net Llama! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I'm trying to build glibc-2.2.5 from the pristine source, and its bombing
about 10 minutes in with the error:
exec: illegal option: -C
Lonni, sorry, I haven't come
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 11:16:24AM -0500, Net Llama! wrote:
I'm trying to build glibc-2.2.5 from the pristine source, and its bombing
about 10 minutes in with the error:
exec: illegal option: -C
If something is invoking exec, perhaps it means exec -c. That said,
make accepts a -C option which
On 11/15/2002 06:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 11:16:24AM -0500, Net Llama! wrote:
I'm trying to build glibc-2.2.5 from the pristine source, and its bombing
about 10 minutes in with the error:
exec: illegal option: -C
If something is invoking exec, perhaps it means
hmm.. Mr. Wonder, I think I would conclude that one could not update
glibc via rpm... the sanity check error will only go away if I compile
and install the glibc-2.2.5 from source couldn't someone confirm this?
is it possible to upgrade glibc via rpm?
btw, I noticed once-a-while
go a typo...
m.w.chang wrote:
hmm.. Mr. Wonder, I think I would conclude that one could not update
glibc via rpm... the sanity check error will only go away if I compile
unless I compile... not if I compile
and install the glibc-2.2.5 from source couldn't someone confirm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim Wunder spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
BTW2, are you doing things to the headers of mail messages that cause
Mozilla to be unable to thread things properly? I BCC myself on messages
I send from work (so I have sent mail copies
install my glibc-2.2.5-1.i386.rpm (size 17M)
ldconfig -v
reboot
compile proftpd-1.2.6, ../configure gave me a sanity check error
cd /usr/src/glibc-2.2.5 and build the glibc once again
checkinstall the gilbc into glibc-2.2.5-2.i386.rpm (note: 18M in size)
ldconfig -v
reboot
compile proftpd-1.2.6
and, in fact, recompiles of glibc have seemed to work.
On 10/7/2002 1:46 AM, someone claiming to be m.w.chang wrote:
you meant after you installed glibc-2.2.5, your gcc-2.95.3 would no
longer compile a thing? hmm.. let me try it tonight. do you want me to
compile a specific package? If not, I would
thank you. here is one prblem when I ran ./configure in proftpd-1.2.6
#include assert.h
Syntax error
configure:3745: /lib/cpp conftest.c
./configure: /lib/cpp: No such file or directory
configure:3745: $? = 126
configure: failed program was:
#line 3745 configure
#include
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
m.w.chang spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
you meant after you installed glibc-2.2.5, your gcc-2.95.3 would no
longer compile a thing? hmm.. let me try it tonight. do you want me to
compile a specific package? If not, I would just
On 10/7/2002 1:08 PM, someone claiming to be Douglas J Hunley wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim Wunder spewed electrons into the ether that resembled:
Really?
My installation of glibc 2.2.5 seems to have rendered me incapable of
compiling *anything* on my Caldera
installation of glibc 2.2.5 seems to have rendered me incapable of
compiling *anything* on my Caldera e3.1-based system. It's interesting that
you seem to have compiled and installed glibc 2.2.5 without incident. What
glibc were you running prior to 2.2.5?
I compiled glibc 2.2.5 on my desktop
I just tried compiling glibc-2.2.5 from source using a dummy COL 3.1.
I noticed that on the first make install, the localedata was not
installed (as revealed by checkinstall).
also, the make install will always failed on libpthread, I must reboot
to run make install again to really finish
a usable part-1 glibc-2.2.5.rpm
no issues here.
also, if is it possible to remove the old glibc before compiling and
intsallating the new glibc? sounds like a chicken-and-egg issues (gcc
doesn't allow that).
nope.
--
Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. .~. In Linux we trust
you meant after you installed glibc-2.2.5, your gcc-2.95.3 would no
longer compile a thing? hmm.. let me try it tonight. do you want me to
compile a specific package? If not, I would just try proftpd-1.2.6.
COL 3.1 came with glibc-2.2.1.
My installation of glibc 2.2.5 seems to have rendered
note: prior to my test buiod of glibc-2.2.5 on the test server, I
upgraded her binutils to 2.13 and gcc to 2.95.3 via the rpms I
checkinstalled on the production server).
--
Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. .~. In Linux we trust.
/ v \
news
and the binutils 2.13 was compiled by gcc-2.95.3
note: prior to my test buiod of glibc-2.2.5 on the test server, I
upgraded her binutils to 2.13 and gcc to 2.95.3 via the rpms I
checkinstalled on the production server).
--
Swiftly. Silently. Invisibly. .~. In Linux we trust
26 matches
Mail list logo
